Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2019

01-12-2019 | Periprosthetic Fracture | Orthopaedic Surgery

Non-fracture stem vs fracture stem of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in complex proximal humeral fracture of asian elderly

Authors: Jae-Jung Jeong, Chae-Gwan Kong, Sang-Eun Park, Jong-Hun Ji, Won-Ha Whang, Bong-Seok Choi

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Fracture stem of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was designed for better tuberosity bone healing for the proximal bone defect of complex proximal humeral fractures (PHF). Our purpose was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients using fracture stem vs non-fracture (conventional) stem of RTSA in complex PHF of elderly patients.

Methods

Between 2008 March and 2017 June, 48 patients who had undergone an RTSA with non-fracture or fracture stem for complex PHF with a minimum 18 months of follow-up were evaluated. Finally, total 45 patients with a mean age of 80 ± 7 years (65–92 years) were enrolled because three patients were excluded due to age related mortality. We divided them into two groups: 25 patients using non-fracture stem (non-fracture stem group) in the early period of this study, and consecutive 20 patients using fracture stem (fracture stem group) in the later period. Between two groups, we compared clinical and radiologic outcomes such as tuberosity failure, heterotopic ossification (HO), dislocation, acromion fracture, notching, loosening and periprosthetic fracture.

Results

In all patients, clinical outcomes were improved significantly and tuberosity failure was found in 62% (28/45). Between two groups, there were no statistically significant differences on clinical outcomes and radiologic outcomes except UCLA score. As complications, two humeral stem revision was performed due to tuberosity failure related HO and stem loosening with subsequent periprosthetic fracture in non-fracture stem group.

Conclusions

Compared to non-fracture stem, fracture stem usage of RTSA in complex PHF of elderly patients has no significant different impact on clinical and radiological outcomes. However, tuberosity failure related secondary HO of non-fracture stem might be responsible for stem loosening and periprosthetic fracture in the RTSA for complex PHF of elderly patients.

Level of evidence

Level IV, case series study.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Koval KJ, Gallagher MA, Marsicano JG, Cuomo F, McShinawy A, Zuckerman JD (1997) Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:203–207CrossRef Koval KJ, Gallagher MA, Marsicano JG, Cuomo F, McShinawy A, Zuckerman JD (1997) Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:203–207CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 52:1090–1103CrossRef Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 52:1090–1103CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wijgman AJ, Roolker W, Patt TW, Raaymakers EL, Marti RK (2002) Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84:1919–1925CrossRef Wijgman AJ, Roolker W, Patt TW, Raaymakers EL, Marti RK (2002) Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84:1919–1925CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM, Sanders DL, Court-Brown CM, Wakefield AE (2003) Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85:1215–1223CrossRef Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM, Sanders DL, Court-Brown CM, Wakefield AE (2003) Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85:1215–1223CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Jt Surg Br 86:388–395CrossRef Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Jt Surg Br 86:388–395CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Mole D (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:401–412CrossRef Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Mole D (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:401–412CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sirveaux F, Roche O, Molé D (2010) Prothèse d’épaule pour fracture récente de l’humérus proximal. Rev de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatol 96:748–760CrossRef Sirveaux F, Roche O, Molé D (2010) Prothèse d’épaule pour fracture récente de l’humérus proximal. Rev de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatol 96:748–760CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Plausinis D, Kwon YW, Zuckerman JD (2005) Complications of humeral head replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Instr Course Lect 54:371–380PubMed Plausinis D, Kwon YW, Zuckerman JD (2005) Complications of humeral head replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Instr Course Lect 54:371–380PubMed
16.
go back to reference Nijs S, Broos P (2009) Outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty in acute proximal humeral fractures: a frustrating meta-analysis experience. Acta Orthop Belg 75:445–451PubMed Nijs S, Broos P (2009) Outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty in acute proximal humeral fractures: a frustrating meta-analysis experience. Acta Orthop Belg 75:445–451PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hernandez-Elena J, de la Red-Gallego MA, Garces-Zarzalejo C, Pascual-Carra MA, Perez-Aguilar MD, Rodriguez-Lopez T, Alfonso-Fernandez A, Perez-Nunez MI (2015) Treatment of proximal humeral fractures by reverse shoulder arthroplasty: mid-term evaluation of functional results and Notching. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 59:413–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2015.05.002 CrossRefPubMed Hernandez-Elena J, de la Red-Gallego MA, Garces-Zarzalejo C, Pascual-Carra MA, Perez-Aguilar MD, Rodriguez-Lopez T, Alfonso-Fernandez A, Perez-Nunez MI (2015) Treatment of proximal humeral fractures by reverse shoulder arthroplasty: mid-term evaluation of functional results and Notching. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 59:413–420. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​recot.​2015.​05.​002 CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27 Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27
Metadata
Title
Non-fracture stem vs fracture stem of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in complex proximal humeral fracture of asian elderly
Authors
Jae-Jung Jeong
Chae-Gwan Kong
Sang-Eun Park
Jong-Hun Ji
Won-Ha Whang
Bong-Seok Choi
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03190-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2019 Go to the issue