Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Perceived health and work-environment related problems and associated subjective production loss in an academic population

Authors: Malin Lohela-Karlsson, Lotta Nybergh, Irene Jensen

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim was to investigate the prevalence of health problems and work environment problems and how these are associated with subjective production loss among women and men at an academic workplace. An additional aim was to investigate whether there were differences between women and men according to age group, years at current workplace, academic rank or managerial position.

Methods

A questionnaire was sent in 2011 to all employees at a Swedish university (n = 5144). Only researchers and teachers were included in the study (n = 3207). Spearman correlations were performed to investigate differences in health and work environment problems. Employees who reported having experienced work environment or health problems in the previous seven days (n = 1475) were included in the analyses in order to investigate differences in subjective production loss. This was done using Student’s t-test, One-way Anova and generalized linear models.

Results

The response rate was 63% (n = 2022). A total of 819 academic staff (40% of the population) reported experiencing either health problems, work environment problems or both during the previous seven days. The prevalence of health problems only or a combination of work environment and health problems was higher among women than men (p-value ˂0.05). This was especially the case for younger women, those in lower academic positions and those who had worked for fewer years at their current workplace. No difference was found for work environment problems. The majority of the employees who reported problems said that these problems affected their ability to perform at work (84–99%). The average production loss varied between 31 and 42% depending on the type of problem. Production loss due to health-related and work-environment related problems was highest among junior researchers and managers. No significant difference between men and women was found in the level of production loss.

Conclusion

Subjective production loss in academia can be associated with health and work- environment problems. These losses appear similar for women and men even though younger female academics, women in lower academic ranks and those with fewer years of employment in their current workplace report a higher prevalence of health problems and combined work-environment and health problems than men.
Literature
1.
Reed D, et al. Gender differences in academic productivity and leadership appointments of physicians throughout academic careers. Acad Med. 2011;86(1):43–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Eloy J, et al. Gender disparities in research productivity among 9952 academic physicians. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:1865–75.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Keith B, et al. The context of scientific achievement: sex status,organizational environments, and the timing of publication on scholarship outcomes. Social Forces. 2002;80(4):1253–82.CrossRef
5.
Bentley JT, Adamson R. In: VA, editor. Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review. Arlington: National Science Foundation; 2003.
6.
Taylor S, Fender B, Burke K. Unraveling the academic productivity of economists: the opportunity costs of teaching and service. South Econ J. 2006;72(4):846–59.CrossRef
7.
Snell C, et al. Gender differences in research productivity among criminal justice and criminology scholars. J Crim Just. 2009;37(3):288–95.CrossRef
8.
Stack S. Gender and scholarly productivity: the case of criminal justice. J Crim Just. 2002;30:175–82.CrossRef
9.
Nakhaie M. Gender differences in publication among university professors in Canada. Can Rev Sociol Anthropol. 2002;39(2):151–79.CrossRef
10.
Ginther D, Hayes K. Gender differences in salary and promotion in the humanities. Am Econ Rev. 1999;89(2):397–402.CrossRef
11.
Bland CJ, et al. A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Acad Med. 2005;80(3):225–37.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Corley EA. How do career strategies, gender, and work environment affect faculty productivity levels in university-based science centers? Rev Pol Res. 2005;22(5):637–55.CrossRef
13.
Rothausen-Vange TJ, Marler JH, Wright PM. Research productivity, gender, family, and tenure in organization science careers. Sex Roles. 2005;53(9):727–38.CrossRef
14.
DesRoches C, et al. Activities, productivity, and compensation of men and women in the life sciences. Acad Med. 2010;85(4):631–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Leah E. Gender differences in productivity - Research Specialization as a Missing Link. Gend Soc. 2006;20(6):754–80.CrossRef
16.
Fox M. Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Soc Stud Sci. 2005;35(1):131–50.CrossRef
17.
Sax LJ, et al. Faculty research productivity: exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Res High Educ. 2002;43(4):423–46.CrossRef
18.
Hunter LA, Leahey E. Parenting and research productivity: new evidence and methods. Soc Stud Sci. 2010;40(3):433–51.CrossRef
19.
van Arensbergen P, van der Weijden I, van den Besselaar P. Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon? Scientometrics. 2012;93:857–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Ryan J, Hurley J. An empirical examination of the relationship between scientists' work environment and research performance. R&D Manag. 2007;37(4):345–54.CrossRef
21.
Widenberg L. Psykosocial arbetsmiljö och vetenskaplig produktivitet (eng: Psychosocial work environment and scientific productivity), in Department of Psychology. Göteborg: Gothenburg University; 2003. p. 113.
22.
Clarke M, Kenny A, Loxley A. Creating a supportive working environment for academics in higher education. In: Country Report Ireland. Dublin: The Teachers’ Union of Ireland & Irish Federation of University Teachers; 2015.
23.
Fridner A, et al. Possible reasons why female physicians publish fewer scientific articles than male physicians. BMC Med Educ. 2015;2(15):67.CrossRef
24.
Lohela Karlsson M, Hagberg J, Bergström G. Production loss among employees perceiving work environment problems. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014.
25.
Aronsson G, Gustafsson K, Dallner M. Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54(7):502–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Kessler R, et al. Using the World Health Organization health and work performance questionnaire (HPQ) to evaluate the indirect workplace costs of illness. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46(6):23–37.CrossRef
27.
Hemp P. Presenteeism: at work--but out of it. Harv Bus Rev. 2004;82(10):49–58. 155PubMed
28.
Karlsson M, et al. Production loss due to ill-health and work environment problems – construct validity and implications. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(12):1475–83.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Lohela Karlsson M, et al. Validation of a measure of health-related production loss: construct validity and responsiveness – a cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1148).
30.
Aboagye E, et al. Validity and test–retest reliability of an at-work production loss instrument. Occup Med. 2016;02.
31.
Jones MK, et al. Work-related health risks in Europe: are older workers more vulnerable? Soc Sci Med. 2013;88:18–29.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Thorsen SV, et al. A one-item workability measure mediates work demands, individual resources and health in the prediction of sickness absence. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013;86(7):755–66.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Robertson I, et al. Poor health but not absent: prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of presenteeism. J Occup Environ Med. 2012;54(11):1344–9.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Li CY, Sung FC. A review of the healthy worker effect in occupational epidemiology. Occup Med. 1999;49(4):225–9.CrossRef
35.
Carr PL, et al. A "ton of feathers": gender discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it. J Women's Health. 2004;12(10):1009–18.CrossRef
36.
Levine R, et al. Stories from early-career women physicians who have left academic medicine: a qualitative study at a single institution. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):752–8.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Rossiter MW. The Matthew Matilda effect in science. Soc Stud Sci. 1993;23(2).
38.
Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38(1):21–37.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Courtenay W. Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(10):1385–401.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Tang K. Estimating productivity costs in health economic evaluations: a review of instruments and psychometric evidence. PharmacoEconomics. 2015;33(1):31–48.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Kessler RC, et al. The World Health Organization health and work performance questionnaire (HPQ). J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:156–74.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Perceived health and work-environment related problems and associated subjective production loss in an academic population
Authors
Malin Lohela-Karlsson
Lotta Nybergh
Irene Jensen
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5154-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

The impact of a social norms approach on reducing levels of misperceptions around smokefree hospital entrances amongst patients, staff, and visitors of a NHS hospital: a repeated cross-sectional survey study

Research article

Gender difference in health related quality of life and associated factors among people living with HIV/AIDS attending anti-retroviral therapy at public health facilities, western Ethiopia: comparative cross sectional study

Research article

Prevalence of breast-related symptoms, health care seeking behaviour and diagnostic needs among women in Burkina Faso

Research article

Hand hygiene in hospitals: an observational study in hospitals from two southern states of India

Research article

Economic evaluation of a dietary intervention for adults with major depression (the “SMILES” trial)

Research article

Mapping the global health employment market: an analysis of global health jobs