Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Cardiology Reports 1/2024

22-12-2023 | Congenital Heart Disease (RA Krasuski and G Fleming, Section Editors)

Patient Engagement in Research: Considerations in Creating a Registry for Adults with Congenital Heart Disease

Authors: Ruth Phillippi, Scott Leezer, Mindi Messmer, Danielle Hile, Anitha S. John

Published in: Current Cardiology Reports | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Patient engagement is defined as the meaningful involvement and active partnership of patients and key partners throughout the entire research project. This article reviews the importance of developing a patient engagement plan to promote better alignment of research with patients’ and clinicians’ real-world needs and concerns.

Recent Findings

The Congenital Heart Initiative (CHI) launched in 2020 is an entirely web-based longitudinal registry designed in close coordination with the adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) community it is intended to serve. Successful community engagement has resulted in real-world data being collected in large scale in a rare disease population.

Summary

Establishing patient engagement plans is critical to conducting patient-centered outcomes research. Continued improvement of community engagement strategies is needed to ensure the entire ACHD population is represented to facilitate future research and improved clinical care.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Forsythe LP, Carman K, Szydlowski V, et al. Patient engagement in research: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Health Aff. 2019;38(3):359–67.CrossRef Forsythe LP, Carman K, Szydlowski V, et al. Patient engagement in research: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Health Aff. 2019;38(3):359–67.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hemphill R, Forsythe LP, Heckert AL, et al. What motivates patients and caregivers to engage in health research and how engagement affects their lives: qualitative survey findings. Health Expect. 2020;23(2):328–36.CrossRefPubMed Hemphill R, Forsythe LP, Heckert AL, et al. What motivates patients and caregivers to engage in health research and how engagement affects their lives: qualitative survey findings. Health Expect. 2020;23(2):328–36.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference • Maurer M, Mangrum R, Hilliard-Boone T, et al. Understanding the influence and impact of stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(Suppl 1):6–13. This study examined the importance and role of partner engagement in PCOR, setting the stage for future study design.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral • Maurer M, Mangrum R, Hilliard-Boone T, et al. Understanding the influence and impact of stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(Suppl 1):6–13. This study examined the importance and role of partner engagement in PCOR, setting the stage for future study design.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Serena B, Graffigna G, Vegni E, Claudio Bosio A. The challenges of conceptualizing patient engagement in health care: a lexicographic literature review. J Particip Med. 2014;6:1. Serena B, Graffigna G, Vegni E, Claudio Bosio A. The challenges of conceptualizing patient engagement in health care: a lexicographic literature review. J Particip Med. 2014;6:1.
7.
go back to reference • Groot B, Haveman A, Buree M, van Zuijlen R, van Zuijlen J, Abma T. What patients prioritize for research to improve their lives and how their priorities get dismissed again. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):1927. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041927. This study reviews some of the barriers that patients face in getting their voices heard, emphasizing the need to be inclusive of all perspectives and backgrounds. • Groot B, Haveman A, Buree M, van Zuijlen R, van Zuijlen J, Abma T. What patients prioritize for research to improve their lives and how their priorities get dismissed again. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):1927. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​ijerph19041927. This study reviews some of the barriers that patients face in getting their voices heard, emphasizing the need to be inclusive of all perspectives and backgrounds.
10.
go back to reference Moloney R, Mohr P, Hawe E, Shah K, Garau M, Towse A. Payer perspective on future acceptability of comparative effectiveness and relative effectiveness research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(1/2):90–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moloney R, Mohr P, Hawe E, Shah K, Garau M, Towse A. Payer perspective on future acceptability of comparative effectiveness and relative effectiveness research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(1/2):90–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al. The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45(5 Supple 1):S3-S11. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al. The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45(5 Supple 1):S3-S11.
14.
go back to reference •• Bradley EA, Khan A, McNeal DM, Bravo-Jaimes K, Khanna A, Cook S, Opotowsky AR et al. Operational and ethical considerations for a national adult congenital heart disease database. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(7):e022338. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022338. This is the only published article that reviews the ethical considerations of Big Data in the CHD population from both the patient and researcher perspective. •• Bradley EA, Khan A, McNeal DM, Bravo-Jaimes K, Khanna A, Cook S, Opotowsky AR et al. Operational and ethical considerations for a national adult congenital heart disease database. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(7):e022338. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1161/​JAHA.​121.​022338. This is the only published article that reviews the ethical considerations of Big Data in the CHD population from both the patient and researcher perspective.
15.
go back to reference Lee SB, Zak A, Iversen MD, Polletta QL, Shadick NA, Solomon DH. Participation in clinical research registries: a focus group study examining views from patients with arthritis and other chronic illnesses. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68(7):974–80.CrossRef Lee SB, Zak A, Iversen MD, Polletta QL, Shadick NA, Solomon DH. Participation in clinical research registries: a focus group study examining views from patients with arthritis and other chronic illnesses. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68(7):974–80.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Groot B, Haveman A, Buree M, van Zuijlen R, van Zuijlen J, Abma T. What patients prioritize for research to improve their lives and how their priorities get dismissed again. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):1927. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041927. Groot B, Haveman A, Buree M, van Zuijlen R, van Zuijlen J, Abma T. What patients prioritize for research to improve their lives and how their priorities get dismissed again. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):1927. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​ijerph19041927.
17.
go back to reference Marelli AJ, Ionescu-Ittu R, Mackie AS, Guo L, Dendukuri N, Kaouache M. Lifetime prevalence of congenital heart disease in the general population from 2000 to 2010. Circulation. 2014;130(9):749–56.CrossRefPubMed Marelli AJ, Ionescu-Ittu R, Mackie AS, Guo L, Dendukuri N, Kaouache M. Lifetime prevalence of congenital heart disease in the general population from 2000 to 2010. Circulation. 2014;130(9):749–56.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Michelle G, Valente AM, Broberg C, Cook S, Stout K, Kay J, Ting J et al. Prevalence and predictors of gaps in care among adult congenital heart disease patients: HEART-ACHD (the Health, Education, and Access Research Trial). J Am College Cardiol. 2013;61(21):2180–2184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.048. Michelle G, Valente AM, Broberg C, Cook S, Stout K, Kay J, Ting J et al. Prevalence and predictors of gaps in care among adult congenital heart disease patients: HEART-ACHD (the Health, Education, and Access Research Trial). J Am College Cardiol. 2013;61(21):2180–2184. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2013.​02.​048.
23.
go back to reference Kalaichandran A. Design thinking for doctors and nurses. New York Times. 2017. [2021–11–20]. Kalaichandran A. Design thinking for doctors and nurses. New York Times. 2017. [2021–11–20].
24.
go back to reference Sanematsu H, Wiehe S. Learning to look: design in health services research. Touchpoint. 2014;TP06–2P82. Sanematsu H, Wiehe S. Learning to look: design in health services research. Touchpoint. 2014;TP06–2P82.
Metadata
Title
Patient Engagement in Research: Considerations in Creating a Registry for Adults with Congenital Heart Disease
Authors
Ruth Phillippi
Scott Leezer
Mindi Messmer
Danielle Hile
Anitha S. John
Publication date
22-12-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Cardiology Reports / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Electronic ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-023-02013-2