Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2014

01-04-2014 | Original Article

Pathological outcomes of Japanese men eligible for active surveillance after radical prostatectomy

Authors: Takahiro Inoue, Hidefumi Kinoshita, Hidekazu Inui, Yoshihiro Komai, Masayuki Nakagawa, Naoki Oguchi, Gen Kawa, Motohiko Sugi, Chisato Ohe, Chika Miyasaka, Yorika Nakano, Noriko Sakaida, Yoshiko Uemura, Tadashi Matsuda

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to analyze the pathological features of prostatectomy specimens from patients with low-risk prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance (AS) and evaluate preoperative data suitable for predicting upstaged (≥pT3) or upgraded disease (Gleason score of ≥7), defined as ‘reclassification’.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 521 consecutive radical prostatectomy procedures (January 2005 through to December 2011) performed at our institution without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was performed. Eighty-four patients fulfilled the following criteria—clinical T1 or T2 disease, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of ≤10 ng/ml, one or two positive biopsies, and Gleason score of <7. Clinicopathological features at diagnosis were compared between patients with and without reclassification after radical prostatectomy.

Results

Forty of 84 patients (47.6 %) had a Gleason score of ≥7, and 8 (9.5 %) had upstaged disease (≥pT3). Seven patients with upstaged disease also showed upgraded reclassification. Two patients with reclassification showed biochemical recurrence at 59 and 89 months after surgery, respectively. Preoperative parameters evaluated included age, PSA level, PSA density (PSAD), clinical T stage, and number and percentage of positive prostate cores. Among 82 patients with complete data, univariate analysis showed that PSAD (ng/ml2) was a significant parameter to discriminate patients with reclassified disease and those without reclassified disease (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that PSAD was the only independent variable to predict disease with reclassification (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Preoperative PSAD may be a good indicator for selecting patients eligible for AS in the Japanese population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer facts and figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer facts and figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
3.
go back to reference Bul M, van den Bergh RC, Zhu X, Rannikko A et al (2012) Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:1672–1677PubMedCrossRef Bul M, van den Bergh RC, Zhu X, Rannikko A et al (2012) Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:1672–1677PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dall’Era MA, Albertsen PC, Bangma C et al (2012) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 62:976–983PubMedCrossRef Dall’Era MA, Albertsen PC, Bangma C et al (2012) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 62:976–983PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Bul M, Zhu X, Rannikko A et al (2012) Radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer following initial active surveillance: results from a prospective observational study. Eur Urol 62:195–200PubMedCrossRef Bul M, Zhu X, Rannikko A et al (2012) Radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer following initial active surveillance: results from a prospective observational study. Eur Urol 62:195–200PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A et al (2010) Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:126–131PubMedCrossRef Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A et al (2010) Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:126–131PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dall’Era MA, Konety BR, Cowan JE et al (2008) Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort. Cancer 112:2664–2670PubMedCrossRef Dall’Era MA, Konety BR, Cowan JE et al (2008) Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort. Cancer 112:2664–2670PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference van As NJ, Norman AR, Thomas K et al (2008) Predicting the probability of deferred radical treatment for localised prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. Eur Urol 54:1297–1305PubMedCrossRef van As NJ, Norman AR, Thomas K et al (2008) Predicting the probability of deferred radical treatment for localised prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. Eur Urol 54:1297–1305PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kakehi Y, Kamoto T, Shiraishi T et al (2008) Prospective evaluation of selection criteria for active surveillance in Japanese patients with stage T1cN0M0 prostate cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38:122–128PubMedCrossRef Kakehi Y, Kamoto T, Shiraishi T et al (2008) Prospective evaluation of selection criteria for active surveillance in Japanese patients with stage T1cN0M0 prostate cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38:122–128PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Beauval JB, Ploussard G, Soulié M et al (2012) Pathologic findings in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients eligible for active surveillance with highly selective criteria: a multicenter study. Urology 80:656–660PubMedCrossRef Beauval JB, Ploussard G, Soulié M et al (2012) Pathologic findings in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients eligible for active surveillance with highly selective criteria: a multicenter study. Urology 80:656–660PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kotb AF, Tanguay S, Luz MA (2011) Relationship between initial PSA density with future PSA kinetics and repeat biopsies in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 14:53–57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kotb AF, Tanguay S, Luz MA (2011) Relationship between initial PSA density with future PSA kinetics and repeat biopsies in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 14:53–57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ko JS, Landis P, Carter HB et al (2011) Effect of intra-observer variation in prostate volume measurement on prostate-specific antigen density calculations among prostate cancer active surveillance participants. BJU Int 108:1739–1742PubMedCrossRef Ko JS, Landis P, Carter HB et al (2011) Effect of intra-observer variation in prostate volume measurement on prostate-specific antigen density calculations among prostate cancer active surveillance participants. BJU Int 108:1739–1742PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H, Kattan MW et al (2007) The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: an initial analysis. BJU Int 99:786–793PubMedCrossRef Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H, Kattan MW et al (2007) The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: an initial analysis. BJU Int 99:786–793PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference O’Brien D, Loeb S, Carvalhal GF et al (2011) Delay of surgery in men with low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 185:2143–2147PubMedCrossRef O’Brien D, Loeb S, Carvalhal GF et al (2011) Delay of surgery in men with low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 185:2143–2147PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Holmström B, Holmberg E, Egevad L et al (2010) Outcome of primary versus deferred radical prostatectomy in the national prostate cancer register of Sweden follow-up study. J Urol 184:1322–1327PubMedCrossRef Holmström B, Holmberg E, Egevad L et al (2010) Outcome of primary versus deferred radical prostatectomy in the national prostate cancer register of Sweden follow-up study. J Urol 184:1322–1327PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M et al (1994) Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 271:368–374PubMedCrossRef Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M et al (1994) Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 271:368–374PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ploussard G, Epstein JI, Montironi R et al (2011) The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 60:291–303PubMedCrossRef Ploussard G, Epstein JI, Montironi R et al (2011) The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 60:291–303PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pathological outcomes of Japanese men eligible for active surveillance after radical prostatectomy
Authors
Takahiro Inoue
Hidefumi Kinoshita
Hidekazu Inui
Yoshihiro Komai
Masayuki Nakagawa
Naoki Oguchi
Gen Kawa
Motohiko Sugi
Chisato Ohe
Chika Miyasaka
Yorika Nakano
Noriko Sakaida
Yoshiko Uemura
Tadashi Matsuda
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-013-0553-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine