Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 6/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Article

Outcomes of support rod usage in loop stoma formation

Authors: Ian Whiteley, Michael Russell, Natasha Nassar, Marc A. Gladman

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

Traditionally, support rods have been used when creating loop stomas in the hope of preventing retraction. However, their effectiveness has not been clearly established. This study aimed to investigate the rate of stoma rod usage and its impact on stoma retraction and complication rates.

Method

A prospective cohort of 515 consecutive patients who underwent loop ileostomy/colostomy formation at a tertiary referral colorectal unit in Sydney, Australia were studied. Mortality and unplanned return to theatre rates were calculated. The primary outcome measure of interest was stoma retraction, occurring within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcome measures included early stoma complications. The 10-year temporal trends for rod usage, stoma retraction, and complications were examined.

Results

Mortality occurred in 23 patients (4.1 %) and unplanned return to theatre in 4 patients (0.8 %). Stoma retraction occurred in four patients (0.78 %), all without rods. However, the rate of retraction was similar, irrespective of whether rods were used (P = 0.12). There was a significant decline in the use of rods during the study period (P < 0.001) but this was not associated with an increase in stoma retraction rates. Early complications occurred in 94/432 patients (21.8 %) and were more likely to occur in patients with rods (64/223 versus 30/209 without rods, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Stoma retraction is a rare complication and its incidence is not significantly affected by the use of support rods. Further, complications are common post-operatively, and the rate appears higher when rods are used. The routine use of rods warrants judicious application.

What does this paper add to the literature?

It remains unclear whether support rods prevent stoma retraction. This study, the largest to date, confirms that stoma retraction is a rare complication and is not significantly affected by the use of rods. Consequently, routine rod usage cannot be recommended, particularly as it is associated with increased stoma complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morris E, Quirke P, Thomas JD, Fairley L, Cottier B, Forman D (2008) Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene? Gut 57(12):1690–7CrossRefPubMed Morris E, Quirke P, Thomas JD, Fairley L, Cottier B, Forman D (2008) Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene? Gut 57(12):1690–7CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Nastro P, Knowles CH, McGrath A, Heyman B, Porrett TR, Lunniss PJ (2010) Complications of intestinal stomas. Br J Surg 97(12):1885–9CrossRefPubMed Nastro P, Knowles CH, McGrath A, Heyman B, Porrett TR, Lunniss PJ (2010) Complications of intestinal stomas. Br J Surg 97(12):1885–9CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Goldstein ET, Williamson PR (1993) A more functional loop ileostomy rod. Dis Colon Rectum 36(3):297–8CrossRefPubMed Goldstein ET, Williamson PR (1993) A more functional loop ileostomy rod. Dis Colon Rectum 36(3):297–8CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Butler DL (2009) Early postoperative complications following ostomy surgery: a review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 36(5):513–9, quiz 20–1CrossRefPubMed Butler DL (2009) Early postoperative complications following ostomy surgery: a review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 36(5):513–9, quiz 20–1CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cheape JD, Hooks VH (1994) Loop ileostomy: a reliable method of diversion. South Med J 87(3):370–4CrossRefPubMed Cheape JD, Hooks VH (1994) Loop ileostomy: a reliable method of diversion. South Med J 87(3):370–4CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Langenbach MR, Sauerland S, Issa E, Nitschke C, Zirngibl H (2011) Loop ileostomy and colostomy—a comparison between supporting plastic rods and epicutaneous or subcutaneous silicon drains. Surg Sci 2:252–6 Langenbach MR, Sauerland S, Issa E, Nitschke C, Zirngibl H (2011) Loop ileostomy and colostomy—a comparison between supporting plastic rods and epicutaneous or subcutaneous silicon drains. Surg Sci 2:252–6
8.
go back to reference Cottam J, Richards K, Hasted A, Blackman A (2007) Results of a nationwide prospective audit of stoma complications within 3 weeks of surgery. Colorectal Dis 9(9):834–8CrossRefPubMed Cottam J, Richards K, Hasted A, Blackman A (2007) Results of a nationwide prospective audit of stoma complications within 3 weeks of surgery. Colorectal Dis 9(9):834–8CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Burch J (2004) The management and care of people with stoma complications. Br J Nurs 13(6):307–8, 10, 12, 14–8CrossRefPubMed Burch J (2004) The management and care of people with stoma complications. Br J Nurs 13(6):307–8, 10, 12, 14–8CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L, Watkins AJ, Morgan AR, Beynon J et al (2003) A prospective audit of stomas—analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Colorectal Dis 5(1):49–52CrossRefPubMed Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L, Watkins AJ, Morgan AR, Beynon J et al (2003) A prospective audit of stomas—analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Colorectal Dis 5(1):49–52CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Speirs M, Leung E, Hughes D, Robertson I, Donnelly L, Mackenzie I et al (2006) Ileostomy rod—is it a bridge too far? Colorectal Dis 8(6):484–7CrossRefPubMed Speirs M, Leung E, Hughes D, Robertson I, Donnelly L, Mackenzie I et al (2006) Ileostomy rod—is it a bridge too far? Colorectal Dis 8(6):484–7CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Aitken RJ, Stevens PJ, du Preez N, Elliot MS (1986) Raising a colostomy—results of a prospective surgical audit. Int J Colorectal Dis 1(4):244–7CrossRefPubMed Aitken RJ, Stevens PJ, du Preez N, Elliot MS (1986) Raising a colostomy—results of a prospective surgical audit. Int J Colorectal Dis 1(4):244–7CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cronin E (2010) An overview of stoma bridges and a case study on their management. Br J Nurs 19(17):S16–S20CrossRefPubMed Cronin E (2010) An overview of stoma bridges and a case study on their management. Br J Nurs 19(17):S16–S20CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lafreniere R, Ketcham AS (1985) The Penrose drain: a safe, atraumatic colostomy bridge. Am J Surg 149(2):288–91CrossRefPubMed Lafreniere R, Ketcham AS (1985) The Penrose drain: a safe, atraumatic colostomy bridge. Am J Surg 149(2):288–91CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Liu J, Bruch HP, Farke S, Nolde J, Schwandner O (2005) Stoma formation for fecal diversion: a plea for the laparoscopic approach. Tech Coloproctol 9(1):9–14CrossRefPubMed Liu J, Bruch HP, Farke S, Nolde J, Schwandner O (2005) Stoma formation for fecal diversion: a plea for the laparoscopic approach. Tech Coloproctol 9(1):9–14CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Wexner SD, Taranow DA, Johansen OB, Itzkowitz F, Daniel N, Nogueras JJ et al (1993) Loop ileostomy is a safe option for fecal diversion. Dis Colon Rectum 36(4):349–54CrossRefPubMed Wexner SD, Taranow DA, Johansen OB, Itzkowitz F, Daniel N, Nogueras JJ et al (1993) Loop ileostomy is a safe option for fecal diversion. Dis Colon Rectum 36(4):349–54CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Byrne BE, Mamidanna R, Vincent CA, Faiz O (2013) Population-based cohort study comparing 30- and 90-day institutional mortality rates after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100(13):1810–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Byrne BE, Mamidanna R, Vincent CA, Faiz O (2013) Population-based cohort study comparing 30- and 90-day institutional mortality rates after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100(13):1810–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Schootman M, Lian M, Pruitt SL, Hendren S, Mutch M, Deshpande AD et al (2014) Hospital and geographic variability in two colorectal cancer surgery outcomes: complications and mortality after complications. Ann Surg Oncol 21(8):2659–66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schootman M, Lian M, Pruitt SL, Hendren S, Mutch M, Deshpande AD et al (2014) Hospital and geographic variability in two colorectal cancer surgery outcomes: complications and mortality after complications. Ann Surg Oncol 21(8):2659–66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Scarpa M, Ruffolo C, Boetto R, Pozza A, Sadocchi L, Angriman I (2010) Diverting loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy: predictors of poor outcome and poor quality of life. Colorectal Dis 12(9):914–20CrossRefPubMed Scarpa M, Ruffolo C, Boetto R, Pozza A, Sadocchi L, Angriman I (2010) Diverting loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy: predictors of poor outcome and poor quality of life. Colorectal Dis 12(9):914–20CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Baloyiannis I, Christodoulidis G, Symeonidis D, Hatzinikolaou I, Spyridakis M, Tepetes K (2010) Loop stomas with a subcutaneously placed bridge device. Tech Coloproctol 14(Suppl 1):S75–6CrossRefPubMed Baloyiannis I, Christodoulidis G, Symeonidis D, Hatzinikolaou I, Spyridakis M, Tepetes K (2010) Loop stomas with a subcutaneously placed bridge device. Tech Coloproctol 14(Suppl 1):S75–6CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Branco AM, Saraiva AC (2009) Loop colostomy with a suprafascial bridge device. Dig Surg 26(4):282–4CrossRefPubMed Branco AM, Saraiva AC (2009) Loop colostomy with a suprafascial bridge device. Dig Surg 26(4):282–4CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Duchesne JC, Wang YZ, Weintraub SL, Boyle M, Hunt JP (2002) Stoma complications: a multivariate analysis. Am Surg 68(11):961–6, discussion 6PubMed Duchesne JC, Wang YZ, Weintraub SL, Boyle M, Hunt JP (2002) Stoma complications: a multivariate analysis. Am Surg 68(11):961–6, discussion 6PubMed
24.
go back to reference Scarpa M, Sadocchi L, Ruffolo C, Iacobone M, Filosa T, Prando D et al (2007) Rod in loop ileostomy: just an insignificant detail for ileostomy-related complications? Langenbecks Arch Surg 392(2):149–54CrossRefPubMed Scarpa M, Sadocchi L, Ruffolo C, Iacobone M, Filosa T, Prando D et al (2007) Rod in loop ileostomy: just an insignificant detail for ileostomy-related complications? Langenbecks Arch Surg 392(2):149–54CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D, Spiers M, Donnelly L, Mackenzie I et al (2005) Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis 7(3):279–85CrossRefPubMed Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D, Spiers M, Donnelly L, Mackenzie I et al (2005) Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis 7(3):279–85CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hollinworth H, Howlett S, Tallett J, Pettitt S, Cooper D, Skingley S et al (2004) Professional holistic care of the person with a stoma: online learning. Br J Nurs 13(21):1268–75CrossRefPubMed Hollinworth H, Howlett S, Tallett J, Pettitt S, Cooper D, Skingley S et al (2004) Professional holistic care of the person with a stoma: online learning. Br J Nurs 13(21):1268–75CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Atkinson SW, Bentley PG (1996) Subcutaneous bridge support for defunctioning loop colostomy. Br J Surg 83(10):1458CrossRefPubMed Atkinson SW, Bentley PG (1996) Subcutaneous bridge support for defunctioning loop colostomy. Br J Surg 83(10):1458CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Nunoo-Mensah JW, Chatterjee A, Khanwalkar D, Nasmyth DG (2004) Loop ileostomy: modification of technique. Surgeon 2(5):287–91CrossRefPubMed Nunoo-Mensah JW, Chatterjee A, Khanwalkar D, Nasmyth DG (2004) Loop ileostomy: modification of technique. Surgeon 2(5):287–91CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Jenkinson LR, Houghton PW, Steele KV, Donaldson LA, Crumplin MK (1984) The Biethium bridge—an advance in stoma care. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 66(6):420–2PubMedPubMedCentral Jenkinson LR, Houghton PW, Steele KV, Donaldson LA, Crumplin MK (1984) The Biethium bridge—an advance in stoma care. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 66(6):420–2PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Schmitz GD, Bailey RT Jr (1987) A simple technique for constructing a loop enterostomy which allows immediate placement of an ostomy appliance. Surg Gynecol Obstet 164(1):78–80PubMed Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Schmitz GD, Bailey RT Jr (1987) A simple technique for constructing a loop enterostomy which allows immediate placement of an ostomy appliance. Surg Gynecol Obstet 164(1):78–80PubMed
Metadata
Title
Outcomes of support rod usage in loop stoma formation
Authors
Ian Whiteley
Michael Russell
Natasha Nassar
Marc A. Gladman
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2569-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 6/2016 Go to the issue