Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2017

01-10-2017 | New Technology

Performance of Kymerax© precision-drive articulating surgical system compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments in a pelvitrainer model

Authors: Marco Alain Sieber, Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer, Michael Mueller

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Kymerax© Precision-Drive Articulating Surgical System by Terumo© is a handheld laparoscopic robot which permits motion in two additional degrees of freedom (deflection and rotation in the instrument tip). In a pelvitrainer model, we compared the performance of participants with different laparoscopic experiences and compared Kymerax© to conventional laparoscopic instruments.

Methods

20 expert surgeons, performing more than 50 laparoscopic procedures per year, and 25 medical students without any experience in surgery at all were selected. Each participant was randomized into two groups: Group TK performed the tasks using the traditional laparoscopic Instruments (TLI) first and Kymerax© thereafter, group KT vice versa. Six standardized tasks were used: Two instructional exercises and four tasks where time, number of mistakes, and overall precision were measured. Finally, a questionnaire had to be answered.

Results

All four tasks were performed significantly more slowly with the Kymerax© device. Improved needle control in stitches towards the surgeon, significantly less deviation while cutting along different lines as well as a significantly reduced fraying of the cutting edge were found when participants were using Kymerax©. By questionnaire more than 90% of the participants indicated clear advantages using Kymerax©. However, participants needed more training time and had an earlier loss of concentration with Kymerax©. Further complaints about Kymerax© were its limitations in rotation and deflection, the impaired view as well as the non-ergonomic instrument handle. Rotation force, instrument weight, digital instrument-tip control, and needle fixation were rated as accurate.

Conclusions

This study shows that more time is needed to solve tasks with Kymerax© compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments. Kymerax© is superior to conventional laparoscopy for suturing at difficult angles and cutting along complex structures. Kymerax© can potentially bring benefits for certain laparoscopic tasks, but as seen in this study, further developments are necessary. Terumo© meanwhile closed down its Kymerax© business.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zullo F, Falbo A, Palomba S (2012) Safety of laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:94–100CrossRefPubMed Zullo F, Falbo A, Palomba S (2012) Safety of laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:94–100CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Yeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D, Sobolewski C (2013) Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:79–84CrossRefPubMed Yeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D, Sobolewski C (2013) Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:79–84CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH (2012) Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:195–198CrossRefPubMed Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH (2012) Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:195–198CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pérez-Duarte FJ, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Díaz-Güemes Martín-Portugés I (2011) Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery and its importance in surgical training. Cir Esp 90:284–291CrossRefPubMed Pérez-Duarte FJ, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Díaz-Güemes Martín-Portugés I (2011) Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery and its importance in surgical training. Cir Esp 90:284–291CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Zhang L, Zhou N, Wang S (2013) Direct manipulation of tool-like masters for controlling a master-slave surgical robotic system. Int J Med Robot 10:427–437CrossRefPubMed Zhang L, Zhou N, Wang S (2013) Direct manipulation of tool-like masters for controlling a master-slave surgical robotic system. Int J Med Robot 10:427–437CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jiang ZW, Li JS (2012) Current status and future perspectives of robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer. Chin J gastrointest surg 15:776–777 Jiang ZW, Li JS (2012) Current status and future perspectives of robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer. Chin J gastrointest surg 15:776–777
7.
8.
go back to reference Frede T, Hammady A, Klein J (2006) The Radius Surgical System—a new device for complex minimally invasive procedures in urology? Eur Urol 51:1015–1022CrossRefPubMed Frede T, Hammady A, Klein J (2006) The Radius Surgical System—a new device for complex minimally invasive procedures in urology? Eur Urol 51:1015–1022CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Waseda M, Inaki N, Torres Bermudez JR (2007) Precision in stitches: Radius Surgical System. Surg Endosc 21:2056–2062CrossRefPubMed Waseda M, Inaki N, Torres Bermudez JR (2007) Precision in stitches: Radius Surgical System. Surg Endosc 21:2056–2062CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Inaki N, Waseda M, Schurr MO (2006) Experimental results of mesh fixation by a manual manipulator in a laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair model. Surg Endosc 21:197–201CrossRefPubMed Inaki N, Waseda M, Schurr MO (2006) Experimental results of mesh fixation by a manual manipulator in a laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair model. Surg Endosc 21:197–201CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Di Lorenzo N, Camperchioli I, Gaspari AL (2007) Radius Surgical System and conventional laparoscopic instruments in abdominal surgery: application, learning curve and ergonomy. Surg Oncol 16:69–72CrossRef Di Lorenzo N, Camperchioli I, Gaspari AL (2007) Radius Surgical System and conventional laparoscopic instruments in abdominal surgery: application, learning curve and ergonomy. Surg Oncol 16:69–72CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Torres Bermudez JR, Buess G, Waseda M (2009). Laparoscopic intacorporal colorectal sutured anastomosis using the Radius Surgical System in a phantom model. Surg Endosc 23(7):1624–1632CrossRef Torres Bermudez JR, Buess G, Waseda M (2009). Laparoscopic intacorporal colorectal sutured anastomosis using the Radius Surgical System in a phantom model. Surg Endosc 23(7):1624–1632CrossRef
14.
go back to reference 14 Bianchi PP, Luca F, Petz W (2013). The role of the robotic technique in minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancer. Encancermedicalscience 26:357.ssss 14 Bianchi PP, Luca F, Petz W (2013). The role of the robotic technique in minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancer. Encancermedicalscience 26:357.ssss
15.
go back to reference Shane MD, Pettitt BJ, Morgenthal CH (2008) Should surgical novices trade their retractors for joysticks? Videogame experience decreases the time needed to acquire surgical skills. Surg Endosc 22(5):1294–1297CrossRefPubMed Shane MD, Pettitt BJ, Morgenthal CH (2008) Should surgical novices trade their retractors for joysticks? Videogame experience decreases the time needed to acquire surgical skills. Surg Endosc 22(5):1294–1297CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Performance of Kymerax© precision-drive articulating surgical system compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments in a pelvitrainer model
Authors
Marco Alain Sieber
Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer
Michael Mueller
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5438-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2017 Go to the issue