Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 11/2012

01-11-2012 | Original Article

Patient goal attainment in vaginal prolapse repair with and without mesh

Authors: David Shveiky, Andrew I. Sokol, Robert E. Gutman, Bela I. Kudish, Cheryl B. Iglesia

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective of this study was to describe patient-centered goals and their attainment in vaginal prolapse repair, with and without mesh.

Methods

A secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of prolapse repair with or without vaginal mesh was performed. Participants (n = 65) selected three preoperative goals ranked by importance. At 3 and 12 months postoperatively, patients graded their goal attainment on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (100 % attainment). Goal attainment was compared with anatomical outcome, symptoms, quality of life, and satisfaction scores. Nonparametric tests and the log-rank test were used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Results

A total of 176 goals were selected. The first goal in 37 women (57 %) was improving prolapse symptoms, in 15 (23 %) urinary symptoms, in 7 (11 %) appearance, activity, and self-image, in 2 (3.1 %) bowel symptoms, and in 2 (3.1 %) sexual function. At 3 and 12 months postoperatively, goal achievement for prolapse symptoms was 96.1 and 93.6 %, for urinary symptoms 75.6 and 70.0 %, and for appearance, activity, and self-image 90.5 and 94.7 %, respectively. The effect of anatomical outcome, mesh use, or the presence of mesh erosion on goal attainment could not be demonstrated. Women who achieved their first goal had significantly better symptoms, quality of life, and satisfaction scores than women who did not.

Conclusions

Patient goal attainment after vaginal prolapse repair was high and not consistently related to objective anatomical outcome or mesh use. It persisted between 3 and 12 months postoperatively and was associated with better satisfaction, quality of life, and symptom scores.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, Spino C, Whitehead WE, Wu J, Brody DJ, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300(11):1311–1316PubMedCrossRef Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, Spino C, Whitehead WE, Wu J, Brody DJ, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300(11):1311–1316PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bovbjerg VE, Trowbridge ER, Barber MD, Martirosian TE, Steers WD, Hullfish KL (2009) Patient-centered treatment goals for pelvic floor disorders: association with quality-of-life and patient satisfaction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(5):568.e1–568.e6CrossRef Bovbjerg VE, Trowbridge ER, Barber MD, Martirosian TE, Steers WD, Hullfish KL (2009) Patient-centered treatment goals for pelvic floor disorders: association with quality-of-life and patient satisfaction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(5):568.e1–568.e6CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies, Washington Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies, Washington
4.
go back to reference Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD (2002) Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(1):88–92PubMedCrossRef Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD (2002) Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(1):88–92PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L (2003) Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(6):1551–1557PubMedCrossRef Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L (2003) Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(6):1551–1557PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Steers WD (2007) Colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse: patient goals, quality of life, and satisfaction. Obstet Gynecol 110(2):341–345PubMedCrossRef Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Steers WD (2007) Colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse: patient goals, quality of life, and satisfaction. Obstet Gynecol 110(2):341–345PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Iglesia CB, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Peterson JL, Shott S (2010) Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 116(2 Pt 1):293–303PubMedCrossRef Iglesia CB, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Peterson JL, Shott S (2010) Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 116(2 Pt 1):293–303PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sokol AI, Iglesia CB, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Shveiky D, Bercik R, Sokol ER (2012) One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(1):86.e1–86.e9CrossRef Sokol AI, Iglesia CB, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Shveiky D, Bercik R, Sokol ER (2012) One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(1):86.e1–86.e9CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Weber AM, Abrams P, Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Davis G, Dmochowski RR, Fischer J, Hull T, Nygaard I, Weidner AC (2001) The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12(3):178–186PubMedCrossRef Weber AM, Abrams P, Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Davis G, Dmochowski RR, Fischer J, Hull T, Nygaard I, Weidner AC (2001) The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12(3):178–186PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Gandek B (1998) Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 51:903–912PubMedCrossRef Ware JE Jr, Gandek B (1998) Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 51:903–912PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:103–113PubMedCrossRef Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:103–113PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rogers R, Kammerer-Doak D, Villarreal A, Coates K, Qualls C (2001) A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:552–558PubMedCrossRef Rogers R, Kammerer-Doak D, Villarreal A, Coates K, Qualls C (2001) A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:552–558PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):98–101PubMedCrossRef Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):98–101PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A et al (2005) Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:795–806PubMedCrossRef Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A et al (2005) Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:795–806PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gutman RE, Ford DE, Quiroz LH, Shippey SH, Handa VL (2008) Is there a pelvic organ prolapse threshold that predicts pelvic floor symptoms? Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(6):683.e1–683.e7CrossRef Gutman RE, Ford DE, Quiroz LH, Shippey SH, Handa VL (2008) Is there a pelvic organ prolapse threshold that predicts pelvic floor symptoms? Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(6):683.e1–683.e7CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL, Schaffer J, Chen Z, Spino C, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (2009) Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 114(3):600–609PubMedCrossRef Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL, Schaffer J, Chen Z, Spino C, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (2009) Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 114(3):600–609PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Committee on Gynecologic Practice (2011) Committee Opinion no. 513: vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 118(6):1459–1464CrossRef Committee on Gynecologic Practice (2011) Committee Opinion no. 513: vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 118(6):1459–1464CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient goal attainment in vaginal prolapse repair with and without mesh
Authors
David Shveiky
Andrew I. Sokol
Robert E. Gutman
Bela I. Kudish
Cheryl B. Iglesia
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1766-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

International Urogynecology Journal 11/2012 Go to the issue