Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery 5/2020

01-10-2020 | Pancreatectomy | Original Article

Robot-Assisted Pancreatic Surgery—the Russian Experience.

Authors: Andrey Germanovich Kriger, Stanislav Valerievich Berelavichus, Ayrat Radikovich Kaldarov, David Semyonovich Gorin, Alexander Vyacheslavovich Smirnov, Zekster Vita Yur’evna

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Surgical procedures that involve working in small anatomical spaces can be successfully performed using robot-assisted surgery. We did a retrospective study of the results of 86 robot-assisted pancreatic operations performed in the Abdominal Department No.1 of the A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow. Seventy (81.4%) patients were female, and 16 (18.6%) were male; the average age was 49 (37; 59). The following robot-assisted surgeries were performed: 17 pancreaticoduodenectomies, 45 distal pancreatectomies, 16 tumor enucleations, 6 median resections, and 2 total duodenopancreatectomies. The duration of robot-assisted surgical operations varied depending on the extent of the surgery: for a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), it was 400 (360–550) min; for a distal pancreatectomy, it was 210 (180–250) min. Estimated blood loss in a PD was 200 (150–500) ml; in a distal pancreatectomy, it was 100 (50–300) ml. Conversions happened in 6 cases: 2 of them in PD and 4 in distal pancreatectomies. The postoperative length of stay was 15 ± 9 days and depended on the extent of the surgery. The maximum length (16 days) was after robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomies (14–25), the minimum (12 days) after organ-preservation surgery (8; 15). Pancreatic fistula А and В occurred in 35 (40.7%) patients and hemorrhages in 6 (7.0%) cases; there were 2 cases of 30-day mortality (2.3%). Robotic assistance can be successfully used in pancreatic surgery. Robot-assisted procedures ensure the precision of lymphadenectomy and anastomoses formation, and the postoperative lengths of stay are more comfortable for patients due to minimal tissue injury. The use of the robot-assisted approach in pancreatic surgery does not guarantee that specific postoperative complications will not occur.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF, Cheow PC, Ong HS, Chan WH, Chow PK, Soo KC, Wong WK, Ooi LL (2008) Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg 143(10):956–965. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.10.956CrossRefPubMed Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF, Cheow PC, Ong HS, Chan WH, Chow PK, Soo KC, Wong WK, Ooi LL (2008) Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg 143(10):956–965. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​archsurg.​143.​10.​956CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A, Herrera MF (1996) Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 120:1051–1054CrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A, Herrera MF (1996) Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 120:1051–1054CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784CrossRef Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Giulianotti PС, Sbrana F, Bianco FM (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24:1646–1657CrossRef Giulianotti PС, Sbrana F, Bianco FM (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24:1646–1657CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boggi U, Signori S, de Lio N, Perrone VG, Vistoli F, Belluomini M, Cappelli C, Amorese G, Mosca F (2013) Feasibility of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100(7):917–925CrossRef Boggi U, Signori S, de Lio N, Perrone VG, Vistoli F, Belluomini M, Cappelli C, Amorese G, Mosca F (2013) Feasibility of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100(7):917–925CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM (2011) Robotic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Comparative Study at a Single Institution. World J Surg 35:2739–2746CrossRef Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM (2011) Robotic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Comparative Study at a Single Institution. World J Surg 35:2739–2746CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM (2012) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc 26:2397–2402CrossRef Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM (2012) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc 26:2397–2402CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DJ, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2015) Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 150(5):416–422CrossRef Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DJ, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2015) Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 150(5):416–422CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Berelavichus SV, Titova NV, Kaldarov AR, Smirnov AV, Kriger AG (2017) Robot-assisted operations on the pancreas. Annaly Hirurgicheskoy Gepatologii 1:103–111 Berelavichus SV, Titova NV, Kaldarov AR, Smirnov AV, Kriger AG (2017) Robot-assisted operations on the pancreas. Annaly Hirurgicheskoy Gepatologii 1:103–111
14.
go back to reference Cirocchi R, Partelli S, Coratti A, Desiderio J, Parisi A, Falconi M (2013) Current status of robotic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review. Surg Oncol 22:201–207CrossRef Cirocchi R, Partelli S, Coratti A, Desiderio J, Parisi A, Falconi M (2013) Current status of robotic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review. Surg Oncol 22:201–207CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Baker EH, Ross SW, Seshadri R, Swan RZ, Iannitti DA, Vrochides D, Martinie JB (2015) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond. J Gastrointest Oncol 6(4):396–405PubMedPubMedCentral Baker EH, Ross SW, Seshadri R, Swan RZ, Iannitti DA, Vrochides D, Martinie JB (2015) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond. J Gastrointest Oncol 6(4):396–405PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Balzano G, Bissolati M, Boggi U, Bassi C, Zerbi A, Falconi M (2014) A multicenter survey on distal pancreatectomy in Italy: results of minimally invasive technique and variability of perioperative pathways. Updat Surg 66:253–263CrossRef Balzano G, Bissolati M, Boggi U, Bassi C, Zerbi A, Falconi M (2014) A multicenter survey on distal pancreatectomy in Italy: results of minimally invasive technique and variability of perioperative pathways. Updat Surg 66:253–263CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bao PQ, Mazirka PO, Watkins KT (2014) Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 18:682–689CrossRef Bao PQ, Mazirka PO, Watkins KT (2014) Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 18:682–689CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robot-Assisted Pancreatic Surgery—the Russian Experience.
Authors
Andrey Germanovich Kriger
Stanislav Valerievich Berelavichus
Ayrat Radikovich Kaldarov
David Semyonovich Gorin
Alexander Vyacheslavovich Smirnov
Zekster Vita Yur’evna
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02298-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Indian Journal of Surgery 5/2020 Go to the issue