Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Research

Perioperative liberal versus restrictive fluid strategies and postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and metanalysis on randomised-controlled trials in major abdominal elective surgery

Authors: Antonio Messina, Chiara Robba, Lorenzo Calabrò, Daniel Zambelli, Francesca Iannuzzi, Edoardo Molinari, Silvia Scarano, Denise Battaglini, Marta Baggiani, Giacomo De Mattei, Laura Saderi, Giovanni Sotgiu, Paolo Pelosi, Maurizio Cecconi

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Postoperative complications impact on early and long-term patients’ outcome. Appropriate perioperative fluid management is pivotal in this context; however, the most effective perioperative fluid management is still unclear. The enhanced recovery after surgery pathways recommend a perioperative zero-balance, whereas recent findings suggest a more liberal approach could be beneficial. We conducted this trial to address the impact of restrictive vs. liberal fluid approaches on overall postoperative complications and mortality.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We performed a systematic literature search using MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid) and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical trials register databases, published from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019. We included RCTs enrolling adult patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery and comparing the use of restrictive/liberal approaches enrolling at least 15 patients in each subgroup. Studies involving cardiac, non-elective surgery, paediatric or obstetric surgeries were excluded.

Results

After full-text examination, the metanalysis finally included 18 studies and 5567 patients randomised to restrictive (2786 patients; 50.0%) or liberal approaches (2780 patients; 50.0%). We found no difference in the occurrence of severe postoperative complications between restrictive and liberal subgroups [risk difference (95% CI) = 0.009 (− 0.02; 0.04); p value = 0.62; I2 (95% CI) = 38.6% (0–66.9%)]. This result was confirmed also in the subgroup of five studies having a low overall risk of bias. The liberal approach was associated with lower overall renal major events, as compared to the restrictive [risk difference (95% CI) = 0.06 (0.02–0.09); p value  = 0.001]. We found no difference in either early (p value  = 0.33) or late (p value  = 0.22) postoperative mortality between restrictive and liberal subgroups

Conclusions

In major abdominal elective surgery perioperative, the choice between liberal or restrictive approach did not affect overall major postoperative complications or mortality. In a subgroup analysis, a liberal as compared to a restrictive perioperative fluid policy was associated with lower overall complication renal major events, as compared to the restrictive.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference de Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM, den Outer AJ, van Andel G, van Helden SH, et al. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1928–37.PubMedCrossRef de Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM, den Outer AJ, van Andel G, van Helden SH, et al. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1928–37.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG, Mosca C, Healey NA, Kumbhani DJ, et al. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 2005;242:326–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG, Mosca C, Healey NA, Kumbhani DJ, et al. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 2005;242:326–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Healy MA, Mullard AJ, Campbell DA Jr, Dimick JB. Hospital and payer costs associated with surgical complications. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:823–30.PubMedCrossRef Healy MA, Mullard AJ, Campbell DA Jr, Dimick JB. Hospital and payer costs associated with surgical complications. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:823–30.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kang SH, Lee Y, Min SH, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, et al. Multimodal enhanced recovery after surgery (eras) program is the optimal perioperative care in patients undergoing totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:3231–8.PubMedCrossRef Kang SH, Lee Y, Min SH, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, et al. Multimodal enhanced recovery after surgery (eras) program is the optimal perioperative care in patients undergoing totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:3231–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Holte K, Kehlet H. Fluid therapy and surgical outcomes in elective surgery: a need for reassessment in fast-track surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:971–89.PubMedCrossRef Holte K, Kehlet H. Fluid therapy and surgical outcomes in elective surgery: a need for reassessment in fast-track surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:971–89.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cecconi M, Corredor C, Arulkumaran N, Abuella G, Ball J, Grounds RM, et al. Clinical review: goal-directed therapy-what is the evidence in surgical patients? The effect on different risk groups. Crit Care. 2013;17:209.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cecconi M, Corredor C, Arulkumaran N, Abuella G, Ball J, Grounds RM, et al. Clinical review: goal-directed therapy-what is the evidence in surgical patients? The effect on different risk groups. Crit Care. 2013;17:209.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1392–402.PubMedCrossRef Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1392–402.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Marik PE. Perioperative hemodynamic optimization: a revised approach. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26:500–5.PubMedCrossRef Marik PE. Perioperative hemodynamic optimization: a revised approach. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26:500–5.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Thacker JK, Mountford WK, Ernst FR, Krukas MR, Mythen MM. Perioperative fluid utilization variability and association with outcomes: considerations for enhanced recovery efforts in sample us surgical populations. Ann Surg. 2016;263:502–10.PubMedCrossRef Thacker JK, Mountford WK, Ernst FR, Krukas MR, Mythen MM. Perioperative fluid utilization variability and association with outcomes: considerations for enhanced recovery efforts in sample us surgical populations. Ann Surg. 2016;263:502–10.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Heming N, Moine P, Coscas R, Annane D. Perioperative fluid management for major elective surgery. Br J Surg. 2020;107:e56–62.PubMedCrossRef Heming N, Moine P, Coscas R, Annane D. Perioperative fluid management for major elective surgery. Br J Surg. 2020;107:e56–62.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced recovery after surgery (eras((r))) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013;37:259–84.PubMedCrossRef Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced recovery after surgery (eras((r))) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013;37:259–84.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Miller TE, Myles PS. Perioperative fluid therapy for major surgery. Anesthesiology. 2019;130:825–32.PubMedCrossRef Miller TE, Myles PS. Perioperative fluid therapy for major surgery. Anesthesiology. 2019;130:825–32.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wrzosek A, Jakowicka-Wordliczek J, Zajaczkowska R, Serednicki WT, Jankowski M, Bala MM, et al. Perioperative restrictive versus goal-directed fluid therapy for adults undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;12:CD012767.PubMed Wrzosek A, Jakowicka-Wordliczek J, Zajaczkowska R, Serednicki WT, Jankowski M, Bala MM, et al. Perioperative restrictive versus goal-directed fluid therapy for adults undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;12:CD012767.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, Forbes A, Peyton P, Story D, et al. Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2263–74.CrossRefPubMed Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, Forbes A, Peyton P, Story D, et al. Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2263–74.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H. “Liberal” vs. “Restrictive” perioperative fluid therapy—a critical assessment of the evidence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:843–51.PubMedCrossRef Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H. “Liberal” vs. “Restrictive” perioperative fluid therapy—a critical assessment of the evidence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:843–51.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H. “Liberal” vs. “Restrictive” perioperative fluid therapy—a critical assessment of the evidence: review article. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:843–51.PubMedCrossRef Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H. “Liberal” vs. “Restrictive” perioperative fluid therapy—a critical assessment of the evidence: review article. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:843–51.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schol PBB, Terink IM, Lancé MD, Scheepers HCJ. Liberal or restrictive fluid management during elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2016;35:26–39.PubMedCrossRef Schol PBB, Terink IM, Lancé MD, Scheepers HCJ. Liberal or restrictive fluid management during elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2016;35:26–39.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. Rob 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.PubMedCrossRef Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. Rob 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Matot I, Paskaleva R, Eid L, Cohen K, Khalaileh A, Elazary R, et al. Effect of the volume of fluids administered on intraoperative oliguria in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2012;147:228–34.PubMedCrossRef Matot I, Paskaleva R, Eid L, Cohen K, Khalaileh A, Elazary R, et al. Effect of the volume of fluids administered on intraoperative oliguria in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2012;147:228–34.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kabon B, Akca O, Taguchi A, Nagele A, Jebadurai R, Arkilic CF, et al. Supplemental intravenous crystalloid administration does not reduce the risk of surgical wound infection. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:1546–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kabon B, Akca O, Taguchi A, Nagele A, Jebadurai R, Arkilic CF, et al. Supplemental intravenous crystalloid administration does not reduce the risk of surgical wound infection. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:1546–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Futier E, Garot M, Godet T, Biais M, Verzilli D, Ouattara A, et al. Effect of hydroxyethyl starch vs saline for volume replacement therapy on death or postoperative complications among high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: the flash randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323:225–36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Futier E, Garot M, Godet T, Biais M, Verzilli D, Ouattara A, et al. Effect of hydroxyethyl starch vs saline for volume replacement therapy on death or postoperative complications among high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: the flash randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323:225–36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:25–32.PubMedCrossRef Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:25–32.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kassim D, Esmat I. Goal directed fluid therapy reduces major complications in elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: Liberal versus restrictive strategies. Egypt J Anaesth. 2016;32:167–73.CrossRef Kassim D, Esmat I. Goal directed fluid therapy reduces major complications in elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: Liberal versus restrictive strategies. Egypt J Anaesth. 2016;32:167–73.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gao T, Li N, Zhang JJ, Xi FC, Chen QY, Zhu WM, et al. Restricted intravenous fluid regimen reduces the rate of postoperative complications and alters immunological activity of elderly patients operated for abdominal cancer: A randomized prospective clinical trail. World J Surg. 2012;36:993–1002.PubMedCrossRef Gao T, Li N, Zhang JJ, Xi FC, Chen QY, Zhu WM, et al. Restricted intravenous fluid regimen reduces the rate of postoperative complications and alters immunological activity of elderly patients operated for abdominal cancer: A randomized prospective clinical trail. World J Surg. 2012;36:993–1002.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Grant F, Brennan MF, Allen PJ, DeMatteo RP, Kingham TP, D’Angelica M, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of liberal vs restricted perioperative fluid management in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Ann Surg. 2016;264:591–8.PubMedCrossRef Grant F, Brennan MF, Allen PJ, DeMatteo RP, Kingham TP, D’Angelica M, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of liberal vs restricted perioperative fluid management in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Ann Surg. 2016;264:591–8.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kalyan JP, Rosbergen M, Pal N, Sargen K, Fletcher SJ, Nunn DL, et al. Randomized clinical trial of fluid and salt restriction compared with a controlled liberal regimen in elective gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1739–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kalyan JP, Rosbergen M, Pal N, Sargen K, Fletcher SJ, Nunn DL, et al. Randomized clinical trial of fluid and salt restriction compared with a controlled liberal regimen in elective gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1739–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lavu H, Sell NM, Carter TI, Winter JM, Maguire DP, Gratch DM, et al. The hyslar trial: a prospective randomized controlled trial of the use of a restrictive fluid regimen with 3% hypertonic saline versus lactated ringers in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2014;260:445–53.PubMedCrossRef Lavu H, Sell NM, Carter TI, Winter JM, Maguire DP, Gratch DM, et al. The hyslar trial: a prospective randomized controlled trial of the use of a restrictive fluid regimen with 3% hypertonic saline versus lactated ringers in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2014;260:445–53.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Piljic D, Petricevic M, Piljic D, Ksela J, Robic B, Klokocovnik T. Restrictive versus standard fluid regimen in elective minilaparotomy abdominal aortic repair-prospective randomized controlled trial. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:296–303.PubMed Piljic D, Petricevic M, Piljic D, Ksela J, Robic B, Klokocovnik T. Restrictive versus standard fluid regimen in elective minilaparotomy abdominal aortic repair-prospective randomized controlled trial. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:296–303.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Wuethrich PY, Burkhard FC, Thalmann GN, Stueber F, Studer UE. Restrictive deferred hydration combined with preemptive norepinephrine infusion during radical cystectomy reduces postoperative complications and hospitalization time: a randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:365–77.PubMedCrossRef Wuethrich PY, Burkhard FC, Thalmann GN, Stueber F, Studer UE. Restrictive deferred hydration combined with preemptive norepinephrine infusion during radical cystectomy reduces postoperative complications and hospitalization time: a randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:365–77.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Futier E, Constantin JM, Petit A, Chanques G, Kwiatkowski F, Flamein R, et al. Conservative vs restrictive individualized goal-directed fluid replacement strategy in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2010;145:1193–200.PubMedCrossRef Futier E, Constantin JM, Petit A, Chanques G, Kwiatkowski F, Flamein R, et al. Conservative vs restrictive individualized goal-directed fluid replacement strategy in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2010;145:1193–200.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N. Zurich Fast Track Study G: a fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:842–7.PubMedCrossRef Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N. Zurich Fast Track Study G: a fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:842–7.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Abraham-Nordling M, Hjern F, Pollack J, Prytz M, Borg T, Kressner U. Randomized clinical trial of fluid restriction in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99:186–91.PubMedCrossRef Abraham-Nordling M, Hjern F, Pollack J, Prytz M, Borg T, Kressner U. Randomized clinical trial of fluid restriction in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99:186–91.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Holte K, Foss NB, Andersen J, Valentiner L, Lund C, Bie P, et al. Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:500–8.PubMedCrossRef Holte K, Foss NB, Andersen J, Valentiner L, Lund C, Bie P, et al. Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:500–8.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Messina A, Pelaia C, Bruni A, Garofalo E, Bonicolini E, Longhini F, et al.: Fluid challenge during anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2018 Messina A, Pelaia C, Bruni A, Garofalo E, Bonicolini E, Longhini F, et al.: Fluid challenge during anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2018
41.
go back to reference See EJ, Jayasinghe K, Glassford N, Bailey M, Johnson DW, Polkinghorne KR, et al. Long-term risk of adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies using consensus definitions of exposure. Kidney Int. 2019;95:160–72.PubMedCrossRef See EJ, Jayasinghe K, Glassford N, Bailey M, Johnson DW, Polkinghorne KR, et al. Long-term risk of adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies using consensus definitions of exposure. Kidney Int. 2019;95:160–72.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Wang Y, Bellomo R. Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: risk factors, pathophysiology and treatment. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13:697–711.PubMedCrossRef Wang Y, Bellomo R. Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: risk factors, pathophysiology and treatment. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13:697–711.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Hobson CE, Yavas S, Segal MS, Schold JD, Tribble CG, Layon AJ, et al. Acute kidney injury is associated with increased long-term mortality after cardiothoracic surgery. Circulation. 2009;119:2444–53.PubMedCrossRef Hobson CE, Yavas S, Segal MS, Schold JD, Tribble CG, Layon AJ, et al. Acute kidney injury is associated with increased long-term mortality after cardiothoracic surgery. Circulation. 2009;119:2444–53.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Kampmeier TG, Ertmer C. Individualized goal-directed therapy: The challenge with the fluids. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:596–8.PubMedCrossRef Kampmeier TG, Ertmer C. Individualized goal-directed therapy: The challenge with the fluids. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:596–8.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Messina A, Robba C, Calabrò L, Zambelli D, Iannuzzi F, Molinari E, et al. Association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes: a 20-year systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized goal-directed trials in major visceral/noncardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2021;25:43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Messina A, Robba C, Calabrò L, Zambelli D, Iannuzzi F, Molinari E, et al. Association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes: a 20-year systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized goal-directed trials in major visceral/noncardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2021;25:43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortso E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: A randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003;238:641–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortso E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: A randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003;238:641–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
go back to reference van Samkar G, Eshuis WJ, Bennink RJ, van Gulik TM, Dijkgraaf MG, Preckel B, et al. Intraoperative fluid restriction in pancreatic surgery: a double blinded randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0140294.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef van Samkar G, Eshuis WJ, Bennink RJ, van Gulik TM, Dijkgraaf MG, Preckel B, et al. Intraoperative fluid restriction in pancreatic surgery: a double blinded randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0140294.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the international committee of medical journal editors. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1250–1.PubMedCrossRef De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the international committee of medical journal editors. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1250–1.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Jie HY, Ye JL, Zhou HH, Li YX. Perioperative restricted fluid therapy preserves immunological function in patients with colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:15852–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jie HY, Ye JL, Zhou HH, Li YX. Perioperative restricted fluid therapy preserves immunological function in patients with colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:15852–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perioperative liberal versus restrictive fluid strategies and postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and metanalysis on randomised-controlled trials in major abdominal elective surgery
Authors
Antonio Messina
Chiara Robba
Lorenzo Calabrò
Daniel Zambelli
Francesca Iannuzzi
Edoardo Molinari
Silvia Scarano
Denise Battaglini
Marta Baggiani
Giacomo De Mattei
Laura Saderi
Giovanni Sotgiu
Paolo Pelosi
Maurizio Cecconi
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03629-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Critical Care 1/2021 Go to the issue