Top

Clinical Oral Investigations

Published in:

01-04-2018 | Original Article

Periodontal screening and referral behaviour of general dental practitioners in Flanders

Authors: E. Meers, C. Dekeyser, C. Favril, W. Teughels, M. Quirynen, Isabelle Laleman

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 3/2018

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study was to investigate the screening and referral behaviour of Flemish dentists concerning periodontitis and more specific, the use of the Dutch Periodontal Screening Index (DPSI).

Materials and methods

An online questionnaire was electronically distributed through the different professional dental societies. It consisted of two parts: the first aimed at describing the profile of the dentist. The second part inquired the screening method, when this was applied, periodontal risk factors and referral behaviour.

Results

One thousand fifty dentists attended to the questionnaire. One hundred fifty-nine questionnaires were excluded since they did not match the target audience. Sixty-four percent of Flemish dentists used DPSI as a periodontal screening method, 28% screened based on probing pocket depth, 4% used solely radiographs and 4% had no screening method at all. The usage of DPSI is influenced by the year of graduation: the longer the dentists were graduated, the less they used DPSI. No influence of sex, education centre and location was found. Referral behaviour is influenced by different patient- and dentist-related factors.

Conclusions

Regarding the screening behaviour, there seems a consensus among Flemish dentists that a periodontal probe should be used. For referral, there is no consensus about if and when to refer to a specialist.

Clinical relevance

It is encouraging that 92% of the Flemish general dental practitioners use a probe when screening for periodontitis. However, DPSI is mainly used by younger dentists. An effort should be made to encourage all dentists to use this, so that in every patient, periodontitis can be detected timely, securing the best treatment outcome.

Available only for authorised users

Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M et al (2014) Global burden of severe periodontitis in 1990-2010: a systematic review and meta-regression. J Dent Res 93:1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514552491 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Frencken JE, Sharma P, Stenhouse L et al (2017) Global epidemiology of dental caries and severe periodontitis—a comprehensive review. J Clin Periodontol 44(Suppl 18):S94–S105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12677 CrossRefPubMed

Ziebolz D, Szabadi I, Rinke S et al (2011) Initial periodontal screening and radiographic findings—a comparison of two methods to evaluate the periodontal situation. BMC Oral Health 11:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-11-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cobb CM, Carrara A, El-Annan E et al (2003) Periodontal referral patterns, 1980 versus 2000: a preliminary study. J Periodontol 74:1470–1474. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.10.1470 CrossRefPubMed

Van der Velden U (2009) The Dutch periodontal screening index validation and its application in The Netherlands. J Clin Periodontol 36:1018–1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01495.x CrossRefPubMed

Garcia RI, Compton R, Dietrich T (2016) Risk assessment and periodontal prevention in primary care. Periodontol 2000 71:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12124 CrossRefPubMed

Glicksman MA (2001) Referral of the periodontal patient to the periodontist. Periodontol 2000 25:110–113CrossRefPubMed

Ghiabi E, Weerasinghe S (2011) The periodontal examination profile of general dentists in Nova Scotia, Canada. J Periodontol 82:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100348 CrossRefPubMed

Corbet EF (1998) Practical periodontal screening and diagnosis. Int Dent J 48:268–274CrossRefPubMed

10.

Lee JH, Bennett DE, Richards PS, Inglehart MR (2009) Periodontal referral patterns of general dentists: lessons for dental education. J Dent Educ 73:199–210PubMed

11.

McGuire MK, Scheyer ET (2003) A referral-based periodontal practice—yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J Periodontol 74:1542–1544. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.10.1542 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Ainamo J, Barmes D, Beagrie G et al (1982) Development of the World Health Organization (WHO) community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN). Int Dent J 32:281–291PubMed

13.

(1993) Periodontal screening & recording an early detection system. J N J Dent Assoc Spring; 64(2):7–9, 11

14.

British Society of Periodontology (2001) Periodontology in general dental practice. A policy statement. https://www.bsperio.org.uk/publications/downloads/64_144208_periodontology-in-general-dental-practicein-the-uk.pdf

15.

van der Velden U (2005) Purpose and problems of periodontal disease classification. Periodontol 2000 39:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2005.00127.x CrossRefPubMed

16.

Veerle Vivet, Pieter-Jan Miermans (2015) Algemene tandartsen op de arbeidsmarkt, 2012 - Resultaten van de PlanCAD Gegevenskoppeling FOD VVVL - Datawarehouse AM&SB - RIZIV

17.

Linden GJ, Stevenson M, Burke FJ (1999) Variation in periodontal referral in 2 regions in the UK. J Clin Periodontol 26:590–595CrossRefPubMed

18.

Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN (2004) Use of the basic periodontal examination and radiographs in the assessment of periodontal diseases in general dental practice. J Dent 32:17–25CrossRefPubMed

19.

Darby IB, Angkasa F, Duong C et al (2005) Factors influencing the diagnosis and treatment of periodontal disease by dental practitioners in Victoria. Aust Dent J 50:37–41CrossRefPubMed

20.

Ghiabi E, Taylor KL (2010) Teaching methods and surgical training in North American graduate periodontics programs: exploring the landscape. J Dent Educ 74:618–627PubMed

21.

Akesson L, Håkansson J, Rohlin M (1992) Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level. J Clin Periodontol 19:326–332CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kim T-S, Obst C, Zehaczek S, Geenen C (2008) Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients. J Periodontol 79:1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070578 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Ercan E, Uysal C, Uzun C, Yılmaz M (2015) Periodontal examination profiles and treatment approaches of a group of Turkish general dentists. Oral Health Prev Dent 13:275–280. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.a32670 PubMed

Title: Periodontal screening and referral behaviour of general dental practitioners in Flanders
Authors: E. Meers
C. Dekeyser
C. Favril
W. Teughels
M. Quirynen
Isabelle Laleman
Publication date: 01-04-2018
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2212-1

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Periodontal screening and referral behaviour of general dental practitioners in Flanders

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Mechanical characteristics of the maxillary sinus Schneiderian membrane ex vivo

Interaction between chlorhexidine and fluoride in a mouthrinse solution—a 4-day and 6-week randomized clinical pilot study

Dental anxiety and oral health-related quality of life in aggressive periodontitis patients

Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure

Push-out bond strength of three different calcium silicate-based root-end filling materials after ultrasonic retrograde cavity preparation

Partial caries removal in deep caries lesions: a 5-year multicenter randomized controlled trial