Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Ovarian Cancer | Study protocol

DICE: Dual mTorc Inhibition in advanCed/recurrent Epithelial ovarian cancer resistant to standard treatment—a study protocol for a randomised trial investigating a novel therapy called TAK228

Authors: Francesca Fiorentino, Jonathan Krell, Consuelo Nohpal de la Rosa, Lee Webber

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The standard initial treatment for ovarian cancer is surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy and potentially maintenance therapy with avastin or inhibitors of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP). While a proportion of women are cured by this approach, the vast majority will relapse and become resistant to platinum chemotherapy either initially or on subsequent treatment. There is an unmet need to improve response to treatment and quality of life in these women. TAK228 is a novel therapy that can be added to standard treatment in the participant population and the aim of the DICE trial is to assess its effectiveness. Laboratory and clinical research has shown that these ovarian cancers may respond to the molecular target of a drug such as TAK228, and there have been studies using it in other advanced solid tumours including endometrial cancer.

Methods

One hundred twenty-four eligible women will be recruited from participating research sites in the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany. Randomised participants will receive either weekly paclitaxel alone (standard treatment, n = 62) or TAK228 plus weekly paclitaxel (n = 62) until the cancer significantly worsens; there are significant adverse events or any other protocol-defined stopping criteria. Participants will be monitored for response to treatment (using radiological imaging), adverse events and quality of life during both randomised treatment and subsequent follow-up.

Discussion

The primary objective/endpoint of the study is to compare the two treatments in terms of progression-free survival, or the length of time that each participant is alive without the cancer significantly worsening according to defined assessment criteria. If the addition of TAK228 to weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy is shown to significantly improve this statistically, and adverse events and quality of life are not significantly worse than standard treatment, then TAK228 plus weekly paclitaxel could potentially be taken forward within the context of a larger phase III trial.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.​govNCT03648489. Registered on 27 August 2018.
Literature
11.
go back to reference Williams CB, Williams KA, Krie AK, De P, Dey N, Leyland-Jones B, et al. Results of a phase Ib trial evaluating the safety and clinical activity of sapanisertib (TAK 228) in combination with serabelisib (TAK 117) and paclitaxel in patients with advanced ovarian, endometrial, or breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(Suppl 15):3604.CrossRef Williams CB, Williams KA, Krie AK, De P, Dey N, Leyland-Jones B, et al. Results of a phase Ib trial evaluating the safety and clinical activity of sapanisertib (TAK 228) in combination with serabelisib (TAK 117) and paclitaxel in patients with advanced ovarian, endometrial, or breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(Suppl 15):3604.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Scambia G, Han SN, Oza AM, Colombo N, Oaknin A, Raspagliesi F, et al. Randomized phase II study of sapanisertib (SAP) + paclitaxel (PAC) plus PAC alone in patients (pts) with advanced, recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(Suppl 15):6087.CrossRef Scambia G, Han SN, Oza AM, Colombo N, Oaknin A, Raspagliesi F, et al. Randomized phase II study of sapanisertib (SAP) + paclitaxel (PAC) plus PAC alone in patients (pts) with advanced, recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(Suppl 15):6087.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours, Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRef Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours, Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rustin GJS, Vergote I, Eisenhauer E, Pujade-Lauraine E, Quinn M, Thigpen T, et al. Definitions for response and progression in ovarian vancer trials incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:419–23.CrossRef Rustin GJS, Vergote I, Eisenhauer E, Pujade-Lauraine E, Quinn M, Thigpen T, et al. Definitions for response and progression in ovarian vancer trials incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:419–23.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference U.S.Department of Health and Human Services/National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Version 4.0 Published: May 28, 2009 (v4.03: June 14, 2010). https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_8.5x11.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2021. U.S.Department of Health and Human Services/National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Version 4.0 Published: May 28, 2009 (v4.03: June 14, 2010). https://​evs.​nci.​nih.​gov/​ftp1/​CTCAE/​CTCAE_​4.​03/​CTCAE_​4.​03_​2010-06-14_​QuickReference_​8.​5x11.​pdf.​ Accessed 25 Mar 2021.
Metadata
Title
DICE: Dual mTorc Inhibition in advanCed/recurrent Epithelial ovarian cancer resistant to standard treatment—a study protocol for a randomised trial investigating a novel therapy called TAK228
Authors
Francesca Fiorentino
Jonathan Krell
Consuelo Nohpal de la Rosa
Lee Webber
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06201-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue