Top

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Published in:

01-11-2015 | Original Article

Patterns of daily energy management at work: relations to employee well-being and job characteristics

Authors: Ulla Kinnunen, Taru Feldt, Jessica de Bloom, Kalevi Korpela

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 8/2015

Abstract

Purpose

The present study aimed at identifying subgroups of employees with similar daily energy management strategies at work and finding out whether well-being indicators and job characteristics differ between these subgroups.

Methods

The study was conducted by electronic questionnaire among 1122 Finnish employees. First, subgroups of employees with unique and distinctive patterns of energy management strategies were identified using latent profile analysis. Second, differences in well-being indicators and job characteristics between the subgroups were investigated by means of ANCOVA.

Results

Four subgroups (i.e., patterns) were identified and named: Passives (n = 371), Averages (n = 390), Casuals (n = 272) and Actives (n = 89). Passives used all three (i.e., work-related, private micro-break and physical micro-break) strategies less frequently than other subgroups, whereas Actives used work-related and physical energy management strategies more frequently than other subgroups. Averages used all strategies on an average level. Casuals’ use of all strategies came close to that of Actives, notably in a shared low use of private micro-break strategies. Active and Casual patterns maintained vigor and vitality. Autonomy and social support at work played a significant role in providing opportunities for the use of beneficial energy management strategies.

Conclusions

Autonomy and support at work seem to support active and casual use of daily energy management, which is important in staying energized throughout the working day.

Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2007) The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol 22:309–328CrossRef

Baruch Y, Holtom B (2008) Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Hum Relat 61:1139–1160CrossRef

Bostic T, Rubio D, Hood M (2000) A validation of the subjective vitality scale using structural equation modeling. Soc Indic Res 52:313–324CrossRef

Brown D, Barton J, Pretty J, Gladwell V (2014) Walks4Work: assessing the role of the natural environment in a workplace physical activity intervention. Scand J Work Environ Health 40:390–398CrossRef

Craig A, Cooper C (1992) Symptoms of acute and chronic fatigue. In: Smith AP, Jones DM (eds) Handbook of human performance, vol 3. Academic Press, London, pp 289–339

Dallner M, Elo A-L, Gamberale F, Hottinen V, Knardahl S, Lindström K et al (2000) Validation of the general Nordic questionnaire (QPSNordic) for psychological and social factors at work (No. Nord 2000:12). Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen

de Bloom J, Geurts S, Kompier M (2013) Vacation (after-)effects on employee health and well-being, and the role of vacation activities, experiences, and sleep. J Happiness Stud 14:613–633CrossRef

de Jonge J, Spoor E, Sonnentag S, Dormann C, van den Tooren M (2012) “Take a break?!” Off-job recovery, job demands and job resources as predictors of health, active learning, and creativity. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 21:321–348CrossRef

Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Geurts S, Taris T (2009) Daily recovery from work-related effort during non-work time. Res Occup Stress Well-being 7:85–123

Fredrickson B (2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The Broaden-and-Build Theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol 56:218–226CrossRef

Fritz C, Sonnentag S, Spector PE, McInroe J (2010) The weekend matters: relationships between stress recovery and affective experiences. J Organ Behav 31:1137–1162CrossRef

Fritz C, Lam C, Spreitzer G (2011) It’s the little things that matter: an examination of knowledge workers’ energy management. Acad Manag Perspect 25:28–39CrossRef

Fritz C, Ellis A, Demsky C, Lin B, Guros F (2013) Embracing work breaks: recovering from work stress. Organ Dyn 42:274–280CrossRef

Geurts S, Sonnentag S (2006) Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scand J Work Environ Health 32:482–492CrossRef

Geurts S, Beckers D, Tucker P (2014) Recovery from demanding work hours. In: Peeters M, de Jonge J, Taris T (eds) An introduction to contemporary work psychology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 196–219

Hockey R (2013) The psychology of fatigue, work effort and control. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRef

Kalimo R, Hakanen J, Toppinen-Tanner S (2006) Maslachin yleinen työuupumuksen arviointimenetelmä MBI-GS. [The Finnish version of the Maslach burnout inventory—general survey]. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki

Kinnunen U, Feldt T (2013) Job characteristics, recovery experiences and occupational well-being: testing cross-lagged relationships across 1 year. Stress Health 29:369–382CrossRef

Kinnunen U, Feldt T, Siltaloppi M, Sonnentag S (2011) Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: testing recovery experiences as mediators. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 20:805–832CrossRef

Krajewski J, Wieland R, Sauerland M (2010) Regulating strain states by using the recovery potential of lunch breaks. J Occup Health Psychol 15:131–139CrossRef

Maslach C, Jackson S, Leiter MP (1996) MBI: maslach burnout inventory manual, 3rd edn. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto

Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP (2001) Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol 52:397–422CrossRef

Muthén BO (1998–2004) Mplus technical appendices. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles

Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO (2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Model 14:535–569CrossRef

Pejtersen J, Sondergård Kristensen T, Borg V, Bjorner J (2010) The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scand J Public Health 38:8–24CrossRef

Ryan RM, Frederick CM (1997) On energy, personality and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. J Personal 65:529–565CrossRef

Satorra A, Bentler BM (2001) A scaled difference Chi square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika 66:507–514CrossRef

Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-Romá V, Bakker AB (2002) The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud 3:71–92CrossRef

Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M (2006) The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas 66:701–716CrossRef

Seppälä P, Mauno S, Feldt T, Hakanen J, Kinnunen U, Tolvanen A, Schaufeli WB (2009) The construct validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: multi-sample and longitudinal evidence. J Happiness Stud 10:459–481CrossRef

Sonnentag S, Fritz C (2015) Recovery from job stress: the stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. J Org Behav 36:72–103CrossRef

Sonnentag S, Zijlstra F (2006) Job characteristics and off-job activities as predictors of need for recovery, well-being, and fatigue. J Appl Psychol 91:330–350CrossRef

Spector PE, Jex SM (1998) Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. J Occup Health Psychol 3:356–367CrossRef

Streiner DL (2003) Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn’t matter. J Personal Assess 80:217–222CrossRef

Taylor WC (2011) Booster breaks: an easy-to-implement workplace policy designed to improve employee health, increase productivity, and lower health care costs. J Workplace Behav Health 26:70–84CrossRef

ten Brummelhuis L, Trougakos J (2014) The recovery potential of intrinsically versus extrinsically motivated off-job activities. J Occup Organ Psychol 87:177–199CrossRef

Trougakos J, Hideg I (2009) Momentary work-recovery: the role of within-day work breaks. In: Sonnentag S, Perrewé PL, Ganster DC (eds) Current perspectives on job-stress recovery: Research in occupational stress and well-being Emeral, Bingley, vol 7, pp 37–84

Trougakos J, Beal D, Green S, Weiss H (2008) Making the break count: an episodic examination of recovery activities, emotional experiences, and positive affective displays. Acad Manag J 51:131–146CrossRef

Trougakos J, Hideg I, Cheng B, Beal D (2014) Lunch breaks unpacked: the role of autonomy as a moderator of recovery during lunch. Acad Manag J 57:405–421CrossRef

Veldhoven M, Meijman T (1994) Het meten van psychosociale arbeidsbelasting met een vragenlijst: de vragenlijst beleving en beoordeling van de arbeid (VBBA). [The measurement of psychosocial job demands with a questionnaire: The questionnaire on the experience and evaluation of work (QEEW)]. Nederlands Instituut voor Arbeidsomstandigheden, Amsterdam

Volman F, Bakker AB, Xanthopoulou D (2013) Recovery at home and performance at work: a dairy study on self-family facilitation. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 22:218–234CrossRef

Wang M, Sinclair R, Zhou L, Sears L (2013) Person-centered analysis. Methods, applications, and implications for occupational health psychology. In: Tetric L, Wang M, Sinclair R (eds) Research methods in occupational health psychology: measurement, design, and data analysis. Routledge, New York, pp 249–373

Zacher H, Brailsford HA, Parker SL (2014) Micro-breaks matter: a diary study on the effects of energy management strategies on occupational well-being. J Voc Behav 85:287–297CrossRef

Title: Patterns of daily energy management at work: relations to employee well-being and job characteristics
Authors: Ulla Kinnunen
Taru Feldt
Jessica de Bloom
Kalevi Korpela
Publication date: 01-11-2015
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-015-1039-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Patterns of daily energy management at work: relations to employee well-being and job characteristics

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

Work disability after diagnosis of hand-arm vibration syndrome

No acute effects of an exposure to 50 ppm methyl methacrylate on the upper airways

Combined musculoskeletal pain in the upper and lower body: associations with occupational mechanical and psychosocial exposures

Psychosocial work factors in new or recurrent injuries among hospital workers: a prospective study

Psychosocial stress at work and cardiovascular diseases: an overview of systematic reviews

Disease-generic factors of work participation of workers with a chronic disease: a systematic review