Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 1/2020

01-03-2020 | Pancreatic Surgery | Original Article

Implementation of a strategic preoperative surgical meeting to improve the level of care at a high-volume pancreatic center: a before–after analysis of 1000 consecutive cases

Authors: Niccolò Surci, Marco Ramera, Alex Borin, Giovanni Marchegiani, Roberto Salvia, Claudio Bassi, SPaRo Group

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

The indication, planning, and risk analysis of a pancreatic surgical procedure have recently become increasingly complex. In December 2015, the “Pancreas Round” (PR) meeting was established at our institution to preoperatively review all scheduled cases with a specific focus on surgical indications and technical issues. The present study aims to determine the impact of the PR on the clinical practice in terms of avoiding unrequested laparotomies and anticipating intraoperative pitfalls. A “before–after” study was conducted by retrospectively comparing a pre-intervention period (9/2014–11/2015) to a prospectively assessed post-intervention one (12/2015–3/2017). Outcomes considered were explorative laparotomy (EL) occurrence and a “mismatch” between what was preoperatively expected by the PR and what was intraoperatively found. Of the 1057 patients included in the present study, 531 underwent surgery in the pre- and 526 in the post-intervention period, respectively. The EL rate was comparable between the two periods (15.4% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.123), despite the significant increase of surgical explorations after neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the post-intervention period (27% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). The “mismatch” rate between preoperative planning and intraoperative findings was significantly reduced in the post-intervention period (12.2% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.038) compared to the pre-PR period. In the setting of a high-volume center, a preoperative surgical meeting designed to review all cases scheduled for surgical exploration can enhance the level of care by addressing intraoperative pitfalls.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Crippa S, Bassi C, Salvia R, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Rebours V, Levy P, Partelli S, Suleiman SL, Banks PA, Ahmed N, Chari ST, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Falconi M (2017) Low progression of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with worrisome features and high-risk stigmata undergoing non-operative management: a mid-term follow-up analysis. Gut 66(3):495–506. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310162 CrossRefPubMed Crippa S, Bassi C, Salvia R, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Rebours V, Levy P, Partelli S, Suleiman SL, Banks PA, Ahmed N, Chari ST, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Falconi M (2017) Low progression of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with worrisome features and high-risk stigmata undergoing non-operative management: a mid-term follow-up analysis. Gut 66(3):495–506. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​gutjnl-2015-310162 CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Falconi M, Eriksson B, Kaltsas G, Bartsch DK, Capdevila J, Caplin M, Kos-Kudla B, Kwekkeboom D, Rindi G, Kloppel G, Reed N, Kianmanesh R, Jensen RT, Vienna Consensus Conference p (2016) ENETS consensus guidelines update for the management of patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 103(2):153–171. https://doi.org/10.1159/000443171 CrossRefPubMed Falconi M, Eriksson B, Kaltsas G, Bartsch DK, Capdevila J, Caplin M, Kos-Kudla B, Kwekkeboom D, Rindi G, Kloppel G, Reed N, Kianmanesh R, Jensen RT, Vienna Consensus Conference p (2016) ENETS consensus guidelines update for the management of patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 103(2):153–171. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000443171 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Meguid C, Schulick RD, Schefter TE, Lieu CH, Boniface M, Williams N, Vogel JD, Gajdos C, McCarter M, Edil BH (2016) The multidisciplinary approach to gi cancer results in change of diagnosis and management of patients. Multidisciplinary care impacts diagnosis and management of patients. Ann Surg Oncol 23(12):3986–3990. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5343-8 CrossRefPubMed Meguid C, Schulick RD, Schefter TE, Lieu CH, Boniface M, Williams N, Vogel JD, Gajdos C, McCarter M, Edil BH (2016) The multidisciplinary approach to gi cancer results in change of diagnosis and management of patients. Multidisciplinary care impacts diagnosis and management of patients. Ann Surg Oncol 23(12):3986–3990. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-016-5343-8 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kirkegard J, Aahlin EK, Al-Saiddi M, Bratlie SO, Coolsen M, de Haas RJ, den Dulk M, Fristrup C, Harrison EM, Mortensen MB, Nijkamp MW, Persson J, Soreide JA, Wigmore SJ, Wik T, Mortensen FV (2019) Multicentre study of multidisciplinary team assessment of pancreatic cancer resectability and treatment allocation. Br J Surg 106(6):756–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11093 CrossRefPubMed Kirkegard J, Aahlin EK, Al-Saiddi M, Bratlie SO, Coolsen M, de Haas RJ, den Dulk M, Fristrup C, Harrison EM, Mortensen MB, Nijkamp MW, Persson J, Soreide JA, Wigmore SJ, Wik T, Mortensen FV (2019) Multicentre study of multidisciplinary team assessment of pancreatic cancer resectability and treatment allocation. Br J Surg 106(6):756–764. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​bjs.​11093 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, Imrie C, Milicevic M, Sandberg AA, Asbun HJ, Bassi C, Buchler M, Charnley RM, Conlon K, Cruz LF, Dervenis C, Fingerhutt A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hartwig W, Lillemoe KD, Montorsi M, Neoptolemos JP, Shrikhande SV, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vashist YK, Vollmer C, Yeo CJ, Izbicki JR, International Study Group of Pancreatic S (2014) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 155(6):977–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.02.001 CrossRefPubMed Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, Imrie C, Milicevic M, Sandberg AA, Asbun HJ, Bassi C, Buchler M, Charnley RM, Conlon K, Cruz LF, Dervenis C, Fingerhutt A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hartwig W, Lillemoe KD, Montorsi M, Neoptolemos JP, Shrikhande SV, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vashist YK, Vollmer C, Yeo CJ, Izbicki JR, International Study Group of Pancreatic S (2014) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 155(6):977–988. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​surg.​2014.​02.​001 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Beleu A, Calabrese A, Rizzo G, Capelli P, Bellini N, Caloggero S, Calbi R, Tinazzi Martini P, De Robertis R, Carbognin G, Marchegiani G, Scarpa A, Salvia R, Bassi C, D’Onofrio M (2019) Preoperative imaging evaluation after downstaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a multi-center study. Cancers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020267 CrossRef Beleu A, Calabrese A, Rizzo G, Capelli P, Bellini N, Caloggero S, Calbi R, Tinazzi Martini P, De Robertis R, Carbognin G, Marchegiani G, Scarpa A, Salvia R, Bassi C, D’Onofrio M (2019) Preoperative imaging evaluation after downstaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a multi-center study. Cancers (Basel). https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​cancers11020267 CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Costi R, De Pastena M, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Butturini G, Violi V, Salvia R, Bassi C (2016) Poor results of pancreatoduodenectomy in high-risk patients with endoscopic stent and bile colonization are associated with E. coli, diabetes and advanced age. J Gastrointest Surg 20(7):1359–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3158-3 CrossRefPubMed Costi R, De Pastena M, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Butturini G, Violi V, Salvia R, Bassi C (2016) Poor results of pancreatoduodenectomy in high-risk patients with endoscopic stent and bile colonization are associated with E. coli, diabetes and advanced age. J Gastrointest Surg 20(7):1359–1367. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11605-016-3158-3 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference De Pastena M, Marchegiani G, Paiella S, Malleo G, Ciprani D, Gasparini C, Secchettin E, Salvia R, Gabbrielli A, Bassi C (2018) Impact of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of 1500 consecutive cases. Dig Endosc 30(6):777–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13221 CrossRefPubMed De Pastena M, Marchegiani G, Paiella S, Malleo G, Ciprani D, Gasparini C, Secchettin E, Salvia R, Gabbrielli A, Bassi C (2018) Impact of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of 1500 consecutive cases. Dig Endosc 30(6):777–784. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​den.​13221 CrossRefPubMed
26.
Metadata
Title
Implementation of a strategic preoperative surgical meeting to improve the level of care at a high-volume pancreatic center: a before–after analysis of 1000 consecutive cases
Authors
Niccolò Surci
Marco Ramera
Alex Borin
Giovanni Marchegiani
Roberto Salvia
Claudio Bassi
SPaRo Group
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00707-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Updates in Surgery 1/2020 Go to the issue