Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2016

01-02-2016 | Cataract

Peripheral corneal relaxing incisions based on anterior keratometry from Scheimpflug tomography versus Placido topography during standard cataract surgery

Authors: Mayank A. Nanavaty, Marizol Dizon, Shruti Malde, Danillo Favor, Damian B. Lake

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

To compare the outcomes of peripheral corneal relaxing incisions (PCRIs) based on standardized nomogram using keratometry from Scheimpflug and Placido machines during standard cataract surgery and to assess the astigmatism neutralization potential of PCRIs.

Methods

In this prospective, comparative case series of eyes with keratometric astigmatism between 0.75D to 2.5D, undergoing routine cataract surgery, PCRIs were performed using standardized nomogram and keratometric data from either Scheimpflug or Placido machines. A single eye of 42 consecutive patients was recruited in each group. Data on pre- and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected DVA (CDVA), keratometry and refraction were assessed at 10 weeks postoperatively. Refractive and keratometric J0 J45 vectors were also analyzed.

Results

Data on 41 and 39 eyes were available in each group, respectively. There was a significant reduction in keratometric astigmatism in both groups. However, between Scheimpflug and Placido groups, there was no difference in postoperative logMAR UDVA [0.15 ± 0.18 vs 0.14 ± 0.16, p = 0.82] and CDVA [0.11 ± 0.11 vs 0.09 ± 0.10, p = 0.58], postoperative spherical equivalent [–0.34D ± 0.40D vs –0.50D ± 0.43D, p = 0.11], keratometric J0 [–0.03 ± 0.39 vs 0.01 ± 0.85, p = 0.67] and J45 [–0.03 ± 0.41 vs 0.01 ± 0.86, p = 0.65] and refractive J0 [0.05 ± 0.46 vs –0.03 ± 0.92, p = 0.47)] and J45 [–0.06 ± 0.49 vs –0.03 ± 0.99, p = 0.82] vectors, reduction of keratometric astigmatism [–0.40D ± 0.55D vs –0.35D ± 1.24D, p = 0.75] and the keratometric astigmatism neutralization potential [38.56 % ± 29.71 % vs 52.66 % ± 44.06 %, p = 0.12].–

Conclusions

Although PCRIs performed using Scheimpflug or Placido keratometry reduced the keratometric astigmatism significantly during standard cataract surgery. The astigmatic neutralization potentials of PCRIs comparing these two groups were not significantly different and remain low during the early postoperative period.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kaufmann C, Peter J, Ooi K, Phipps S, Cooper P, Goggin M (2005) Limbal relaxing incisions versus on-axis incisions to reduce corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:2261–2265PubMedCrossRef Kaufmann C, Peter J, Ooi K, Phipps S, Cooper P, Goggin M (2005) Limbal relaxing incisions versus on-axis incisions to reduce corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:2261–2265PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Muller-Jensen K, Fischer P, Siepe U (1999) Limbal relaxing incisions to correct astigmatism in clear corneal cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 15:586–589PubMed Muller-Jensen K, Fischer P, Siepe U (1999) Limbal relaxing incisions to correct astigmatism in clear corneal cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 15:586–589PubMed
3.
go back to reference Nichamin LD (2006) Astigmatism control. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 19:485–493 Nichamin LD (2006) Astigmatism control. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 19:485–493
4.
go back to reference Talley-Rostov A (2008) Patient-centered care and refractive cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19:5–9PubMedCrossRef Talley-Rostov A (2008) Patient-centered care and refractive cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19:5–9PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gills JPGJ (1998) Reducing pre-existing astiigmatism. Slack, Thorofare, pp 53–66 Gills JPGJ (1998) Reducing pre-existing astiigmatism. Slack, Thorofare, pp 53–66
6.
go back to reference Nanavaty MA, Favor MP, Lake DB (2013) Comparison of equivalent keratometric indices on Scheimpflug tomography with Placido-based topography system at different optical zones. Br J Ophthalmol 97:350–356PubMedCrossRef Nanavaty MA, Favor MP, Lake DB (2013) Comparison of equivalent keratometric indices on Scheimpflug tomography with Placido-based topography system at different optical zones. Br J Ophthalmol 97:350–356PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference DelRivo MVP, Galletti JD, Garibotto M, Bonthoux FF, Pförtner T, Galletti JG (2014) Agreement between Placido topography and Scheimpflug tomography for corneal astigmatism assessment. J Refract Surg 30:49–53PubMedCrossRef DelRivo MVP, Galletti JD, Garibotto M, Bonthoux FF, Pförtner T, Galletti JG (2014) Agreement between Placido topography and Scheimpflug tomography for corneal astigmatism assessment. J Refract Surg 30:49–53PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2009) Accuracy of Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1193–1197PubMedCrossRef Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2009) Accuracy of Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1193–1197PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2009) Agreement between Pentacam and videokeratography in corneal power assessment. J Refract Surg 25:534–538PubMed Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2009) Agreement between Pentacam and videokeratography in corneal power assessment. J Refract Surg 25:534–538PubMed
10.
go back to reference Savini G, Carbonelli M, Sbreglia A, Barboni P, Deluigi G, Hoffer KJ (2010) Comparison of anterior segment measurements by 3 Scheimpflug tomographers and 1 Placido corneal topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1679–1685CrossRef Savini G, Carbonelli M, Sbreglia A, Barboni P, Deluigi G, Hoffer KJ (2010) Comparison of anterior segment measurements by 3 Scheimpflug tomographers and 1 Placido corneal topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1679–1685CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Budak K, Friedman NJ, Koch DD (1998) Limbal relaxing incisions with cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:503–508PubMedCrossRef Budak K, Friedman NJ, Koch DD (1998) Limbal relaxing incisions with cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:503–508PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wang L, Misra M, Koch DD (2003) Peripheral corneal relaxing incisions combined with cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:712–722PubMedCrossRef Wang L, Misra M, Koch DD (2003) Peripheral corneal relaxing incisions combined with cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:712–722PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pfleger T, Skorpik C, Menapace R, Scholz U, Weghaupt H, Zehetmayer M (1996) Long-term course of induced astigmatism after clear corneal incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 22:72–77PubMedCrossRef Pfleger T, Skorpik C, Menapace R, Scholz U, Weghaupt H, Zehetmayer M (1996) Long-term course of induced astigmatism after clear corneal incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 22:72–77PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Muller-Jensen K, Barlinn B, Zimmerman H (1996) Astigmatism reduction: no-stitch 4.0 mm versus sutured 12.0 mm clear corneal incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg 22:1108–1112PubMedCrossRef Muller-Jensen K, Barlinn B, Zimmerman H (1996) Astigmatism reduction: no-stitch 4.0 mm versus sutured 12.0 mm clear corneal incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg 22:1108–1112PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Barequet IS, Yu E, Vitale S, Cassard S, Azar DT, Stark WJ (2004) Astigmatism outcomes of horizontal temporal versus nasal clear corneal incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:418–423PubMedCrossRef Barequet IS, Yu E, Vitale S, Cassard S, Azar DT, Stark WJ (2004) Astigmatism outcomes of horizontal temporal versus nasal clear corneal incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:418–423PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Budak K, Yilmaz G, Aslan BS, Duman S (2001) Limbal relaxing incisions in congenital astigmatism: 6 month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:715–719PubMedCrossRef Budak K, Yilmaz G, Aslan BS, Duman S (2001) Limbal relaxing incisions in congenital astigmatism: 6 month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:715–719PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Qammar A, Mullaney P (2005) Paired opposite clear corneal incisions to correct preexisting astigmatism in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:1167–1170PubMedCrossRef Qammar A, Mullaney P (2005) Paired opposite clear corneal incisions to correct preexisting astigmatism in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:1167–1170PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bayramlar HH, Daglioglu MC, Borazan M (2003) Limbal relaxing incisions for primary mixed astigmatism and mixed astigmatism after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:723–728PubMedCrossRef Bayramlar HH, Daglioglu MC, Borazan M (2003) Limbal relaxing incisions for primary mixed astigmatism and mixed astigmatism after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:723–728PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Osher RH (1989) Paired transverse relaxing keratotomy: a combined technique for reducing astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 15:32–37PubMedCrossRef Osher RH (1989) Paired transverse relaxing keratotomy: a combined technique for reducing astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 15:32–37PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Oshika T, Shimazaki J, Yoshitomi F et al (1998) Arcuate keratotomy to treat corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery: a prospective evaluation of predictability and effectiveness. Ophthalmology 105:2012–2016PubMedCrossRef Oshika T, Shimazaki J, Yoshitomi F et al (1998) Arcuate keratotomy to treat corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery: a prospective evaluation of predictability and effectiveness. Ophthalmology 105:2012–2016PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Carvalho MJ, Suzuki SH, Freitas LL, Branco BC, Schor P, Lima AL (2007) Limbal relaxing incisions to correct corneal astigmatism during phacoemulsification. J Refract Surg 23:499–504PubMed Carvalho MJ, Suzuki SH, Freitas LL, Branco BC, Schor P, Lima AL (2007) Limbal relaxing incisions to correct corneal astigmatism during phacoemulsification. J Refract Surg 23:499–504PubMed
22.
go back to reference Kim DH, Wee WR, Lee JH, Kim MK (2010) The short term effects of a single limbal relaxing incision combined with clear corneal incision. Korean J Ophthalmol 24:78–82PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kim DH, Wee WR, Lee JH, Kim MK (2010) The short term effects of a single limbal relaxing incision combined with clear corneal incision. Korean J Ophthalmol 24:78–82PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Koch DD, Ali SF, Weikert MP, Shirayama M, Jenkins R, Wang L (2012) Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:2080–2087PubMedCrossRef Koch DD, Ali SF, Weikert MP, Shirayama M, Jenkins R, Wang L (2012) Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:2080–2087PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sarver EJ, Van Heugten TY, Padrick TD, Hall MT (2007) Astigmatic refraction using peaks of the interferogram Fourier transform for a Talbot Moire interferometer. J Refract Surg 23:972–977PubMed Sarver EJ, Van Heugten TY, Padrick TD, Hall MT (2007) Astigmatic refraction using peaks of the interferogram Fourier transform for a Talbot Moire interferometer. J Refract Surg 23:972–977PubMed
25.
go back to reference Packer M (2010) Effect of intraoperative aberrometry on the rate of postoperative enhancement: retrospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:747–755PubMedCrossRef Packer M (2010) Effect of intraoperative aberrometry on the rate of postoperative enhancement: retrospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:747–755PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Peripheral corneal relaxing incisions based on anterior keratometry from Scheimpflug tomography versus Placido topography during standard cataract surgery
Authors
Mayank A. Nanavaty
Marizol Dizon
Shruti Malde
Danillo Favor
Damian B. Lake
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3232-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2016 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor (by invitation)

Detecting the effect of under-correcting myopia