Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 6/2009

01-11-2009

Pancreaticoduodenectomy: frequency and outcome of post-operative imaging-guided percutaneous drainage

Authors: Stephen I. Zink, Erik V. Soloff, Rebekah R. White, Bryan M. Clary, Douglas S. Tyler, Theodore N. Pappas, Erik K. Paulson

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 6/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To study the frequency and outcomes of percutaneous imaging-guided drainage following pancreaticoduodenectomy and to assess if fluid collection location correlates with pancreatic duct leak.

Methods

IRB approval was obtained. Three hundred and seventy-three subjects (age 21–84 years) who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were included in this retrospective study. Eighty-three of these subjects underwent post-operative imaging-guided drainage (CT 77; US 6). Medical and imaging records were reviewed. Procedural details including collection location, size, catheter size, drain duration, fluid type, fluid chemistry, and fluid culture were recorded. Collection location was correlated with fluid amylase.

Results

The frequency of imaging-guided percutaneous drainage following Whipple was 22.2%. The immediate technical and overall success rates for fluid collection drainage were 97.6% and 79.6%, respectively. Rate of complication was 4.8% (4/83). 74.7% (62/83) of fluid collections were proven abscesses, and 61.4% (51/83) were complicated by pancreatic fistula. Collections near the pancreatic resection site were more likely to have elevated fluid amylase.

Conclusion

Approximately one-fifth of subjects requires percutaneous drainage following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Percutaneous imaging-guided drainage is an effective means of managing post-pancreaticoduodenectomy fluid collections. Collections near the pancreas resection site often have a pancreatic duct leak.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Gervais DA, Fernandez-del Castillo C, O’Neill MJ, et al. (2001) Complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: imaging and imaging-guided interventional procedures. Radiographics 21:673–690PubMed Gervais DA, Fernandez-del Castillo C, O’Neill MJ, et al. (2001) Complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: imaging and imaging-guided interventional procedures. Radiographics 21:673–690PubMed
3.
go back to reference Cheng T, Sheth K, White RR, et al. (2006) Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on operative mortality and morbidity for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 13(1):66–74CrossRefPubMed Cheng T, Sheth K, White RR, et al. (2006) Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on operative mortality and morbidity for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 13(1):66–74CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Goldman R, Hunter TB, Haber K (2006) The silent abdominal abscess: role of the radiologist. AJR 187:1591–1596CrossRef Goldman R, Hunter TB, Haber K (2006) The silent abdominal abscess: role of the radiologist. AJR 187:1591–1596CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Beecher EE, Shires GT, Shires GT (2004) Treatment of post-pancreaticoduodenectomy complications. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 7(5):365–370CrossRef Beecher EE, Shires GT, Shires GT (2004) Treatment of post-pancreaticoduodenectomy complications. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 7(5):365–370CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Ajiki T, et al. (2005) No mortality among 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in a middle-volume center. World J Surg 29(11):1409–1414CrossRefPubMed Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Ajiki T, et al. (2005) No mortality among 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in a middle-volume center. World J Surg 29(11):1409–1414CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. (2003) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: role of interventional radiologists in managing patients and complications. J Gastrointest Surg 7(2):209–219CrossRefPubMed Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. (2003) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: role of interventional radiologists in managing patients and complications. J Gastrointest Surg 7(2):209–219CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D, et al. (2001) Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 234(4):487–493CrossRefPubMed Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D, et al. (2001) Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 234(4):487–493CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference AAssar OS, LaBerge JM, Gordon RL, et al. (1999) Percutaneous management of abscess and fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 22(1):25–28CrossRefPubMed AAssar OS, LaBerge JM, Gordon RL, et al. (1999) Percutaneous management of abscess and fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 22(1):25–28CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Singh AK, Gervais DA, Alhilali LM, et al. (2006) Imaging-guided catheter drainage of abdominal collections with fistulous pancreaticobiliary communication. AJR 187:1591–1596CrossRefPubMed Singh AK, Gervais DA, Alhilali LM, et al. (2006) Imaging-guided catheter drainage of abdominal collections with fistulous pancreaticobiliary communication. AJR 187:1591–1596CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hashimoto M, Koga M, Ishiyama K, et al. (2007) CT features of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. AJR 188:W323–W327CrossRefPubMed Hashimoto M, Koga M, Ishiyama K, et al. (2007) CT features of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. AJR 188:W323–W327CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: frequency and outcome of post-operative imaging-guided percutaneous drainage
Authors
Stephen I. Zink
Erik V. Soloff
Rebekah R. White
Bryan M. Clary
Douglas S. Tyler
Theodore N. Pappas
Erik K. Paulson
Publication date
01-11-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 6/2009
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9455-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2009

Abdominal Radiology 6/2009 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine