Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 13/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

Pediatric providers and radiology examinations: knowledge and comfort levels regarding ionizing radiation and potential complications of imaging

Authors: Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner, Victoria M. Parente, Charles M. Maxfield

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 13/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pediatric providers should understand the basic risks of the diagnostic imaging tests they order and comfortably discuss those risks with parents. Appreciating providers’ level of understanding is important to guide discussions and enhance relationships between radiologists and pediatric referrers.

Objective

To assess pediatric provider knowledge of diagnostic imaging modalities that use ionizing radiation and to understand provider concerns about risks of imaging.

Materials and methods

A 6-question survey was sent via email to 390 pediatric providers (faculty, trainees and midlevel providers) from a single academic institution. A knowledge-based question asked providers to identify which radiology modalities use ionizing radiation. Subjective questions asked providers about discussions with parents, consultations with radiologists, and complications of imaging studies.

Results

One hundred sixty-nine pediatric providers (43.3% response rate) completed the survey. Greater than 90% of responding providers correctly identified computed tomography (CT), fluoroscopy and radiography as modalities that use ionizing radiation, and ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as modalities that do not. Fewer (66.9% correct, P<0.001) knew that nuclear medicine utilizes ionizing radiation. A majority of providers (82.2%) believed that discussions with radiologists regarding ionizing radiation were helpful, but 39.6% said they rarely had time to do so. Providers were more concerned with complications of sedation and cost than they were with radiation-induced cancer, renal failure or anaphylaxis.

Conclusion

Providers at our academic referral center have a high level of basic knowledge regarding modalities that use ionizing radiation, but they are less aware of ionizing radiation use in nuclear medicine studies. They find discussions with radiologists helpful and are concerned about complications of sedation and cost.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dorfman AL, Fazel R, Einstein AJ et al (2011) Use of medical imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children: a population-based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 165:458–464CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dorfman AL, Fazel R, Einstein AJ et al (2011) Use of medical imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children: a population-based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 165:458–464CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Frush DP, Applegate K (2004) Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues. J Am Coll Radiol 1:113–119CrossRefPubMed Frush DP, Applegate K (2004) Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues. J Am Coll Radiol 1:113–119CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Wachtel RE, Dexter F, Dow AJ (2009) Growth rates in pediatric diagnostic imaging and sedation. Anesth Analg 108:1616–1621CrossRefPubMed Wachtel RE, Dexter F, Dow AJ (2009) Growth rates in pediatric diagnostic imaging and sedation. Anesth Analg 108:1616–1621CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Azmoonfar R, Faghirnavaz H, Younesi H et al (2016) Physicians’ knowledge about radiation dose in radiological investigation in Iran. J Biomed Phys Eng 6:285–288PubMedPubMedCentral Azmoonfar R, Faghirnavaz H, Younesi H et al (2016) Physicians’ knowledge about radiation dose in radiological investigation in Iran. J Biomed Phys Eng 6:285–288PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Famurewa OC, Obiajunwa PO, Elusiyan JB, Ibitoye BO (2014) Radiation dose and radiation protection principle awareness: a survey among Nigerian paediatricians. Niger Postgrad Med J 21:28–33PubMed Famurewa OC, Obiajunwa PO, Elusiyan JB, Ibitoye BO (2014) Radiation dose and radiation protection principle awareness: a survey among Nigerian paediatricians. Niger Postgrad Med J 21:28–33PubMed
10.
go back to reference Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP et al (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231:393–398CrossRefPubMed Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP et al (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231:393–398CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lee RK, Chu WC, Graham CA et al (2012) Knowledge of radiation exposure in common radiological investigations: a comparison between radiologists and non-radiologists. Emerg Med J 29:306–308CrossRefPubMed Lee RK, Chu WC, Graham CA et al (2012) Knowledge of radiation exposure in common radiological investigations: a comparison between radiologists and non-radiologists. Emerg Med J 29:306–308CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jacob K, Vivian G, Steel JR (2004) X-ray dose training: are we exposed to enough? Clin Radiol 59:928–934 discussion 926-927CrossRefPubMed Jacob K, Vivian G, Steel JR (2004) X-ray dose training: are we exposed to enough? Clin Radiol 59:928–934 discussion 926-927CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ditkofsky N, Shekhani HN, Cloutier M et al (2016) Ionizing radiation knowledge among emergency department providers. J Am Coll Radiol 13:1044–1049 e1041CrossRefPubMed Ditkofsky N, Shekhani HN, Cloutier M et al (2016) Ionizing radiation knowledge among emergency department providers. J Am Coll Radiol 13:1044–1049 e1041CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Eksioglu AS, Uner C (2012) Pediatricians’ awareness of diagnostic medical radiation effects and doses: are the latest efforts paying off? Diagn Interv Radiol 18:78–86PubMed Eksioglu AS, Uner C (2012) Pediatricians’ awareness of diagnostic medical radiation effects and doses: are the latest efforts paying off? Diagn Interv Radiol 18:78–86PubMed
15.
go back to reference Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S et al (2006) Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatr Radiol 36:823–832CrossRefPubMed Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S et al (2006) Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatr Radiol 36:823–832CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Uri IF (2012) Lack of radiation awareness among referrers: implications and possible solutions. Int J Clin Pract 66:574–581CrossRefPubMed Uri IF (2012) Lack of radiation awareness among referrers: implications and possible solutions. Int J Clin Pract 66:574–581CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rice HE, Frush DP, Farmer D et al (2007) Review of radiation risks from computed tomography: essentials for the pediatric surgeon. J Pediatr Surg 42:603–607CrossRefPubMed Rice HE, Frush DP, Farmer D et al (2007) Review of radiation risks from computed tomography: essentials for the pediatric surgeon. J Pediatr Surg 42:603–607CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Guillerman RP (2014) From ‘Image Gently’ to image intelligently: a personalized perspective on diagnostic radiation risk. Pediatr Radiol 44:444–449CrossRefPubMed Guillerman RP (2014) From ‘Image Gently’ to image intelligently: a personalized perspective on diagnostic radiation risk. Pediatr Radiol 44:444–449CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Trakhtenbroit M, Abdollahian D, Horton KM, Johnson PT (2016) Choosing wisely and imaging 3.0 professional development: radiology resident consultant service. J Am Coll Radiol 13:730–732CrossRefPubMed Trakhtenbroit M, Abdollahian D, Horton KM, Johnson PT (2016) Choosing wisely and imaging 3.0 professional development: radiology resident consultant service. J Am Coll Radiol 13:730–732CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Feinendegen LE, Pollycove M (2001) Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: detriment versus hormesis. Part 1. Dose responses of cells and tissues. J Nucl Med 42:17N–27NPubMed Feinendegen LE, Pollycove M (2001) Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: detriment versus hormesis. Part 1. Dose responses of cells and tissues. J Nucl Med 42:17N–27NPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pollycove M, Feinendegen LE (2001) Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: detriment versus hormesis. Part 2. Dose responses of organisms. J Nucl Med 42:26N-32N, 37NPubMed Pollycove M, Feinendegen LE (2001) Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: detriment versus hormesis. Part 2. Dose responses of organisms. J Nucl Med 42:26N-32N, 37NPubMed
25.
go back to reference Cravero JP, Blike GT, Beach M et al (2006) Incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room: report from the pediatric sedation research consortium. Pediatrics 118:1087–1096CrossRefPubMed Cravero JP, Blike GT, Beach M et al (2006) Incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room: report from the pediatric sedation research consortium. Pediatrics 118:1087–1096CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH et al (2007) Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing i.v. contrast media in children and adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1533–1538CrossRefPubMed Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH et al (2007) Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing i.v. contrast media in children and adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1533–1538CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gooding CA, Berdon WE, Brodeur AE, Rowen M (1975) Adverse reactions to intravenous pyelography in children. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 123:802–804CrossRefPubMed Gooding CA, Berdon WE, Brodeur AE, Rowen M (1975) Adverse reactions to intravenous pyelography in children. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 123:802–804CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sun LS, Li G, Miller TL et al (2016) Association between a single general anesthesia exposure before age 36 months and neurocognitive outcomes in later childhood. JAMA 315:2312–2320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sun LS, Li G, Miller TL et al (2016) Association between a single general anesthesia exposure before age 36 months and neurocognitive outcomes in later childhood. JAMA 315:2312–2320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Pediatric providers and radiology examinations: knowledge and comfort levels regarding ionizing radiation and potential complications of imaging
Authors
Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner
Victoria M. Parente
Charles M. Maxfield
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 13/2017
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3969-8

Other articles of this Issue 13/2017

Pediatric Radiology 13/2017 Go to the issue