Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2010

01-08-2010

Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Nepalese Experience

Authors: Paleswan Joshi Lakhey, Ramesh Singh Bhandari, Bikal Ghimire, Mahesh Khakurel

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pancreaticodudenectomy (PD) is a high-risk, technically demanding operation associated with substantial perioperative morbidity and mortality. This review is intended to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of PD done in a single gastrointestinal surgery unit of a university teaching hospital.

Patients and methods

A retrospective review of medical records of patients who underwent PD from April 2005 through May 2009 was done. Perioperative morbidity was defined according to the standard of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF). The patient demographics, type of surgery, and perioperative morbidity and mortality were evaluated. The factors associated with increased morbidity were analyzed.

Results

Twenty-four patients underwent PD, and there were no perioperative deaths. The overall morbidity was 58%, with a pancreatic fistula rate of 13%. None of the associated parameters, like increasing age, the presence of co-morbidity, preoperative biliary drainage, and duration of surgery, were found to increase the morbidity. These results of PD, though a small case series, are comparable to the international standard. Better outcomes can be achieved even in low- to medium-volume centers in developing countries where a dedicated team with special interest in pancreatic surgery is in place.

Conclusions

Although there were no deaths after PD in our series, the morbidity was higher than that observed in other high-volume centers. To decrease the morbidity associated with PD, various factors must be streamlined, among them, the operative technique and the intensive perioperative management of the patient, as well as uniform definition of complications, use of a multidisciplinary approach, and identification of associated risk factors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Halsted WS (1899) Contributions to surgery of the bile passages, especially of the common bile duct. Boston Med Surg J 141:645–654 Halsted WS (1899) Contributions to surgery of the bile passages, especially of the common bile duct. Boston Med Surg J 141:645–654
2.
go back to reference Kausch W (1912) Radical resection of carcinoma of duodenal papilla [in German]. Beitr Z Clin Chir 78:439–486 Kausch W (1912) Radical resection of carcinoma of duodenal papilla [in German]. Beitr Z Clin Chir 78:439–486
3.
go back to reference Whipple A, Parsons WB, Mullins CR (1935) Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 102:763–779CrossRefPubMed Whipple A, Parsons WB, Mullins CR (1935) Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 102:763–779CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Shapiro TM (1975) Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a statistical analysis of biliary bypass vs Whipple resection in good risk patients. Ann Surg 182:715–721CrossRefPubMed Shapiro TM (1975) Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a statistical analysis of biliary bypass vs Whipple resection in good risk patients. Ann Surg 182:715–721CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ et al (1993) One-hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 217:430–438CrossRefPubMed Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ et al (1993) One-hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 217:430–438CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fernandez-del Castillo C, Ratner DW, Warshaw AL (1995) Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 130:295–300PubMed Fernandez-del Castillo C, Ratner DW, Warshaw AL (1995) Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 130:295–300PubMed
7.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Russell RC, Bramhall S et al (1997) Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumors in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. Br J Surg 84:1370–1376CrossRefPubMed Neoptolemos JP, Russell RC, Bramhall S et al (1997) Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumors in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. Br J Surg 84:1370–1376CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795CrossRefPubMed Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bassi C, Falconi M, Salvia R et al (2001) Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume center: results on 150 consecutive patients. Dig Surg 18:453–458CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Falconi M, Salvia R et al (2001) Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume center: results on 150 consecutive patients. Dig Surg 18:453–458CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference DeOliveria ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery. A novel grading system applied for 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244:931–939CrossRef DeOliveria ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery. A novel grading system applied for 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244:931–939CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Gouma DJ et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)—an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Gouma DJ et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)—an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML et al (1999) Infection control and hospital epidemiology: guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, vol 20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, p 247 Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML et al (1999) Infection control and hospital epidemiology: guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, vol 20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, p 247
14.
go back to reference Moosa AR (1979) Reoperations for pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 114:502 Moosa AR (1979) Reoperations for pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 114:502
15.
go back to reference van Heek NT, Kulhmann KFD, Scholten RJ et al (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection. A systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 242:781–790CrossRefPubMed van Heek NT, Kulhmann KFD, Scholten RJ et al (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection. A systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 242:781–790CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF et al (2007) Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg 246:246–253CrossRefPubMed McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF et al (2007) Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg 246:246–253CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chan C, Franssen B, Rubio A et al (2008) Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a Latin American country: the transition to a high volume center. J Gastrointest Surg 12:527–533CrossRefPubMed Chan C, Franssen B, Rubio A et al (2008) Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a Latin American country: the transition to a high volume center. J Gastrointest Surg 12:527–533CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Poon RTP, Fan ST, Chu KM et al (2002) Standards of pancreaticoduodenectomy in a tertiary referral centre in Hong Kong: retrospective case series. Hong Kong Med J 8:249–254PubMed Poon RTP, Fan ST, Chu KM et al (2002) Standards of pancreaticoduodenectomy in a tertiary referral centre in Hong Kong: retrospective case series. Hong Kong Med J 8:249–254PubMed
19.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–260CrossRefPubMed Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–260CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E et al (2004) Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg 21:54–59CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E et al (2004) Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg 21:54–59CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Poon RTP, Fan ST, Lo MC et al (2007) External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 246:425–435CrossRefPubMed Poon RTP, Fan ST, Lo MC et al (2007) External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 246:425–435CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Perwaiz A, Singhal D, Singh A et al (2009) Is isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy superior to conventional reconstruction in pancreaticoduodenectomy? HPB 11:326–331PubMed Perwaiz A, Singhal D, Singh A et al (2009) Is isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy superior to conventional reconstruction in pancreaticoduodenectomy? HPB 11:326–331PubMed
23.
go back to reference Shukla PJ, Barreto SG, Mohandas KM et al (2009) Defining the role of surgery for complications after pancreatoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg 1–2:33–37CrossRef Shukla PJ, Barreto SG, Mohandas KM et al (2009) Defining the role of surgery for complications after pancreatoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg 1–2:33–37CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tran K, Van Eijick C, Valerio DC et al (2002) Occlusion of pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomised trial. Ann Surg 236:422–428CrossRefPubMed Tran K, Van Eijick C, Valerio DC et al (2002) Occlusion of pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomised trial. Ann Surg 236:422–428CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Kim MP et al (2004) Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 8:766–772CrossRefPubMed Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Kim MP et al (2004) Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 8:766–772CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1280–1290CrossRefPubMed Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1280–1290CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM et al (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222:580–592PubMed Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM et al (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222:580–592PubMed
28.
go back to reference Poon RTP, Lo SH, Fong D et al (2002) Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 183:42–52CrossRefPubMed Poon RTP, Lo SH, Fong D et al (2002) Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 183:42–52CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Gulik TM, DeWit LT et al (1997) Delayed gastric emptying after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of 200 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:373–379PubMed Van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Gulik TM, DeWit LT et al (1997) Delayed gastric emptying after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of 200 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:373–379PubMed
30.
go back to reference Paraskevas KI, Avgerinos C, Manes C et al (2006) Delayed gastric emptying is associated with pylorus-preserving but not classical Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy: a review of the literature and critical reappraisal of the implicated pathomechanism. World J Gastroenterol 12:5951–5958PubMed Paraskevas KI, Avgerinos C, Manes C et al (2006) Delayed gastric emptying is associated with pylorus-preserving but not classical Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy: a review of the literature and critical reappraisal of the implicated pathomechanism. World J Gastroenterol 12:5951–5958PubMed
31.
go back to reference Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 246:269–280CrossRefPubMed Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 246:269–280CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Barnett SA, Collier NA (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: does preoperative biliary drainage, method of pancreatic reconstruction or age influence perioperative outcome? A retrospective study of 104 consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg 76:563–568CrossRefPubMed Barnett SA, Collier NA (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: does preoperative biliary drainage, method of pancreatic reconstruction or age influence perioperative outcome? A retrospective study of 104 consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg 76:563–568CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Kawarada Y, Higashiguchi T, Yokoi H et al (1995) Preoperative biliary drainage in obstructive jaundice. Hepatogastroenterology 42:300–307PubMed Kawarada Y, Higashiguchi T, Yokoi H et al (1995) Preoperative biliary drainage in obstructive jaundice. Hepatogastroenterology 42:300–307PubMed
34.
go back to reference Sewnath ME, Karsten TM, Prins MH et al (2002) A meta-analysis on the efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage for tumors causing obstructive jaundice. Ann Surg 236:17–27CrossRefPubMed Sewnath ME, Karsten TM, Prins MH et al (2002) A meta-analysis on the efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage for tumors causing obstructive jaundice. Ann Surg 236:17–27CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Srivastava S, Sikora SS, Kumar A et al (2001) Outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients undergoing preoperative biliary drainage. Dig Surg 18:381–387CrossRefPubMed Srivastava S, Sikora SS, Kumar A et al (2001) Outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients undergoing preoperative biliary drainage. Dig Surg 18:381–387CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Jagannath P, Dhir V, Shrikhande S et al (2005) Effect of preoperative biliary stenting on immediate outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 92:356–361CrossRefPubMed Jagannath P, Dhir V, Shrikhande S et al (2005) Effect of preoperative biliary stenting on immediate outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 92:356–361CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Sano K, Kubota K, Bandai Y et al (1999) Rate of bilirubin decrease as a risk predictor in hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. Hepatogastroenterology 46:2171–2177PubMed Sano K, Kubota K, Bandai Y et al (1999) Rate of bilirubin decrease as a risk predictor in hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. Hepatogastroenterology 46:2171–2177PubMed
38.
go back to reference Choi YM, Cho EH, Lee KY et al (2008) Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical results after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with distal common bile duct cancer: focused on the rate of decrease in serum bilirubin. World J Gastroenterol 14:1102–1107CrossRefPubMed Choi YM, Cho EH, Lee KY et al (2008) Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical results after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with distal common bile duct cancer: focused on the rate of decrease in serum bilirubin. World J Gastroenterol 14:1102–1107CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhunang Y et al (2005) Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 11:2456–2461PubMed Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhunang Y et al (2005) Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 11:2456–2461PubMed
40.
go back to reference Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J et al (2006) One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244:692–698CrossRef Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J et al (2006) One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244:692–698CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Nepalese Experience
Authors
Paleswan Joshi Lakhey
Ramesh Singh Bhandari
Bikal Ghimire
Mahesh Khakurel
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0589-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2010

World Journal of Surgery 8/2010 Go to the issue