Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 4/2013

01-10-2013 | Original Clinical Article

Percutaneous epiphysiodesis in the proximal tibia by a single-portal approach: evaluation by radiostereometric analysis

Authors: Joachim Horn, Ragnhild Beate Gunderson, Anders Wensaas, Harald Steen

Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We modified the method for tibial epiphysiodesis by solely using a lateral approach to the physis. From this small-incision approach, the lateral as well as the medial part of the tibial physis were ablated. The aim of our study was to see if this operative technique might be as effective as a bilateral approach, and reduce the operation time and usage time of the image intensifier. The epiphysiodeses were monitored by radiostereometric analysis (RSA), which is a well-established method for the analysis of micro movements and has been used to monitor percutaneous epiphysiodesis with the bilateral approach. There are no reports in the literature comparing single- with double-portal approaches for percutaneous epiphysiodesis evaluated by RSA.

Methods

Twenty children were treated by percutaneous epiphysiodesis for leg length discrepancies ranging from 15 to 70 mm, comprising 14 boys and 6 girls with a mean age of 13 (11–15) years. The timing of epiphysiodesis was determined by using Moseley’s straight-line graph and Paley’s multiplier method. For the tibial epiphysiodesis, ten patients were operated with a single surgical approach from the lateral side (Group I) and ten patients were operated with a surgical approach from both the medial and the lateral sides (Group II). The percutaneous epiphysiodesis was monitored by RSA, a method which allows analysis of the three-dimensional dynamics of the epiphysis relative to the metaphysics. RSA examinations were performed postoperatively and after 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months.

Results

From 0 to 6 weeks after epiphysiodesis, the mean longitudinal growth across the operated physis in the tibia in Group I was 0.26 (0.01–0.6) mm. In Group II, the mean growth for the first 6 weeks after surgery was 0.17 (0.01–0.5) mm. During the time period from 6 weeks to 12 weeks after surgery, there was a mean growth of 0.06 (0.00–0.18) mm in Group I and 0.03 (0.00–0.2) mm in Group II. The mean growth from 0 to 6 weeks after epiphysiodesis for all patients was 0.22 mm, which corresponds to 30 % of the normal growth rate. From 6 to 12 weeks, the mean growth for all patients was 0.046 mm, i.e., 6 % of the normal growth rate. From 12 weeks to 24 weeks, no significant growth across the operated physis was observed in neither Group I nor Group II. The mean surgical time was 26 (21–30) min in Group I and 43 (35–48) min in Group II. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.006). The mean time for use of the image intensifier during surgery was 202 (191–236) s in Group I and 229 (185–289) s in Group II (p = 0.013).

Conclusions

In our study, a single-portal technique from the lateral side for percutaneous epiphysiodesis of the proximal tibia was as effective as the double-portal technique. Actual growth arrest appeared within 12 weeks after surgery. A single-portal technique for epiphysiodesis of the tibia is a safe technique, with less surgical time and less time for image intensification compared to the double-portal technique.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Phemister DB (1933) Operative arrestment of longitudinal growth of bones in the treatment of deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 15:1–15 Phemister DB (1933) Operative arrestment of longitudinal growth of bones in the treatment of deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 15:1–15
2.
go back to reference White JW, Stubbins SG (1944) Growth arrest for equalizing leg lengths. J Am Med Assoc 124:1146–1149CrossRef White JW, Stubbins SG (1944) Growth arrest for equalizing leg lengths. J Am Med Assoc 124:1146–1149CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Blount WP, Clarke GR (1949) Control of bone growth by epiphyseal stapling; a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 31A:464–478 Blount WP, Clarke GR (1949) Control of bone growth by epiphyseal stapling; a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 31A:464–478
4.
go back to reference Métaizeau JP, Wong-Chung J, Bertrand H et al (1998) Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS). J Pediatr Orthop 18:363–369 Métaizeau JP, Wong-Chung J, Bertrand H et al (1998) Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS). J Pediatr Orthop 18:363–369
5.
go back to reference Bowen JR, Johnson WJ (1984) Percutaneous epiphysiodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (190):170–173 Bowen JR, Johnson WJ (1984) Percutaneous epiphysiodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (190):170–173
6.
go back to reference Edmonds EW, Stasikelis PJ (2007) Percutaneous epiphysiodesis of the lower extremity: a comparison of single- versus double-portal techniques. J Pediatr Orthop 27:618–622CrossRef Edmonds EW, Stasikelis PJ (2007) Percutaneous epiphysiodesis of the lower extremity: a comparison of single- versus double-portal techniques. J Pediatr Orthop 27:618–622CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gabriel KR, Crawford AH, Roy DR et al (1994) Percutaneous epiphyseodesis. J Pediatr Orthop 14:358–362CrossRef Gabriel KR, Crawford AH, Roy DR et al (1994) Percutaneous epiphyseodesis. J Pediatr Orthop 14:358–362CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Selvik G (1989) Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 232:1–51CrossRef Selvik G (1989) Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 232:1–51CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lauge-Pedersen H, Hägglund G, Johnsson R (2006) Radiostereometric analysis for monitoring percutaneous physiodesis. A preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1502–1507CrossRef Lauge-Pedersen H, Hägglund G, Johnsson R (2006) Radiostereometric analysis for monitoring percutaneous physiodesis. A preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1502–1507CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Timperlake RW, Bowen JR, Guille JT et al (1991) Prospective evaluation of fifty-three consecutive percutaneous epiphysiodeses of the distal femur and proximal tibia and fibula. J Pediatr Orthop 11:350–357CrossRef Timperlake RW, Bowen JR, Guille JT et al (1991) Prospective evaluation of fifty-three consecutive percutaneous epiphysiodeses of the distal femur and proximal tibia and fibula. J Pediatr Orthop 11:350–357CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Moseley CF (1977) A straight-line graph for leg-length discrepancies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:174–179 Moseley CF (1977) A straight-line graph for leg-length discrepancies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:174–179
12.
go back to reference Paley D, Bhave A, Herzenberg JE et al (2000) Multiplier method for predicting limb-length discrepancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:1432–1446 Paley D, Bhave A, Herzenberg JE et al (2000) Multiplier method for predicting limb-length discrepancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:1432–1446
13.
go back to reference Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Stanford University Press, Stanford Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Stanford University Press, Stanford
14.
go back to reference Digas G, Kärrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P (2003) Highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented THA: randomized study of 61 hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res (417):126–138 Digas G, Kärrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P (2003) Highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented THA: randomized study of 61 hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res (417):126–138
15.
go back to reference Menelaus MB (1966) Correction of leg length discrepancy by epiphysial arrest. J Bone Joint Surg Br 48:336–339 Menelaus MB (1966) Correction of leg length discrepancy by epiphysial arrest. J Bone Joint Surg Br 48:336–339
16.
go back to reference Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L et al (2005) Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop 76:563–572CrossRef Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L et al (2005) Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop 76:563–572CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Scott AC, Urquhart BA, Cain TE (1996) Percutaneous vs modified Phemister epiphysiodesis of the lower extremity. Orthopedics 19:857–861 Scott AC, Urquhart BA, Cain TE (1996) Percutaneous vs modified Phemister epiphysiodesis of the lower extremity. Orthopedics 19:857–861
18.
go back to reference Surdam JW, Morris CD, DeWeese JD et al (2003) Leg length inequality and epiphysiodesis: review of 96 cases. J Pediatr Orthop 23:381–384 Surdam JW, Morris CD, DeWeese JD et al (2003) Leg length inequality and epiphysiodesis: review of 96 cases. J Pediatr Orthop 23:381–384
19.
go back to reference Canale ST, Russell TA, Holcomb RL (1986) Percutaneous epiphysiodesis: experimental study and preliminary clinical results. J Pediatr Orthop 6:150–156CrossRef Canale ST, Russell TA, Holcomb RL (1986) Percutaneous epiphysiodesis: experimental study and preliminary clinical results. J Pediatr Orthop 6:150–156CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Percutaneous epiphysiodesis in the proximal tibia by a single-portal approach: evaluation by radiostereometric analysis
Authors
Joachim Horn
Ragnhild Beate Gunderson
Anders Wensaas
Harald Steen
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1863-2521
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2548
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-013-0502-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 4/2013 Go to the issue