Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 2/2012

01-06-2012

Patients’ View of Their Preoperative Education for Radical Prostatectomy: Does It Change After Surgery?

Authors: Johannes Huber, Andreas Ihrig, Wolfgang Herzog, Christian G. Huber, Beryl Konyango, Eva Löser, Gencay Hatiboglu, Boris A. Hadaschik, Sascha Pahernik, Markus Hohenfellner

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

When preparing the evaluation of a newly designed multimedia tool for supporting preoperative education before radical prostatectomy, we realized that the standard procedure has rarely been investigated. Therefore, we performed semi-structured interviews with 30 consecutive patients the day before and 15 days after radical prostatectomy. Patients’ opinion about their preoperative education is decidedly positive and demonstrates intense patient–physician interaction. All patients wanted to be informed about the procedure and possible risks. None reported to be dissatisfied. All but one of the patients (29/30) was able to ask every single question (6.5 mean). Except for signs of forgetting and a slightly altered retrospective assessment of anxiety, we have found no relevant changes over time. Preoperative education is very important to our patients. Therefore, good communication skills should be developed during medical education. A systematic patient-centered approach could further improve the quality of care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leclercq WKG, Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MRM et al (2010) A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions. World J Surg 34:1406–1415PubMedCrossRef Leclercq WKG, Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MRM et al (2010) A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions. World J Surg 34:1406–1415PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Issa MM, Setzer E, Charaf C et al (2006) Informed versus uninformed consent for prostate surgery: the value of electronic consents. J Urol 176:694–699PubMedCrossRef Issa MM, Setzer E, Charaf C et al (2006) Informed versus uninformed consent for prostate surgery: the value of electronic consents. J Urol 176:694–699PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Akkad A, Jackson C, Kenyon S et al (2006) Patients’ perceptions of written consent: questionnaire study. BMJ 333:528PubMedCrossRef Akkad A, Jackson C, Kenyon S et al (2006) Patients’ perceptions of written consent: questionnaire study. BMJ 333:528PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Singer S, Götze H, Möbius C et al (2009) Quality of care and emotional support from the inpatient cancer patient’s perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:723–731PubMedCrossRef Singer S, Götze H, Möbius C et al (2009) Quality of care and emotional support from the inpatient cancer patient’s perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:723–731PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gyomber D, Lawrentschuk N, Wong P et al (2010) Improving informed consent for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy using multimedia techniques: a prospective randomized crossover study. BJU Int 106:1152–1156PubMedCrossRef Gyomber D, Lawrentschuk N, Wong P et al (2010) Improving informed consent for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy using multimedia techniques: a prospective randomized crossover study. BJU Int 106:1152–1156PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Masood J, Hafeez A, Wiseman O et al (2007) Informed consent: are we deluding ourselves? A randomized controlled study. BJU Int 99:4–5PubMedCrossRef Masood J, Hafeez A, Wiseman O et al (2007) Informed consent: are we deluding ourselves? A randomized controlled study. BJU Int 99:4–5PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Evrard S, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Larrue C et al (2005) Evaluation of a preoperative multimedia information program in surgical oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:106–110PubMedCrossRef Evrard S, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Larrue C et al (2005) Evaluation of a preoperative multimedia information program in surgical oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:106–110PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Huber J, Ihrig A, Yass M, et al. (2011) Improving the preoperative consultation before radical prostatectomy using multimedia support: a randomized controlled trial. Urology 78:S314 Huber J, Ihrig A, Yass M, et al. (2011) Improving the preoperative consultation before radical prostatectomy using multimedia support: a randomized controlled trial. Urology 78:S314
9.
go back to reference Gray RE, Fitch MI, Phillips C et al (1999) Presurgery experiences of prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer Pract 7:130–135PubMedCrossRef Gray RE, Fitch MI, Phillips C et al (1999) Presurgery experiences of prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer Pract 7:130–135PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fagermoen MS, Hamilton G (2003) Preparing patients for urological surgery. Int J Nurs Stud 40:281–290PubMedCrossRef Fagermoen MS, Hamilton G (2003) Preparing patients for urological surgery. Int J Nurs Stud 40:281–290PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Burt J, Caelli K, Moore K et al (2005) Radical prostatectomy: men’s experiences and postoperative needs. J Clin Nurs 14:883–890PubMedCrossRef Burt J, Caelli K, Moore K et al (2005) Radical prostatectomy: men’s experiences and postoperative needs. J Clin Nurs 14:883–890PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Laux L, Glanzmann P, Schaffner P, et al. (1981) [The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: theoretical foundations and manual.] Beltz Test GmbH, Weinheim Laux L, Glanzmann P, Schaffner P, et al. (1981) [The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: theoretical foundations and manual.] Beltz Test GmbH, Weinheim
14.
go back to reference Rasch D, Guiard V (2004) The robustness of parametric statistical methods. Psychol Sci 2:175–208 Rasch D, Guiard V (2004) The robustness of parametric statistical methods. Psychol Sci 2:175–208
15.
go back to reference Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MRM, Houterman S et al (2008) Surgeons underestimate their patients’ desire for preoperative information. World J Surg 32:964–970PubMedCrossRef Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MRM, Houterman S et al (2008) Surgeons underestimate their patients’ desire for preoperative information. World J Surg 32:964–970PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ghulam AT, Kessler M, Bachmann LM et al (2006) Patients’ satisfaction with the preoperative informed consent procedure: a multicenter questionnaire survey in Switzerland. Mayo Clin Proc 81:307–312PubMedCrossRef Ghulam AT, Kessler M, Bachmann LM et al (2006) Patients’ satisfaction with the preoperative informed consent procedure: a multicenter questionnaire survey in Switzerland. Mayo Clin Proc 81:307–312PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Moore KN, Estey A (1999) The early post-operative concerns of men after radical prostatectomy. J Adv Nurs 29:1121–1129PubMedCrossRef Moore KN, Estey A (1999) The early post-operative concerns of men after radical prostatectomy. J Adv Nurs 29:1121–1129PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Berry MG, Unwin J, Ross GL et al (2007) A comparison of the views of patients and medical staff in relation to the process of informed consent. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:368–373PubMedCrossRef Berry MG, Unwin J, Ross GL et al (2007) A comparison of the views of patients and medical staff in relation to the process of informed consent. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:368–373PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wilhelm D, Gillen S, Wirnhier H et al (2009) Extended preoperative patient education using a multimedia DVD-impact on patients receiving a laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:227–233PubMedCrossRef Wilhelm D, Gillen S, Wirnhier H et al (2009) Extended preoperative patient education using a multimedia DVD-impact on patients receiving a laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:227–233PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Luck A, Pearson S, Maddern G et al (1999) Effects of video information on precolonoscopy anxiety and knowledge: a randomised trial. Lancet 354:2032–2035PubMedCrossRef Luck A, Pearson S, Maddern G et al (1999) Effects of video information on precolonoscopy anxiety and knowledge: a randomised trial. Lancet 354:2032–2035PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wildschut T, Sedikides C, Arndt J et al (2006) Nostalgia: content, triggers, functions. J Pers Soc Psychol 91:975–993PubMedCrossRef Wildschut T, Sedikides C, Arndt J et al (2006) Nostalgia: content, triggers, functions. J Pers Soc Psychol 91:975–993PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nuttall M, Wilby D, Chappell B et al (2009) What would truly patient-centered urological care look like? BJU Int 104:287–288PubMedCrossRef Nuttall M, Wilby D, Chappell B et al (2009) What would truly patient-centered urological care look like? BJU Int 104:287–288PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Malle BF, Knobe JM, Nelson SE (2007) Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: new answers to an old question. J Pers Soc Psychol 93:491–514PubMedCrossRef Malle BF, Knobe JM, Nelson SE (2007) Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: new answers to an old question. J Pers Soc Psychol 93:491–514PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Hayter C et al (2000) What questions do patients with curable prostate cancer want answered? Med Decis Mak 20:7–19CrossRef Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Hayter C et al (2000) What questions do patients with curable prostate cancer want answered? Med Decis Mak 20:7–19CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L et al (2008) Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 54:785–793PubMedCrossRef Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L et al (2008) Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 54:785–793PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patients’ View of Their Preoperative Education for Radical Prostatectomy: Does It Change After Surgery?
Authors
Johannes Huber
Andreas Ihrig
Wolfgang Herzog
Christian G. Huber
Beryl Konyango
Eva Löser
Gencay Hatiboglu
Boris A. Hadaschik
Sascha Pahernik
Markus Hohenfellner
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0293-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Journal of Cancer Education 2/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine