Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 1/2011

01-03-2011

Patients’ Perception of Care During Image-Guided Breast Biopsy in a Rural Community Breast Center

Communication Matters

Authors: Catherine J. Brandon, Patricia B. Mullan

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

This retrospective study surveyed women about their experience with image-guided breast biopsies in a rural cancer center. Our study objectives were to determine: women’s perception of their emotional and physical comfort during the biopsy; the clarity and acceptability of the communication about the biopsy, as well as the methods used to provide the results of her biopsy and treatment options; and the overall impressions of the technical and personal care she received. A single mailed survey of 500 biopsy patients. The response rate was 43% (n = 215). Prior to their biopsy, 22% had been concerned that the biopsy would be painful and 43% were concerned that the biopsy might show cancer. Almost all women rated the communication about the biopsy procedure as understandable (99%) and accurately reflecting their experience (99%.) Most (77%) patients characterized the biopsy as producing minimal discomfort, although 5% disagreed. Most patients (98%) characterized their physician and technologists as caring about their emotional and physical comfort. Most patients felt that the typical 1-day wait to receive the results of their biopsy was reasonable (90%) and that the use of the phone to convey the results was acceptable (90%). On comparing patients with a diagnosis of cancer to those without, there was no difference in the level of satisfaction with the use of the phone to communicate biopsy results. This study offers encouragement that communication practices can alleviate the anxiety of women undergoing image-guided breast cancer biopsies.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Griffin SJ, Kinmonth AL, Veltman MW, Gillard S, Grant J, Stewart M (2004) Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med 2(6):595–608CrossRefPubMed Griffin SJ, Kinmonth AL, Veltman MW, Gillard S, Grant J, Stewart M (2004) Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med 2(6):595–608CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Carney P, Kettler M, Cook A, Geller B, Karliner L, Miglioretti D, Bowles EA, Buist DS, Gallagher T, Elmore JG (2009) An assessment of the likelihood, frequency, and content of verbal communication between radiologists and women receiving screening and diagnostic mammography. Acad Radiol 16:1056–1063CrossRefPubMed Carney P, Kettler M, Cook A, Geller B, Karliner L, Miglioretti D, Bowles EA, Buist DS, Gallagher T, Elmore JG (2009) An assessment of the likelihood, frequency, and content of verbal communication between radiologists and women receiving screening and diagnostic mammography. Acad Radiol 16:1056–1063CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bugbee ME, Wellisch DK, Arnott IM, Maxwell JR, Kirsch DL, Sayre JW, Bassett LW (2005) Breast core-needle biopsy: clinical trial of relaxation technique versus medication versus no intervention for anxiety reduction. Radiology 234(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed Bugbee ME, Wellisch DK, Arnott IM, Maxwell JR, Kirsch DL, Sayre JW, Bassett LW (2005) Breast core-needle biopsy: clinical trial of relaxation technique versus medication versus no intervention for anxiety reduction. Radiology 234(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Braeuning MP, Earp JL, O’Brien SM, Schell MJ, Denham AC, Pisano ED, O’Malley MS (2000) Informing patients of diagnostic mammography results: mammographers’ opinions. Acad Radiol 7(5):335–340CrossRefPubMed Braeuning MP, Earp JL, O’Brien SM, Schell MJ, Denham AC, Pisano ED, O’Malley MS (2000) Informing patients of diagnostic mammography results: mammographers’ opinions. Acad Radiol 7(5):335–340CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Levin KS, Braeuning MP, O’Malley MS, Pisano ED, Barrett ED, Earp JA (2000) Communicating results of diagnostic mammography: what do patients think? Acad Radiol 7(12):1069–1076CrossRefPubMed Levin KS, Braeuning MP, O’Malley MS, Pisano ED, Barrett ED, Earp JA (2000) Communicating results of diagnostic mammography: what do patients think? Acad Radiol 7(12):1069–1076CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Landercasper J, Linebarger JH, Ellis RL, Mathiason MA, Jonson JM, Marcou KA, Maiffe BM, Jago GS (2010) A quality review of the timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in an integrated breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 210(4):449–455CrossRefPubMed Landercasper J, Linebarger JH, Ellis RL, Mathiason MA, Jonson JM, Marcou KA, Maiffe BM, Jago GS (2010) A quality review of the timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in an integrated breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 210(4):449–455CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hislop TG, Harris SR, Jackson J, Thorne SE, Rousseau EJ, Coldman AJ, Vestrup JA, Wright CJ, Olivotto IA (2002) Satisfaction and anxiety for women during investigation of an abnormal screening mammogram. Breast Cancer Res Treat 76(3):245–254CrossRefPubMed Hislop TG, Harris SR, Jackson J, Thorne SE, Rousseau EJ, Coldman AJ, Vestrup JA, Wright CJ, Olivotto IA (2002) Satisfaction and anxiety for women during investigation of an abnormal screening mammogram. Breast Cancer Res Treat 76(3):245–254CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patients’ Perception of Care During Image-Guided Breast Biopsy in a Rural Community Breast Center
Communication Matters
Authors
Catherine J. Brandon
Patricia B. Mullan
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-010-0178-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Journal of Cancer Education 1/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine