Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Perinatal health care services for imprisoned pregnant women and associated outcomes: a systematic review

Authors: Eleanor Bard, Marian Knight, Emma Plugge

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Women are an increasing minority of prisoners worldwide, and most are of childbearing age. Prisons offer unique opportunities for improving the pregnancy outcomes of these high-risk women, and no systematic review to date has looked at their care. This systematic review identified studies describing models of perinatal health care for imprisoned women which report maternal and child health and care outcomes.

Methods

We systematically searched for literature published between 1980 and April 2014. Studies were eligible if they included a group of imprisoned pregnant women, a description of perinatal health care and any maternal or infant health or care outcomes. Two authors independently extracted data. We described relevant outcomes in prisons (including jails) under models of care we termed PRISON, PRISON+ and PRISON++, depending on the care provided. Where outcomes were available on a comparison group of women, we calculated odds ratios with 95 % confidence intervals.

Results

Eighteen studies were reported, comprising 2001 imprisoned pregnant women. Fifteen were in the US, two in the UK and one in Germany. Nine contained a comparison group of women comprising 849 pregnant women. Study quality was variable and outcome reporting was inconsistent. There was some evidence that women in prisons receiving enhanced prison care, PRISON+, were less likely to have inadequate prenatal care (15.4 % vs 30.7 %, p < 0 · 001), preterm delivery (6.4 % vs 19.0 %, p = 0 · 001) or caesarean delivery (12.9 % vs 26.5 %, p = 0 · 005) compared to women in prisons receiving usual care (PRISON). Women participating in two PRISON++ interventions, that is, interventions which included not only enhanced care in prisons but also coordination of community care on release, demonstrated reductions in long term recidivism rates (summary OR 0 · 37, 95 % CI 0 · 19–0 · 70) compared to pregnant women in the same prisons who did not participate in the intervention.

Conclusions

Enhanced perinatal care can improve both short and long-term outcomes but there is a lack of data. Properly designed programmes with rigorous evaluation are needed to address the needs of this vulnerable population. The cost to mothers, children and to society of failing to address these important public health issues are likely to be substantial.

Trial registration

PROSPERO registration: CRD42012002384.
Literature
1.
Walmsley R. World prison population list, 10th edition. International Centre for Prison Studies, University of Essex; 2012.
2.
WHO: Women’s health in prison: correcting gender inequity in prison health. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009.
3.
Glaze L, Kaeble D. Correctional populations in the United States, US Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics 2014. 2013.
4.
Rebecca Project for Human Rights NWsLC: Mothers Behind Bars: A State-By-State Report Card And Analysis Of Federal Policies On Conditions Of Confinement For Pregnant And Parenting Women And The Effect On Their Children. 2010.
5.
Maruschak L. Medical Problems of Prisoners, US Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2008.CrossRef
6.
Europe W. Declaration on prison health as part of public health. WHO Europe: Moscow; 2003.
7.
Assembly UNG. United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules). 2010.
8.
Assembly UNG. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules). 2015.
9.
Greenfeld L, Snell T. Women offenders, Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report Washington: US Department of Justice. 1999.
10.
11.
Edge D: Perinatal Healthcare in Prison: A scoping review of policy and provision. University of Manchester; 2006.
12.
Knight M, Plugge E. The outcomes of pregnancy among imprisoned women: a systematic review. BJOG. 2005;112(11):1467–74.PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Higgins Julian PT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2, The Cochrane Collaboration. 2009.
16.
Barkauskas VH, Low LK, Pimlott S. Health outcomes of incarcerated pregnant women and their infants in a community-based program. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002;47(5):371–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Bell JF, Zimmerman FJ, Huebner CE, Cawthon ML, Ward DH, Schroeder CA. Perinatal health service use by women released from jail. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2004;15(3):426–42.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Carlson JR. Prison Nursery 2000: A Five-Year Review of the Prison Nursery at the Nebraska Correctional Center for Women. J Offender Rehabil. 2001;33:75–97.
19.
Carlson JR, Jr. Prison Nurseries: A Pathway to Crime-Free Futures. Correct Compend. 2009;34(1):17–23.
20.
Clark J, Sansom S, Simpson BJ, Walker F, Wheeler C, Yazdani K, Zapata A. Promising strategies for preventing perinatal HIV transmission: model programs from three states. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10(4):367–73.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Cordero L, Hines S, Shibley KA, Landon MB. Perinatal outcome for women in prison. J Perinatol. 1992;12(3):205–9.PubMed
22.
Inoue D. Models of excellence 1999–2002: Innovative Programs and Services in America’s Public Hospitals and Health Systems. Washington: National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems; 2003.
23.
Kubiak SP, Kasiborski N, Schmittel E. Assessing long-term outcomes of an intervention designed for pregnant incarcerated women. Res Soc Work Prac. 2010;20(5):528–35.CrossRef
24.
Kyei-Aboagye K, Vragovic O, Chong D. Birth outcome in incarcerated, high-risk pregnant women. J Reprod Med. 2000;45(3):190–4.PubMed
25.
Leifer D. The keys to care. Nursing Standard. 2003;18(13):14–15.
26.
Mertens DJ. Pregnancy outcomes of inmates in a large county jail setting. Public Health Nurs. 2001;18(1):45–53.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Rowles SaB, S. Birth Companions External Evaluation report. Sara Burns Associates. 2007.
28.
29.
Schroeder C, Bell J. Labor support for incarcerated pregnant women: the doula project. Prison J. 2005;85(3):311–28.CrossRef
30.
31.
Siefert K, Pimlott S. Improving pregnancy outcome during imprisonment: a model residential care program. Soc Work. 2001;46(2):125–34.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Terk JV, Martens MG, Williamson MA. Pregnancy outcomes of incarcerated women. J Matern Fetal Med. 1993;2(5):246–50.CrossRef
33.
Stauber M, Weingart B, Koubenec J. Pregnancy, labor and the puerperium in women prisoners. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1984;44(11):731–7.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Osborne OH. Jailed mothers: further explorations in public sector nursing. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 1995;33(8):23–8.PubMed
35.
36.
37.
Philipp E. Pregnancy in prison. Br J Clin Pract. 1985;39(9):331–4.PubMed
38.
Troisier S. H.I.V. Positive women in prison. Int Med J. 1996;3(2):95–6.
39.
Stein DJ. Babies behind bars: nurseries for incarcerated mothers and their children. Child Voice. 2010;19(4):10–3.
40.
Hromadka P. Innovative York program allows babies to stay with inmate moms. Nebr Nurse. 1995;28(2):14.PubMed
41.
Champion DJ. Women and Corrections (From Corrections in the United States: A Contemporary Perspective, Third Edition. United States: Prentice Hall; 2001.
42.
Services for Families of Prison Inmates. In. US National Institute of Corrections; 2002.
43.
Williams EF. Tie that binds - fostering the mother-child bond in a correctional setting. Corrections Today. 1996;58(6):80–1.
44.
Metzler DK. Neglected by the system: children of incarcerated mothers. Ill Bar J. 1994;82(8):428–32.
45.
Schupak TL. Women and children first - an examination of the unique needs of women in prison. Golden Gate Univ Law Rev. 1986;16(3):455–74.
46.
47.
Holmes RJ, L; Maclure, M; Browne, K: Styal Prison: Mother and Baby Unit: An appreciative inquiry. In.: Centre for Cultural Studies of Children and Childhood (CCSCC), Manchester Metropolitan University; 2011.
48.
Association WsP: Mothers, Infants and Imprisonment: A National Look at Prison Nurseries and Community-based alternatives. In. United States; 2009.
49.
Ferszt GG, Erickson-Owens DA. Development of an educational/support group for pregnant women in prison. J Forensic Nurs. 2008;4(2):55–60.PubMed
50.
Philipp E. Pregnancy in women prisoners. Br J Hosp Med. 1988;40(2):150.PubMed
51.
Fogel CI, Harris BG. Expecting in prison: preparing for birth under conditions of stress. JOGNN. 1986;15(6):454–8.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Gaido-Le Moullec N. Matriculation ZQ 06 “mother and son” or maternity in a penitentiary environment. Soins - Gynecologie, Obstetrique, Puericulture, Pediatrie. 1984;(39–40):57–65.
53.
Jolley BG, Brown LM, Byrnes C, Junod SP, Martin S, McBurney WT, McGrory JL. Care and management of pregnant women in custody. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48:110–1.CrossRef
54.
Low G, Williams D, Hare P, Imus T, Ott RE. Pregnant and incarcerated--telemedicine that serves and protects. Telemed E Health. 2008;14(Suppl1):36–7.
55.
Johannaber EL. Teaching prepared childbirth to women in prison. Int J Childbirth Educ. 2006;21(2):10–2.
56.
Wellisch J, Prendergast ML, Anglin MD. Jail: a found opportunity for intervening with drug-abusing pregnant women. J Correct Health Care. 1994;1:17–38.CrossRef
57.
Kropova O. Life behind bars: the soviet perspective. Corrections Today. 1990;52(4):133–4.
58.
Ashley R. Meeting the challenge: addressing the needs of pregnant women in the District of Columbia department of corrections. Am Jails. 1990;4(1):24–8.
59.
Augood CN M, Thomas K. NCT antenatal sessions at Styal prison, UK National Childbirth Trust. 2009.
60.
Geraghty S, Laurin RM, O’Conner A. The implementation of the first outreach antenatal clinic for incarcerated, substance-using pregnant women in Western Australia. Women Birth. 2013;26:S29–30.CrossRef
61.
Elson V, Bullock M. Adapting birth services for incarcerated mothers. Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 2012;101:20–3.PubMed
62.
Schroeder C, Bell J. Doula birth support for incarcerated pregnant women. Public Health Nurs. 2005;22(1):53–8.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Marshall D. Birth companions: working with women in prison giving birth. Br J Midwifery. 2010;18(4):225–8.CrossRef
64.
Morgan C. Mama Doula. Int J Childbirth Educ. 2006;21(2):13–4.
65.
66.
Parker K. Pregnant women inmates: evaluating their rights and identifying opportunities for improvements in their treatment. J Law Health. 2004;19(2):259–95.PubMed
67.
McGurrin MC. Pregnant inmates’ right to health care. N Engl J Crim Civil Confinement. 1994;20(1):163–94.
68.
Flanagan LW. Meeting the special needs of females in custody: Maryland’s unique approach. Fed Probation. 1995;59(2):49–53.
69.
Stein L, Mistiaen V. Pregnant in prison. Progressive. 1988;36(2):18–21.
70.
J N. Getting it right? Services for pregnant women, new mothers, and babies in prison. In. UK: The Maternity Alliance; 2006.
71.
Lorenzen D, Bracy K. MOMS plus: a public health program for substance using pregnant inmates in an urban jail. J Correct Health Care. 2011;17(3):233–40.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Cassidy J, Ziv Y, Stupica B, Sherman LJ, Butler H, Karfgin A, Cooper G, Hoffman KT, Powell B. Enhancing attachment security in the infants of women in a jail-diversion program. Attach Hum Dev. 2010;12(4):333–53.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Enright F, Boyle T, Murphy J. Babies behind bars; an Irish perspective. Ir Med J. 2007;100(1):327–8.PubMed
74.
Byrne MW, Goshin L, Blanchard-Lewis B. Maternal separations during the reentry years for 100 infants raised in a prison nursery. Fam Court Rev. 2012;50(1):77–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
75.
Goshin LS. Behavior problems and competence in preschoolers who spent their first one to eighteen months in a prison nursery program. Diss Abstr Int. 2011;72(5-B):2698.
76.
Frank ML. Therapeutic change at project pride: Residential substance abuse treatment from an attachment perspective. Diss Abstr Int. 2010;71(3-B):2046.
77.
Wiewel B, Mosley T. Family foundations: a New program for pregnant and parenting women offenders with substance abuse histories. J Offender Rehabil. 2006;43(1):65–91.CrossRef
78.
Gat I. Incarcerated mothers: effects of the Mother/Offspring Life Development program (MOLD) on recidivism, prosocial moral development, empathy, hope, and parent–child attachment. Diss Abstr Int. 2001;61(7-B):3878.
79.
Martin Prieto M, Bayona Garcia M, Barderas Marzal E. Pointers of health (psychical and physical) of children residents at the mother’s unit in Carabanchel prison. Revista de Psiquiatria Infanto Juvenil. 1996;3:166–71.
80.
Kubiak SP, Siefert K, Stewart A, Young A. Pregnant, substance-abusing, and incarcerated: exploratory study of a comprehensive approach to treatment. Fam Soc. 2004;85(2):177–86.CrossRef
81.
Borelli JL, et al. Attachment organization in a sample of incarcerated mothers: distribution of classifications and associations with substance abuse history, depressive symptoms, perceptions of parenting competency and social support. Attach Hum Dev. 2010;12(4):355–74. 2010.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
82.
Epp J. Exploring health care needs of adult female offenders. Corrections Today. 1996;58:96–7.
83.
McCall C, Casteel J, Shaw NS. Pregnancy in Prison: A Needs Assessment of Perinatal Outcome In Three California Penal Institutions. In. United States; 1985.
84.
85.
NYDOCS: Profile and three year follow-up of Bedford Hills and Taconic nursery program participants: 1997 and 1998 .In. United States; 1999.
86.
Kaminsky JO. Child disipline in a sample of previously incarcerated mothers who participated in a co-residential prison nursery program: a mixed methods study. United States: Johns Hopkins University; 2013.
87.
Parke RD, Clarke-Stewart KA. The effects of parental incarceration on children. In: Travis JaW M, editor. Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities. Washington: Urban Institute Press; 2003. p. 189–232.
88.
Cordero L, Hines S, Shibley KA, Landon MB. Duration of incarceration and perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;78(4):641–5.
89.
Hollowell J, Kurinczuk J, Oakley L, Brocklehurst P, Gray R. A systematic review of antenatal care programmes to reduce infant mortality and its major causes in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women. Oxford: NPEU; 2009.
90.
Armstrong MA, Osejo VG, Lieberman L, Carpenter DM, Pantoja PM, Escobar GJ. Perinatal substance abuse intervention in obstetric clinics decreases adverse neonatal outcomes. J Perinatol. 2003;23(1):3–9.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Edwards C, Chazotte C, Freda M, Shah L, Girz B, Damus K, Merkatz I. Impact of an inner-city, hospital-based preterm prevention program on preterm births in twin gestation. J Assoc Acad Minor Phys. 1994;6(2):78–81.
92.
Kafatos A, Tsitoura S, Pantelakis S, Doxiadis S, Baldwin C, El-Zanaty F, Ahmed Y, Adam A, Zhou L, Duraisamy P. Maternal and infant health education in a rural Greek community. Hygie. 1991;10(1):32–7.PubMed
93.
Keeton K, Saunders SE, Koltun D. The effect of the Family Case Management Program on 1996 birth outcomes in Illinois. J Womens Health. 2004;13(2):207–15.CrossRef
94.
Klerman LV, Ramey SL, Goldenberg RL, Marbury S, Hou J, Cliver SP. A randomized trial of augmented prenatal care for multiple-risk, Medicaid-eligible African American women. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(1):105–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
95.
Reece E, Lequizamon G, Silva J, Whiteman V, Smith D. Intensive interventional maternity care reduces infant morbidity and hospital costs. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;11(3):204–10.PubMedCrossRef
96.
Van Winter J, Harmon M, Atkinson E, Simmons P, Ogburn Jr P. Young moms’ clinic: a multidisciplinary approach to pregnancy education in teens and in young single women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1997;10(1):28–33.PubMedCrossRef
97.
Gray R. Life stage: Pre-conception and pregnancy. In: Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer 2012, Our Children Deserve Better: Prevention Pays. Chapter 5, London, UK: Department of Health. edn. Edited by Lemer C; 2013:1–13.
98.
Craig P, Dieppe P, MacIntyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance, Medical Research Council. 2008.
99.
Metadata
Title
Perinatal health care services for imprisoned pregnant women and associated outcomes: a systematic review
Authors
Eleanor Bard
Marian Knight
Emma Plugge
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1080-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Progress in the utilization of antenatal and delivery care services in Bangladesh: where does the equity gap lie?

Research article

Community and provider perceptions of traditional and skilled birth attendants providing maternal health care for pastoralist communities in Kenya: a qualitative study

Research article

Maternal near misses from two referral hospitals in Uganda: a prospective cohort study on incidence, determinants and prognostic factors

Research article

Prevalence and incidence of domestic violence during pregnancy and associated risk factors: a longitudinal cohort study in the south of Sweden

Research article

The impact of socioeconomic factors on the efficiency of voluntary toxoplasmosis screening during pregnancy: a population-based study

Research article

Examining the impact of introducing ICD-MM on observed trends in maternal mortality rates in the UK 2003–13