Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 3/2009

01-05-2009

Patient Perceptions of Obstetrician-gynecologists’ Practices Related to HIV Testing

Authors: Victoria H. Coleman, Maria A. Morgan, Rebecca Carlson, Debra Hawks, Jay Schulkin

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the percentage of obstetrician-gynecologists’ patients who have been tested for HIV; (2) examine patient attitudes about HIV testing and patients’ knowledge about their own risk status; (3) determine primary reasons patients decline an HIV test; and (4) learn patient recall of how their obstetrician-gynecologists approach the topic of HIV testing. Method Survey packets were mailed to each of 687 obstetrician-gynecologists who are members of the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network (CARN) to distribute to their patients. Data are reported from 851 patient respondents (297 pregnant and 554 non-pregnant), and were analyzed utilizing independent samples t-tests, χ2 analysis, and linear regression. Results Two-thirds of respondents (65%/n = 534) reported having been tested for HIV at some point, although the majority (72%) did not recall that their current obstetrician-gynecologist had recommended HIV testing. Among pregnant respondents specifically, 61% did not recall that their current obstetrician-gynecologist had recommended HIV testing, although 82% reported having had an HIV test at some point and 71% stated they had received their most recent HIV test results from their obstetrician-gynecologist during their current pregnancy. Age, race, and pregnancy status were linked to likelihood of patient recall of receiving an HIV testing recommendation from their obstetrician-gynecologist; with young, pregnant, Hispanic, and African-American patients most likely to recall a test recommendation. Perceived low risk was the primary reason given for declining an HIV test. Only 2% of respondents considered themselves high-risk for HIV despite almost half of the sample reporting having had unprotected sex at some point with more than one partner. Conclusions Many patients did not recall that their obstetrician-gynecologist had ever recommended HIV testing, although the majority had been tested. Efforts should be made to increase communication between obstetrician-gynecologists and their patients related to HIV risk status and HIV testing.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
AK, AR, CA, CT, DE, FL, GA, IL, IN, MD, MI, NJ, NM, OR, RI, TN, TX, and VA.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Branson, B. M., Handsfield, H. H., Lampe, M. A., Janssen, R. S., Taylor, A. W., Lyss, S. B., et al. (2006). Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55, 1–17. Branson, B. M., Handsfield, H. H., Lampe, M. A., Janssen, R. S., Taylor, A. W., Lyss, S. B., et al. (2006). Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55, 1–17.
2.
go back to reference CDC. (2005). Cases of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States, 2004. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 16, 16–45. CDC. (2005). Cases of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States, 2004. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 16, 16–45.
3.
go back to reference CDC. (2001). Revised recommendations for HIV screening of pregnant women. MMWR, 50(RR-19), 63–85. CDC. (2001). Revised recommendations for HIV screening of pregnant women. MMWR, 50(RR-19), 63–85.
4.
go back to reference Chou, R., Smits, A. K., Huffman, L. H., Fu, R., & Korthuis, P. T. (2005). Prenatal screening for HIV: A review of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143, 38–54.PubMed Chou, R., Smits, A. K., Huffman, L. H., Fu, R., & Korthuis, P. T. (2005). Prenatal screening for HIV: A review of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143, 38–54.PubMed
6.
go back to reference CDC. (2006). Achievements in public health: Reduction in perinatal transmission of HIV infection—United States, 1985–2005. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55, 592–597. CDC. (2006). Achievements in public health: Reduction in perinatal transmission of HIV infection—United States, 1985–2005. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55, 592–597.
7.
go back to reference Troccoli, K., Pollard, H., III, McMahon, M., Foust, E., Erickson, K., & Schulkin, J. (2002). Human immunodeficiency virus counseling and testing practices among North Carolina providers. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 100, 420–427. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02120-8.PubMedCrossRef Troccoli, K., Pollard, H., III, McMahon, M., Foust, E., Erickson, K., & Schulkin, J. (2002). Human immunodeficiency virus counseling and testing practices among North Carolina providers. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 100, 420–427. doi:10.​1016/​S0029-7844(02)02120-8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hill, L. D., Erickson, K., Holzman, G. B., Power, M. L., & Schulkin, J. (2001). Practice trends in outpatient obstetrics and gynecology: Findings of the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network, 1995–2000. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 56, 505–516. doi:10.1097/00006254-200108000-00024.PubMedCrossRef Hill, L. D., Erickson, K., Holzman, G. B., Power, M. L., & Schulkin, J. (2001). Practice trends in outpatient obstetrics and gynecology: Findings of the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network, 1995–2000. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 56, 505–516. doi:10.​1097/​00006254-200108000-00024.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (US). (1999). Reducing the odds: Preventing perinatal transmission of HIV in the United States. Washington, DC: The Institute. Institute of Medicine (US). (1999). Reducing the odds: Preventing perinatal transmission of HIV in the United States. Washington, DC: The Institute.
10.
go back to reference Guidelines for Women’s Health Care. (2002). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2nd Edn.). Washington, DC. Guidelines for Women’s Health Care. (2002). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2nd Edn.). Washington, DC.
11.
go back to reference Gray, A. D., Carlson, R., Morgan, M. A., Hawks, D., & Schulkin, J. (2007). Obstetrician-gynecologists’ knowledge and practice regarding human immunodeficiency virus screening. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 110, 1019–1026.PubMed Gray, A. D., Carlson, R., Morgan, M. A., Hawks, D., & Schulkin, J. (2007). Obstetrician-gynecologists’ knowledge and practice regarding human immunodeficiency virus screening. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 110, 1019–1026.PubMed
12.
go back to reference American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (1999). Joint statement of ACOG/AAP on human immunodeficiency virus screening. Elk Grove (PA) and Washington (DC). Reaffirmed by AAP in 2005 and by ACOG in 2006. American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (1999). Joint statement of ACOG/AAP on human immunodeficiency virus screening. Elk Grove (PA) and Washington (DC). Reaffirmed by AAP in 2005 and by ACOG in 2006.
13.
go back to reference ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. (2004). Committee opinion 304: Prenatal and perinatal human immunodeficiency virus testing: Expanded recommendations. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 104, 1119–1124. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. (2004). Committee opinion 304: Prenatal and perinatal human immunodeficiency virus testing: Expanded recommendations. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 104, 1119–1124.
Metadata
Title
Patient Perceptions of Obstetrician-gynecologists’ Practices Related to HIV Testing
Authors
Victoria H. Coleman
Maria A. Morgan
Rebecca Carlson
Debra Hawks
Jay Schulkin
Publication date
01-05-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0374-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Maternal and Child Health Journal 3/2009 Go to the issue