Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 12/2006

01-12-2006

Perianal Local Block for Stapled Anopexy

Authors: Roger Gerjy, M.D., Kristoffer Derwinger, M.D., Per-Olof Nyström, M.D., Ph.D.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 12/2006

Login to get access

Purpose

This study was designed to demonstrate the usefulness of a method of regional anesthesia for circular stapler anopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids.

Methods

Thirty-three patients consented to stapled anopexy under perianal local anesthesia. Eighteen patients with stapled anopexy under general anesthesia were controls. The perianal block was applied with 40 ml of ropivacaine, 4.75 mg/ml, injected immediately peripheral to the external sphincter. A submucosal block with 15 ml of ropivacaine, 2 mg/ml, was added after applying the pursestring suture. Postoperative pain was rated by the patient for 14 days by using a ten-point visual analogue scale. Patients also submitted a preoperative and postoperative (3–6 months) symptom questionnaire to rate anal symptoms.

Results

No operation was converted to general anesthesia. Operation time was similar in both groups. All patients in the local anesthesia group were pain free at discharge. The sums of pain scores during 14 days for daily average pain and peak pain were similar in both groups (average pain 23 (local anesthesia) vs. 35 (general anesthesia); peak pain 39 (local anesthesia) vs. 50 (general anesthesia); P > 0.05). The preoperative symptom scores were 7.8 (local anesthesia) vs. 8.9 (general anesthesia) points, and the follow-up scores were 2.2 (local anesthesia) and 2.7 (general anesthesia), a significant improvement (P = 0.001) in both groups but not different between groups.

Conclusions

A perianal local block is easy to apply and has a high degree of acceptance among patients. The operation time, postoperative pain, and success rates of the operation equaled those of stapled anopexy performed under general anesthesia. The advantages are quicker turnover between cases and simpler management of pain-free postoperative patients in day surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a new circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery; June 3–6, 1998; Rome. Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a new circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery; June 3–6, 1998; Rome.
2.
go back to reference Marti, MC 1993Loco-regional anesthesia in proctological surgery [in French]Ann Chir47250255PubMed Marti, MC 1993Loco-regional anesthesia in proctological surgery [in French]Ann Chir47250255PubMed
3.
go back to reference Gabrielli, F, Chiarelli, M, Cioffi, U, et al. 2001Day surgery for mucosal-hemorrhoidal prolapse using a circular stapler and modified regional anesthesiaDis Colon Rectum44842844PubMedCrossRef Gabrielli, F, Chiarelli, M, Cioffi, U,  et al. 2001Day surgery for mucosal-hemorrhoidal prolapse using a circular stapler and modified regional anesthesiaDis Colon Rectum44842844PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nyström, PO, Derwinger, K, Gerjy, R 2004Local perianal block for anal surgeryTech Coloproctol82326PubMedCrossRef Nyström, PO, Derwinger, K, Gerjy, R 2004Local perianal block for anal surgeryTech Coloproctol82326PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ganio, E, Altomare, DF, Gabrielli, F, et al. 2001Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg88669674PubMedCrossRef Ganio, E, Altomare, DF, Gabrielli, F,  et al. 2001Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg88669674PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hetzer, FH, Demartines, N, Handschin, AE, et al. 2002Stapled vs. excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trialArch Surg137337340PubMedCrossRef Hetzer, FH, Demartines, N, Handschin, AE,  et al. 2002Stapled vs. excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trialArch Surg137337340PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ho, YH, Cheong, WK, Tsang, C, et al. 2000Stapled hemorrhoidectomy-cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three monthsDis Colon Rectum4316661675PubMedCrossRef Ho, YH, Cheong, WK, Tsang, C,  et al. 2000Stapled hemorrhoidectomy-cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three monthsDis Colon Rectum4316661675PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mehigan, BJ, Monson, JR, Hartley, JE 2000Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trialLancet355782785PubMedCrossRef Mehigan, BJ, Monson, JR, Hartley, JE 2000Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trialLancet355782785PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pescatori, M 2002Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg89122PubMedCrossRef Pescatori, M 2002Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg89122PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rowsell, M, Bello, M, Hemingway, DM 2000Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trialLancet355779781PubMedCrossRef Rowsell, M, Bello, M, Hemingway, DM 2000Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trialLancet355779781PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shalaby, R, Desoky, A 2001Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg8810491053PubMedCrossRef Shalaby, R, Desoky, A 2001Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg8810491053PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gabrielli, F, Cioffi, U, Chiarelli, M, et al. 2000Hemorrhoidectomy with posterior perineal block: experience with 400 casesDis Colon Rectum43809812PubMedCrossRef Gabrielli, F, Cioffi, U, Chiarelli, M,  et al. 2000Hemorrhoidectomy with posterior perineal block: experience with 400 casesDis Colon Rectum43809812PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ho, KS, Eu, KW, Heah, SM, et al. 2000Randomized clinical trial of haemorrhoidectomy under a mixture of local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesiaBr J Surg87410413PubMedCrossRef Ho, KS, Eu, KW, Heah, SM,  et al. 2000Randomized clinical trial of haemorrhoidectomy under a mixture of local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesiaBr J Surg87410413PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Luck, AJ, Hewett, PJ 2000Ischiorectal fossa block decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain: randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical trialDis Colon Rectum43142145PubMedCrossRef Luck, AJ, Hewett, PJ 2000Ischiorectal fossa block decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain: randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical trialDis Colon Rectum43142145PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vinson-Bonnet, B, Coltat, JC, Fingerhut, A, et al. 2002Local infiltration with ropivacaine improves immediate postoperative pain control after hemorrhoidal surgeryDis Colon Rectum45104108PubMedCrossRef Vinson-Bonnet, B, Coltat, JC, Fingerhut, A,  et al. 2002Local infiltration with ropivacaine improves immediate postoperative pain control after hemorrhoidal surgeryDis Colon Rectum45104108PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Guy, RJ, Ng, CE, Eu, KW 2003Stapled anoplasty for haemorrhoids: a comparison of ambulatory vs. in-patient proceduresColorectal Dis52932PubMedCrossRef Guy, RJ, Ng, CE, Eu, KW 2003Stapled anoplasty for haemorrhoids: a comparison of ambulatory vs. in-patient proceduresColorectal Dis52932PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kairaluoma, M, Nuorva, K, Kellokumpu, I 2003Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcomeDis Colon Rectum469399PubMedCrossRef Kairaluoma, M, Nuorva, K, Kellokumpu, I 2003Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcomeDis Colon Rectum469399PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mlakar, B, Kosorok, P 2003Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy as a day surgical procedureTech Coloproctol7164168PubMedCrossRef Mlakar, B, Kosorok, P 2003Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy as a day surgical procedureTech Coloproctol7164168PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perianal Local Block for Stapled Anopexy
Authors
Roger Gerjy, M.D.
Kristoffer Derwinger, M.D.
Per-Olof Nyström, M.D., Ph.D.
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 12/2006
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0750-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2006

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 12/2006 Go to the issue

Editorial

Signing Off