Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Letter to the Editor

Pandora’s Box: Unpredictable Evolution of a 20-Year History of a Bariatric Patient—Report of Small Bowel Migrated Gastric Band after Redo Banded Gastric Bypass

Authors: Cristian Boru, Tommaso Maria Manzia, Gianfranco Silecchia

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity, with excellent long-term results on weight loss, comorbidities, and quality of life (QoL) [1]. However, complications due to surgical technique, surgeons’ experience, patient’s compliance, and lack of availability of multidisciplinary follow-up have resulted in failure in 10–20% cases [2]. Standard RY gastric bypass (GBP) is considered the “gold standard” [3] even if sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained worldwide supremacy as the most performed bariatric surgery procedure [4]. In case of failure (weight regain (WR) or insufficient weight loss IWL) due to dilatation of isolated gastric pouch and/or wide gastro-jejunal anastomosis, several other options have been proposed: endoscopic/surgical re-size of the pouch or anastomosis, banding the isolated gastric pouch (with different rings or bands), conversion to distal GBP or more malabsorbative procedures [5]. All these redo procedures seem to be safe with limited long-term follow-up [68]. In a recent systematic review, Mawar et al. showed that primary banded GBP (PBRYGBP) is an attractive bariatric procedure with superior weight loss that is best demonstrated in super-obese patients [7], associated with specific complication rates like migration in up to 2% of the cases. We herein present a case of a 58-year-old morbid obese female patient having a history of over 20 years of bariatric endo-laparoscopic treatment. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Courcoulas AP, Yanovski SZ, Bonds D, et al. Long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery: a National Institutes of Health symposium. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(12):1323–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Courcoulas AP, Yanovski SZ, Bonds D, et al. Long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery: a National Institutes of Health symposium. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(12):1323–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Karmali S, Brar B, Shi X, et al. Weight recidivism post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1922–33.CrossRefPubMed Karmali S, Brar B, Shi X, et al. Weight recidivism post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1922–33.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ, et al. Overview of outcomes of laparoscopic and open roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the United States. Surg Technol Int. 2012;22:72–6.PubMed Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ, et al. Overview of outcomes of laparoscopic and open roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the United States. Surg Technol Int. 2012;22:72–6.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Varela JE, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leads the U.S. utilization of bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015; 11(5): 987–90. Erratum in: Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016; 12 (4): 937. Esteban Varela, J [corrected to Varela, J Esteban]. Varela JE, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leads the U.S. utilization of bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015; 11(5): 987–90. Erratum in: Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016; 12 (4): 937. Esteban Varela, J [corrected to Varela, J Esteban].
5.
go back to reference Moon RC, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA. Treatment of weight regain following roux-en-Y gastric bypass: revision of pouch, creation of new gastrojejunostomy and placement of proximal pericardial patch ring. Obes Surg. 2014;24(6):829–34.CrossRefPubMed Moon RC, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA. Treatment of weight regain following roux-en-Y gastric bypass: revision of pouch, creation of new gastrojejunostomy and placement of proximal pericardial patch ring. Obes Surg. 2014;24(6):829–34.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sudan R, Nguyen NT, Hutter MM, et al. Morbidity, mortality, and weight loss outcomes after reoperative bariatric surgery in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(1):171–8. discussion 178–9CrossRefPubMed Sudan R, Nguyen NT, Hutter MM, et al. Morbidity, mortality, and weight loss outcomes after reoperative bariatric surgery in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(1):171–8. discussion 178–9CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mahawar KK, Parikh C, Carr WR, et al. Primary banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1771–92.CrossRefPubMed Mahawar KK, Parikh C, Carr WR, et al. Primary banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1771–92.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Vijgen GH, Schouten R, Bouvy ND, et al. Salvage banding for failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(6):803–8.CrossRefPubMed Vijgen GH, Schouten R, Bouvy ND, et al. Salvage banding for failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(6):803–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Irani K, Youn HA, Ren-Fielding CJ, et al. Midterm results for gastric banding as salvage procedure for patients with weight loss failure after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(2):219–24.CrossRefPubMed Irani K, Youn HA, Ren-Fielding CJ, et al. Midterm results for gastric banding as salvage procedure for patients with weight loss failure after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(2):219–24.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Heneghan HM, Annaberdyev S, Eldar S, et al. Banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(2):210–6.CrossRefPubMed Heneghan HM, Annaberdyev S, Eldar S, et al. Banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(2):210–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pandora’s Box: Unpredictable Evolution of a 20-Year History of a Bariatric Patient—Report of Small Bowel Migrated Gastric Band after Redo Banded Gastric Bypass
Authors
Cristian Boru
Tommaso Maria Manzia
Gianfranco Silecchia
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3159-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Obesity Surgery 5/2018 Go to the issue