Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2007

01-12-2007 | Urologic Oncology

Partial Penectomy for Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Experience

Authors: Ruslan Korets, MD, Theresa M. Koppie, MD, Mark E. Snyder, BA, Paul Russo, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To present our institution’s experience with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, with analysis of oncologic efficacy and survival.

Methods

Between 1989 and 2005, we identified 32 consecutive patients (median age, 61 years) with SCC of the penis managed with partial penectomy. Clinicopathologic variables were examined, and overall and disease-specific survival were determined.

Results

Pathologic stage of the primary tumor was pTis in 1 patient (3%), pT1 in 11 (34%), pT2 in 16 (50%), and pT3 in 4 (13%). Pathologic grade was well differentiated in 9 patients (28%), moderately differentiated in 20 (63%), and poorly differentiated in 2 (6%). Twenty-five patients (78%) underwent inguinal lymph node dissection, with 15 (60%) demonstrating nodal metastases. Twenty-two patients (69%) underwent pelvic lymph node dissection; 21 were negative for pelvic nodal metastases, and 1 had grossly positive nodes. One patient developed local recurrence. After a mean follow-up of 34 months, overall survival was 56%. Numbers of patients alive and disease-free were 9 and 11 in the low-stage and advanced-stage groups, and 8 and 12 in the well and moderately differentiated groups, respectively. Both patients with poorly differentiated disease died of disease within 12 months from presentation.

Conclusions

Partial penectomy for SCC of the penis provides excellent local control, with low recurrence rate, and acceptable maintenance of urinary and sexual function. Outcomes are generally poor, however, for patients with regional metastases, even in moderately differentiated disease. Future studies are needed to identify a reliable method of predicting regional metastases.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Narayana AS, Olney LE, Loening SA, et al. Carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 219 cases. Cancer 1982;49:2185–91PubMedCrossRef Narayana AS, Olney LE, Loening SA, et al. Carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 219 cases. Cancer 1982;49:2185–91PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference McDougal WS. Phallic preserving surgery in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 2005;174:2218–20PubMedCrossRef McDougal WS. Phallic preserving surgery in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 2005;174:2218–20PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pietrzak P, Corbishley C, Watkin N. Organ-sparing surgery for invasive penile cancer: early follow-up data. BJU Int 2004;94:1253–7PubMedCrossRef Pietrzak P, Corbishley C, Watkin N. Organ-sparing surgery for invasive penile cancer: early follow-up data. BJU Int 2004;94:1253–7PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mazza ON, Cheliz GM. Glanuloplasty with scrotal flap for partial penectomy. J Urol 2001;166:887–9PubMedCrossRef Mazza ON, Cheliz GM. Glanuloplasty with scrotal flap for partial penectomy. J Urol 2001;166:887–9PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Davis JW, Schellhammer PF, Schlossberg SM. Conservative surgical therapy for penile and urethral carcinoma. Urology 1999;53:386–92PubMedCrossRef Davis JW, Schellhammer PF, Schlossberg SM. Conservative surgical therapy for penile and urethral carcinoma. Urology 1999;53:386–92PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Russo P, Horenblas S. Comprehensive Textbook of Genitourinary Oncology. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006 Russo P, Horenblas S. Comprehensive Textbook of Genitourinary Oncology. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006
9.
go back to reference Russo P, Saldana EF, Yu S, Chaglasian T, et al. Myocutaneous flaps in genitourinary oncology. J Urol 1994;151:920–4PubMed Russo P, Saldana EF, Yu S, Chaglasian T, et al. Myocutaneous flaps in genitourinary oncology. J Urol 1994;151:920–4PubMed
10.
go back to reference Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz A, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al. (eds) Penis. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. New York: Springer 2002:303 Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz A, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al. (eds) Penis. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. New York: Springer 2002:303
11.
go back to reference Lont AP, Gallee MP, Meinhardt W, et al. Penis conserving treatment for T1 and T2 penile carcinoma: clinical implications of a local recurrence. J Urol 2006;176:575–80PubMedCrossRef Lont AP, Gallee MP, Meinhardt W, et al. Penis conserving treatment for T1 and T2 penile carcinoma: clinical implications of a local recurrence. J Urol 2006;176:575–80PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hoffman MA, Renshaw AA, Loughlin KR. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and microscopic pathologic margins: how much margin is needed for local cure? Cancer 1999;85:1565–8PubMedCrossRef Hoffman MA, Renshaw AA, Loughlin KR. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and microscopic pathologic margins: how much margin is needed for local cure? Cancer 1999;85:1565–8PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Minhas S, Kayes O, Hegarty P, et al. What surgical resection margins are required to achieve oncological control in men with primary penile cancer? BJU Int 2005;96:1040–3PubMedCrossRef Minhas S, Kayes O, Hegarty P, et al. What surgical resection margins are required to achieve oncological control in men with primary penile cancer? BJU Int 2005;96:1040–3PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Agrawal A, Pai D, Ananthakrishnan N, et al. The histological extent of the local spread of carcinoma of the penis and its therapeutic implications. BJU Int 2000;85:299–301PubMedCrossRef Agrawal A, Pai D, Ananthakrishnan N, et al. The histological extent of the local spread of carcinoma of the penis and its therapeutic implications. BJU Int 2000;85:299–301PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference McDougal WS, Kirchner FK Jr, Edwards RH, et al. Treatment of carcinoma of the penis: the case for primary lymphadenectomy. J Urol 1986;136:38–41PubMed McDougal WS, Kirchner FK Jr, Edwards RH, et al. Treatment of carcinoma of the penis: the case for primary lymphadenectomy. J Urol 1986;136:38–41PubMed
16.
go back to reference Ficarra V, D’Amico A, Cavalleri S, et al. Surgical treatment of penile carcinoma: our experience from 1976 to 1997. Urol Int 1999;62:234–7PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, D’Amico A, Cavalleri S, et al. Surgical treatment of penile carcinoma: our experience from 1976 to 1997. Urol Int 1999;62:234–7PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference D’Ancona CA, Botega NJ, De Moraes C, et al. Quality of life after partial penectomy for penile carcinoma. Urology 1997;50:593–6PubMedCrossRef D’Ancona CA, Botega NJ, De Moraes C, et al. Quality of life after partial penectomy for penile carcinoma. Urology 1997;50:593–6PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Opjordsmoen S, Fossa SD. Quality of life in patients treated for penile cancer. A follow-up study. Br J Urol 1994;74:652–7PubMed Opjordsmoen S, Fossa SD. Quality of life in patients treated for penile cancer. A follow-up study. Br J Urol 1994;74:652–7PubMed
19.
go back to reference Romero FR, Romero KR, Mattos MA, et al. Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer. Urology 2005;66:1292–5PubMedCrossRef Romero FR, Romero KR, Mattos MA, et al. Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer. Urology 2005;66:1292–5PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Theodorescu D, Russo P, Zhang ZF, et al. Outcomes of initial surveillance of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and negative nodes. J Urol 1996;155:1626–31PubMedCrossRef Theodorescu D, Russo P, Zhang ZF, et al. Outcomes of initial surveillance of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and negative nodes. J Urol 1996;155:1626–31PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bouchot O, Rigaud J, Maillet F, et al. Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 2004;45:761–5PubMedCrossRef Bouchot O, Rigaud J, Maillet F, et al. Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 2004;45:761–5PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Meinhardt W, et al. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma: evaluation of 10 years experience. Eur Urol 2005;47:601–6PubMedCrossRef Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Meinhardt W, et al. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma: evaluation of 10 years experience. Eur Urol 2005;47:601–6PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Partial Penectomy for Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Experience
Authors
Ruslan Korets, MD
Theresa M. Koppie, MD
Mark E. Snyder, BA
Paul Russo, MD
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2007
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9563-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2007

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2007 Go to the issue