Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Original Article

Paediatric sutureless circumcision—an alternative to the standard technique

Authors: Brian D. Kelly, Dara J. Lundon, Marie E. Timlin, Mazhar Sheikh, Nadeem B. Nusrat, Frank T. D’Arcy, Syed Q. Jaffry

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Circumcision is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in male children. A range of surgical techniques exist for this commonly performed procedure. The aim of this study is to assess the safety, functional outcome and cosmetic appearance of a sutureless circumcision technique.

Methods

Over a 9-year period, 502 consecutive primary sutureless circumcisions were performed by a single surgeon. All 502 cases were entered prospectively into a database including all relevant clinical details and a review was performed. The technique used to perform the sutureless circumcision is a modification of the standard sleeve technique with the use of a bipolar diathermy and the application of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) to approximate the tissue edges.

Results

All boys in this study were pre-pubescent and the ages ranged from 6 months to 12 years (mean age 3.5 years). All patients had this procedure performed as a day case and under general anaesthetic. Complications included: haemorrhage (2.2%), haematoma (1.4%), wound infection (4%), allergic reaction (0.2%) and wound dehiscence (0.8%). Only 9 (1.8%) parents or patients were dissatisfied with the cosmetic appearance.

Conclusion

The use of 2-OCA as a tissue adhesive for sutureless circumcisions is an alternative to the standard suture technique. The use of this tissue adhesive, 2-OCA, results in comparable complication rates to the standard circumcision technique and results in excellent post-operative cosmetic satisfaction.
Literature
2.
go back to reference O’Sullivan DC, Heal MR, Powell CS (1996) Circumcision: how do urologists do it? Br J Urol 78(2):265–270PubMedCrossRef O’Sullivan DC, Heal MR, Powell CS (1996) Circumcision: how do urologists do it? Br J Urol 78(2):265–270PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Elmasalme FN, Matbouli SA, Zuberi MS (1995) Use of tissue adhesive in the closure of small incisions and lacerations. J Pediatr Surg 30(6):837–838PubMedCrossRef Elmasalme FN, Matbouli SA, Zuberi MS (1995) Use of tissue adhesive in the closure of small incisions and lacerations. J Pediatr Surg 30(6):837–838PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Toriumi DM, Bagal AA (2002) Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives for skin closure in the outpatient setting. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 35(1):103–118 (vi–vii)PubMedCrossRef Toriumi DM, Bagal AA (2002) Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives for skin closure in the outpatient setting. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 35(1):103–118 (vi–vii)PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cheng W, Saing H (1997) A prospective randomized study of wound approximation with tissue glue in circumcision in children. J Paediatr Child Health 33(6):515–516PubMedCrossRef Cheng W, Saing H (1997) A prospective randomized study of wound approximation with tissue glue in circumcision in children. J Paediatr Child Health 33(6):515–516PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Toriumi DM et al (1998) Use of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate for skin closure in facial plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(6):2209–2219PubMedCrossRef Toriumi DM et al (1998) Use of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate for skin closure in facial plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(6):2209–2219PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Maw JL et al (1997) A prospective comparison of octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and suture for the closure of head and neck incisions. J Otolaryngol 26(1):26–30PubMed Maw JL et al (1997) A prospective comparison of octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and suture for the closure of head and neck incisions. J Otolaryngol 26(1):26–30PubMed
9.
go back to reference Bruns TB, Worthington JM (2000) Using tissue adhesive for wound repair: a practical guide to dermabond. Am Fam Physician 61(5):1383–1388PubMed Bruns TB, Worthington JM (2000) Using tissue adhesive for wound repair: a practical guide to dermabond. Am Fam Physician 61(5):1383–1388PubMed
10.
go back to reference Quinn JV et al (1995) N-2-butylcyanoacrylate: risk of bacterial contamination with an appraisal of its antimicrobial effects. J Emerg Med 13(4):581–585PubMedCrossRef Quinn JV et al (1995) N-2-butylcyanoacrylate: risk of bacterial contamination with an appraisal of its antimicrobial effects. J Emerg Med 13(4):581–585PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Griffiths DM, Atwell JD, Freeman NV (1985) A prospective survey of the indications and morbidity of circumcision in children. Eur Urol 11(3):184–187PubMed Griffiths DM, Atwell JD, Freeman NV (1985) A prospective survey of the indications and morbidity of circumcision in children. Eur Urol 11(3):184–187PubMed
12.
go back to reference Arunachalam P, King PA, Orford J (2003) A prospective comparison of tissue glue versus sutures for circumcision. Pediatr Surg Int 19(1–2):18–19PubMed Arunachalam P, King PA, Orford J (2003) A prospective comparison of tissue glue versus sutures for circumcision. Pediatr Surg Int 19(1–2):18–19PubMed
13.
go back to reference El-Dars LD et al (2010) Allergic contact dermatitis to Dermabond after orthopaedic joint replacement. Contact Dermat 62(5):315–317CrossRef El-Dars LD et al (2010) Allergic contact dermatitis to Dermabond after orthopaedic joint replacement. Contact Dermat 62(5):315–317CrossRef
14.
go back to reference D’Arcy FT, Jaffry SQ (2011) A review of 100 consecutive sutureless child and adult circumcisions. Ir J Med Sci 180(1):51–53PubMedCrossRef D’Arcy FT, Jaffry SQ (2011) A review of 100 consecutive sutureless child and adult circumcisions. Ir J Med Sci 180(1):51–53PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Subramaniam R, Jacobsen AS (2004) Sutureless circumcision: a prospective randomised controlled study. Pediatr Surg Int 20(10):783–785PubMedCrossRef Subramaniam R, Jacobsen AS (2004) Sutureless circumcision: a prospective randomised controlled study. Pediatr Surg Int 20(10):783–785PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Elmore JM, Smith EA, Kirsch AJ (2007) Sutureless circumcision using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond): appraisal after 18-month experience. Urology 70(4):803–806PubMedCrossRef Elmore JM, Smith EA, Kirsch AJ (2007) Sutureless circumcision using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond): appraisal after 18-month experience. Urology 70(4):803–806PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kaye JD et al (2010) Sutureless and scalpel-free circumcision–more rapid, less expensive and better? J Urol 184(4 Suppl):1758–1762PubMedCrossRef Kaye JD et al (2010) Sutureless and scalpel-free circumcision–more rapid, less expensive and better? J Urol 184(4 Suppl):1758–1762PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Paediatric sutureless circumcision—an alternative to the standard technique
Authors
Brian D. Kelly
Dara J. Lundon
Marie E. Timlin
Mazhar Sheikh
Nadeem B. Nusrat
Frank T. D’Arcy
Syed Q. Jaffry
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-3015-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Pediatric Surgery International 3/2012 Go to the issue