Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 11/2010

01-11-2010 | Original Article

Pathological examination of 12 regional lymph nodes and long-term survival in stages I–III colon cancer patients: an analysis of 2,056 consecutive patients in two branches of same institution

Authors: Hong Hwa Chen, Dilip Chakravarty K, Jeng-Yi Wang, Chung-Rong Changchien, Reiping Tang

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 11/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Pathologic examination of at least 12 lymph nodes (LNs) is widely accepted as a standard for colon cancer surgery. We sought to address its association with patient source, other clinicopathological factors, and survival by comparing information from two branches in a large single institution.

Methods

Patients with stages I–III adenocarcinoma of the colon between 1998 and 2003 were identified from the Chang Gung Colorectal Tumor Registry in two branches (Linkou and Kaohsiung branches) of same institution. We used multivariate analysis to adjust for variables with P < 0.1 in univariate analyses.

Results

A minimum of 12 examined nodes were observed in 80% of patients in Linkou branch versus 25% in Kaohsiung branch (P < 0.0001). Younger age, right hemicolectomy, larger tumor, higher tumor stage, higher caseload of surgeons, and patients at Linkou branch with an odds ratio (OR) as high as 23 (95% CI, 17–31) were independently associated with a higher frequency of ≥12 examined nodes. Patients with examined node number of <12 had a greater risk of recurrence within stages II and III (stage II: adjusted OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.27–2.79; stage III: adjusted OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.15–2.17) but not within stage I (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.23–2.24).

Conclusions

The results confirm that factors influencing nodal harvest are multifactorial and the examined LN number of 12 or more is associated with an increased long-term survival in stages II–III colon cancer. It is possible to adequately sample and examine a sufficient number of nodes in the majority of colon cancer specimens by standardized conventional methods.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cancer registry annual report (2008) Taiwan, R.O.C., Taipei. Department of Health, the Executive Yuan, R.O.C Cancer registry annual report (2008) Taiwan, R.O.C., Taipei. Department of Health, the Executive Yuan, R.O.C
2.
go back to reference Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A et al (2001) Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:583–596CrossRefPubMed Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A et al (2001) Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:583–596CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of Intergroup Trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21:2912–2919CrossRefPubMed Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of Intergroup Trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21:2912–2919CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM et al (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:433–441CrossRefPubMed Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM et al (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:433–441CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fielding LP, Arsenault PA, Chapuis PH et al (1991) Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer. An international documentation systems and international comprehensive anatomical terminology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:325–344CrossRefPubMed Fielding LP, Arsenault PA, Chapuis PH et al (1991) Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer. An international documentation systems and international comprehensive anatomical terminology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:325–344CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gonen M, Schran D, Weiser MR (2009) Nodal staging score: a tool to assess adequate staging of node-negative colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:6166–6171CrossRefPubMed Gonen M, Schran D, Weiser MR (2009) Nodal staging score: a tool to assess adequate staging of node-negative colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:6166–6171CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB et al (1999) Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17:2896–2900PubMed Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB et al (1999) Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17:2896–2900PubMed
9.
go back to reference Mammen JM, James LE, Molloy M et al (2007) The relationship of lymph node dissection and colon cancer survival in the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry. Am J Surg 194:349–354CrossRefPubMed Mammen JM, James LE, Molloy M et al (2007) The relationship of lymph node dissection and colon cancer survival in the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry. Am J Surg 194:349–354CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Johnson PM, Malatjalian D, Porter GA (2002) Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg 6:883–888CrossRefPubMed Johnson PM, Malatjalian D, Porter GA (2002) Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg 6:883–888CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Caplin S, Cerottini JP, Bosman FT et al (1998) For patients with Dukes’ B (TNM stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer 83:666–672CrossRefPubMed Caplin S, Cerottini JP, Bosman FT et al (1998) For patients with Dukes’ B (TNM stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer 83:666–672CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK et al (2003) The Prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 10:65–71CrossRefPubMed Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK et al (2003) The Prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 10:65–71CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Vather R, Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Connolly AB, Hill AG (2009) Lymph node evaluation and long-term survival in stage II and stage III colon cancer: a national study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:585–593CrossRefPubMed Vather R, Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Connolly AB, Hill AG (2009) Lymph node evaluation and long-term survival in stage II and stage III colon cancer: a national study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:585–593CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Goldstein NS (2002) Lymph node recoveries from 2, 427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 26:179–189CrossRefPubMed Goldstein NS (2002) Lymph node recoveries from 2, 427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 26:179–189CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Compton CC, Greene FL (2004) The staging of colorectal cancer: 2004 and beyond. CA Cancer J Clin 54:295–308CrossRefPubMed Compton CC, Greene FL (2004) The staging of colorectal cancer: 2004 and beyond. CA Cancer J Clin 54:295–308CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sobin HL, Greene FL (2001) TNM classification: clarification of number of regional lymph node for pN0. Cancer 92:452CrossRefPubMed Sobin HL, Greene FL (2001) TNM classification: clarification of number of regional lymph node for pN0. Cancer 92:452CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ et al (2000) Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer: College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:979–994PubMed Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ et al (2000) Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer: College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:979–994PubMed
19.
go back to reference Wong SL, Ji H, Hollenbeck BK et al (2007) Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer. JAMA 298:2149–2154CrossRefPubMed Wong SL, Ji H, Hollenbeck BK et al (2007) Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer. JAMA 298:2149–2154CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Jestin P, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Gunnarsson U (2005) Cancer staging and survival in colon cancer is dependent on the quality of the pathologists’ specimen examination. Eur J Cancer 41:2071–2078CrossRefPubMed Jestin P, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Gunnarsson U (2005) Cancer staging and survival in colon cancer is dependent on the quality of the pathologists’ specimen examination. Eur J Cancer 41:2071–2078CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Palis BE et al (2008) Adequacy and importance of lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 206:247–254CrossRefPubMed Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Palis BE et al (2008) Adequacy and importance of lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 206:247–254CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sarli L, Bader G, Iusco D et al (2005) Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 41:272–279CrossRefPubMed Sarli L, Bader G, Iusco D et al (2005) Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 41:272–279CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A et al (2002) Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg 235:458–463CrossRefPubMed Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A et al (2002) Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg 235:458–463CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Joseph NE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Accuracy of determining nodal negativity in colorectal cancer on the basis of the number of nodes retrieved on resection. Ann Surg Oncol 10:213–218CrossRefPubMed Joseph NE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Accuracy of determining nodal negativity in colorectal cancer on the basis of the number of nodes retrieved on resection. Ann Surg Oncol 10:213–218CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Jessup JM, Gunderson LL, Greene FL et al (2009) Colon and rectum. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (eds) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York, pp 143–164 Jessup JM, Gunderson LL, Greene FL et al (2009) Colon and rectum. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (eds) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York, pp 143–164
26.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, Morris AM, Jessurun J, Virnig BA (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:219–225CrossRefPubMed Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, Morris AM, Jessurun J, Virnig BA (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:219–225CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kelder W, Inberg B, Schaapveld M et al (2009) Impact of the number of histologically examined lymph nodes on prognosis in colon cancer: a population-based study in the Netherlands. Dis Colon Rectum 52:260–267PubMed Kelder W, Inberg B, Schaapveld M et al (2009) Impact of the number of histologically examined lymph nodes on prognosis in colon cancer: a population-based study in the Netherlands. Dis Colon Rectum 52:260–267PubMed
28.
go back to reference Evans MD, Barton K, Rees A et al (2008) The impact of surgeon and pathologist on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its impact on survival for patients with Dukes’ stage B disease. Colorectal Dis 10:157–164PubMed Evans MD, Barton K, Rees A et al (2008) The impact of surgeon and pathologist on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its impact on survival for patients with Dukes’ stage B disease. Colorectal Dis 10:157–164PubMed
29.
go back to reference Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK (1985) The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 312:1604–1608CrossRefPubMed Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK (1985) The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 312:1604–1608CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Pagès F, Berger A, Camus M et al (2005) Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 353:2654–2666CrossRefPubMed Pagès F, Berger A, Camus M et al (2005) Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 353:2654–2666CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Eveno C, Nemeth J, Soliman H et al (2010) Association between a high number of isolated lymph nodes in T1 to T4 N0M0 colorectal cancer and the microsatellite instability phenotype. Arch Surg 145:12–17CrossRefPubMed Eveno C, Nemeth J, Soliman H et al (2010) Association between a high number of isolated lymph nodes in T1 to T4 N0M0 colorectal cancer and the microsatellite instability phenotype. Arch Surg 145:12–17CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Sankila R, Aaltonen LA, Järvinen HJ, Mecklin JP (1996) Better survival rates in patients with MLH1-associated hereditary colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 110:682–687CrossRefPubMed Sankila R, Aaltonen LA, Järvinen HJ, Mecklin JP (1996) Better survival rates in patients with MLH1-associated hereditary colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 110:682–687CrossRefPubMed
33.
34.
go back to reference Wright FC, Gagliardi AR, Law CH et al (2008) A randomized controlled trial to improve lymph node assessment in stage II colon cancer. Arch Surg 143:1050–1055CrossRefPubMed Wright FC, Gagliardi AR, Law CH et al (2008) A randomized controlled trial to improve lymph node assessment in stage II colon cancer. Arch Surg 143:1050–1055CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Bembenek AE, Rosenberg R, Wagler E et al (2007) Sentinel lymph node biopsy in colon cancer: a prospective multicenter trial. Ann Surg 245:858–863CrossRefPubMed Bembenek AE, Rosenberg R, Wagler E et al (2007) Sentinel lymph node biopsy in colon cancer: a prospective multicenter trial. Ann Surg 245:858–863CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Nordgård O, Oltedal S, Kørner H et al (2009) Quantitative RT-PCR detection of tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes isolated from colon cancer patients with an ex vivo approach. Ann Surg 249:602–607CrossRefPubMed Nordgård O, Oltedal S, Kørner H et al (2009) Quantitative RT-PCR detection of tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes isolated from colon cancer patients with an ex vivo approach. Ann Surg 249:602–607CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Stojadinovic A, Nissan A, Protic M et al (2007) Prospective randomized study comparing sentinel lymph node evaluation with standard pathologic evaluation for the staging of colon carcinoma: results from the United States Military Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Group Study GI-01. Ann Surg 245:846–857CrossRefPubMed Stojadinovic A, Nissan A, Protic M et al (2007) Prospective randomized study comparing sentinel lymph node evaluation with standard pathologic evaluation for the staging of colon carcinoma: results from the United States Military Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Group Study GI-01. Ann Surg 245:846–857CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Bertagnolli M, Miedema B, Redston M et al (2004) Sentinel node staging of resectable colon cancer: results of a multicenter study. Ann Surg 240:624–628PubMed Bertagnolli M, Miedema B, Redston M et al (2004) Sentinel node staging of resectable colon cancer: results of a multicenter study. Ann Surg 240:624–628PubMed
39.
go back to reference Lim SJ, Feig BW, Wang H et al (2008) Sentinel lymph node evaluation does not improve staging accuracy in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15:46–51CrossRefPubMed Lim SJ, Feig BW, Wang H et al (2008) Sentinel lymph node evaluation does not improve staging accuracy in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15:46–51CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Redston M, Compton CC, Miedema BW et al (2006) Analysis of micrometastatic disease in sentinel lymph nodes from resectable colon cancer: results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 80001. J Clin Oncol 24878–24883 Redston M, Compton CC, Miedema BW et al (2006) Analysis of micrometastatic disease in sentinel lymph nodes from resectable colon cancer: results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 80001. J Clin Oncol 24878–24883
41.
go back to reference Berger AC, Sigurdson ER, LeVoyer T et al (2005) Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol 23:8706–8712CrossRefPubMed Berger AC, Sigurdson ER, LeVoyer T et al (2005) Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol 23:8706–8712CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pathological examination of 12 regional lymph nodes and long-term survival in stages I–III colon cancer patients: an analysis of 2,056 consecutive patients in two branches of same institution
Authors
Hong Hwa Chen
Dilip Chakravarty K
Jeng-Yi Wang
Chung-Rong Changchien
Reiping Tang
Publication date
01-11-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 11/2010
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1020-8

Other articles of this Issue 11/2010

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 11/2010 Go to the issue