Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 12/2018

01-12-2018 | Clinical Investigation

Patient Radiation Dose Reduction Considerations in a Contemporary Interventional Radiology Suite

Authors: Catherine Panick, Kevin Wunderle, Mark Sands, Charles Martin

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We sought to evaluate patient radiation exposure during complex liver interventional procedures performed with newer angiography equipment.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creations and liver tumor embolizations performed in our new angiography suite (Discovery IGS740, GE Healthcare). T tests were used to compare air kerma-area product (PKA) and reference plane air kerma (Ka,r) in the new room versus data from historical rooms and previous studies (including the RAD IR study). Results were expressed as medians [interquartile ranges (Q1, Q3)].

Results

From February 2015 to June 2016, 134 complex liver interventional procedures were performed in the new room, including 14 TIPS creations, 60 hepatic tumor arterial embolizations (HAEs), 26 Y90 mappings (Y90m), and 34 Y90 radioembolizations (Y90). Ka,r (Gy) values were as follows: TIPS, 0.65 (0.24, 1.15); HAE, 0.89 (0.49, 1.49); Y90m, 0.54 (0.38, 0.94); Y90, 0.46 (0.21, 1.06). PKA (Gy·cm2) values were as follows: TIPS, 148.2 (66.7, 326.5); HAE, 142.6 (88, 217.8); Y90m, 148.3 (98.2, 247); Y90, 90.8 (43.9, 161.5). Ka,r and PKA were lower in the new room than in historical rooms [Ka,r and PKA reductions: TIPS, 58 and 49%; HAE, 31 and 39%; Y90m, 58 and 52%; Y90, 49 and 56% (p < 0.05)] and versus the RAD IR study [Ka,r and PKA reductions: TIPS, 64 and 43%; HAE, 26 and 40% (p < 0.05)].

Conclusions

Using the latest technology and image processing tools enables significant reduction in radiation exposure during complex liver interventional procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chauhan NR, Kapoor BS. Advanced intraprocedural imaging applications in hepatobiliary intervention. Dig Dis Interv. 2017;1:155–62.CrossRef Chauhan NR, Kapoor BS. Advanced intraprocedural imaging applications in hepatobiliary intervention. Dig Dis Interv. 2017;1:155–62.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Windham-Herman A-M, Chapiro J, Geschwind J-F. Minimally invasive, image-guided therapy for liver cancer: what every oncologist needs to know. Am J Hematol Oncol. 2017;13:30–6. Windham-Herman A-M, Chapiro J, Geschwind J-F. Minimally invasive, image-guided therapy for liver cancer: what every oncologist needs to know. Am J Hematol Oncol. 2017;13:30–6.
3.
go back to reference Williams JR. The interdependence of staff and patient doses in interventional radiology. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:498–503.CrossRef Williams JR. The interdependence of staff and patient doses in interventional radiology. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:498–503.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60601-2-43:2010/AMD1:2017: Amendment 1-Medical electrical equipment-Part 2-43: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures; 2017. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60601-2-43:2010/AMD1:2017: Amendment 1-Medical electrical equipment-Part 2-43: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures; 2017.
5.
go back to reference Hertault A, Maurel B, Midulla M, et al. Editor’s choice: minimizing radiation exposure during endovascular procedures—basic knowledge, literature review, and reporting standards. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50:21–36.CrossRef Hertault A, Maurel B, Midulla M, et al. Editor’s choice: minimizing radiation exposure during endovascular procedures—basic knowledge, literature review, and reporting standards. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50:21–36.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hymes SR, Strom EA, Fife C. Radiation dermatitis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment 2006. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:28–46.CrossRef Hymes SR, Strom EA, Fife C. Radiation dermatitis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment 2006. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:28–46.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aroua A, Rickli H, Stauffer JC, et al. How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at a national level. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1621–33.CrossRef Aroua A, Rickli H, Stauffer JC, et al. How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at a national level. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1621–33.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dave JK, Eschelman DJ, Wasserman JR, Gonsalves CF, Gingold EL. A phantom study and a retrospective clinical analysis to investigate the impact of a new image processing technology on radiation dose and image quality during hepatic embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27:593–600.CrossRef Dave JK, Eschelman DJ, Wasserman JR, Gonsalves CF, Gingold EL. A phantom study and a retrospective clinical analysis to investigate the impact of a new image processing technology on radiation dose and image quality during hepatic embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27:593–600.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Efstathopoulos EP, Brountzos EN, Alexopoulou E, et al. Patient radiation exposure measurements during interventional procedures: a prospective study. Health Phys. 2006;91:36–40.CrossRef Efstathopoulos EP, Brountzos EN, Alexopoulou E, et al. Patient radiation exposure measurements during interventional procedures: a prospective study. Health Phys. 2006;91:36–40.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hidajat N, Wust P, Felix R, Schroder RJ. Radiation exposure to patient and staff in hepatic chemoembolization: risk estimation of cancer and deterministic effects. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29:791–6.CrossRef Hidajat N, Wust P, Felix R, Schroder RJ. Radiation exposure to patient and staff in hepatic chemoembolization: risk estimation of cancer and deterministic effects. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29:791–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hidajat N, Wust P, Kreuschner M, Felix R, Schroder RJ. Radiation risks for the radiologist performing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Br J Radiol. 2006;79:483–6.CrossRef Hidajat N, Wust P, Kreuschner M, Felix R, Schroder RJ. Radiation risks for the radiologist performing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Br J Radiol. 2006;79:483–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Khoury HJ, Garzon WJ, Andrade G, et al. Radiation exposure to patients and medical staff in hepatic chemoembolisation interventional procedures in Recife, Brazil. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;165:263–7.CrossRef Khoury HJ, Garzon WJ, Andrade G, et al. Radiation exposure to patients and medical staff in hepatic chemoembolisation interventional procedures in Recife, Brazil. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;165:263–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kothary N, Abdelmaksoud MH, Tognolini A, et al. Imaging guidance with C-arm CT: prospective evaluation of its impact on patient radiation exposure during transhepatic arterial chemoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:1535–43.CrossRef Kothary N, Abdelmaksoud MH, Tognolini A, et al. Imaging guidance with C-arm CT: prospective evaluation of its impact on patient radiation exposure during transhepatic arterial chemoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:1535–43.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Livingstone RS, Keshava SN. Technical note: reduction of radiation dose using ultrasound guidance during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2011;21:13–4.CrossRef Livingstone RS, Keshava SN. Technical note: reduction of radiation dose using ultrasound guidance during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2011;21:13–4.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Livingstone RS, Mammen T. Evaluation of radiation dose to patients during abdominal embolizations. Indian J Med Sci. 2005;59:527–33.CrossRef Livingstone RS, Mammen T. Evaluation of radiation dose to patients during abdominal embolizations. Indian J Med Sci. 2005;59:527–33.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part I—overall measures of dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:711–27.CrossRef Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part I—overall measures of dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:711–27.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Miraglia R, Maruzzelli L, Cortis K, et al. Radiation exposure in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39:210–7.CrossRef Miraglia R, Maruzzelli L, Cortis K, et al. Radiation exposure in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39:210–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Papageorgiou E, Tsapaki V, Tsalafoutas IA, et al. Comparison of patient doses in interventional radiology procedures performed in two large hospitals in Greece. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2007;124:97–102.CrossRef Papageorgiou E, Tsapaki V, Tsalafoutas IA, et al. Comparison of patient doses in interventional radiology procedures performed in two large hospitals in Greece. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2007;124:97–102.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pinto NGV, Braz D, Vallim MA, et al. Radiation exposure in interventional radiology. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2007;580:586–90.CrossRef Pinto NGV, Braz D, Vallim MA, et al. Radiation exposure in interventional radiology. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2007;580:586–90.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ruiz-Cruces R, Vano E, Carrera-Magarino F, et al. Diagnostic reference levels and complexity indices in interventional radiology: a national programme. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:4268–76.CrossRef Ruiz-Cruces R, Vano E, Carrera-Magarino F, et al. Diagnostic reference levels and complexity indices in interventional radiology: a national programme. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:4268–76.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schernthaner RE, Duran R, Chapiro J, Wang Z, Geschwind JF, Lin M. A new angiographic imaging platform reduces radiation exposure for patients with liver cancer treated with transarterial chemoembolization. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:3255–62.CrossRef Schernthaner RE, Duran R, Chapiro J, Wang Z, Geschwind JF, Lin M. A new angiographic imaging platform reduces radiation exposure for patients with liver cancer treated with transarterial chemoembolization. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:3255–62.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vano E, Jarvinen H, Kosunen A, et al. Patient dose in interventional radiology: a European survey. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008;129:39–45.CrossRef Vano E, Jarvinen H, Kosunen A, et al. Patient dose in interventional radiology: a European survey. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008;129:39–45.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vano E, Sanchez R, Fernandez JM, et al. Patient dose reference levels for interventional radiology: a national approach. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32:19–24.CrossRef Vano E, Sanchez R, Fernandez JM, et al. Patient dose reference levels for interventional radiology: a national approach. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32:19–24.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Vano E, Segarra A, Fernandez JM, et al. A pilot experience launching a national dose protocol for vascular and interventional radiology. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008;129:46–9.CrossRef Vano E, Segarra A, Fernandez JM, et al. A pilot experience launching a national dose protocol for vascular and interventional radiology. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008;129:46–9.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Verdun FR, Aroua A, Trueb PR, Vock P, Valley JF. Diagnostic and interventional radiology: a strategy to introduce reference dose level taking into account the national practice. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2005;114:188–91.CrossRef Verdun FR, Aroua A, Trueb PR, Vock P, Valley JF. Diagnostic and interventional radiology: a strategy to introduce reference dose level taking into account the national practice. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2005;114:188–91.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wen X, Jiang X, Li R, Zhang J, Yang P, Shen B. Novel X-ray imaging technology allows substantial patient radiation reduction without image quality impairment in repetitive transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Acad Radiol. 2015;22:1361–7.CrossRef Wen X, Jiang X, Li R, Zhang J, Yang P, Shen B. Novel X-ray imaging technology allows substantial patient radiation reduction without image quality impairment in repetitive transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Acad Radiol. 2015;22:1361–7.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Zweers D, Geleijns J, Aarts NJ, et al. Patient and staff radiation dose in fluoroscopy-guided TIPS procedures and dose reduction, using dedicated fluoroscopy exposure settings. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:672–6.CrossRef Zweers D, Geleijns J, Aarts NJ, et al. Patient and staff radiation dose in fluoroscopy-guided TIPS procedures and dose reduction, using dedicated fluoroscopy exposure settings. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:672–6.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Heilmaier C, Zuber N, Berthold C, Kara L, Weishaupt D. Establishing local diagnostic reference levels in IR procedures with dose management software. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28:429–41.CrossRef Heilmaier C, Zuber N, Berthold C, Kara L, Weishaupt D. Establishing local diagnostic reference levels in IR procedures with dose management software. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28:429–41.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wunderle KA, Rakowski JT, Dong FF. Approaches to interventional fluoroscopic dose curves. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17:5788. Wunderle KA, Rakowski JT, Dong FF. Approaches to interventional fluoroscopic dose curves. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17:5788.
30.
go back to reference International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment-characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices-part 1-1: determination of the detective quantum efficiency-detectors used in radiographic imaging; 2015. International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment-characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices-part 1-1: determination of the detective quantum efficiency-detectors used in radiographic imaging; 2015.
31.
go back to reference Mitchell EL, Furey P. Prevention of radiation injury from medical imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:22S–7S.CrossRef Mitchell EL, Furey P. Prevention of radiation injury from medical imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:22S–7S.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sanchez R, Vano E, Fernandez JM, Gallego JJ. Staff radiation doses in a real-time display inside the angiography room. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33:1210–4.CrossRef Sanchez R, Vano E, Fernandez JM, Gallego JJ. Staff radiation doses in a real-time display inside the angiography room. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33:1210–4.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Bordier C, Klausz R, Desponds L. Patient dose map indications on interventional X-ray systems and validation with Gafchromic XR-RV3 film. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;163:306–18.CrossRef Bordier C, Klausz R, Desponds L. Patient dose map indications on interventional X-ray systems and validation with Gafchromic XR-RV3 film. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;163:306–18.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hertault A, Maurel B, Sobocinski J, et al. Impact of hybrid rooms with image fusion on radiation exposure during endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:382–90.CrossRef Hertault A, Maurel B, Sobocinski J, et al. Impact of hybrid rooms with image fusion on radiation exposure during endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:382–90.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Iwazawa J, Ohue S, Hashimoto N, Mitani T. Comparison of the number of image acquisitions and procedural time required for transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with and without tumor-feeder detection software. Radiol Res Pract. 2013;2013:580839.PubMedPubMedCentral Iwazawa J, Ohue S, Hashimoto N, Mitani T. Comparison of the number of image acquisitions and procedural time required for transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with and without tumor-feeder detection software. Radiol Res Pract. 2013;2013:580839.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Kaladji A, Daoudal A, Clochard E, et al. Interest of fusion imaging and modern navigation tools with hybrid rooms in endovascular aortic procedures. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017;58:458–66. Kaladji A, Daoudal A, Clochard E, et al. Interest of fusion imaging and modern navigation tools with hybrid rooms in endovascular aortic procedures. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017;58:458–66.
37.
go back to reference Lin PJ, Schueler BA, Balter S, et al. Accuracy and calibration of integrated radiation output indicators in diagnostic radiology: a report of the AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 190. Med Phys. 2015;42:6815–29.CrossRef Lin PJ, Schueler BA, Balter S, et al. Accuracy and calibration of integrated radiation output indicators in diagnostic radiology: a report of the AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 190. Med Phys. 2015;42:6815–29.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Report No. 168-radiation dose management for fluoroscopically-guided interventional medical procedures; 2010. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Report No. 168-radiation dose management for fluoroscopically-guided interventional medical procedures; 2010.
Metadata
Title
Patient Radiation Dose Reduction Considerations in a Contemporary Interventional Radiology Suite
Authors
Catherine Panick
Kevin Wunderle
Mark Sands
Charles Martin
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2052-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 12/2018 Go to the issue