Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Perceptions and experiences of using a nipple shield among parents and staff – an ethnographic study in neonatal units

Authors: Renée Flacking, Fiona Dykes

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Preterm infants have an immature sucking behavior and the capacity to be exclusively breastfed may be reduced for a period of weeks or months, depending on gestational age. Nipple shields have been used, not only as a device to help mothers with sore nipples, but also to facilitate the infant’s latch on to the breast. However, the benefits of using nipple shields have been debated. The aim of this study was to explore perceptions and experiences of using a nipple shield among parents and staff in neonatal units in Sweden and England.

Methods

An ethnographic study was undertaken where observations and interviews were conducted in four neonatal units in Sweden and England. The data were analyzed using a thematic networks analysis.

Result

The global theme was developed and named, ‘Nipple shield in a liminal time’. This comprised of two organizing themes: ‘Relational breastfeeding’ and ‘Progression’. ‘Relational breastfeeding’ was underpinned by the basic themes, ‘good enough breast’, ‘something in between’ and ‘tranquil moment’. ‘Progression’ was underpinned by the basic themes, ‘learning quicker’, ‘short-term solution’ and ‘rescue remedy’. Although breastfeeding was seen primarily as a nutritive transaction, the relational aspects of breastfeeding were of crucial importance. These two organizing themes show the tension between acknowledging the relational aspects of breastfeeding and yet facilitating or supporting the progression of breastfeeding in the period from tube feeding or cup feeding to breastfeeding. It is a liminal time as mothers and their infants are “in between” phases and the outcome, in terms of breastfeeding, is yet to be realized.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates parents’ and staffs’ perceptions of the nipple shield as a short term solution to help initiation of breastfeeding but also as a barrier between the mother and infant. It is important that the mother and baby’s own particular needs are taken into account, in a person-centred way and on an ongoing basis. Furthermore, we need to emphasise the importance of the ‘relational’ whilst understanding the need for ‘progression’. Holding these in balance may be the key to appropriate use of the nipple shield.
Literature
1.
Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, Naylor AJ, O’Hare D, Schanler RJ, et al. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2):496–506.CrossRefPubMed
2.
World Health Organization. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
3.
Delobel-Ayoub M, Kaminski M, Marret S, Burguet A, Marchand L, N’Guyen S, et al. Behavioral outcome at 3 years of age in very preterm infants: the EPIPAGE study. Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):1996–2005.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Ringborg A, Berg J, Norman M, Westgren M, Jonsson B. Preterm birth in Sweden: what are the average lengths of hospital stay and the associated inpatient costs? Acta paediatr. 2006;95(12):1550–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Nyqvist KH. Early attainment of breastfeeding competence in very preterm infants. Acta paediatr. 2008;97(6):776–81.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Eglash A, Ziemer AL, Chevalier A. Health professionals’ attitudes and use of nipple shields for breastfeeding women. Breastfeed med. 2010;5(4):147–51.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Kronborg H, Foverskov E, Nilsson I, Maastrup R. Why do mothers use nipple shields and how does this influence duration of exclusive breastfeeding? Matern Child Nutr. 2016; doi: 10.​1111/​mcn.​12251
9.
Meier PP, Brown LP, Hurst NM, Spatz DL, Engstrom JL, Borucki LC, et al. Nipple shields for preterm infants: effect on milk transfer and duration of breastfeeding. J hum lact. 2000;16(2):106–14.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Maastrup R, Hansen BM, Kronborg H, Bojesen SN, Hallum K, Frandsen A, et al. Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding of preterm infants. Results from a prospective national cohort study. Plos one. 2014;9(2):e89077.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Nyqvist KH, Haggkvist AP, Hansen MN, Kylberg E, Frandsen AL, Maastrup R, et al. Expansion of the baby-friendly hospital initiative ten steps to successful breastfeeding into neonatal intensive care: expert group recommendations. J hum lact. 2013;29(3):300–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Flacking R, Dykes F. ‘Being in a womb’ or ‘playing musical chairs’: the impact of place and space on infant feeding in NICUs. BMC pregnancy childbirth. 2013;13:179.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
The National Board of Health and Welfare. Breast-feeding and smoking habits among parents of infants born in 2012. Stockholm: Centre for Epidemiology; 2014.
14.
Spradley J. Participant observation. UK: Cengage Learning; 1980.
15.
Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual res. 2001;1(3):385–405.CrossRef
16.
Dykes F, Flacking R. Encouraging breastfeeding: a relational perspective. Early hum dev. 2010;86(11):733–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Dykes F. ‘Supply’ and ‘demand’: breastfeeding as labour. Soc sci med. 2005;60(10):2283–93.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Flacking R, Ewald U, Nyqvist KH, Starrin B. Trustful bonds: a key to “becoming a mother” and to reciprocal breastfeeding. Stories of mothers of very preterm infants at a neonatal unit. Soc sci med. 2006;62(1):70–80.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Schmied V, Beake S, Sheehan A, McCourt C, Dykes F. Women’s perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support: a metasynthesis. Birth. 2011;38(1):49–60.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 2007.
21.
Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1985.
22.
Flacking R, Dykes F. Cross-national ethnography in neonatal intensive care units. In: Dykes F, Flacking R, editors. Ethnographic research in maternal and child health. London: Routledge; 2015.
Metadata
Title
Perceptions and experiences of using a nipple shield among parents and staff – an ethnographic study in neonatal units
Authors
Renée Flacking
Fiona Dykes
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1183-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

The prevalence and risk factors of preterm small-for-gestational-age infants: a population-based retrospective cohort study in rural Chinese population

Research article

Causal explanations of miscarriage amongst Qataris

Research article

Relationships between parental sleep quality, fatigue, cognitions about infant sleep, and parental depression pre and post-intervention for infant behavioral sleep problems

Correction

Correction to: Protocol for the Emory University African American Vaginal, oral, and gut microbiome in pregnancy cohort study

Research article

Sociodemographic factors and pregnancy outcomes associated with prepregnancy obesity: effect modification of parity in the nationwide Epifane birth-cohort

Research article

Folic acid usage and associated factors in the prevention of neural tube defects among pregnant women in Ethiopia: cross-sectional study