Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Periprosthetic Fracture | Research

Operative treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur with a contralateral, upside-down LISS plate in elderly patients

Authors: Marc Schmid, Caroline Gurschler-Pavotbawan, Patrick Fries, Method Kabelitz, Michael Dietrich

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Increasing expectancy of life and levels of activity in the growing geriatric population lead to a rising number of prosthetic implants of the hip and consequently the incidence of periprosthetic fractures of the femur increase. The fracture pattern and the possible instability of the stem are a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. Treatment options are complete replacement of the implant or a solitary osteosynthesis. The goal of this study was to analyse the feasibility of the operative intervention using a contralateral reversed anatomic distal femoral LISS® locking plate and the radiological and functional outcome in a geriatric cohort.

Methods

We included all patients older than 75 years of age with a Vancouver type B fracture, which have been treated by osteosynthesis using a LISS® (contralateral reversed) plate in our institution in an interdisciplinary ortho-geriatric setting between 7/2013 and 12/2021. Perioperative morbidities, clinical and radiological outcome during follow-up were retrospectively analysed.

Results

During the observed time period, 83 patients (mean age: 88 years (range: 76–103), male/female: 26/57) were treated. Most fractures were Vancouver type B2 (n = 45, 54%) followed by B1 (n = 20, 24%) and B3 (n = 18, 22%). The most prevalent postoperative surgical complication was anaemia (n = 73, 88%) followed by infections (n = 12, 14%, urinary infections, pneumonia) and cardiovascular decompensation (n = 8, 10%). Clinical and radiological follow up 6–8 weeks postoperative was possible for 59 patients (70%). The majority of them did not describe pain (n = 50, 85%) and had a good or excellent radiological outcome. Three cases needed revision surgery due to infection and another three due to non-union, loosening of the stem or an additional fracture. 1-year mortality was 30%.

Conclusion

We are convinced that the reversed contralateral LISS-plate is an easy-to-use implant with a small complication rate but a very successful and high healing rate in a geriatric, polymorbid cohort.
Literature
1.
go back to reference United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs PD. World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. 2022. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs PD. World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. 2022.
2.
go back to reference Swiss National Hip & Knee Joint Registry. Annual Report of the SIRIS Registry Hip & Knee, 2012–2021 Ten Years of Swiss Hip and Knee Registry. 2022. Swiss National Hip & Knee Joint Registry. Annual Report of the SIRIS Registry Hip & Knee, 2012–2021 Ten Years of Swiss Hip and Knee Registry. 2022.
3.
go back to reference Lindahl H. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury. 2007;38(6). Lindahl H. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury. 2007;38(6).
4.
go back to reference Abdel MP, Watts CD, Houdek MT, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ. Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties. Bone Joint J. 2016;98–B(4):461–7.CrossRefPubMed Abdel MP, Watts CD, Houdek MT, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ. Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties. Bone Joint J. 2016;98–B(4):461–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Phillips JRA, Boulton C, Moran CG, Manktelow ARJ. What is the financial cost of treating periprosthetic hip fractures? Injury. 2011;42(2):146–9.CrossRefPubMed Phillips JRA, Boulton C, Moran CG, Manktelow ARJ. What is the financial cost of treating periprosthetic hip fractures? Injury. 2011;42(2):146–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Vanhegan IS, Malik AK, Jayakumar P, Islam SU, Haddad FS. A financial analysis of revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2012;94(5). Vanhegan IS, Malik AK, Jayakumar P, Islam SU, Haddad FS. A financial analysis of revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2012;94(5).
7.
go back to reference González-Martín D, Pais-Brito JL, González-Casamayor S, Guerra-Ferraz A, Martín-Vélez P, Herrera-Pérez M. Periprosthetic hip fractures with a Loose Stem: open reduction and internal fixation Versus Stem Revision. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(9):3318–25.CrossRefPubMed González-Martín D, Pais-Brito JL, González-Casamayor S, Guerra-Ferraz A, Martín-Vélez P, Herrera-Pérez M. Periprosthetic hip fractures with a Loose Stem: open reduction and internal fixation Versus Stem Revision. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(9):3318–25.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Duncan CP, Masri BA. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:293–304.PubMed Duncan CP, Masri BA. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:293–304.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Masri BA, Meek RMD, Duncan CP. Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:80–95.CrossRef Masri BA, Meek RMD, Duncan CP. Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:80–95.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Carrozzino D, Guidi J, Patierno C. Charlson Comorbidity Index: a critical review of Clinimetric Properties. Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(1):8–35.CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Carrozzino D, Guidi J, Patierno C. Charlson Comorbidity Index: a critical review of Clinimetric Properties. Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(1):8–35.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Saklad M, GRADING OF PATIENTS FOR SURGICAL. PROCEDURES Anesthesiology. 1941;2(3):281–4.CrossRef Saklad M, GRADING OF PATIENTS FOR SURGICAL. PROCEDURES Anesthesiology. 1941;2(3):281–4.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Buecking B. Periprosthetic fractures – incidence, risk factors, classification, and therapeutic concepts. OUP. 2013;2(5):259–67. Buecking B. Periprosthetic fractures – incidence, risk factors, classification, and therapeutic concepts. OUP. 2013;2(5):259–67.
14.
go back to reference Beals RK, Tower SS. Periprosthetic fractures of the Femur An Analysis of 93 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;327:238–46.CrossRef Beals RK, Tower SS. Periprosthetic fractures of the Femur An Analysis of 93 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;327:238–46.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Loggers SAI, Van Lieshout EMM, Joosse P, Verhofstad MHJ, Willems HC. Prognosis of nonoperative treatment in elderly patients with a hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2020;51(11):2407–13.CrossRefPubMed Loggers SAI, Van Lieshout EMM, Joosse P, Verhofstad MHJ, Willems HC. Prognosis of nonoperative treatment in elderly patients with a hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2020;51(11):2407–13.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hu F, Jiang C, Shen J, Tang P, Wang Y. Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2012;43(6):676–85.CrossRefPubMed Hu F, Jiang C, Shen J, Tang P, Wang Y. Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2012;43(6):676–85.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bannay A, Chaignot C, Blotière PO, Basson M, Weill A, Ricordeau P, et al. The best use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index with Electronic Health Care Database to Predict Mortality. Med Care. 2016;54(2):188–94.CrossRefPubMed Bannay A, Chaignot C, Blotière PO, Basson M, Weill A, Ricordeau P, et al. The best use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index with Electronic Health Care Database to Predict Mortality. Med Care. 2016;54(2):188–94.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Barghi A, Hanna P, Merchan N, Lechtig A, Haggerty C, Weaver MJ, et al. Outcomes after operative fixation of Vancouver B2 and B3 type periprosthetic fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2022;36(5):228–33.CrossRefPubMed Barghi A, Hanna P, Merchan N, Lechtig A, Haggerty C, Weaver MJ, et al. Outcomes after operative fixation of Vancouver B2 and B3 type periprosthetic fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2022;36(5):228–33.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gitajn IL, Heng M, Weaver MJ, Casemyr N, May C, Vrahas MS, et al. Mortality following Surgical Management of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(1):9–14.CrossRefPubMed Gitajn IL, Heng M, Weaver MJ, Casemyr N, May C, Vrahas MS, et al. Mortality following Surgical Management of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(1):9–14.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Spina M, Scalvi A. Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28(6):1133–42.CrossRefPubMed Spina M, Scalvi A. Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28(6):1133–42.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Moreta J, Aguirre U, de Ugarte OS, Jáuregui I, Mozos JLMDL. Functional and radiological outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty. Injury. 2015;46(2):292–8.CrossRefPubMed Moreta J, Aguirre U, de Ugarte OS, Jáuregui I, Mozos JLMDL. Functional and radiological outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty. Injury. 2015;46(2):292–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Khan T, Grindlay D, Ollivere BJ, Scammell BE, Manktelow ARJ, Pearson RG. A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(4 Supple B):17–25. Khan T, Grindlay D, Ollivere BJ, Scammell BE, Manktelow ARJ, Pearson RG. A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(4 Supple B):17–25.
23.
go back to reference Schreiner AJ, Steidle C, Schmidutz F, Gonser C, Hemmann P, Stöckle U, et al. Hip revision arthroplasty of Periprosthetic Fractures Vancouver B2 and B3 with a modular revision stem: short-term results and review of literature. Z Orthop Unfall. 2022;160(01):40–8.CrossRefPubMed Schreiner AJ, Steidle C, Schmidutz F, Gonser C, Hemmann P, Stöckle U, et al. Hip revision arthroplasty of Periprosthetic Fractures Vancouver B2 and B3 with a modular revision stem: short-term results and review of literature. Z Orthop Unfall. 2022;160(01):40–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Baum C, Leimbacher M, Kriechling P, Platz A, Cadosch D. Treatment of Periprosthetic femoral fractures Vancouver Type B2: revision arthroplasty Versus Open reduction and internal fixation with locking Compression plate. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019;10:215145931987685.CrossRef Baum C, Leimbacher M, Kriechling P, Platz A, Cadosch D. Treatment of Periprosthetic femoral fractures Vancouver Type B2: revision arthroplasty Versus Open reduction and internal fixation with locking Compression plate. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019;10:215145931987685.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Operative treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur with a contralateral, upside-down LISS plate in elderly patients
Authors
Marc Schmid
Caroline Gurschler-Pavotbawan
Patrick Fries
Method Kabelitz
Michael Dietrich
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04277-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Geriatrics 1/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine