Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Study protocol

Peer specialists deliver cognitive behavioral social skills training compared to social skills training and treatment as usual to veterans with serious mental illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Chantele Mitchell-Miland, Sharon McCarthy, Matthew Chinman

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Serious mental illness (SMI) affects 4.6% of the American population. While treatments are available, adherence to specific regimens is often suboptimal. Multiple organizations, such as the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), have called for more options that improve accessibility and engagement to treatment among individuals with SMI. This study protocol answers such calls by testing the effectiveness of peer specialists—individuals with SMI trained to use their experience to help others with SMI—in delivering social skills training (SST) and cognitive behavioral social skills training (CBSST), evidence-based treatments effective at engaging individuals with SMI to make behavioral and cognitive changes. Peer specialists have been shown to be adept at engaging those with SMI in treatment; however, their ability to deliver these structured treatments is unknown.

Methods

This study is a randomized, hybrid 1, research assistant-blinded, superiority trial. A total of 252 veterans with SMI will be recruited and randomized to one of three arms: CBSST-Peer vs. SST-Peer vs. treatment as usual. Participants randomized to CBSST-Peer or SST-Peer will participate in a 20-week group-based intervention that meets weekly for a 60-min class. All participants will complete 4 study assessments at baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks, and 32 weeks. A multidimensional battery of functional outcomes will be used with the Independent Living Skills Survey (ILSS) as the primary outcome measure. Post-study completion, veterans who participated in the CBSST-Peer or SST-Peer arms will randomly be invited to participate in focus groups, and peer specialists will complete interviews to further assess the effectiveness of each intervention.

Discussion

Improving care and outcomes for individuals with SMI is a national priority. To improve care, it is imperative to think about new ways to improve engagement and accessibility to care. This study provides an innovative solution to this problem by evaluating how two different types of treatment, delivered by peer specialists, compare to usual care. The results of the study will allow for the expansion of treatment options that improve access and engagement among veterans with SMI.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: results from the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP19-5068, NSDUH Series H-54). Rockville: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2019.
2.
Velligan DI, et al. Why do psychiatric patients stop antipsychotic medication? A systematic review of reasons for nonadherence to medication in patients with serious mental illness. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:449–68.CrossRef
3.
Interdepartmental Serious Mental Illness Coordinating Committee. The way forward: federal action for a system that works for all people living with SMI and SED and their families and caregivers. Rockville: SAMSHA; 2017.
4.
Chinman M, et al. Peer support services for individuals with serious mental illnesses: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(4):429–41.CrossRef
5.
Klee A, Chinman M, Kearney L. Peer specialist services: new frontiers and new roles. Psychol Serv. 2019;16(3):353–9.CrossRef
6.
Granholm EL, McQuaid JR, Holden JL. Cognitive-behavioral social skills training for schizophrenia: a practical treatment guide. New York: Guilford Publications; 2016.
7.
Granholm E, et al. Randomized clinical trial of cognitive behavioral social skills training for schizophrenia: improvement in functioning and experiential negative symptoms. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014;82(6):1173–85.CrossRef
8.
Granholm E, et al. Randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral social skills training for older consumers with schizophrenia: defeatist performance attitudes and functional outcome. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;21(3):251–62.CrossRef
9.
Granholm E, Holden J, Worley M. Improvement in negative symptoms and functioning in cognitive-behavioral social skills training for schizophrenia: mediation by defeatist performance attitudes and asocial beliefs. Schizophr Bull. 2018;44(3):653–61.CrossRef
10.
Granholm E, et al. Neuropsychological predictors of functional outcome in cognitive behavioral social skills training for older people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2008;100(1-3):133–43.CrossRef
11.
Granholm E, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of cognitive behavioral social skills training for middle-aged and older outpatients with chronic schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(3):520–9.CrossRef
12.
Granholm E, et al. Randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral social skills training for older people with schizophrenia: 12-month follow-up. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68(5):730–7.CrossRef
13.
Herman Y, et al. Cognitive-behavioural social skills training for first-episode psychosis: a feasibility study. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018;12(5):863–8.CrossRef
14.
Chinman M, McCarthy S, Holden J, Link P, Granholm E. Pilot test of using peer specialists to deliver cognitive-behavioral social skills training. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2019;22:168–78.
15.
Benton MK, Schroeder HE. Social skills training with schizophrenics: a meta-analytic evaluation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990;58(6):741–7.CrossRef
16.
Kurtz MM, Mueser KT. A meta-analysis of controlled research on social skills training for schizophrenia. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008;76(3):491–504.CrossRef
17.
Curran GM, et al. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217–26.CrossRef
18.
Katzman R, et al. Validation of a short orientation-memory-concentration test of cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry. 1983;140(6):734–9.CrossRef
19.
Fervaha G, Remington G. Validation of an abbreviated quality of life scale for schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;23(9):1072–7.CrossRef
20.
Zanello A, et al. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (version 4.0) factorial structure and its sensitivity in the treatment of outpatients with unipolar depression. Psychiatry Res. 2013;210(2):626–33.CrossRef
21.
Kring AM, et al. The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS): final development and validation. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(2):165–72.CrossRef
22.
Arns P, et al. The IAPSRS toolkit: development, utility, and relation to other performance measurement systems. Members of the IAPSRS Research Committee. International Association of Psychological Rehabilitation Services. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001;25(1):43–52.CrossRef
23.
Cane DB, et al. Factor structure of the dysfunctional attitude scale in a student population. J Clin Psychol. 1986;42(2):307–9.CrossRef
24.
Wallace CJ, et al. The independent living skills survey: a comprehensive measure of the community functioning of severely and persistently mentally ill individuals. Schizophr Bull. 2000;26(3):631–58.CrossRef
25.
Hibbard JH, et al. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 1):1918–30.CrossRef
26.
Lehman AF. The well-being of chronic mental patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40(4):369–73.CrossRef
27.
Lukoff D, Liberman RP, Nuechterlein KH. Symptom monitoring in the rehabilitation of schizophrenic patients. Schizophr Bull. 1986;12(4):578–602.CrossRef
28.
29.
Haddock G, et al. An investigation into the psychometric properties of the Cognitive Therapy Scale for Psychosis. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2001;29:221–33.CrossRef
30.
Bellack AS, et al., editors. Social skills training for schizophrenia: a step-by-step guide. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2004.
31.
32.
Krueger R, Morgan D. The Focus Group Kit. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.
33.
Damschroder LJ, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50.CrossRef
34.
35.
Granholm E, McQuaid JR, Holden J. Cognitive behavioral social skills training (CBSST) for schizophrenia: a practical treatment guide. New York: Guilford Press; 2016.
36.
Hayes RL, Halford WK, Varghese FT. Social skills training with chronic schizophrenic patients: effects on negative symptoms and community functioning. Behav Ther. 1995;26(3):433–49.CrossRef
37.
Vindrola-Padros C, Johnson GA. Rapid techniques in qualitative research: a critical review of the literature. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(10):1596–604.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Peer specialists deliver cognitive behavioral social skills training compared to social skills training and treatment as usual to veterans with serious mental illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Chantele Mitchell-Miland
Sharon McCarthy
Matthew Chinman
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06376-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Planning implementation and scale-up of physical activity interventions for people with walking difficulties: study protocol for the process evaluation of the ComeBACK trial

Study protocol

Effect of m-health-based core stability exercise combined with self-compassion training for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Reducing the risk of Plasmodium vivax after falciparum infections in co-endemic areas—a randomized controlled trial (PRIMA)

Study protocol

A multimodal intervention to optimise antimicrobial use in residential aged care facilities (ENGAGEMENT): protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial

Study protocol

Cluster randomised control trial protocol for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FLUCARE)

Study protocol

High-flow nasal cannula therapy with sequential noninvasive ventilation versus noninvasive ventilation alone as the initial ventilatory strategy in acute COPD exacerbations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial