Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Paper

Part 2: outcome of acetabular fractures and associated prognostic factors—a ten-year retrospective study of one hundred and fifty six operated cases with open reduction and internal fixation

Authors: Mehdi Boudissa, Sébastien Ruatti, Gael Kerschbaumer, Michel Milaire, Philippe Merloz, Jérôme Tonetti

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Questions/purposes

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors associated with a poor quality of reduction and their relationships.

Methods

Data from medical charts for all patients admitted with acetabular fractures operated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) from 2005 to 2014 were extracted. A total of 156 patients with a mean age of 40.3 years were included. All patients were reviewed at six months of follow-up. The prognostic factors analyzed were clinical and radiological factors. A new radiological parameter was also studied: the scanographic roof-arc angle. Specific statistical analysis was performed using a logistic regression model.

Results

Using a multivariate analysis logistic regression model: roof impaction (p = 0.001; OR = 6.59; CI 95% [2.01–20.97]), transverse + posterior wall (p = 0.03, OR = 2.52; CI 95% [1.46–13.65]) and surgeons in training (p = 0.02; OR = 1.24; CI 95% [1.07–3.32]) were three independent prognostic factors. Lower values of medial and posterior scanographic roof-arc angle were associated with unsatisfactory reduction. A significant association between unsatisfactory reduction and posterior roof arc angle < 61° was found.

Conclusions

Three independent prognostic factors associated with a risk of unsatisfactory reduction in ORIF for acetabular fractures were identified: roof impaction, transverse + posterior wall fracture and surgeons in training. Scanographic roof-arc angle seems to be a new prognostic factor.
Level of Evidence Level 4 retrospective study
Literature
1.
go back to reference Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E (1964) Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:1615–1646PubMed Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E (1964) Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:1615–1646PubMed
2.
go back to reference Matta JM, Merritt PO (1988) Displaced acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 230:83–97PubMed Matta JM, Merritt PO (1988) Displaced acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 230:83–97PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kreder HJ, Rozen N, Borkhoff CM, Laflamme YG, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH, Stephen DJ (2006) Determinants of functional outcome after simple and complex acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:776–782CrossRefPubMed Kreder HJ, Rozen N, Borkhoff CM, Laflamme YG, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH, Stephen DJ (2006) Determinants of functional outcome after simple and complex acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:776–782CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bhandari M, Matta J, Ferguson T, Matthys G (2006) Predictors of clinical and radiological outcome in patients with fractures of the acetabulum and concomitant posterior dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1618–1624CrossRefPubMed Bhandari M, Matta J, Ferguson T, Matthys G (2006) Predictors of clinical and radiological outcome in patients with fractures of the acetabulum and concomitant posterior dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1618–1624CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wright R, Barrett K, Christie MJ, Johnson KD (1994) Acetabular fractures : long-term follow-up of open reduction and internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma 8:397–403CrossRefPubMed Wright R, Barrett K, Christie MJ, Johnson KD (1994) Acetabular fractures : long-term follow-up of open reduction and internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma 8:397–403CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Murphy D, Kaliszer A, Rice J, McElwain JP (2003) Outcome after Acetabular fracture. Prognostic factors and their inter-relationships. Injury 34:512–517CrossRefPubMed Murphy D, Kaliszer A, Rice J, McElwain JP (2003) Outcome after Acetabular fracture. Prognostic factors and their inter-relationships. Injury 34:512–517CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Borrelli J Jr, Ricci WM, Steger-May K, Totty WG, Goldfarb C (2005) Postoperative radiographic assessment of acetabular fractures. A comparison of plain radiographs and CT scans. J Orthop Trauma 19:299–304PubMed Borrelli J Jr, Ricci WM, Steger-May K, Totty WG, Goldfarb C (2005) Postoperative radiographic assessment of acetabular fractures. A comparison of plain radiographs and CT scans. J Orthop Trauma 19:299–304PubMed
10.
go back to reference Letournel E (1980) Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop 151:81–106PubMed Letournel E (1980) Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop 151:81–106PubMed
11.
go back to reference Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, Hendricks P (1986) Fractures of the acetabulum: a retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop 205:241–250PubMed Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, Hendricks P (1986) Fractures of the acetabulum: a retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop 205:241–250PubMed
12.
go back to reference Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1632–1645PubMed Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1632–1645PubMed
13.
go back to reference Olson SA, Matta JM (1993) The computerized tomography subchondral arc: a new method of assessing acetabular articular continuity after fracture (a preliminary report). J Orthop Trauma 7:402–413CrossRefPubMed Olson SA, Matta JM (1993) The computerized tomography subchondral arc: a new method of assessing acetabular articular continuity after fracture (a preliminary report). J Orthop Trauma 7:402–413CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Anglen JO, Burd TA, Hendricks KJ, Harrison P (2003) The ‘Gull sign”: a harbinger of failure for internal fixation of geriatric acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 17:625–634CrossRefPubMed Anglen JO, Burd TA, Hendricks KJ, Harrison P (2003) The ‘Gull sign”: a harbinger of failure for internal fixation of geriatric acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 17:625–634CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Olson SA, Bay BK, Chapman MW, Sharkey NA (1995) Biomechanical consequences of fracture and repair of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1184–1192PubMed Olson SA, Bay BK, Chapman MW, Sharkey NA (1995) Biomechanical consequences of fracture and repair of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1184–1192PubMed
18.
go back to reference Levine RG, Renard R, Behrens FF, Tornetta P 3rd (2002) Biomechanical consequences of secondary congruence after both-column acetabular fracture. J Orthop Trauma 16:87–91CrossRefPubMed Levine RG, Renard R, Behrens FF, Tornetta P 3rd (2002) Biomechanical consequences of secondary congruence after both-column acetabular fracture. J Orthop Trauma 16:87–91CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H (2005) Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:2–9PubMed Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H (2005) Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:2–9PubMed
22.
go back to reference Mears DC, Velyvis JH, Chang CP (2003) Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:173–186 Mears DC, Velyvis JH, Chang CP (2003) Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:173–186
23.
go back to reference Cimerman M, Kristan A (2007) Preoperative planning in pelvic and acetabular surgery : the value of advanced computerised planning modules. Injury 38:442–449CrossRefPubMed Cimerman M, Kristan A (2007) Preoperative planning in pelvic and acetabular surgery : the value of advanced computerised planning modules. Injury 38:442–449CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Part 2: outcome of acetabular fractures and associated prognostic factors—a ten-year retrospective study of one hundred and fifty six operated cases with open reduction and internal fixation
Authors
Mehdi Boudissa
Sébastien Ruatti
Gael Kerschbaumer
Michel Milaire
Philippe Merloz
Jérôme Tonetti
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3070-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

International Orthopaedics 10/2016 Go to the issue