Top

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Published in:

01-12-2006

Patient Satisfaction and Aesthetic Results After Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap for Breast Reconstruction

Authors: Rony A. Moscona, MD, Liora Holander, MD, Drorit Or, MD, Lucian Fodor, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2006

Abstract

Background

The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap is one of the most widely used procedures for breast reconstruction. Our aim was to evaluate the patient satisfaction and aesthetic results after pedicled TRAM flap.

Methods

One hundred thirty-three pedicled TRAM procedures were performed between 1993 and 2000. A questionnaire was filled out by 101 patients, and they represented the study group. We investigated variables of general background, those related to the operation, and those connected with satisfaction.

Results

A total of 75% of women were satisfied with the operation, 73% declared high satisfaction, and only 12% were dissatisfied with the results. A total of 86% were highly satisfied with their appearance in clothes, but only 48% were satisfied with their nude appearance. The lowest grade was given to breast sensation. A total of 82% noted high satisfaction of the spouse, compared with only 7% who stated a lack of satisfaction. Ninety percent claimed that there was no change in sexual attraction, 81% stated there was no change in sexual intercourse, and 79% noted no change in spousal attitude. Younger women reported better symmetry of breasts and a better sexual relationship with the spouse after the procedure. Women who did not undergo radiotherapy were more satisfied with all the aesthetic factors.

Conclusions

Satisfaction is affected by many factors; both objective surgical factors and mental and psychological parameters vary among women. From this point of view, the pedicled TRAM flap can be considered a good option for women desiring breast reconstruction. Those who had immediate breast reconstruction were more satisfied with all measures.

Hartrampf CR, Scheflan M, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69:216–25PubMed

Trabulsy PP, Anthony JP, Mathes SJ. Changing trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a 13-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93:1418–27PubMedCrossRef

Elliott LF, Eskenazi L, Beegle PH Jr, et al. Immediate TRAM flap breast reconstruction: 128 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92:217–27PubMedCrossRef

Rosen PB, Jabs AD, Kister SJ, Hugo NE. Clinical experience with immediate breast reconstruction using tissue expansion or transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg 1990; 25:249–57PubMedCrossRef

Wilkins EG, August DA, Chang AD, Smith DJ Jr. Immediate, bilateral transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction after mastectomy. Am Surg 1993; 59:519-22; discussion 522–4PubMed

Bostwick J III, Jones G. Why I choose autogenous tissue in breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1994; 21:165–75PubMed

McCraw JB, Horton CE, Grossman JA, et al. An early appraisal of the methods of tissue expansion and the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap in reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 1987; 18:93–113PubMedCrossRef

Hartrampf CR Jr. Abdominal wall competence in transverse abdominal island flap operations. Ann Plast Surg 1984; 12:139–46PubMedCrossRef

Mizgala CL, Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennett GK. Assessment of the abdominal wall after pedicled TRAM flap surgery: 5- to 7-year follow-up of 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93:988–1002; discussion 1003–4PubMed

10.

Eberlein TJ, Crespo LD, Smith BL, et al. Prospective evaluation of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann Surg 1993; 218:29–36PubMedCrossRef

11.

Kroll SS, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90:455–62PubMed

12.

Cederna PS, Yates WR, Chang P, et al. Postmastectomy reconstruction: comparative analysis of the psychosocial, functional, and cosmetic effects of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap versus breast implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35:458–68PubMedCrossRef

13.

Kroll SS, Coffey JA Jr, Winn RJ, Schusterman MA. A comparison of factors affecting aesthetic outcomes of TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96:860–4PubMed

14.

Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106:769–76PubMedCrossRef

15.

Edsander-Nord A, Brandberg Y, Wickman M. Quality of life, patients’ satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicled or free TRAM flap breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107:1142–53; discussion 1154–5PubMedCrossRef

16.

Kovacs L, Papadopulos NA, Ammar SA, et al. Clinical outcome and patients’ satisfaction after simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction with free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53:199–204PubMedCrossRef

17.

Brandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L. A prospective and randomized study, “SVEA,” comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105:66–74; discussion 75–6PubMed

18.

Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966; 44(Suppl):166–206PubMedCrossRef

19.

Andrade WN, Baxter N, Semple JL. Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107:46–54PubMedCrossRef

20.

Franchelli S, Leone MS, Berrino P, et al. Psychological evaluation of patients undergoing breast reconstruction using two different methods: autologous tissues versus prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95:1213–8; discussion 1219–20PubMedCrossRef

21.

Noguchi M, Kitagawa H, Kinoshita K, et al. Psychologic and cosmetic self-assessments of breast conserving therapy compared with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. J Surg Oncol 1993; 54:260–6PubMed

22.

Berry MG, al-Mufti RA, Jenkinson AD, et al. An audit of outcome including patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction performed by breast surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998; 80:173–7PubMed

23.

Mizgala CL, Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennett GK. Abdominal function after pedicled TRAM flap surgery. Clin Plast Surg 1994; 21:255–72PubMed

24.

Simon AM, Bouwense CL, McMillan S, et al. Comparison of unipedicled and bipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions: assessment of physical function and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113:136–40PubMedCrossRef

25.

Freiberg A, Giguere D, Ross DC, et al. Are patients satisfied with results from residents performing aesthetic surgery? Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100:1824–31; discussion 1832–3PubMed

26.

Fiala TG, Lee WP, May JW Jr. Augmentation mammoplasty: results of a patient survey. Ann Plast Surg 1993; 30:503–9PubMed

27.

Hetter GP. Improved patient satisfaction with augmentation mammoplasty: the transaxillary subpectoral approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1991; 15:123–7PubMedCrossRef

28.

Thors CL, Broeckel JA, Jacobsen PB. Sexual functioning in breast cancer survivors. Cancer Control 2001; 8:442–8PubMed

29.

Lim J, Hoe AL, Wong CY, Soo KC. Sexuality of women after mastectomy. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1995; 24:659–63PubMed

30.

Wilmoth MC, Townsend J. A comparison of the effects of lumpectomy versus mastectomy on sexual behaviors. Cancer Pract 1995; 3:279–85PubMed

31.

Barni S, Mondin R. Sexual dysfunction in treated breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 1997; 8:149–53PubMedCrossRef

32.

Clough KB, O’Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, et al. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107:1702–9PubMedCrossRef

33.

Anderson SG, Rodin J, Ariyan S. Treatment considerations in postmastectomy reconstruction: their relative importance and relationship to patient satisfaction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 33:263–70; discussion 270–1PubMedCrossRef

34.

Baker RR. The management of breast cancer with immediate or delayed reconstruction. Adv Surg 1992; 25:51–64PubMed

35.

Schover LR, Yetman RJ, Tuason LJ, et al. Partial mastectomy and breast reconstruction. A comparison of their effects on psychosocial adjustment, body image, and sexuality. Cancer 1995; 75:54–64PubMedCrossRef

36.

Hopewell JW, Calvo W, Jaenke R, et al. Microvasculature and radiation damage. Recent Results Cancer Res 1993; 130:1–16PubMed

37.

Schuster RH, Kuske RR, Young VL, Fineberg B. Breast reconstruction in women treated with radiation therapy for breast cancer: cosmesis, complications, and tumor control. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90:445–52; discussion 453–4PubMed

38.

Kroll SS, Ames F, Singletary SE, Schusterman MA. The oncologic risks of skin preservation at mastectomy when combined with immediate reconstruction of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991; 172:17–20PubMed

Title: Patient Satisfaction and Aesthetic Results After Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap for Breast Reconstruction
Authors: Rony A. Moscona, MD
Liora Holander, MD
Drorit Or, MD
Lucian Fodor, MD
Publication date: 01-12-2006
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2006
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9096-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Patient Satisfaction and Aesthetic Results After Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap for Breast Reconstruction

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 12/2006

Prognostic Significance of Postoperative Morbidities in Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Delayed Primary Surgical Debulking

Perineal Small Bowel Fistula After Pelvic Exenteration for Cancer: Technical Guidelines for Perineal Fistula

Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR Trial

REG I Expression Predicts Long-term Survival among Locally Advanced Thoracic Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy

Nuclear Translocation of β-Catenin Protein but Absence of β-Catenin and APC Mutation in Gastrointestinal Carcinoid Tumor

Retroperitoneal and Lateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Mapped by Lymphoscintigraphy and Blue Dye for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Staging: Preliminary Results