Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 5/2015

01-05-2015 | Pictorial Essay

Pattern-based approach to fetal congenital cardiovascular anomalies using the transverse aortic arch view on prenatal cardiac MRI

Authors: Su-Zhen Dong, Ming Zhu

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Fetal echocardiography is the imaging modality of choice for prenatal diagnosis of congenital cardiovascular anomalies. However, echocardiography has limitations. Fetal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to complement US in detecting congenital cardiovascular anomalies. This article draws on our experience; it describes the transverse aortic arch view on fetal cardiac MRI and important clues on an abnormal transverse view at the level of the aortic arch to the diagnosis of fetal congenital cardiovascular anomalies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Loomba RS, Chandrasekar S, Shah PH et al (2011) The developing role of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of congenital cardiac anomalies: a systematic review. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 4:172–176CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Loomba RS, Chandrasekar S, Shah PH et al (2011) The developing role of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of congenital cardiac anomalies: a systematic review. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 4:172–176CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Trento LU, Pruetz JD, Chang RK et al (2012) Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: impact of mode of delivery on neonatal outcome. Prenat Diagn 32:1250–1255CrossRefPubMed Trento LU, Pruetz JD, Chang RK et al (2012) Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: impact of mode of delivery on neonatal outcome. Prenat Diagn 32:1250–1255CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Victoria T, Danzer E, Adzick NS (2013) Use of ultrasound and MRI for evaluation of lung volumes in fetuses with isolated left congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg 22:30–36CrossRefPubMed Victoria T, Danzer E, Adzick NS (2013) Use of ultrasound and MRI for evaluation of lung volumes in fetuses with isolated left congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg 22:30–36CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Griffiths PD, Porteous M, Mason G et al (2012) The use of in utero MRI to supplement ultrasound in the foetus at high risk of developmental brain or spine abnormality. Br J Radiol 85:e1038–e1045CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Griffiths PD, Porteous M, Mason G et al (2012) The use of in utero MRI to supplement ultrasound in the foetus at high risk of developmental brain or spine abnormality. Br J Radiol 85:e1038–e1045CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gorincour G, Bourlière-Najean B, Bonello B et al (2007) Feasibility of fetal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:105–108CrossRefPubMed Gorincour G, Bourlière-Najean B, Bonello B et al (2007) Feasibility of fetal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:105–108CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Saleem SN (2008) Feasibility of MRI of the fetal heart with balanced steady-state free precession sequence along fetal body and cardiac planes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1208–1215CrossRefPubMed Saleem SN (2008) Feasibility of MRI of the fetal heart with balanced steady-state free precession sequence along fetal body and cardiac planes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1208–1215CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Manganaro L, Savelli S, Di Maurizio M et al (2008) Potential role of fetal cardiac evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience. Prenat Diagn 28:148–156CrossRefPubMed Manganaro L, Savelli S, Di Maurizio M et al (2008) Potential role of fetal cardiac evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience. Prenat Diagn 28:148–156CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Manganaro L, Savelli S, Di Maurizio M et al (2009) Assessment of congenital heart disease (CHD): is there a role for fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)? Eur J Radiol 72:172–180CrossRefPubMed Manganaro L, Savelli S, Di Maurizio M et al (2009) Assessment of congenital heart disease (CHD): is there a role for fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)? Eur J Radiol 72:172–180CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dong SZ, Zhu M, Li F (2013) Preliminary experience with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in evaluation of fetal cardiovascular anomalies. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:40CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Dong SZ, Zhu M, Li F (2013) Preliminary experience with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in evaluation of fetal cardiovascular anomalies. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:40CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Votino C, Jani J, Damry N et al (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging in the normal fetal heart and in congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:322–329CrossRefPubMed Votino C, Jani J, Damry N et al (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging in the normal fetal heart and in congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:322–329CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Yoo SJ, Lee YH, Cho KS (1999) Abnormal three-vessel view on sonography: a clue to the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in the fetus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:825–830CrossRefPubMed Yoo SJ, Lee YH, Cho KS (1999) Abnormal three-vessel view on sonography: a clue to the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in the fetus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:825–830CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gardiner H, Chaoui R (2013) The fetal three-vessel and tracheal view revisited. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 18:261–268CrossRefPubMed Gardiner H, Chaoui R (2013) The fetal three-vessel and tracheal view revisited. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 18:261–268CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Yoo SJ, Min JY, Lee YH et al (2003) Fetal sonographic diagnosis of aortic arch anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:535–546CrossRefPubMed Yoo SJ, Min JY, Lee YH et al (2003) Fetal sonographic diagnosis of aortic arch anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:535–546CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Zidere V, Tsapakis EG, Huggon IC et al (2006) Right aortic arch in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:876–881CrossRefPubMed Zidere V, Tsapakis EG, Huggon IC et al (2006) Right aortic arch in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:876–881CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Türkvatan A, Büyükbayraktar FG, Olçer T et al (2009) Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch: evaluation with the use of multidetector computed tomography. Korean J Radiol 10:176–184CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Türkvatan A, Büyükbayraktar FG, Olçer T et al (2009) Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch: evaluation with the use of multidetector computed tomography. Korean J Radiol 10:176–184CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rose D, D’Ascoli R, Ventriglia F et al (2013) Double aortic arch: postnatal obliteration of the left aortic arch. Is arterial duct closure responsible? Cardiol Young 29:1–3 Rose D, D’Ascoli R, Ventriglia F et al (2013) Double aortic arch: postnatal obliteration of the left aortic arch. Is arterial duct closure responsible? Cardiol Young 29:1–3
18.
go back to reference Wong SF, Ward C, Lee-Tannock A et al (2007) Pulmonary artery/aorta ratio in simple screening for fetal outflow tract abnormalities during the second trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:275–28019CrossRefPubMed Wong SF, Ward C, Lee-Tannock A et al (2007) Pulmonary artery/aorta ratio in simple screening for fetal outflow tract abnormalities during the second trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:275–28019CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Manganaro L, Savelli S, Di Maurizio M et al (2009) Fetal MRI of the cardiovascular system: role of steady-state free precession sequences for the evaluation of normal and pathological appearances. Radiol Med 114:852–870CrossRefPubMed Manganaro L, Savelli S, Di Maurizio M et al (2009) Fetal MRI of the cardiovascular system: role of steady-state free precession sequences for the evaluation of normal and pathological appearances. Radiol Med 114:852–870CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wielandner A, Mlczoch E, Prayer D et al (2013) Potential of magnetic resonance for imaging the fetal heart. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 18:286–297CrossRefPubMed Wielandner A, Mlczoch E, Prayer D et al (2013) Potential of magnetic resonance for imaging the fetal heart. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 18:286–297CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gielecki JS, Syc B, Wilk R et al (2006) Quantitative evaluation of aortic arch development using digital-image analysis. Ann Anat 188:19–23CrossRefPubMed Gielecki JS, Syc B, Wilk R et al (2006) Quantitative evaluation of aortic arch development using digital-image analysis. Ann Anat 188:19–23CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Al Nafisi B, van Amerom JF, Forsey J et al (2013) Fetal circulation in left-sided congenital heart disease measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a case–control study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:65CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Al Nafisi B, van Amerom JF, Forsey J et al (2013) Fetal circulation in left-sided congenital heart disease measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a case–control study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:65CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
23.
go back to reference Freire G, Miller M, Huhta J (2012) Foetal echocardiography of transposition of the great arteries and common arterial trunk. Cardiol Young 22:671–676CrossRefPubMed Freire G, Miller M, Huhta J (2012) Foetal echocardiography of transposition of the great arteries and common arterial trunk. Cardiol Young 22:671–676CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Galindo A, Gutiérrez-Larraya F, Escribano D et al (2007) Clinical significance of persistent left superior vena cava diagnosed in fetal life. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:152–161CrossRefPubMed Galindo A, Gutiérrez-Larraya F, Escribano D et al (2007) Clinical significance of persistent left superior vena cava diagnosed in fetal life. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:152–161CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pattern-based approach to fetal congenital cardiovascular anomalies using the transverse aortic arch view on prenatal cardiac MRI
Authors
Su-Zhen Dong
Ming Zhu
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3131-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Pediatric Radiology 5/2015 Go to the issue