Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Paper

Patient-specific implants for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Authors: Marco K. Demange, Arvind Von Keudell, Christian Probst, Hiroshi Yoshioka, Andreas H. Gomoll

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The lateral compartment of the knee is biomechanically and anatomically different from the medial compartment. Most commercially available unicompartmental implants are not designed specifically for the lateral compartment. Patient-specific custom-made unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are designed to provide optimal fit on both femoral and tibial surfaces. This study aimed to determine if the use of patient-specific lateral unicompartmental implants provide better bone coverage than standard, off-the-shelf commercially available unicompartmental implants in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. As a secondary question, we wished to determine if patient-specific unicompartmental implants provide good clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of lateral unicompartmental osteoarthritis.

Methods

We prospectively evaluated 33 patients who underwent lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty using patient-specific implants and instrumentation with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. We analysed bone coverage observed in plain radiographs in 33 patient-specific lateral unicompartmental arthroplasties and compared to 20 lateral unicompartmental arthroplasties performed with commercially-available, standard off-the-shelf unicondylar implants.

Results

The mean tibial implant lateral coverage mismatch in the patient-specific implant group was 1.0 mm (S.D. 1.2, range 0–5.7 mm ) versus 3.3 mm (S.D. 2.43, range 0.4–7.8 mm) in the conventional implant group (p < 0.01). In the patient specific cohort, pre-operative limb alignment was 3.3 (valgus) and post-operative limb alignment was −0.9 (varus). The Knee Society score improved from 48 (S.D. 16.2) to 95 (S.D. 7.6). Survivorship in the patient-specific implant group was 97% at an average follow up of 37 months, versus 85% at a follow-up period of 32 months for the standard implant group.

Conclusions

Patient-specific lateral unicompartmental knee replacements demonstrated better tibial coverage and provide excellent short-term clinical and radiological results as compared to a standard lateral UKA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ledingham J, Regan M, Jones A, Doherty M (1993) Radiographic patterns and associations of osteoarthritis of the knee in patients referred to hospital. Ann Rheum Dis 52:520–526PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ledingham J, Regan M, Jones A, Doherty M (1993) Radiographic patterns and associations of osteoarthritis of the knee in patients referred to hospital. Ann Rheum Dis 52:520–526PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schindler OS, Scott WN, Scuderi GR (2010) The practice of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United Kingdom. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 18:312–319 Schindler OS, Scott WN, Scuderi GR (2010) The practice of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United Kingdom. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 18:312–319
9.
go back to reference Gulati A, Chau R, Beard DJ, Price AJ, Gill HS, Murray DW (2009) Localization of the full-thickness cartilage lesions in medial and lateral unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 27:1339–1346. doi:10.1002/jor.20880 PubMedCrossRef Gulati A, Chau R, Beard DJ, Price AJ, Gill HS, Murray DW (2009) Localization of the full-thickness cartilage lesions in medial and lateral unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 27:1339–1346. doi:10.​1002/​jor.​20880 PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Scott RD (2005) Lateral unicompartmental replacement: a road less traveled. Orthopedics 28:983–984PubMed Scott RD (2005) Lateral unicompartmental replacement: a road less traveled. Orthopedics 28:983–984PubMed
12.
18.
go back to reference Mensch JS, Amstutz HC (1975) Knee morphology as a guide to knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 112:231–241 Mensch JS, Amstutz HC (1975) Knee morphology as a guide to knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 112:231–241
19.
go back to reference Hofmann AA, Bachus KN, Wyatt RW (1991) Effect of the tibial cut on subsidence following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269:63–69 Hofmann AA, Bachus KN, Wyatt RW (1991) Effect of the tibial cut on subsidence following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269:63–69
20.
go back to reference Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, Mitchell W, Hoffman G, Hofmann AA (1994) Analysis of the bone surface area in resected tibia. Implications in tibial component subsidence and fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:2–10 Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, Mitchell W, Hoffman G, Hofmann AA (1994) Analysis of the bone surface area in resected tibia. Implications in tibial component subsidence and fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:2–10
Metadata
Title
Patient-specific implants for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Authors
Marco K. Demange
Arvind Von Keudell
Christian Probst
Hiroshi Yoshioka
Andreas H. Gomoll
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2678-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

International Orthopaedics 8/2015 Go to the issue