Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 9/2023

05-07-2023 | Pathology | Original Article

High Proportions of Newly Detected Visible Lesions and Pathology Grade Change Among Patients with Barrett’s Esophagus Referred to Expert Centers

Authors: Christian Davis, Andrew Fuller, David Katzka, Sachin Wani, Tarek Sawas

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 9/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Aims

Endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett’s esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia is increasingly being performed at tertiary and community centers. While it has been suggested that these patients should be evaluated at expert centers, the impact of this practice has not been evaluated. We aimed to assess the impact of referral of BE-related neoplasia patients to expert centers by assessing the proportion of patients with change in pathological diagnosis and visible lesions detected.

Methods

Multiple databases were searched until December 2021 for studies of patients with BE referred from the community to expert center. The proportions of pathology grade change and newly detected visible lesions at expert centers were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed based on baseline histology and other relevant factors.

Results

Twelve studies were included (1630 patients). The pooled proportion of pathology grade change after expert pathologist review was 47% (95% CI 34–59%) overall and 46% (95% CI 31–62%) among patients with baseline low-grade dysplasia. When upper endoscopy was repeated at an expert center, the pooled proportion of pathology grade change was still high 47% (95% 26–69%) overall and 40% (95% CI 34–45%) among patients with baseline LGD. The pooled proportion of newly detected visible lesions was 45% (95% CI 28–63%) and among patients referred with LGD was 27% (95% CI 22–32%).

Conclusion

An alarmingly high proportion of newly detected visible lesions and pathology grade change were found when patients were referred to expert centers supporting the need for centralized care for BE-related neoplasia patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cook MB, Thrift AP. Epidemiology of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: implications for screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2021;31:1–26.CrossRefPubMed Cook MB, Thrift AP. Epidemiology of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: implications for screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2021;31:1–26.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Curtius K, Rubenstein JH, Chak A et al. Computational modelling suggests that Barrett’s oesophagus may be the precursor of all oesophageal adenocarcinomas. Gut 2020. Curtius K, Rubenstein JH, Chak A et al. Computational modelling suggests that Barrett’s oesophagus may be the precursor of all oesophageal adenocarcinomas. Gut 2020.
3.
go back to reference Frei NF, Stachler MD, Bergman J. Risk stratification in Barrett’s esophagus patients with diagnoses of indefinite for dysplasia: the definite silver bullet has not (yet) been found. Gastrointest Endosc 2020;91:11–13.CrossRefPubMed Frei NF, Stachler MD, Bergman J. Risk stratification in Barrett’s esophagus patients with diagnoses of indefinite for dysplasia: the definite silver bullet has not (yet) been found. Gastrointest Endosc 2020;91:11–13.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG et al. Diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus: an updated ACG guideline. Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117:559–587.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG et al. Diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus: an updated ACG guideline. Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117:559–587.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Wani S, Gyawali CP, Katzka DA. AGA clinical practice update on reducing rates of post-endoscopy esophageal adenocarcinoma: commentary. Gastroenterology 2020;159:1533–1537.CrossRefPubMed Wani S, Gyawali CP, Katzka DA. AGA clinical practice update on reducing rates of post-endoscopy esophageal adenocarcinoma: commentary. Gastroenterology 2020;159:1533–1537.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603–605.CrossRefPubMed Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603–605.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1006–1012.CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1006–1012.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nieuwenhuis EA, van Munster SN, Curvers WL et al. Impact of expert center endoscopic assessment of confirmed low grade dysplasia diagnosed in community hospitals. Endoscopy 2022;54:936–944.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nieuwenhuis EA, van Munster SN, Curvers WL et al. Impact of expert center endoscopic assessment of confirmed low grade dysplasia diagnosed in community hospitals. Endoscopy 2022;54:936–944.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Tsoi EH, Mahindra P, Cameron G et al. Barrett’s esophagus with low-grade dysplasia: high rate of upstaging at Barrett’s esophagus referral units suggests progression rates may be overestimated. Gastrointest Endosc 2021;94:902–908.CrossRefPubMed Tsoi EH, Mahindra P, Cameron G et al. Barrett’s esophagus with low-grade dysplasia: high rate of upstaging at Barrett’s esophagus referral units suggests progression rates may be overestimated. Gastrointest Endosc 2021;94:902–908.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Saraiva S, Conceicao D, Castela J et al. Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia: impact of the referral to a specialized center. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2020;8:208. Saraiva S, Conceicao D, Castela J et al. Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia: impact of the referral to a specialized center. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2020;8:208.
12.
go back to reference Maddalo G, Morbin T, Cristofori C et al. Endoscopic and Pathologic Second Opinion for Barrett’s esophagus (be) associated dysplasia: the experience of a Northeast Reference Center. Dig Liver Dis 2020;52:S62–S63.CrossRef Maddalo G, Morbin T, Cristofori C et al. Endoscopic and Pathologic Second Opinion for Barrett’s esophagus (be) associated dysplasia: the experience of a Northeast Reference Center. Dig Liver Dis 2020;52:S62–S63.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Leclercq P, De Hertogh G, Bisschops R. Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus is downgraded in half of the cases after systematic expert pathology review before patient referral for endoscopic treatment. Gastrointest Endosc 2020;91:399.CrossRef Leclercq P, De Hertogh G, Bisschops R. Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus is downgraded in half of the cases after systematic expert pathology review before patient referral for endoscopic treatment. Gastrointest Endosc 2020;91:399.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Villanacci V, Salemme M, Stroppa I et al. The importance of a second opinion in the diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus: a “real life” study. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas 2017;109:185–189.PubMed Villanacci V, Salemme M, Stroppa I et al. The importance of a second opinion in the diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus: a “real life” study. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas 2017;109:185–189.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Scholvinck DW, van der Meulen K, Bergman JJGHM et al. Detection of lesions in dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus by community and expert endoscopists. Endoscopy 2017;49:113–120.PubMed Scholvinck DW, van der Meulen K, Bergman JJGHM et al. Detection of lesions in dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus by community and expert endoscopists. Endoscopy 2017;49:113–120.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Rayner-Hartley E, Takach O, Galorport CE et al. Diagnosis and management of barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective study comparing the approach of community and tertairy centre physicians. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;1:504.CrossRef Rayner-Hartley E, Takach O, Galorport CE et al. Diagnosis and management of barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective study comparing the approach of community and tertairy centre physicians. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;1:504.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Krishnamoorthi R, Krishna M, Lewis J et al. Impact of histology confirmation by gi pathologist panel on progression rates in barrett’s esophagus with low-grade dysplasia: results from a multicenter prospective be registry. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;1:S731–S732.CrossRef Krishnamoorthi R, Krishna M, Lewis J et al. Impact of histology confirmation by gi pathologist panel on progression rates in barrett’s esophagus with low-grade dysplasia: results from a multicenter prospective be registry. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;1:S731–S732.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Duits LC, Phoa KN, Curvers WL et al. Barrett’s oesophagus patients with low-grade dysplasia can be accurately risk-stratified after histological review by an expert pathology panel. Gut 2015;64:700–706.CrossRefPubMed Duits LC, Phoa KN, Curvers WL et al. Barrett’s oesophagus patients with low-grade dysplasia can be accurately risk-stratified after histological review by an expert pathology panel. Gut 2015;64:700–706.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ayers K, Shi C, Washington K et al. Expert pathology review and endoscopic mucosal resection alters the diagnosis of patients referred to undergo therapy for Barrett’s esophagus. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2836–2840.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ayers K, Shi C, Washington K et al. Expert pathology review and endoscopic mucosal resection alters the diagnosis of patients referred to undergo therapy for Barrett’s esophagus. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2836–2840.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Wani S, Muthusamy VR, Shaheen NJ et al. Development of quality indicators for endoscopic eradication therapies in Barrett’s esophagus: the TREAT-BE (Treatment with Resection and Endoscopic Ablation Techniques for Barrett’s Esophagus) Consortium. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;86:1–17.CrossRefPubMed Wani S, Muthusamy VR, Shaheen NJ et al. Development of quality indicators for endoscopic eradication therapies in Barrett’s esophagus: the TREAT-BE (Treatment with Resection and Endoscopic Ablation Techniques for Barrett’s Esophagus) Consortium. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;86:1–17.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sharma P, Shaheen NJ, Katzka D et al. AGA clinical practice update on endoscopic treatment of Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia and/or early cancer: expert review. Gastroenterology 2020;158:760–769.CrossRefPubMed Sharma P, Shaheen NJ, Katzka D et al. AGA clinical practice update on endoscopic treatment of Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia and/or early cancer: expert review. Gastroenterology 2020;158:760–769.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Muthusamy VR, Wani S, Gyawali CP et al. AGA clinical practice update on new technology and innovation for surveillance and screening in Barrett's esophagus: expert review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022. Muthusamy VR, Wani S, Gyawali CP et al. AGA clinical practice update on new technology and innovation for surveillance and screening in Barrett's esophagus: expert review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022.
23.
go back to reference Weusten B, Bisschops R, Coron E et al. Endoscopic management of Barrett’s esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2017;49:191–198.CrossRefPubMed Weusten B, Bisschops R, Coron E et al. Endoscopic management of Barrett’s esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2017;49:191–198.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pasricha S, Cotton C, Hathorn KE et al. Effects of the learning curve on efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 2015;149:890–6.CrossRefPubMed Pasricha S, Cotton C, Hathorn KE et al. Effects of the learning curve on efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 2015;149:890–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Fudman DI, Lightdale CJ, Poneros JM et al. Positive correlation between endoscopist radiofrequency ablation volume and response rates in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;80:71–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fudman DI, Lightdale CJ, Poneros JM et al. Positive correlation between endoscopist radiofrequency ablation volume and response rates in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;80:71–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Tan MC, Kanthasamy KA, Yeh AG et al. Factors associated With recurrence of Barrett’s esophagus after radiofrequency ablation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;17:65–72.CrossRefPubMed Tan MC, Kanthasamy KA, Yeh AG et al. Factors associated With recurrence of Barrett’s esophagus after radiofrequency ablation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;17:65–72.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Ni M et al. The influence of procedural volume and proficiency gain on mortality from upper GI endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut 2018;67:79–85.CrossRefPubMed Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Ni M et al. The influence of procedural volume and proficiency gain on mortality from upper GI endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut 2018;67:79–85.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Bergman J, de Groof AJ, Pech O et al. An interactive web-based educational tool improves detection and delineation of Barrett’s esophagus-related neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2019;156:1299–1308.CrossRefPubMed Bergman J, de Groof AJ, Pech O et al. An interactive web-based educational tool improves detection and delineation of Barrett’s esophagus-related neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2019;156:1299–1308.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Haidry RJ, Butt MA, Dunn JM et al. Improvement over time in outcomes for patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for Barrett’s oesophagus-related neoplasia: 6-year experience from the first 500 patients treated in the UK patient registry. Gut 2015;64:1192–1199.CrossRefPubMed Haidry RJ, Butt MA, Dunn JM et al. Improvement over time in outcomes for patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for Barrett’s oesophagus-related neoplasia: 6-year experience from the first 500 patients treated in the UK patient registry. Gut 2015;64:1192–1199.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Sawas T, Majzoub AM, Haddad J et al. Magnitude and time-trend analysis of postendoscopy esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022;20:e31–e50.CrossRefPubMed Sawas T, Majzoub AM, Haddad J et al. Magnitude and time-trend analysis of postendoscopy esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022;20:e31–e50.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Wani S, Yadlapati R, Singh S et al. Post-endoscopy esophageal neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: consensus statements from an international expert panel. Gastroenterology 2022;162:366–372.CrossRefPubMed Wani S, Yadlapati R, Singh S et al. Post-endoscopy esophageal neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: consensus statements from an international expert panel. Gastroenterology 2022;162:366–372.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Pech O, Vieth M, Schmitz D et al. Conclusions from the histological diagnosis of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007;42:682–688.CrossRefPubMed Pech O, Vieth M, Schmitz D et al. Conclusions from the histological diagnosis of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007;42:682–688.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Phoa KN, van Vilsteren FG, Weusten BL et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett esophagus and low-grade dysplasia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014;311:1209–1217.CrossRefPubMed Phoa KN, van Vilsteren FG, Weusten BL et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett esophagus and low-grade dysplasia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014;311:1209–1217.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Singh S, Manickam P, Amin AV et al. Incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus with low-grade dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:897–909 e4; quiz 983 e1, 983 e3. Singh S, Manickam P, Amin AV et al. Incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus with low-grade dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:897–909 e4; quiz 983 e1, 983 e3.
35.
go back to reference Curvers WL, ten Kate FJ, Krishnadath KK et al. Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: overdiagnosed and underestimated. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:1523–1530.CrossRefPubMed Curvers WL, ten Kate FJ, Krishnadath KK et al. Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: overdiagnosed and underestimated. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:1523–1530.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Falk GW. Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: more than meets the eye? Gastrointest Endosc 2021;94:909–911.CrossRefPubMed Falk GW. Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: more than meets the eye? Gastrointest Endosc 2021;94:909–911.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Wani S, Rubenstein JH, Vieth M et al. Diagnosis and management of low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: expert review from the Clinical Practice Updates Committee of the American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology 2016;151:822–835.CrossRefPubMed Wani S, Rubenstein JH, Vieth M et al. Diagnosis and management of low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: expert review from the Clinical Practice Updates Committee of the American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology 2016;151:822–835.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference van der Wel MJ, Coleman HG, Bergman J et al. Histopathologist features predictive of diagnostic concordance at expert level among a large international sample of pathologists diagnosing Barrett’s dysplasia using digital pathology. Gut 2020;69:811–822.CrossRefPubMed van der Wel MJ, Coleman HG, Bergman J et al. Histopathologist features predictive of diagnostic concordance at expert level among a large international sample of pathologists diagnosing Barrett’s dysplasia using digital pathology. Gut 2020;69:811–822.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
High Proportions of Newly Detected Visible Lesions and Pathology Grade Change Among Patients with Barrett’s Esophagus Referred to Expert Centers
Authors
Christian Davis
Andrew Fuller
David Katzka
Sachin Wani
Tarek Sawas
Publication date
05-07-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 9/2023
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-07968-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2023

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 9/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine