Top

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Pathology | Research article

Designing a novel hybrid healthcare teleconsultation network: a benchtop study of telepathology in Iran and a systematic review

Authors: Mohammad Mahdi Taghipour, Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2020

Abstract

Background

Growing demand for medical services has increased patient waiting time due to the limited number or unbalanced distribution of healthcare centers. Healthcare teleconsultation networks are one of the potentially powerful systems to overcome this problem. Medical pathology can hugely benefit from teleconsultation networks because having second opinions is precious for many cases; however, resource planning (i.e., assignment and distribution of pathology consultation requests) is challenging due to bulky medical images of patients. This results in high setup and operational costs. The aim of this study is to design an optimal teleconsultation network for pathology labs under the supervision of medical sciences universities in Tehran, Iran.

Methods

To avoid the setup cost, we first propose a modified hybrid peer-to-peer (P2P) overlay architecture for our telepathology network, using Iran’s National Healthcare Information Network (SHAMS) as the underlying infrastructure. Then we apply optimization techniques to solve the request assignment and distribution problems in the network. Finally, we present a novel mathematical model with the objective of minimizing the variable operational costs of the system.

Results

The efficiency of the proposed method was evaluated by a set of practical-sized network instances simulated based on the characteristics of SHAMS. The results show that the presented model and architecture can obtain optimal solutions for network instances up to 350 nodes, which covers our target network.

Conclusions

We believe that the proposed method can be beneficial for designing large-scale medical teleconsultation networks by adjusting the constraints according to the rules and conditions of each country. Our findings showed that teleconsultation networks in countries with strong information technology (IT) infrastructures are under the influence of consultation fees, while in countries with weak IT infrastructure, the transmission costs are more critical. To the best of our knowledge, no research has so far addressed resource planning in medical teleconsultation networks using optimization techniques. Besides, the target network, i.e., pathology labs under the supervision of medical sciences universities in Tehran and the SHAMS network, are discussed for the first time in this work.

Available only for authorised users

Viberg N, Forsberg BC, Borowitz M, Molin R. International comparisons of waiting times in health care–limitations and prospects. Health Policy. 2013;112(1):53–61.PubMed

Siciliani L, Moran V, Borowitz M. Measuring and comparing health care waiting times in OECD countries. Health Policy. 2014;118(3):292–303.PubMed

Pena SM, Lawrence N. Analysis of wait times and impact of real-time surveys on patient satisfaction. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(10):1288–91.PubMed

Paul DL, McDaniel RR. Influences on teleconsultation project utilization rates: the role of dominant logic. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016;16(1):155.PubMedPubMedCentral

Tuot DS, Leeds K, Murphy EJ, Sarkar U, Lyles CR, Mekonnen T, et al. Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):568.PubMedPubMedCentral

Kern J. Evaluation of teleconsultation systems. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75(3):330–4.PubMed

Dadlani R, Mani S, JG AU, Mohan D, Rajgopalan N, Thakar S, et al. The impact of telemedicine in the postoperative care of the neurosurgery patient in an outpatient clinic: a unique perspective of this valuable resource in the developing world—an experience of more than 3000 teleconsultations. World Neurosurgery. 2014;82(3–4):270–83.PubMed

Jue JS, Spector SA, Spector SA. Telemedicine broadening access to care for complex cases. J Surg Res. 2017;220:164–70.PubMed

Sherwood BG, Han Y, Nepple KG, Erickson BA. Evaluating the effectiveness, efficiency and safety of telemedicine for urological care in the male prisoner population. Urology practice. 2018;5(1):44–51.PubMed

10.

Abdirad A, Ghaderi-Sohi S. Telepathology in Iran. In: Kumar S, Dunn BE, editors. Telepathology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009. p. 91–103.

11.

Dietel M, Nguyen-Dobinsky TN, Hufnagl P. The uicc telepathology consultation center. Cancer. 2000;89(1):187–91.PubMed

12.

Cross S, Dennis T, Start R. Telepathology: current status and future prospects in diagnostic histopathology. Histopathology. 2002;41(2):91–109.PubMed

13.

Parimbelli E, Bottalico B, Losiouk E, Tomasi M, Santosuosso A, Lanzola G, et al. Trusting telemedicine: a discussion on risks, safety, legal implications, and liability of involved stakeholders. Int J Med Inform. 2018.

14.

Park S, Parwani AV, Aller RD, Banach L, Becich MJ, Borkenfeld S, et al. The history of pathology informatics: a global perspective. J Pathol Inform. 2013;4.

15.

Crown W, Buyukkaramikli N, Thokala P, Morton A, Sir MY, Marshall DA, et al. Constrained optimization methods in health services research—an introduction: report 1 of the ISPOR optimization methods emerging good practices task force. Value Health. 2017;20(3):310–9.PubMed

16.

Batun S, Begen MA. Optimization in healthcare delivery modeling: methods and applications: Handbook of Healthcare Operations Management. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 75–119.

17.

Payne TH, Lovis C, Gutteridge C, Pagliari C, Natarajan S, Yong C, et al. Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries. J Global Health. 9(2):2019.

18.

Davoody N, Koch S, Krakau I, Hägglund M. Accessing and sharing health information for post-discharge stroke care through a national health information exchange platform-a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):95.PubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Dogac A, Yuksel M, Avcl A, Ceyhan B, Hülür Ü, Eryllmaz Z, et al. Electronic health record interoperability as realized in the Turkish health information system. Methods Inf Med. 2011;50(02):140–9.PubMed

20.

OECD. Strengthening Health Information Infrastructure for Health Care Quality Governance 2013.

21.

McConnell H. International efforts in implementing national health information infrastructure and electronic health records. World Hospitals Health Services. 2004;40(1):33.PubMed

22.

Attallah N, Gashgari H, Al Muallem Y, Al Dogether M, Al Moamary E, Almeshari M, et al., editors. A Literature Review on Health Information Exchange (HIE). ICIMTH; 2016.

23.

Galán-Jiménez J, Gazo-Cervero A. Overview and challenges of overlay networks: a survey. Int J Comput Sci Eng Surv (IJCSES). 2011;2:19–37.

24.

Vu QH, Lupu M, Ooi BC. Peer-to-peer computing: principles and applications: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.

25.

Weinstein RS, Descour MR, Liang C, Bhattacharyya AK, Graham AR, Davis JR, et al. Telepathology overview: from concept to implementation. Hum Pathol. 2001;32(12):1283–99.PubMed

26.

Deldar K, Bahaadinbeigy K, Tara SM. Teleconsultation and clinical decision making: a systematic review. Acta Informatica Medica. 2016;24(4):286.PubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Dietel M, Nguyen-Dobinsky T-N, Hufnagl P. The UICC Telepathology consultation center. International Union against Cancer. A global approach to improving consultation for pathologists in cancer diagnosis. Cancer. 2000;89(1):187–91.PubMed

28.

Chong T, Palma-Diaz MF, Fisher C, Gui D, Ostrzega NL, Sempa G, et al. The California Telepathology service: UCLA’s experience in deploying a regional digital pathology subspecialty consultation network. J Pathol Informatics. 2019;10.

29.

Mizushima H, Uchiyama E, Nagata H, Matsuno Y, Sekiguchi R, Ohmatsu H, et al. Japanese experience of telemedicine in oncology. Int J Med Inform. 2001;61(2):207–15.PubMed

30.

Sakai Y, Kitagawa M, Fukayama M, Yoshizawa A. Development of artificial intelligence to help pathological diagnosis-Japan pathology AI diagnostics (JP-AID) project. Impact. 2019;2019(6):40–2.

31.

Brauchli K, Oberholzer M. The iPath telemedicine platform. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(2_suppl):3–7.

32.

Adam H, Lebeau A, Turzynski A, Materna V, Rakowsky S, Wesselmann S. Telemedizin in der Onkologie: Qualität verbessern–aber wie? Krankenhaus-Report 2019: Springer; 2019. p. 145–58.

33.

Parwani A. Clinical applications of telepathology and whole slide imaging. APIII06, The Advancing Practice, Instruction, and Innovation through Informatics Conference. Canada: Frontiers in Oncology and Pathology Informatics Vancouver; 2006.

34.

Alami H, Fortin J-P, Gagnon M-P, Pollender H, Têtu B, Tanguay F. The challenges of a complex and innovative telehealth project: a qualitative evaluation of the eastern Quebec Telepathology network. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(5):421.PubMed

35.

Casparie M, Tiebosch A, Burger G, Blauwgeers H, Van de Pol A, van Krieken J, et al. Pathology databanking and biobanking in the Netherlands, a central role for PALGA, the nationwide histopathology and cytopathology data network and archive. Anal Cell Pathol. 2007;29(1):19–24.

36.

van Diest PJ, Huisman A, van Ekris J, Meijer J, Willems S, Hofhuis H, et al. Pathology image exchange: the Dutch digital pathology platform for exchange of whole-slide images for efficient Teleconsultation, Telerevision, and virtual expert panels. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. 2019;3:1–7.PubMed

37.

Munabi I, Isyagi M, Royall J, Sewankambo N. Static telepathology in a rural African hospital setting: a pilot experience by Makerere University Faculty of medicine; 2008.

38.

Montgomery ND, Tomoka T, Krysiak R, Powers E, Mulenga M, Kampani C, et al. Practical successes in telepathology experiences in Africa. Clin Lab Med. 2018;38(1):141–50.PubMed

39.

Cserneky M, Szende B, Fonyad L, Krenács T. Telepathology in Hungary: Telepathology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 127–47.

40.

Garaguly Z, Kozlovszky M, Kovács L. Platform independent telepathology system for pathologists. In: 2016 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI). United States: IEEE; 2016.

41.

Chen J, Jiao Y, Lu C, Zhou J, Zhang Z, Zhou C. A nationwide telepathology consultation and quality control program in China: implementation and result analysis. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9(1):S2.PubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Lauro GR, Cable W, Lesniak A, Tseytlin E, McHugh J, Parwani A, et al. Digital pathology consultations—a new era in digital imaging, challenges, and practical applications. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26(4):668–77.

43.

Adeogun O, Tiwari A, Alcock JR. Models of information exchange for UK telehealth systems. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80(5):359–70.PubMed

44.

McCarthy DB, Propp K, Cohen A, Sabharwal R, Schachter AA, Rein AL. Learning from health information exchange technical architecture and implementation in seven beacon communities. EGEMS. 2014;2(1).

45.

Pare G, Meyer J, Trudel MC, Tetu B. Impacts of a large decentralized Telepathology network in Canada. Telemed J E-health. 2016;22(3):246–50.PubMed

46.

Killian C, Vrable M, Snoeren AC, Vahdat A, Pasquale J. The overlay network content distribution problem. Technical Report CS2005–0824 UCSD, University of California, San Diego, CA; 2005.

47.

Chmaj G, Walkowiak K, Tarnawski M, Kucharzak M. Heuristic algorithms for optimization of task allocation and result distribution in peer-to-peer computing systems. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci. 2012;22(3):733–48.

48.

Rai A, Singh R, Modiano E. A Distributed Algorithm for Throughput Optimal Routing in Overlay Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:161205537; 2016.

49.

Yang S, Zhao W, Jiang Y, Xu M, Ming Z. Restricted overlay routing. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. 2016;7(2):275–85.

50.

Maiti A, Kist AA, Maxwell AD. Design and operational reliability of a Peer-to-Peer distributed remote access laboratory. In: Proceedings of 2015 12th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV). United States: IEEE; 2015.

51.

Carbajo RS, Mc GC. Decentralised peer-to-peer data dissemination in wireless sensor networks. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. 2017;40:242–66.

52.

Nobre JC, Melchiors C, Marquezan CC, Tarouco LMR, Granville LZ. A survey on the use of P2P technology for network management. J Netw Syst Manag. 2018;26(1):189–221.

53.

Pióro M, Medhi D. Routing, flow, and capacity design in communication and computer networks: Elsevier; 2004.

54.

Gendron B, Crainic TG, Frangioni A. Multicommodity capacitated network design. In: Sansò B, Soriano P, editors. Telecommunications network planning. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1999. p. 1–19.

55.

Zegura EW, Calvert KL, Bhattacharjee S. How to model an internetwork. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'96. Conference on Computer Communications. Vol. 2. United States: IEEE; 1996.

Title: Designing a novel hybrid healthcare teleconsultation network: a benchtop study of telepathology in Iran and a systematic review
Authors: Mohammad Mahdi Taghipour
Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri
Publication date: 01-12-2020
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keyword: Pathology
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01170-6

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Designing a novel hybrid healthcare teleconsultation network: a benchtop study of telepathology in Iran and a systematic review

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Thailand medical mobile application for patients triage base on criteria based dispatch protocol

Data mining application to healthcare fraud detection: a two-step unsupervised clustering method for outlier detection with administrative databases

Diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy using convolutional neural network

Monitoring stance towards vaccination in twitter messages

Validation of a machine learning algorithm for early severe sepsis prediction: a retrospective study predicting severe sepsis up to 48 h in advance using a diverse dataset from 461 US hospitals

Early prediction of acquiring acute kidney injury for older inpatients using most effective laboratory test results