Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2006

01-06-2006 | Editorial

Patient Satisfaction: An Increasingly Important Measure of Quality

Authors: James S. Tomlinson, MD, Clifford Y. Ko, MD, MS, MSHS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2006

Login to get access

Excerpt

There has been an ongoing national effort to improve the quality of health care. In accordance with a popular model described by Donabedian,1 quality measures should address three areas for improvement: structural items (environment within which care is delivered), processes of care (professional activities associated with providing care), and outcomes (changes in the patient’s current and future health status as a result of care). Recently, some groups, including the National Quality Forum and the National Comprehensive Care Network, have been working to identify processes of care to help improve the quality of cancer care. As these quality measures in cancer care are identified, they likely will be added to the growing list of “pay for performance” process measures used by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services and other payers. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Donabedian A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1980 Donabedian A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1980
2.
go back to reference Walker MS, Ristvedt SL, Haughey BH. Patient care in multidisciplinary cancer clinics: does attention to psychosocial needs predict patient satisfaction? Psychooncology 2003; 12:291–300CrossRefPubMed Walker MS, Ristvedt SL, Haughey BH. Patient care in multidisciplinary cancer clinics: does attention to psychosocial needs predict patient satisfaction? Psychooncology 2003; 12:291–300CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kavadas V, Barham CP, Finch-Jones MD, et al. Assessment of satisfaction with care after inpatient treatment for oesophageal and gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91:719–23.CrossRefPubMed Kavadas V, Barham CP, Finch-Jones MD, et al. Assessment of satisfaction with care after inpatient treatment for oesophageal and gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91:719–23.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52:609–20CrossRefPubMed Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52:609–20CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Avery KNL, Metcalfe C, Nicklin J, et al. Satisfaction with care: an independent outcome measure in surgical oncology. Ann Surg Oncol (in press) Avery KNL, Metcalfe C, Nicklin J, et al. Satisfaction with care: an independent outcome measure in surgical oncology. Ann Surg Oncol (in press)
6.
go back to reference Bredart A, et al. An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Eur J Cancer 2005; 41:2120–31CrossRefPubMed Bredart A, et al. An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Eur J Cancer 2005; 41:2120–31CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Potter SJ, McKinlay JB. From a relationship to encounter: an examination of longitudinal and lateral dimensions in the doctor-patient relationship. Soc Sci Med 2005; 61:465–79CrossRefPubMed Potter SJ, McKinlay JB. From a relationship to encounter: an examination of longitudinal and lateral dimensions in the doctor-patient relationship. Soc Sci Med 2005; 61:465–79CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patient Satisfaction: An Increasingly Important Measure of Quality
Authors
James S. Tomlinson, MD
Clifford Y. Ko, MD, MS, MSHS
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2006
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.01.904

Other articles of this Issue 6/2006

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2006 Go to the issue