Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2023

01-12-2023 | Pancreaticojejunostomy | Brief report

How i do it: microscope augmented pancreaticojejunostomy

Authors: Christopher Seng Hong Lim, Anubhav Mittal, Jaswinder Singh Samra

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is perhaps one of most dreaded pancreatoduodenectomy-related complications. Various approaches to mitigate this risk have been explored, with conflicting results and no clear consensus on the comparative superiority of any one technique. We postulate that regardless of technique, the key to reducing POPF is a robust pancreatic anastomosis with careful apposition of tissues, in particular the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis.

Method

We describe the fashioning of a pancreatojejunostomy with an external pancreatic stent in the setting of a high-risk anastomosis with help of a 10 × magnification surgical microscope. A technical description with a short, edited video is presented.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wroński M et al (2019) Surgical management of the grade C pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB 21(9):1166–1174PubMedCrossRef Wroński M et al (2019) Surgical management of the grade C pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB 21(9):1166–1174PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pedrazzoli S (2017) Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF): a systematic review and analysis of the POPF-related mortality rate in 60,739 patients retrieved from the English literature published between 1990 and 2015. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(19):e6858PubMedCrossRef Pedrazzoli S (2017) Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF): a systematic review and analysis of the POPF-related mortality rate in 60,739 patients retrieved from the English literature published between 1990 and 2015. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(19):e6858PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Adams DB (2009) The pancreatic anastomosis: the danger of a leak, which anastomotic technique is better? J Gastrointest Surg 13(7):1182–1183PubMedCrossRef Adams DB (2009) The pancreatic anastomosis: the danger of a leak, which anastomotic technique is better? J Gastrointest Surg 13(7):1182–1183PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shrikhande SV et al (2017) Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 161(5):1221–1234PubMedCrossRef Shrikhande SV et al (2017) Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 161(5):1221–1234PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Callery MP et al (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(1):1–14PubMedCrossRef Callery MP et al (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(1):1–14PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nahm CB et al (2018) Acinar cell density at the pancreatic resection margin is associated with post-pancreatectomy pancreatitis and the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula. HPB 20(5):432–440PubMedCrossRef Nahm CB et al (2018) Acinar cell density at the pancreatic resection margin is associated with post-pancreatectomy pancreatitis and the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula. HPB 20(5):432–440PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Andrianello S et al (2020) Pancreaticojejunostomy with externalized stent vs pancreaticogastrostomy with externalized stent for patients with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis: a single-center, phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 155(4):313–321PubMedCrossRef Andrianello S et al (2020) Pancreaticojejunostomy with externalized stent vs pancreaticogastrostomy with externalized stent for patients with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis: a single-center, phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 155(4):313–321PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ecker BL et al (2018) Characterization and optimal management of high-risk pancreatic anastomoses during pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 267(4):608–616PubMedCrossRef Ecker BL et al (2018) Characterization and optimal management of high-risk pancreatic anastomoses during pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 267(4):608–616PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference McMillan MT et al (2016) Externalized stents for pancreatoduodenectomy provide value only in high-risk scenarios. J Gastrointest Surg 20(12):2052–2062PubMedCrossRef McMillan MT et al (2016) Externalized stents for pancreatoduodenectomy provide value only in high-risk scenarios. J Gastrointest Surg 20(12):2052–2062PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Halle-Smith JM et al (2022) Perioperative interventions to reduce pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: meta-analysis. Br J Surg 109(9):812–821PubMedCrossRef Halle-Smith JM et al (2022) Perioperative interventions to reduce pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: meta-analysis. Br J Surg 109(9):812–821PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wada K, Traverso LW (2006) Pancreatic anastomotic leak after the Whipple procedure is reduced using the surgical microscope. Surgery 139(6):735–742PubMedCrossRef Wada K, Traverso LW (2006) Pancreatic anastomotic leak after the Whipple procedure is reduced using the surgical microscope. Surgery 139(6):735–742PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hashimoto Y, Traverso LW (2010) Pancreatic anastomotic failure rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy decreases with microsurgery. J Am Coll Surg 211(4):510–521PubMedCrossRef Hashimoto Y, Traverso LW (2010) Pancreatic anastomotic failure rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy decreases with microsurgery. J Am Coll Surg 211(4):510–521PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
How i do it: microscope augmented pancreaticojejunostomy
Authors
Christopher Seng Hong Lim
Anubhav Mittal
Jaswinder Singh Samra
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03055-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2023 Go to the issue