Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics 1/2017

Open Access 01-01-2017 | Original Article

Paediatric biobanking: Dutch experts reflecting on appropriate legal standards for practice

Authors: Elcke J. Kranendonk, Raoul C. Hennekam, M. Corrette Ploem

Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Large sets of data and human specimens, such as blood, tumour tissue and DNA, are deposited in biobanks for research purposes, preferably for long periods of time and with broadly defined research aims. Our research focuses on the retention of data and biological materials obtained from children. However important such paediatric biobanks may be, the privacy interests of the children involved and the related risks may not be ignored. The privacy issues arising from paediatric biobanks are the central focus of this article. We first review the international regulations that apply to biobanks and then summarise viewpoints expressed by experts in a round-table discussion. We confine ourselves here to two normative questions: (1) How much control should children’s parents or legal representatives, and later the children themselves, have over the stored materials and data? (2) What should be done if research findings emerge that have serious implications for a child’s health?
Conclusion: On the basis of international legal standards and the views of experts, involved in paediatric biobanking, we argue that biological material of children may only be stored in a biobank for scientific purposes if parents provide their explicit consent, the child is re-contacted at 16 or 18 years of age to reconsider storage and use of its material, and the biobank maintains a limited policy in disclosure of individual research findings to the child’s parents.
What is Known:
Increasingly, biological material of children is stored in biobanks for research purposes.
Clear standards on the conditions under which childrens cells or tissues may be stored and used are lacking.
What is New:
According to experts, storage and use of childrens materials should only be allowed if performed in accordance with appropriate consent procedures and feedback policies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
See furthermore Article 15 of Council of Europe’s Recommendation R(2006)4 on Research on biological materials of human origin, which stipulates that children must be enabled to exercise their rights as soon as they attain the capacity to provide consent. Included are the rights to withdraw or alter the scope of consent given by parents on their behalf [9].
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Annas GJ, Glantz LH, Roche PA (1995) Drafting the genetic privacy act: science, policy, and practical considerations. J Law, Med Ethics 23(4):360–366CrossRef Annas GJ, Glantz LH, Roche PA (1995) Drafting the genetic privacy act: science, policy, and practical considerations. J Law, Med Ethics 23(4):360–366CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bredenoord AL, Onland-Moret NC, van Delden JJM (2011) Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy. Hum Mutat 32(8):861–867. doi:10.1002/humu.21518 CrossRefPubMed Bredenoord AL, Onland-Moret NC, van Delden JJM (2011) Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy. Hum Mutat 32(8):861–867. doi:10.​1002/​humu.​21518 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Burke WD, Diekema DS (2006) Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research. J Pediatr 149 Burke WD, Diekema DS (2006) Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research. J Pediatr 149
10.
go back to reference Fisher CB (2006) Privacy and ethics in pediatric environmental health research, part I: genetic and prenatal testing. Environ Health Perspect 114(10):1617–1621CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fisher CB (2006) Privacy and ethics in pediatric environmental health research, part I: genetic and prenatal testing. Environ Health Perspect 114(10):1617–1621CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Harris ED, Ziniel SI, Amatruda JG, Clinton CM, Savage SK, Taylor PL, Huntington NL, Green RC, Holm IA (2012) The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository. Genet Med 14(3):330–337. doi:10.1038/gim.2011.25 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harris ED, Ziniel SI, Amatruda JG, Clinton CM, Savage SK, Taylor PL, Huntington NL, Green RC, Holm IA (2012) The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository. Genet Med 14(3):330–337. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2011.​25 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
17.
go back to reference Hens K, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, Dierickx K (2011b) The storage and use of biological tissue samples from minors for research: a focus group study. Public Health Genom 14:68–76. doi:10.1159/000294185 CrossRef Hens K, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, Dierickx K (2011b) The storage and use of biological tissue samples from minors for research: a focus group study. Public Health Genom 14:68–76. doi:10.​1159/​000294185 CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Klima J, Fitzgerald-Butt SM, Kelleher KJ, Chisolm DJ, Comstock RD, Ferketich AK, McBride KL (2014) Understanding of informed consent by parents of children enrolled in a genetic biobank. Genet Med 16(2):141–148. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.86 CrossRefPubMed Klima J, Fitzgerald-Butt SM, Kelleher KJ, Chisolm DJ, Comstock RD, Ferketich AK, McBride KL (2014) Understanding of informed consent by parents of children enrolled in a genetic biobank. Genet Med 16(2):141–148. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2013.​86 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Knoppers BM, Avard D, Senecal K, Zawati MH (2014) Return of whole-genome sequencing results in paediatric research: a statement of the P3G international paediatrics platform. Eur J Hum Genet 22(1):3–5. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.176 CrossRefPubMed Knoppers BM, Avard D, Senecal K, Zawati MH (2014) Return of whole-genome sequencing results in paediatric research: a statement of the P3G international paediatrics platform. Eur J Hum Genet 22(1):3–5. doi:10.​1038/​ejhg.​2013.​176 CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (2006) Multifactoriële aandoeningen in het genomics-tijdperk (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences KNAW, Multifactorial health disorders in the era of genomics) Amsterdam: KNAW 49–50 Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (2006) Multifactoriële aandoeningen in het genomics-tijdperk (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences KNAW, Multifactorial health disorders in the era of genomics) Amsterdam: KNAW 49–50
24.
go back to reference Kranendonk EJ, Ploem MC (2016) Kinderbiobanken in Nederland; Passende uitgangspunten nader in beeld [Pediatric biobanks in the Nederlands. Towards appropriate principles]. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen 94(1):20–24CrossRef Kranendonk EJ, Ploem MC (2016) Kinderbiobanken in Nederland; Passende uitgangspunten nader in beeld [Pediatric biobanks in the Nederlands. Towards appropriate principles]. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen 94(1):20–24CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ploem C (2014) Handling unsolicited findings in clinical care: a legal perspective. Eur J Health Law 21:502–503CrossRef Ploem C (2014) Handling unsolicited findings in clinical care: a legal perspective. Eur J Health Law 21:502–503CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ries NM (2007) Growing up as a research subject: ethical and legal issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research. Health Law J 15:1–42PubMed Ries NM (2007) Growing up as a research subject: ethical and legal issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research. Health Law J 15:1–42PubMed
29.
go back to reference Salvaterra E, Locatelli F, Strazzer S, Borgatti R, D’Angelo G, Lenzi L (2014) Paediatric biobanks: opinions, feelings and attitudes of parents towards the specimen donation of their sick children to a hypothetical biobank. Pathobiology: J Immunopathol, Mol Cell Biol 81(5–6):304–308. doi:10.1159/000362091 Salvaterra E, Locatelli F, Strazzer S, Borgatti R, D’Angelo G, Lenzi L (2014) Paediatric biobanks: opinions, feelings and attitudes of parents towards the specimen donation of their sick children to a hypothetical biobank. Pathobiology: J Immunopathol, Mol Cell Biol 81(5–6):304–308. doi:10.​1159/​000362091
33.
go back to reference Verma IC, Puri RD (2015) Global burden of genetic disease and the role of genetic screening. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 20(5):354–363CrossRefPubMed Verma IC, Puri RD (2015) Global burden of genetic disease and the role of genetic screening. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 20(5):354–363CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Paediatric biobanking: Dutch experts reflecting on appropriate legal standards for practice
Authors
Elcke J. Kranendonk
Raoul C. Hennekam
M. Corrette Ploem
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-6199
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1076
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2810-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

European Journal of Pediatrics 1/2017 Go to the issue