Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2016

01-02-2016 | Original Article

Patient and family experiences with accessing telephone cancer treatment symptom support: a descriptive study

Authors: Dawn Stacey, Esther Green, Barbara Ballantyne, Myriam Skrutkowski, Angela Whynot, Lucie Tardif, Joy Tarasuk, Meg Carley, For the Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) Team

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Assess patient and family member experiences with telephone cancer treatment symptom support.

Methods

Descriptive study guided by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework. Patients and family members who received telephone support for a cancer treatment symptom within the last month at one of three ambulatory cancer programs (Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec) were eligible. An adapted Short Questionnaire for Out-of-hours Care instrument was analyzed with univariate statistics.

Results

Of 105 participants, 83 % telephoned about themselves and 17 % for a family member. Participants received advice over the telephone (90 %) and were advised to go to emergency (13 %) and/or the clinic (9 %). Two left a message and were not called back. Participants were “very satisfied” with the manner of nurse or doctor (58 %), explanation about problem (56 %), treatment/advice given (54 %), way call was handled (48 %), getting through (40 %), and wait time to speak to a nurse or doctor (38 %). The proportion “dissatisfied” or “very dissatisfied” for the above items was 4, 5, 9, 11, 10, and 14 %, respectively. Suggestions were shorter call back time, weekend access to telephone support, more knowledgeable advice on self-care strategies, more education at discharge, and shared documentation on calls to avoid repetition and improve continuity.

Conclusions

Most patients and family members who responded to the survey were satisfied with telephone-based cancer treatment symptom support. Programs could improve telephone support services by providing an estimated time for callback, ensuring that nurses have access to and use previous call documentation, and enhancing patient education on self-care strategies for managing and triaging treatment-related symptoms.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stacey D, Bakker D, Green E, Zanchetta M, Conlon M (2007) Ambulatory oncology nursing telephone services: a provincial survey. Can Oncol Nurs J 17:1–5 Stacey D, Bakker D, Green E, Zanchetta M, Conlon M (2007) Ambulatory oncology nursing telephone services: a provincial survey. Can Oncol Nurs J 17:1–5
2.
go back to reference Macartney G, Stacey D, Carley M, Harrison MB (2012) Priorities, barriers and facilitators for remote support of cancer symptoms: a survey of Canadian oncology nurses. Can Oncol Nurs J 22:235–47PubMedCrossRef Macartney G, Stacey D, Carley M, Harrison MB (2012) Priorities, barriers and facilitators for remote support of cancer symptoms: a survey of Canadian oncology nurses. Can Oncol Nurs J 22:235–47PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference College of Nurses of Ontario. Telepractice: a practice guideline. College of Nurses of Ontario. Telepractice: a practice guideline.
5.
go back to reference National Clinical Guideline Centre (NCGC) (2012) Patient experience in adult NHS services: improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS services: patient experience in generic terms (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 138.). Royal College of Physicians (UK), London, Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115230/ National Clinical Guideline Centre (NCGC) (2012) Patient experience in adult NHS services: improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS services: patient experience in generic terms (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 138.). Royal College of Physicians (UK), London, Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​books/​NBK115230/​
7.
11.
go back to reference Kimman ML, Bloebaum MM, Dirksen CD, Houben RM, Lambin P, Boersma LJ (2010) Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer. BMC Cancer 10.1186/1471-2407-10-174 [doi]. Kimman ML, Bloebaum MM, Dirksen CD, Houben RM, Lambin P, Boersma LJ (2010) Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer. BMC Cancer 10.​1186/​1471-2407-10-174 [doi].
14.
go back to reference Overend A, Khoo K, Delorme M, Krause V, Avanessian A, Saltman D (2008) Evaluation of a nurse-led telephone follow-up clinic for patients with indolent and chronic hematological malignancies: a pilot study. Can Oncol Nurs J 18:64–73PubMedCrossRef Overend A, Khoo K, Delorme M, Krause V, Avanessian A, Saltman D (2008) Evaluation of a nurse-led telephone follow-up clinic for patients with indolent and chronic hematological malignancies: a pilot study. Can Oncol Nurs J 18:64–73PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Booker J, Eardley A, Cowan R, Logue J, Wylie J, Caress AL (2004) Telephone first post-intervention follow-up for men who have had radical radiotherapy to the prostate: evaluation of a novel service delivery approach. Eur J Oncol Nurs 8:325–33. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2004.01.003 PubMedCrossRef Booker J, Eardley A, Cowan R, Logue J, Wylie J, Caress AL (2004) Telephone first post-intervention follow-up for men who have had radical radiotherapy to the prostate: evaluation of a novel service delivery approach. Eur J Oncol Nurs 8:325–33. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejon.​2004.​01.​003 PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mair F, Whitten P, May C, Doolittle GC (2000) Patients’ perceptions of a telemedicine specialty clinic. J Telemed Telecare 6:36–40PubMedCrossRef Mair F, Whitten P, May C, Doolittle GC (2000) Patients’ perceptions of a telemedicine specialty clinic. J Telemed Telecare 6:36–40PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB et al (2006) Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 26:13–24PubMedCrossRef Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB et al (2006) Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 26:13–24PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Stacey D, Carley M, Ballantyne B, Skrutkowski M, Whynot A, For the Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) Team (2015) Perceived factors influencing nurses’ use of evidence-informed protocols for remote cancer treatment-related symptom management: a mixed methods study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 19:268–77. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2014.11.002 PubMedCrossRef Stacey D, Carley M, Ballantyne B, Skrutkowski M, Whynot A, For the Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) Team (2015) Perceived factors influencing nurses’ use of evidence-informed protocols for remote cancer treatment-related symptom management: a mixed methods study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 19:268–77. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejon.​2014.​11.​002 PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
go back to reference Garratt AM, Danielsen K, Hunskaar S (2007) Patient satisfaction questionnaires for primary care out-of-hours services: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 57:741–7PubMedPubMedCentral Garratt AM, Danielsen K, Hunskaar S (2007) Patient satisfaction questionnaires for primary care out-of-hours services: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 57:741–7PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (1976) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–91CrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (1976) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–91CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wilson R, Hubert J (2002) Resurfacing the care in nursing by telephone: lessons from ambulatory oncology. Nurs Outlook 50:160–4PubMedCrossRef Wilson R, Hubert J (2002) Resurfacing the care in nursing by telephone: lessons from ambulatory oncology. Nurs Outlook 50:160–4PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Henry DH, Viswanathan HN, Elkin EP, Traina S, Wade S, Cella D (2008) Symptoms and treatment burden associated with cancer treatment: results from a cross-sectional national survey in the U.S. Support Care Cancer 16:791–801PubMedCrossRef Henry DH, Viswanathan HN, Elkin EP, Traina S, Wade S, Cella D (2008) Symptoms and treatment burden associated with cancer treatment: results from a cross-sectional national survey in the U.S. Support Care Cancer 16:791–801PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Barbera L, Seow H, Howell D et al (2010) Symptom burden and performance status in a population-based cohort of ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 116:5767–76PubMedCrossRef Barbera L, Seow H, Howell D et al (2010) Symptom burden and performance status in a population-based cohort of ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 116:5767–76PubMedCrossRef
31.
Metadata
Title
Patient and family experiences with accessing telephone cancer treatment symptom support: a descriptive study
Authors
Dawn Stacey
Esther Green
Barbara Ballantyne
Myriam Skrutkowski
Angela Whynot
Lucie Tardif
Joy Tarasuk
Meg Carley
For the Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) Team
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2859-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine