Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Perception of peer physical examination in two Australian osteopathy programs

Authors: Brett Vaughan, Sandra Grace

Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Peer physical examination (PPE) is an efficient and practical educational approach whereby students can practise their examination skills on each other before commencing clinical practice with actual patients. Little is known about the use of PPE in osteopathy education.

Methods

Students in Year 1 of the osteopathy programs at Victoria University (Melbourne, Australia) and Southern Cross University (Lismore, Australia) completed the Examining Fellow Students and the Peer Physical Examination questionnaires prior to, and at the completion of, their first 12-week teaching session. Descriptive statistics were generated for each questionnaire. The McNemar and sign tests were used to evaluate differences between each questionnaire administration. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of demographics on responses to both questionnaires.

Results

Results showed that students in both programs were generally willing to examine non-sensitive areas both before and after the 12-week teaching session. Students’ were less apprehensive about PPE at the end of the teaching session, and this was reinforced by results for previous exposure to PPE in other courses. Consistent with previous studies, unwillingness to participate in PPE was associated with being female, being born outside Australia, holding religious beliefs, and being older.

Conclusions

This is the first study to explore students’ perceptions of PPE in this cohort and provides a basis for further work, including evaluating longer term changes in student perception of PPE, and whether these perceptions extend to practising manual therapy techniques. This study demonstrates that perceptions about PPE reported in medicine and other disciplines, namely that unwillingness to participate in PPE is associated with being female, being born outside Australia, holding religious beliefs, and being older, also apply to osteopathy. These findings are significant for all manual therapy students who spend a substantial portion of their course developing skills in PPE and practising manual therapy techniques. They highlight the need for curriculum development that acknowledges the importance of good practice in PPE, including discussions about body image, feedback skills training for educators, and providing detailed information to students about what to expect in practical skills classes before they commence their course.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wearn AM, Bhoopatkar H, Mathew TK, Stewart L. Exploration of the attitudes of nursing students to peer physical examination and physical examination of patients. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:884–8.CrossRefPubMed Wearn AM, Bhoopatkar H, Mathew TK, Stewart L. Exploration of the attitudes of nursing students to peer physical examination and physical examination of patients. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:884–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Delany C, Frawley H. A process of informed consent for student learning through peer physical examination in pelvic floor physiotherapy practice. Physiothera. 2012;98:33–9.CrossRef Delany C, Frawley H. A process of informed consent for student learning through peer physical examination in pelvic floor physiotherapy practice. Physiothera. 2012;98:33–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Consorti F, Mancuso R, Piccolo A, Consorti G, Zurlo J. Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Consorti F, Mancuso R, Piccolo A, Consorti G, Zurlo J. Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Braunack‐Mayer AJ. Should medical students act as surrogate patients for each other? Med Educ. 2001;35:681–6.CrossRefPubMed Braunack‐Mayer AJ. Should medical students act as surrogate patients for each other? Med Educ. 2001;35:681–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rees CE, Bradley P, Collett T, McLachlan JC. “Over my dead body?”: the influence of demographics on students’ willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Med Teach. 2005;27:599–605.CrossRefPubMed Rees CE, Bradley P, Collett T, McLachlan JC. “Over my dead body?”: the influence of demographics on students’ willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Med Teach. 2005;27:599–605.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wearn A, Vnuk A. Medical Students and Peer Physical Examination: Two Case Studies of Strategies to Improve Safety and Increase Acceptance. Focus Health Prof Educ. 2005;7:88–98. Wearn A, Vnuk A. Medical Students and Peer Physical Examination: Two Case Studies of Strategies to Improve Safety and Increase Acceptance. Focus Health Prof Educ. 2005;7:88–98.
7.
go back to reference Wearn AM, Rees CE, Bradley P, Vnuk AK. Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework. Med Educ. 2008;42:1218–26.CrossRefPubMed Wearn AM, Rees CE, Bradley P, Vnuk AK. Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework. Med Educ. 2008;42:1218–26.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wearn A, Bhoopatkar H. Evaluation of consent for peer physical examination: Students reflect on their clinical skills learning experience. Med Educ. 2006;40:957–64.CrossRefPubMed Wearn A, Bhoopatkar H. Evaluation of consent for peer physical examination: Students reflect on their clinical skills learning experience. Med Educ. 2006;40:957–64.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rees CE, Wearn AM, Vnuk AK, Bradley PA. Don’t want to show fellow students my naughty bits: Medical students’ anxieties about peer examination of intimate body regions at six schools across UK, Australasia and Far-East Asia. Med Teach. 2009;31:921–7.CrossRefPubMed Rees CE, Wearn AM, Vnuk AK, Bradley PA. Don’t want to show fellow students my naughty bits: Medical students’ anxieties about peer examination of intimate body regions at six schools across UK, Australasia and Far-East Asia. Med Teach. 2009;31:921–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Koehler N, McMenamin C. The need for a peer physical examination policy within Australian medical schools. Med Teach. 2014;36:430–3.CrossRefPubMed Koehler N, McMenamin C. The need for a peer physical examination policy within Australian medical schools. Med Teach. 2014;36:430–3.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference O’Neill A, Larcombe C, Duffy K, Dorman T. Medical students’ willingness and reactions to learning basic skills through examining fellow students. Med Teach. 1998;20:433–7.CrossRef O’Neill A, Larcombe C, Duffy K, Dorman T. Medical students’ willingness and reactions to learning basic skills through examining fellow students. Med Teach. 1998;20:433–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chang EH, Power DV. Are medical students comfortable with practicing physical examinations on each other? Acad Med. 2000;75:384–9.CrossRefPubMed Chang EH, Power DV. Are medical students comfortable with practicing physical examinations on each other? Acad Med. 2000;75:384–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Burke SR, Myers R, Zhang AL. A profile of osteopathic practice in Australia 2010–2011: a cross sectional survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:1–10.CrossRef Burke SR, Myers R, Zhang AL. A profile of osteopathic practice in Australia 2010–2011: a cross sectional survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:1–10.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wearn A, Bhoopatkar H. Experience of a peer physical examination policy within a New Zealand medical programme. Med Teach. 2014;36:826–7.CrossRefPubMed Wearn A, Bhoopatkar H. Experience of a peer physical examination policy within a New Zealand medical programme. Med Teach. 2014;36:826–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hendry GJ. Barriers to undergraduate peer-physical examination of the lower limb in the health sciences and strategies to improve inclusion: a review. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2013;18:807–15.CrossRef Hendry GJ. Barriers to undergraduate peer-physical examination of the lower limb in the health sciences and strategies to improve inclusion: a review. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2013;18:807–15.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Reid KJ, Kgakololo M, Sutherland RM, Elliott SL, Dodds AE. First-year medical students’ willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24:55–62.CrossRefPubMed Reid KJ, Kgakololo M, Sutherland RM, Elliott SL, Dodds AE. First-year medical students’ willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24:55–62.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Zinbarg RE, Revelle W, Yovel I, Li W. Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika. 2005;70:123–33.CrossRef Zinbarg RE, Revelle W, Yovel I, Li W. Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika. 2005;70:123–33.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Power DV, Center BA. Examining the medical student body: peer physical exams and genital, rectal, or breast exams. Teach Learn Med. 2005;17:337–43.CrossRefPubMed Power DV, Center BA. Examining the medical student body: peer physical exams and genital, rectal, or breast exams. Teach Learn Med. 2005;17:337–43.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Rees CE, Wearn AM, Vnuk AK, Sato TJ. Medical students’ attitudes towards peer physical examination: Findings from an international cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14:103–21.CrossRef Rees CE, Wearn AM, Vnuk AK, Sato TJ. Medical students’ attitudes towards peer physical examination: Findings from an international cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14:103–21.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Chinnah TI, De Bere SR, Collett T. Students’ views on the impact of peer physical examination and palpation as a pedagogic tool for teaching and learning living human anatomy. Med Teach. 2011;33:e27–36.CrossRefPubMed Chinnah TI, De Bere SR, Collett T. Students’ views on the impact of peer physical examination and palpation as a pedagogic tool for teaching and learning living human anatomy. Med Teach. 2011;33:e27–36.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Metcalf NF, Prentice ED, Metcalf WK, Stinson WW. Peer group models in examination instruction as an integral part of medical gross anatomy. Acad Med. 1982;57:641–4.CrossRef Metcalf NF, Prentice ED, Metcalf WK, Stinson WW. Peer group models in examination instruction as an integral part of medical gross anatomy. Acad Med. 1982;57:641–4.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Outram S, Nair BR. Peer physical examination: time to revisit. Med J Aust. 2008;189:274–6.PubMed Outram S, Nair BR. Peer physical examination: time to revisit. Med J Aust. 2008;189:274–6.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Rees CE. The influence of gender on student willingness to engage in peer physical examination: The practical implications of feminist theory of body image. Med Educ. 2007;41:801–7.CrossRefPubMed Rees CE. The influence of gender on student willingness to engage in peer physical examination: The practical implications of feminist theory of body image. Med Educ. 2007;41:801–7.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Chen JY, Yip AL, Lam CL, Patil NG. Does medical student willingness to practise peer physical examination translate into action? Med Teach. 2011;33:e528–40.CrossRefPubMed Chen JY, Yip AL, Lam CL, Patil NG. Does medical student willingness to practise peer physical examination translate into action? Med Teach. 2011;33:e528–40.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Rees CE, Bradley P, McLachlan JC. Short communication Exploring medical students’ attitudes towards peer physical examination. Med Teach. 2004;26:86–8.CrossRefPubMed Rees CE, Bradley P, McLachlan JC. Short communication Exploring medical students’ attitudes towards peer physical examination. Med Teach. 2004;26:86–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference McLachlan J, White P, Donnelly L, Patten D. Student attitudes to peer physical examination: A qualitative study of changes in expressed willingness to participate. Med Teach. 2010;32:e101–5.CrossRefPubMed McLachlan J, White P, Donnelly L, Patten D. Student attitudes to peer physical examination: A qualitative study of changes in expressed willingness to participate. Med Teach. 2010;32:e101–5.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Barnette JJ, Kreiter CD, Schuldt SS. Student attitudes toward same-gender versus mixed-gender partnering in practicing physical examination skills. Eval Health Prof. 2000;23:360–70.CrossRef Barnette JJ, Kreiter CD, Schuldt SS. Student attitudes toward same-gender versus mixed-gender partnering in practicing physical examination skills. Eval Health Prof. 2000;23:360–70.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Revelle W, Zinbarg RE. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika. 2009;74:145–54.CrossRef Revelle W, Zinbarg RE. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika. 2009;74:145–54.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Zinbarg RE, Yovel I, Revelle W, McDonald RP. Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale’s indicators: A comparison of estimators for ωh. Appl Psychol Meas. 2006;30:121–44.CrossRef Zinbarg RE, Yovel I, Revelle W, McDonald RP. Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale’s indicators: A comparison of estimators for ωh. Appl Psychol Meas. 2006;30:121–44.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Carnes D, Mars TS, Mullinger B, Froud R, Underwood M. Adverse events and manual therapy: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010;15:355–63.CrossRefPubMed Carnes D, Mars TS, Mullinger B, Froud R, Underwood M. Adverse events and manual therapy: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010;15:355–63.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Perception of peer physical examination in two Australian osteopathy programs
Authors
Brett Vaughan
Sandra Grace
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2045-709X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0102-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2016 Go to the issue