Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Article

Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Versus Conservative Treatment for Acute Cholecystitis: a Cohort Study

Authors: Stine Ydegaard Turiño, Daniel Mønsted Shabanzadeh, Nethe Malik Eichen, Stine Lundgaard Jørgensen, Lars Tue Sørensen, Lars Nannestad Jørgensen

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous cholecystostomy is frequently used as a treatment option for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients unfit for surgery. There is sparse evidence on the long-term impact of cholecystostomy on gallstone-related morbidity and mortality in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. This study describes the long-term outcome of acute calculous cholecystitis following percutaneous cholecystostomy compared to conservative treatment.

Methods

This was a cohort study of patients admitted at our institution from 2006 to 2015 with acute calculous cholecystitis without early or delayed cholecystectomy. Endpoints were gallstone-related readmissions, recurrent cholecystitis, and overall mortality.

Results

The investigation included 201 patients of whom 97 (48.2%) underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy. Patients in the cholecystostomy group had significantly higher age, comorbidity level, and inflammatory response at admission. The median duration of catheter placement in the cholecystostomy group was 6 days. The complication rate of cholecystostomy was 3.1% and the mortality during the index admission was 3.5%. The median follow-up was 1.6 years. The rate of gallstone-related readmissions was 38.6%, and 25.3% had recurrence of cholecystitis. Cox regression analyses revealed no significant differences in gallstone-related readmissions, recurrence of acute calculous cholecystitis, and overall mortality in the two groups.

Conclusions

Percutaneous cholecystostomy in the treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis was neither associated with long-term benefits nor complications. Based on the high gallstone-related readmission rates of this study population and todays perioperative improvements, we suggest rethinking the indications for non-operative management including percutaneous cholecystostomy in acute calculous cholecystitis.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Itoi T, Tsuyuguchi T, Takada T, et al. TG13 indications and techniques for biliary drainage in acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 71–80.CrossRefPubMed Itoi T, Tsuyuguchi T, Takada T, et al. TG13 indications and techniques for biliary drainage in acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 71–80.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Yamashita Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007; 14: 91–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yamashita Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007; 14: 91–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Atar E, Bachar GN, Berlin S, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis: Complications and late outcome. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: e247–52.CrossRefPubMed Atar E, Bachar GN, Berlin S, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis: Complications and late outcome. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: e247–52.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Horn T, Christensen SD, Kirkegård J, Larsen LP, Knudsen AR, Mortensen F V. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective treatment option for acute calculous cholecystitis: A 10-year experience. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17: 326–31.CrossRefPubMed Horn T, Christensen SD, Kirkegård J, Larsen LP, Knudsen AR, Mortensen F V. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective treatment option for acute calculous cholecystitis: A 10-year experience. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17: 326–31.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Zerem E, Omerović S. Can percutaneous cholecystostomy be a definitive management for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients?. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 2014; 24: 187–91.CrossRef Zerem E, Omerović S. Can percutaneous cholecystostomy be a definitive management for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients?. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 2014; 24: 187–91.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Granlund A, Karlson BM, Elvin A, Rasmussen I. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk surgical patients. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 2001; 386: 212–7.CrossRef Granlund A, Karlson BM, Elvin A, Rasmussen I. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk surgical patients. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 2001; 386: 212–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sanjay P, Mittapalli D, Marioud A, White RD, Ram R, Alijani A. Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: A multicentre analysis. Hpb 2013; 15: 511–6.CrossRefPubMed Sanjay P, Mittapalli D, Marioud A, White RD, Ram R, Alijani A. Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: A multicentre analysis. Hpb 2013; 15: 511–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Smith TJ, Manske JG, Mathiason MA, Kallies KJ, Kothari SN. Changing trends and outcomes in the use of percutaneous cholecystostomy tubes for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 1112–5.CrossRefPubMed Smith TJ, Manske JG, Mathiason MA, Kallies KJ, Kothari SN. Changing trends and outcomes in the use of percutaneous cholecystostomy tubes for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 1112–5.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hatzidakis AA, Prassopoulos P, Petinarakis I, et al. Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: Percutaneous cholecystostomy vs conservative treatment. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1778–84.CrossRefPubMed Hatzidakis AA, Prassopoulos P, Petinarakis I, et al. Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: Percutaneous cholecystostomy vs conservative treatment. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1778–84.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 35–46.CrossRefPubMed Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 35–46.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mazeh H, Mizrahi I, Dior U, et al. Role of antibiotic therapy in mild acute calculus cholecystitis: A prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2012;36:1750–59.CrossRefPubMed Mazeh H, Mizrahi I, Dior U, et al. Role of antibiotic therapy in mild acute calculus cholecystitis: A prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2012;36:1750–59.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference STROBE statement - Checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies (STROBE Initiative). Int J Public Health 2008; 53: 3–4. STROBE statement - Checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies (STROBE Initiative). Int J Public Health 2008; 53: 3–4.
14.
go back to reference Boland GW, Lee MJ, Leung J, Mueller PR. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in critically ill patients: Early response and final outcome in 82 patients. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 339–42.CrossRef Boland GW, Lee MJ, Leung J, Mueller PR. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in critically ill patients: Early response and final outcome in 82 patients. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 339–42.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference van Overhagen H, Meyers H, Tilanus HW, Jeekel J, Laméris JS. Percutaneous cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis and an increased surgical risk. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1996; 19: 72–6.CrossRefPubMed van Overhagen H, Meyers H, Tilanus HW, Jeekel J, Laméris JS. Percutaneous cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis and an increased surgical risk. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1996; 19: 72–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Winbladh A, Gullstrand P, Svanvik J, Sandström P. Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis. HPB (Oxford) 2009; 11: 183–93.CrossRef Winbladh A, Gullstrand P, Svanvik J, Sandström P. Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis. HPB (Oxford) 2009; 11: 183–93.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ambe PC, Kaptanis S, Papadakis M, Weber SA, Jansen S, Zirngibl H. The treatment of critically Ill patients with acute cholecystitis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2016; 113: 545–51.PubMedPubMedCentral Ambe PC, Kaptanis S, Papadakis M, Weber SA, Jansen S, Zirngibl H. The treatment of critically Ill patients with acute cholecystitis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2016; 113: 545–51.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Loozen CS, Van Ramshorst B, Van Santvoort HC, Boerma D. Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the elderly population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig. Surg 2017; 34: 371–9.CrossRefPubMed Loozen CS, Van Ramshorst B, Van Santvoort HC, Boerma D. Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the elderly population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig. Surg 2017; 34: 371–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kortram K, van Ramshorst B, Bollen TL, et al. Acute cholecystitis in high risk surgical patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CHOCOLATE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012; 13: 7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kortram K, van Ramshorst B, Bollen TL, et al. Acute cholecystitis in high risk surgical patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CHOCOLATE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012; 13: 7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Versus Conservative Treatment for Acute Cholecystitis: a Cohort Study
Authors
Stine Ydegaard Turiño
Daniel Mønsted Shabanzadeh
Nethe Malik Eichen
Stine Lundgaard Jørgensen
Lars Tue Sørensen
Lars Nannestad Jørgensen
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-4021-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2019 Go to the issue