Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Urology Reports 6/2010

01-11-2010

Penile Prosthesis Infection: Progress in Prevention and Treatment

Author: John J. Mulcahy

Published in: Current Urology Reports | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Almost four decades ago, modern penile implants were introduced as a treatment of erectile dysfunction. Infection associated with placement of an implant is a feared complication, and fortunately, has become less common due to a number of measures, including antibiotic-coated devices and chlorhexidine–alcohol skin preparation. When an infection around an implant occurs, the device should be removed. An option, termed a salvage (or rescue) procedure, is cleansing the wound with a series of antiseptic solutions and replacing a new prosthesis during the same procedure, with success in the range of 85%. The alternative is to return at a later date to replace the implant. However, the latter approach is associated with a difficult insertion, a shorter erection, and a less satisfied patient. Most patients elected the salvage approach because they were highly motivated to continue sexual activity to have the implant placed initially.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carson CC, Robertson CN: Late hematogenous infection of penile prostheses. J Urol 1988, 139:50–52.PubMed Carson CC, Robertson CN: Late hematogenous infection of penile prostheses. J Urol 1988, 139:50–52.PubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Thomalla JV, Thompson ST, Rowland RG, Mulcahy JJ: Infectious complications of penile prosthetic implants. J Urol 1987, 138:65–67.PubMed Thomalla JV, Thompson ST, Rowland RG, Mulcahy JJ: Infectious complications of penile prosthetic implants. J Urol 1987, 138:65–67.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Henry GD, Wilson SK, Delk JR 2nd, et al.: Penile prosthesis culture during revision surgery: multicenter study. J Urol 2004, 172:153–156.CrossRefPubMed Henry GD, Wilson SK, Delk JR 2nd, et al.: Penile prosthesis culture during revision surgery: multicenter study. J Urol 2004, 172:153–156.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fallon B, Ghanem H: Sexual performance and satisfaction with penile prostheses in impotence of various etiologies. Int J Impot Res 1990, 2:35–42. Fallon B, Ghanem H: Sexual performance and satisfaction with penile prostheses in impotence of various etiologies. Int J Impot Res 1990, 2:35–42.
7.
go back to reference Bishop JR, Moul JW, Sihelnik SA, et al.: Use of glycosylated hemoglobin to identify diabetics at high risk for penile prosthetic infections. J Urol 1992, 147:386–388.PubMed Bishop JR, Moul JW, Sihelnik SA, et al.: Use of glycosylated hemoglobin to identify diabetics at high risk for penile prosthetic infections. J Urol 1992, 147:386–388.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Wilson SK, Carson CC, Cleves MA, Delk JR 2nd: Quantifying risks of penile prosthesis infection with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. J Urol 1998, 159:1537–1540.CrossRefPubMed Wilson SK, Carson CC, Cleves MA, Delk JR 2nd: Quantifying risks of penile prosthesis infection with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. J Urol 1998, 159:1537–1540.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Diokno AC, Sonda LP: Compatibility of genitourinary prostheses and intermittent self catheterization. J Urol 1981, 125:659–660.PubMed Diokno AC, Sonda LP: Compatibility of genitourinary prostheses and intermittent self catheterization. J Urol 1981, 125:659–660.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Dietzen CJ, Lloyd LK: Complications of intracavernous injections and penile prostheses in spinal cord injured men. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1992, 73:652–655. Dietzen CJ, Lloyd LK: Complications of intracavernous injections and penile prostheses in spinal cord injured men. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1992, 73:652–655.
11.
go back to reference Zermann DH, Kutzenberger J, Sauerwein D, et al.: Penile prosthetic surgery in neurologically impaired patients: long term follow up. J Urol 2006, 175:1041–1044.CrossRefPubMed Zermann DH, Kutzenberger J, Sauerwein D, et al.: Penile prosthetic surgery in neurologically impaired patients: long term follow up. J Urol 2006, 175:1041–1044.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sidi AA, Peng W, Sanseau C, Lange PH: Penile prosthesis surgery in the treatment of immunosuppressed men. J Urol 1987, 137:681–682.PubMed Sidi AA, Peng W, Sanseau C, Lange PH: Penile prosthesis surgery in the treatment of immunosuppressed men. J Urol 1987, 137:681–682.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Sadeghi-Nejad H, Ilbeigi P, Wilson SK, et al.: Multi-institutional outcome on the efficacy of closed suction drainage of the scrotum in three piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res 2005, 17:535–538.CrossRefPubMed Sadeghi-Nejad H, Ilbeigi P, Wilson SK, et al.: Multi-institutional outcome on the efficacy of closed suction drainage of the scrotum in three piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res 2005, 17:535–538.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference •• Darouiche RO, Wall MJ, Kamal MF, et al.: Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:18–26. This study shows that a more effective skin preparation is obtained with chlorhexidine–alcohol solutions than previously used mixtures. This will become the standard for surgical skin preparation. CrossRefPubMed •• Darouiche RO, Wall MJ, Kamal MF, et al.: Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:18–26. This study shows that a more effective skin preparation is obtained with chlorhexidine–alcohol solutions than previously used mixtures. This will become the standard for surgical skin preparation. CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mulcahy JJ: Surgical management of penile prosthesis complications. Int J Imp Res 2000, 12(Suppl 4):108–111.CrossRef Mulcahy JJ: Surgical management of penile prosthesis complications. Int J Imp Res 2000, 12(Suppl 4):108–111.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference • Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, et al.: Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 2008, 179:1379–1390. (Published erratum appears in J Urol 2008, 180:2262–2263). The American Urological Association Guidelines Committee on Prophylactic Antibiotics has made recommendations for the use of antibiotics in conjunction with prosthetic procedures in this manuscript. • Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, et al.: Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 2008, 179:1379–1390. (Published erratum appears in J Urol 2008, 180:2262–2263). The American Urological Association Guidelines Committee on Prophylactic Antibiotics has made recommendations for the use of antibiotics in conjunction with prosthetic procedures in this manuscript.
17.
go back to reference •• Siegrist TC, Kwon EO, Fracchia JA, Eid JF: No touch technique: a novel technique for reducing postoperative infections in patients receiving multicomponent inflatable penile prostheses (abstract 1173). J Urol 2008, 179(Suppl 4):404. This abstract demonstrates that the skin is the source of prosthetic infections and that compulsive skin draping reduces the incidence of these infections. CrossRef •• Siegrist TC, Kwon EO, Fracchia JA, Eid JF: No touch technique: a novel technique for reducing postoperative infections in patients receiving multicomponent inflatable penile prostheses (abstract 1173). J Urol 2008, 179(Suppl 4):404. This abstract demonstrates that the skin is the source of prosthetic infections and that compulsive skin draping reduces the incidence of these infections. CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Carson CC 3 rd: Efficacy of antibiotic impregnation of inflatable penile prostheses in decreasing infection in original implants. J Urol 2004, 171:1611–1614. (Published erratum appears in J Urol 2004, 172:781.) Carson CC 3 rd: Efficacy of antibiotic impregnation of inflatable penile prostheses in decreasing infection in original implants. J Urol 2004, 171:1611–1614. (Published erratum appears in J Urol 2004, 172:781.)
19.
go back to reference •• Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Harsch M: Seven year outcomes: infection reduction with original antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile implants (poster 79). J Sex Med 2010, 7(Suppl 1):36. This poster shows the dramatic reduction in infection rate with antibiotic-coated implants versus noncoated implants. •• Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Harsch M: Seven year outcomes: infection reduction with original antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile implants (poster 79). J Sex Med 2010, 7(Suppl 1):36. This poster shows the dramatic reduction in infection rate with antibiotic-coated implants versus noncoated implants.
20.
go back to reference •• Mulcahy JJ, Carson CC, Harsch M: Long term infection prevention outcomes in diabetic patients using antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile prosthesis: 7 year outcomes [poster 80]. J Sex Med 2010, 7(Suppl 1):36. This poster demonstrates that people with diabetes have a higher incidence of penile implant infection compared with the whole implant population, and antibiotic-coated devices are even more effective in reducing the implant infection rate in this subgroup. •• Mulcahy JJ, Carson CC, Harsch M: Long term infection prevention outcomes in diabetic patients using antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile prosthesis: 7 year outcomes [poster 80]. J Sex Med 2010, 7(Suppl 1):36. This poster demonstrates that people with diabetes have a higher incidence of penile implant infection compared with the whole implant population, and antibiotic-coated devices are even more effective in reducing the implant infection rate in this subgroup.
21.
go back to reference Wolter CE, Hellstrom WJ: The hydrophilic coated inflatable penile prosthesis: one year experience. J Sex Med 2004, 1:221–224.CrossRefPubMed Wolter CE, Hellstrom WJ: The hydrophilic coated inflatable penile prosthesis: one year experience. J Sex Med 2004, 1:221–224.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference •• Richardson B, Caire A, Hellstrom W: Retrospective long-term analysis of Titan hydrophilic coating: positive reduction of infection compared to non-coated device [poster 51]. J Sex Med 2010, 7(Suppl 1):28. This poster demonstrates that dipping hydrophilic-coated implants in antibiotic solutions before insertion is effective in bringing antibiotics into the wound and significantly reducing the implant infection rate compared with nonhydrophilic devices. •• Richardson B, Caire A, Hellstrom W: Retrospective long-term analysis of Titan hydrophilic coating: positive reduction of infection compared to non-coated device [poster 51]. J Sex Med 2010, 7(Suppl 1):28. This poster demonstrates that dipping hydrophilic-coated implants in antibiotic solutions before insertion is effective in bringing antibiotics into the wound and significantly reducing the implant infection rate compared with nonhydrophilic devices.
23.
go back to reference John T, Rajpurkar A, Fairfax M, Dhabuwala C: Inflatable penile prosthesis components: an in vitro comparative study of antibacterial activity [poster 39]. J Sex Med 2008, 5(Suppl 1):35. John T, Rajpurkar A, Fairfax M, Dhabuwala C: Inflatable penile prosthesis components: an in vitro comparative study of antibacterial activity [poster 39]. J Sex Med 2008, 5(Suppl 1):35.
24.
go back to reference Fishman IJ, Scott FB, Selim AM: Rescue procedure: an alternative to complete removal for treatment of infected penile prosthesis [abstract 396]. J Urol 1987, 137(Suppl 4):202. Fishman IJ, Scott FB, Selim AM: Rescue procedure: an alternative to complete removal for treatment of infected penile prosthesis [abstract 396]. J Urol 1987, 137(Suppl 4):202.
25.
go back to reference Kim JC, Lunati FP, Kahn, SA Waltzer WC: T-tube drainage of infected corporal chambers. Urology 1995, 45:314–315.CrossRef Kim JC, Lunati FP, Kahn, SA Waltzer WC: T-tube drainage of infected corporal chambers. Urology 1995, 45:314–315.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Maatman TJ, Montague DK: Intracorporal drainage after removal of infected penile prosthesis. Urology 1984, 23:184–185.CrossRefPubMed Maatman TJ, Montague DK: Intracorporal drainage after removal of infected penile prosthesis. Urology 1984, 23:184–185.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Brant MD, Ludlow JK, Mulcahy JJ: The prosthesis salvage operation: immediate replacement of the infected penile prosthesis. J Urol 1996, 155:155–157.CrossRefPubMed Brant MD, Ludlow JK, Mulcahy JJ: The prosthesis salvage operation: immediate replacement of the infected penile prosthesis. J Urol 1996, 155:155–157.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Fishman IJ, Scott FB, Selim AM, Nguyen TA: Contemp Urol 1997, 11:77–80. Fishman IJ, Scott FB, Selim AM, Nguyen TA: Contemp Urol 1997, 11:77–80.
29.
go back to reference Henry GD, Carson CC, Wilson SK, et al.: Revision washout decreases implant capsule tissue culture positivity: a multicenter study. J Urol 2008, 179:186–190.CrossRefPubMed Henry GD, Carson CC, Wilson SK, et al.: Revision washout decreases implant capsule tissue culture positivity: a multicenter study. J Urol 2008, 179:186–190.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Knoll LD: Penile prosthesis infection: management by delayed and immediate salvage technique. Urology 1998, 52:287–290.CrossRefPubMed Knoll LD: Penile prosthesis infection: management by delayed and immediate salvage technique. Urology 1998, 52:287–290.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Furlow WL, Goldwasser B: Salvage of eroded inflatable penile prosthesis: a new concept. J Urol 1987, 138:312–314.PubMed Furlow WL, Goldwasser B: Salvage of eroded inflatable penile prosthesis: a new concept. J Urol 1987, 138:312–314.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Penile Prosthesis Infection: Progress in Prevention and Treatment
Author
John J. Mulcahy
Publication date
01-11-2010
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Urology Reports / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-010-0140-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Current Urology Reports 6/2010 Go to the issue