Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

Peer mentor versus teacher delivery of a physical activity program on the effects of BMI and daily activity: protocol of a school-based group randomized controlled trial in Appalachia

Authors: Laureen H. Smith, Rick L. Petosa, Abigail Shoben

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Rural Appalachian populations have poorer health and fewer positive health-related behaviors compared to other United States populations. Appalachians are the most sedentary U.S. population and teens are particularly sedentary. Obesity prevention through improving physical activity is a top priority in Rural Healthy People 2020. Obesity prevalence among Appalachian teens exceeds the national rates of 13.9% and has consistently been greater than 26%. Organized sports has not been effective at improving daily physical activity or health outcomes for Appalachian teens. The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of a 10-week school-based intervention in promoting self-regulation of physical activity among adolescents not participating in organized sports. By using accelerometers, our study will measure both sedentary time and planned exercise during waking hours.

Methods

The design for this four-year study is a group-randomized controlled trial (G-RCT). We will recruit high schools in 3 waves, with 4 in Wave 1, 8 in Wave 2, and 8 in Wave 3, for a total of 20 schools. For each wave of schools, we will randomly assign half of the schools to each condition--intervention (peer-to-peer mentoring [MBA]) and comparison (teacher-led [PBA])--for a total of 10 schools in each of the two conditions by study’s end. We will collect data at baseline (T1), 3 months post intervention (T2), and 6 months post intervention (T3). Linear Mixed Models (LMMs) and Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) will be used to test the main hypotheses. Power for this study was based the primary analysis comparing BMI outcomes at T2 between the groups, adjusting for baseline BMI values.

Discussion

This study provides age-appropriate lifestyle education and skill building. Peer-to-peer mentoring by local high school students and school-based tailored support strengthens sustainable behavioral change. Focusing on unique healthy-lifestyle challenges prevalent in low-resource areas such as Appalachia such as overcoming environmental, social, and psychological barriers may improve adherence to physical activity. Serving as role models, peer mentors may improve their own lifestyle behaviors, providing a dual intervention.

Trial registration

Literature
1.
Ickes MJ, Slagle KM. Targeting obesity in rural and Appalachian children and families: a systematic review of prevention and treatment interventions. Universal J Public Health. 2013;1(3):51–64.
2.
Moore JB, Brinkley J, Crawford TW, Evenson KR, Brownson RC. Association of the built environment with physical activity and adiposity in rural and urban youth. Prev Med. 2013;56(2):145–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Hovland J, McCleod M, Duffrin M, Johanson G, Berryman D. School-based screening of the dietary intakes of third graders in rural Appalachian Ohio. J Sch Health. 2010;80(11):536–43.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Smith LH, Holloman C. Health status and access to health care services: a comparison between Ohio’s rural non-Appalachian and Appalachian families. Fam Community Health. 2011;34(2):102–10.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Swanson M, Schoenberg NE, Erwin H, Davis RE. Perspectives on physical activity and exercise among Appalachian youth. J Phys Act Health. 2013;10(1):42–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Kruger TM, Swanson M, Davis RE, Wright S, Dollarhide D, Schoenberg NE. Formative research conducted in rural Appalachia to inform a community physical activity intervention. Am J Health Promot. 2013;26(3):143–51.CrossRef
7.
Martin SL, Kirkner GJ, Mayo K, Matthews CE, Durstine JL, Hebert JR. Urban, rural, and regional variations in physical activity. J Rural Health. 2005;21(3):239–44.CrossRefPubMed
8.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Active healthy living: prevention of childhood obesity through increased physical activity. Pediatrics. 2006:115(5):1834–42.
9.
County- Level Estimates of Diagnosed Diabetes, Leisure-Time Physical Inactivity and Obesity- 2008. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. 2011. Accessed 24 Oct 2013.
10.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States 2015. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(6):38–40.
11.
Bolin JN, Bellamy G. Rural healthy people 2020: new rural health priorities and strategies identified through the national RHP 2020 survey. College Station: TAMU. Accessed 11 Nov 2013
12.
Montgomery-Reagan K, Bianco JA, Heh V, Rettos J, Huston RS. Prevalence and correlates of high body mass index in rural Appalachian children aged 6-11 years. Rural Remote Health. 2010;10(1):1408.
13.
County Health Ratings: Mobile action toward community health- Ohio 2013. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, Madison. 2014. Accessed 05 Sept 2014.
14.
Smith LH. Piloting the use of teen mentors to promote a healthy diet and physical activity among children in Appalachia. J Spec Pediatric Nurs. 2011;16:16–26.CrossRef
15.
Wang L, Slawson DL, Relyea G, Southerland JL, Wang Y. Prevalence of and risk factors for adolescent obesity in southern Appalachia, 2012. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E222.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Demerath E, Muratova V, Spangler E, Minor VE, Neal WA. School-based obesity screening in rural Appalachia. Prev Med. 2003;37(6):553–60.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Stevens E. Evaluation of a social cognitive theory-based adolescent physical activity intervention: plan for exercise, plan for health. Columbus: The Ohio State University; 2006.
18.
Hortz BV. Evaluation of a social cognitive theory based physical activity intervention targeting leisure time physical exercise. Columbus: The Ohio State University; 2005.
19.
Hortz BV, Petosa RL. Impact of the “planning to be active” leisure time physical exercise program on rural high school students. J Adol Health. 2006;39(4):530–5.CrossRef
20.
Appalachian Regional Commission. Defining Appalachia: The Appalachian Regional Commission part II. Beautiful upon the mountains. 2014; Accessed on 22 April 2015.
21.
Marcum C. Appalachian cultural awareness and community development. Morgantown: West Virginia University; 2008.
22.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Highest rates of leisure-time physical inactivity in Appalachia and the south. 2011; Press Release.
23.
Hortz B, Stevens E, Holden B, Petosa R. Rates of physical activity among Appalachian adolescents in Ohio. J Rural Health. 2009;25(1):58–60.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Whittemore R, Chao A, Popick R, Grey M. School-based internet obesity prevention programs for adolescents: a systematic literature review. Yale J Biol Med. 2013;86(1):49–62.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Grydeland M, Bjelland M, Anderssen SA, Klepp KI, Bergh IH, Andersen LF, Ommundsen Y, Lien N. Effects of a 20-month cluster randomized controlled school-based intervention trial on BMI of school-aged boys and girls: the HEIA study. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(9):768–73.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Summerbell CD, et al. Intervention for treating obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;3:CD001872.
27.
Barlow SE, et al. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. 2007;120 Suppl December:S164–92.CrossRef
28.
Kruger TM, Swanson M, Davis RE, Wright S, Dollarhide K, Schoenberg NE. Formative research conducted in rural Appalachia to inform a community physical activity intervention. Am J Health Promot. 2012;26(3):143–51.
29.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Active healthy living: prevention of childhood obesity through increased physical activity; 2006. p. 1834–42.
30.
Westerman JJ. Mentoring and cross-age mentoring: improving academic achievement through a unique partnership. University of Kentucky: Unpublished dissertation; 2002.
31.
Smith LH, Holloman C. Comparing the effects of teen mentors to adult teachers on child lifestyle behaviors and health outcomes in Appalachia. J Sch Nurs. 2013;29(5):386–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Karcher M. Increases in academic connectedness and self-esteem among high school students who serve as cross-age mentors. Prof Sch Counsel. 2009;12(4):292–9.CrossRef
33.
Kuperminic G, Thomason JD. Group mentoring. In: DuBois D, Karcher M, editors. Handbook of youth mentoring. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2013.
34.
SAMHSA National Registry of Evidenced-based Programs and Practice. Cross-age mentoring program (CAMP) for children with adolescent mentors. Washington: United States Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
35.
Peterson MS, Lawman HG, Wilson DK, Fairchild A, Van Horn ML. The association of self-efficacy and parent social support on physical activity in male and female adolescents. Health Psychol. 2013;32(6):666–74.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zhao J, Gao Z, Settles BH. Determinants of parental perception and support on youth physical activity. Fam Community Health. 2013:77–88.
37.
Karcher MJ. Cross-age peer mentoring. In: Dubois DL, Karcher MJ, editors. Handbook of youth mentoring. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2013.
38.
Karcher MJ. The effects of developmental mentoring and high school mentors’ attendance on their younger mentees’ self-esteem, social skills, and connectedness. Psych Sch. 2005;42(1):65–77.CrossRef
39.
Portwood SG, Ayers PM, Kinnison KE, Waris RG, Wise D. Youth friends: outcomes from a school-based mentoring program. J Primary Prev. 2005;26(2):129–45.CrossRef
40.
Rosenblum A, Magura S, Fong C, et al. Effects of peer mentoring on HIV-affected youths’ substance use risk and association with substance using friends. J Soc Serv Res. 2005;32:45–60.CrossRef
41.
Campbell R, Starkey F, Holliday J, et al. An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): a cluster randomized trial. Lancet. 2008;371:1595–602.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Plotnikoff RC, Costigan SA, Karunamuni N, Lubans DR. Social cognitive theories used to explain physical activity behavior in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2013;56(5):245–53.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Harris J. The nurture assumption. New York: Academic Press; 1998.
44.
Heaney CA, Israel BA. Social networks and social support. In K Glanz et al (Eds.). Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice, 2008; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45.
Smith LH. Cross-age peer mentoring approach to impact the health outcomes of children ad families. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2011;16:220–5.CrossRefPubMed
46.
David JL. Some summer programs narrow learning gaps. Educ Leadership. 2010;11:78–9.
47.
Downey DB, von HippelBroh B. Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. Am Sociol Rev. 2004;69(5):613–35.CrossRef
48.
Heyns B. Schooling and cognitive development: is there a reason for learning? Child Devel. 1987;58:1151–60.
49.
Karcher MJ. The cross-age mentoring program (CAMP) for children with adolescent mentors: mentor training guide. San Antonio: Developmental Press; 2012.
50.
Tanita Corporation of America. Body composition analyzer DC-430U instruction manual. Arlington Heights: Author (Tanita Corporation); 2014.
51.
U.S. Department of Health & human services and the National Institutes of Health. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in body composition measurement: NIH technology assessment conference statement. 1994.
52.
53.
54.
Krebs NF, Himes JH, Jacobson D, Nicklas TA, Guilday P, Styne D. Assessment of child overweight and obesity. Pediatrics. 2007;120:S193–228.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Cole TJ, Faith MS, Pietobelli A, Heo M. What is the best measure of adiposity change in growing children: BMI, BMI%, BMI z-score or BMI percentile? European. J Clin Nutr. 2005;59(3):419–25.CrossRef
56.
Kuczmarski RJ, Odgen CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, et al. CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data. 2000;314(314):1–27.
57.
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG, et al. Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988-1994 through 2013-2014. JAMA. 2016;315(21):2292–9.CrossRefPubMed
58.
de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2007;85:660–67.
59.
Pulsford RM, Cortina-Borja M, Rich C, Kinnafick F, Dezateux C, Griffiths LJ. Actigraph accelerometer-defined boundaries for sedentary behavior and physical activity intensities in 7 year old children. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e2822.CrossRef
60.
Warolin J, Carrico AR, Wang L, Chen KY, Acra S, Buchowski MS. Effect of BMI on prediction of accelerometry-based energy expenditure in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(12):2428–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
61.
Rich C, Griffiths LJ, Dezateux C. Seasonal variation in accelerometer-determined sedentary behavior and physical activity in children: a review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ. 2012;9:49.CrossRef
62.
Lubans D, Hesketh D, Cliff L, Barnett L, Salmon J, Dollman P, Morgan A, et al. A systematic review of the validity and reliability of sedentary behavior measures used with children and adolescents. Obes Rev. 2011;12(10):781–99.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Actigraph Support. What’s the difference among the cut points available in Actilife? Actigraph support, 2012.
64.
Langlois MA, Petosa R, Hallam JS. Why do effective smoking prevention programs work? Student changes in social cognitive theory constructs. J Sch Health. 1999;69(8):326–31.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Langlois MA, Petosa RL, Hallam JS. Measuring self-efficacy and outcome expectations for resisting social pressures to smoke. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2006;15(2):1–17.CrossRef
66.
Stevens E, Petosa RL. Evaluation of a social cognitive theory-based adolescent physical activity intervention: plan for exercise, plan for health. Columbus: Ohio State University; 2006.
67.
Winters ER, Petosa RL, Charlton TE. Using social cognitive theory to explain discretionary, “leisure-time” physical exercise among high school students. J Adolesc Health. 2003;32(6):436–42.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Reynolds K, Killen J, Bryson S. Psychosocial predictors of physical activity in adolescents. Prev Med. 1990;19:541–51.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Trost DG, Pate RR, Saunders R, Ward DS, Dowda M, Felton GA. Prospective study of the determinants of physical activity in rural fifth-grade children. Prev Med. 1997;26(2):257–63.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Actigraph Corporation. Actigraph wGT3X-BT + ActiLife activity monitor user guide. Pensacola; 2017.
71.
Murray DM, Catellier DJ, Hannan PJ, et al. School-level intraclass correlation for physical activity in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:876–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
72.
Murray DM, Hannan PJ, Baker WLA. Monte Carlo study of alternative responses to intraclass correlation in community trials: is it ever possible to avoid Cornfield’s penalties? Eval Rev. 1996;20(3):313–37.CrossRefPubMed
73.
74.
Murray DM. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
75.
Kish L. Survey sampling. New York: Wiley; 1965.
76.
Murray DM, Short B. Intraclass correlation among measures related to alcohol use by young adults: estimates, correlates, and applications in interventions studies. J Stud Alcohol. 1995;56:681–94.
77.
Donner A. Linear regression analysis with repeated measurements. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(6):441–448.68.CrossRefPubMed
78.
Murray DM, Hannan PJ, Jacobs DR, McGovern PJ, Schmid L, Baker WL, et al. Assessing intervention effects in the Minnesota heart health program. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139(1):91–103.CrossRefPubMed
79.
National Research Council. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. Washington, DC: Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; 2010.
80.
Gail MH, Mark SD, Carroll RJ, Green SB, Pee D. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials. Stat Med. 1996;15:1069–92.CrossRefPubMed
81.
Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin; 2002.
82.
Andridge RR. Quantifying the impact of fixed effects modeling of clusters in multiple imputation for cluster randomized trials. BMJ. 2011;53(1):57.
83.
Murray DM, Wolfinger RD. Analysis issues in the evaluation of community trials: progress toward solutions in SAS/STAT MIXED. J Community Psychol. 1994;CSAP Special Issue:140–54.
84.
Janega JB, Murray DM, Varnell SP, Blitstein JL, Birnbaum AS, Lytle LA. Assessing intervention effects in a school-based nutrition intervention trial: which analytic model is most powerful? Health Educ Behav. 2004;31(6):756–74.CrossRefPubMed
85.
Janega JB, Murray DM, Varnell SP, Blitstein JL, Birnbaum AS, Lytle LA. Assessing the most powerful analysis method for school-based intervention studies with alcohol, tobacco and other drug outcomes. Addict Behav. 2004;29(3):595–606.CrossRefPubMed
86.
Murray DM, Varnell SP, Blitstein JL. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(3):423–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Peer mentor versus teacher delivery of a physical activity program on the effects of BMI and daily activity: protocol of a school-based group randomized controlled trial in Appalachia
Authors
Laureen H. Smith
Rick L. Petosa
Abigail Shoben
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5537-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

“Euphoria” or “Only Teardrops”? Eurovision Song Contest performance, life satisfaction and suicide

Research article

Examining diffusion to understand the how of SASA!, a violence against women and HIV prevention intervention in Uganda

Research article

Health behaviour changes in partners of women with recent gestational diabetes: a phase IIa trial

Research article

Knowledge and practice of patients with diabetes mellitus in Lebanon: a cross-sectional study

Research article

Progress in the performance of HIV early infant diagnosis services in Zambia using routinely collected data from 2006 to 2016

Research article

Theorizing the complexity of HIV disclosure in vulnerable populations: a grounded theory study