Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery 6/2019

01-12-2019 | Original Article

Pelvic Exenterations for Cervical Cancer Recurrences—a Safe Option in Indian Scenario

Authors: P. Rema, S. Suchetha, Arun Peter Mathew, Preethy George, Aleyamma Mathew, Shaji Thomas

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Cervical cancer is still a major health problem in India with majority of patients presenting with locally advanced stages. Management of local recurrences of cervical cancer after chemoradiation is a challenging task. Pelvic exenteration is a radical surgery with en bloc resection of pelvic organs is an accepted treatment modality for local recurrence of cervical cancer. In a low-resource country like India where alternate treatment modalities like chemotherapy and targeted therapy are unaffordable to these patients, this radical surgery may be the only treatment modality which gives long-term survival benefit. The aim of the study is to evaluate the morbidity and survival outcome following pelvic exenteration in patients with recurrent cervical cancer in our institution. After obtaining institutional review board approval, a retrospective audit was conducted of all patients who underwent pelvic exenterative surgery for recurrent cervical cancer in our institution from January 2007 to December 2017. The parameters assessed were age of the patient, histologic type and grade, stage of disease, surgical procedures performed, type of reconstruction, intra-operative complications, length of hospital stay, and post-operative morbidity. Patients were followed until March 2017. Survival time was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of last contact or death. Survival estimation was done by Kaplan-Meier method. Between 2007 and 2017, 30 patients underwent the surgery. Mean age of the cohort was 50.9 years (range 33–67 years). Histological type was squamous cell carcinoma in 23 and adenocarcinoma in 7 patients. Twelve patients had anterior exenteration, one had posterior and 17 had total exenteration. The mean operating time was 367.3 min (210–600 min). No post-operative mortality was observed. Post-operative complications were seen in 66.6% of which the most common was of the urinary tract including 4 patients with recurrent urosepsis, one patient with obstructive uropathy and acute renal failure necessitating laparotomy and ureteric reimplantation. Two patients developed fistulae, one urinary and one bowel. Median follow-up time was 27.5 months (1.8–99.1 months). A five-year overall survival for the cohort was 60.5%. It is suggested that pelvic exenteration is an effective technique with reasonable long-term survival benefit and acceptable morbidity in selected patients with cervical cancer recurrence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127:2893–2917CrossRef Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127:2893–2917CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hong JH, Tsai CS, Lai CH, Chang TC, Wang CC, Chou HH, Lee SP, Hsueh S (2004) Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma after definitive radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:249–257CrossRef Hong JH, Tsai CS, Lai CH, Chang TC, Wang CC, Chou HH, Lee SP, Hsueh S (2004) Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma after definitive radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:249–257CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Qiu J-T, Abdullah NA, Chou H-H, Lin C-T, Jung S-M, Wang C-C, Chen M-Y, Huang K-G, Chang T-C, Lai C-H (2012) Outcomes and prognosis of patients with recurrent cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 127:472–477CrossRef Qiu J-T, Abdullah NA, Chou H-H, Lin C-T, Jung S-M, Wang C-C, Chen M-Y, Huang K-G, Chang T-C, Lai C-H (2012) Outcomes and prognosis of patients with recurrent cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 127:472–477CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Webb MJ, Symmonds RE (1980) Site of recurrence of cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138(7 Pt 1):813–817CrossRef Webb MJ, Symmonds RE (1980) Site of recurrence of cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138(7 Pt 1):813–817CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brunschwig A (1948) Complete excision of pelvic viscera for advanced carcinoma. Cancer 1:177–183CrossRef Brunschwig A (1948) Complete excision of pelvic viscera for advanced carcinoma. Cancer 1:177–183CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sharma S, Odunsi K, Driscoll D et al (2005) Pelvic exenteration for gyneco-logical malignancies: twenty-year experience at Rosewell Park Cancer Institute. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:475–482CrossRef Sharma S, Odunsi K, Driscoll D et al (2005) Pelvic exenteration for gyneco-logical malignancies: twenty-year experience at Rosewell Park Cancer Institute. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:475–482CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marnitz S, Dowdy S, Lanowska M, Schneider A, Podratz K, Köhler C (2009) Exenterations 60 years after first description: results of a survey among US and German gynecologic oncology centers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19:974–977CrossRef Marnitz S, Dowdy S, Lanowska M, Schneider A, Podratz K, Köhler C (2009) Exenterations 60 years after first description: results of a survey among US and German gynecologic oncology centers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19:974–977CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Carter MF, Dalton DP, Garnett JE (1989) Simultaneous diversion of the urinary and fecal streams utilizing a single abdominal stoma: the double-barreled wet colostomy. J Urol 141:1189–1191CrossRef Carter MF, Dalton DP, Garnett JE (1989) Simultaneous diversion of the urinary and fecal streams utilizing a single abdominal stoma: the double-barreled wet colostomy. J Urol 141:1189–1191CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Averette HE, Lichtinger M, Sevin BU, Girtanner RE (1984) Pelvic exenteration: a 15-year experience in a general metropolitan hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150(2):179–184CrossRef Averette HE, Lichtinger M, Sevin BU, Girtanner RE (1984) Pelvic exenteration: a 15-year experience in a general metropolitan hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150(2):179–184CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chiantera V, Rossi M, De Iaco P et al (2014) Morbidity after pelvic exen-teration for gynecological malignancies: a retrospective multicentric study of 230 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer : Official J Int Gynecol Cancer Soc 24:156–164CrossRef Chiantera V, Rossi M, De Iaco P et al (2014) Morbidity after pelvic exen-teration for gynecological malignancies: a retrospective multicentric study of 230 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer : Official J Int Gynecol Cancer Soc 24:156–164CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Berek JS, Howe C, Lagasse LD, Hacker NF (2005) Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecological malignancy: survival and morbidity analysis of the 45 year experience at UCLA. Gynecol Oncol 99(1):153–159CrossRef Berek JS, Howe C, Lagasse LD, Hacker NF (2005) Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecological malignancy: survival and morbidity analysis of the 45 year experience at UCLA. Gynecol Oncol 99(1):153–159CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schmidt AM, Imesch P, Fink D, Egger H (2012) Indications and long-term clinical outcomes in 282 patients with pelvic exenteration for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 125(3):604–609CrossRef Schmidt AM, Imesch P, Fink D, Egger H (2012) Indications and long-term clinical outcomes in 282 patients with pelvic exenteration for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 125(3):604–609CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Goldberg GL, Sukumvanich P, Einstein MH, Smith HO, Anderson PS, Fields AL (2006) Total pelvic exenteration: the Albert Ein-stein College of Medicine/Montefiore medical center experience. Gynecol Oncol 101:261–268CrossRef Goldberg GL, Sukumvanich P, Einstein MH, Smith HO, Anderson PS, Fields AL (2006) Total pelvic exenteration: the Albert Ein-stein College of Medicine/Montefiore medical center experience. Gynecol Oncol 101:261–268CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bladou F, Houvenaeghel G, Delpero JR et al (1995) Incidence and management of major urinary complications after pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies. J Surg Oncol 58:91–96CrossRef Bladou F, Houvenaeghel G, Delpero JR et al (1995) Incidence and management of major urinary complications after pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies. J Surg Oncol 58:91–96CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Soper JT, Berchuck A, Creasman WT, Clarke-Pearson DL (1989) Pelvic exenteration: factors associated with major surgical morbidity. Gynecol Oncol 35:93–98CrossRef Soper JT, Berchuck A, Creasman WT, Clarke-Pearson DL (1989) Pelvic exenteration: factors associated with major surgical morbidity. Gynecol Oncol 35:93–98CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Carter MF, Dalton DP, Garnett JE (1994) The double barreled wet colostomy: long-term experience with the first 11 patients. J Urol 152(6 pt 2):2312–2315CrossRef Carter MF, Dalton DP, Garnett JE (1994) The double barreled wet colostomy: long-term experience with the first 11 patients. J Urol 152(6 pt 2):2312–2315CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Golda T, Biondo S, Kreisler E, Frago R, Fraccalvieri D, Millan M (2010) Follow-up of double-barreled wet colostomy after pelvic exenteration at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum 5(3):822–829CrossRef Golda T, Biondo S, Kreisler E, Frago R, Fraccalvieri D, Millan M (2010) Follow-up of double-barreled wet colostomy after pelvic exenteration at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum 5(3):822–829CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Guimaraes GC, Ferreira FO, Rossi BM, Aguiar S, Zequi SC, Bachega W, Nakagawa WT, Fonseca FP, Sarkis AS, Lopes A (2006) Double-barreled wet colostomy is a safe option for simultaneous urinary and fecal diversion. Analysis of 56 procedures from a single institution. J Surg Oncol 93:206–211CrossRef Guimaraes GC, Ferreira FO, Rossi BM, Aguiar S, Zequi SC, Bachega W, Nakagawa WT, Fonseca FP, Sarkis AS, Lopes A (2006) Double-barreled wet colostomy is a safe option for simultaneous urinary and fecal diversion. Analysis of 56 procedures from a single institution. J Surg Oncol 93:206–211CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chokshi RJ, Kuhrt MP, Schmidt C, Arrese D, Routt M, Parks L, Bahnson R, Martin EW Jr (2011) Single institution experience comparing double-barreled wet colostomy to ileal conduit for urinary and fecal diversion. Urology 78:856–862CrossRef Chokshi RJ, Kuhrt MP, Schmidt C, Arrese D, Routt M, Parks L, Bahnson R, Martin EW Jr (2011) Single institution experience comparing double-barreled wet colostomy to ileal conduit for urinary and fecal diversion. Urology 78:856–862CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Shingleton HM, Soong SJ, Gelder MS et al (Jun 1989) Clinical and histopathologic factors predicting recurrence and survival after pelvic exenteration for cancer of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 73(6):1027–1034PubMed Shingleton HM, Soong SJ, Gelder MS et al (Jun 1989) Clinical and histopathologic factors predicting recurrence and survival after pelvic exenteration for cancer of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 73(6):1027–1034PubMed
Metadata
Title
Pelvic Exenterations for Cervical Cancer Recurrences—a Safe Option in Indian Scenario
Authors
P. Rema
S. Suchetha
Arun Peter Mathew
Preethy George
Aleyamma Mathew
Shaji Thomas
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-018-1853-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Indian Journal of Surgery 6/2019 Go to the issue