Top

International Urogynecology Journal

Published in:

01-08-2019 | Original Article

Outcomes after laparoscopic removal of retropubic midurethral slings for chronic pain

Authors: Elizabeth J. Goodall, Rufus Cartwright, Emily C. Stratta, Simon R. Jackson, Natalia Price

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 8/2019

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Midurethral slings (MUS) are an established treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), with good objective outcomes and low rates of complications. However, large population-based registry studies highlighted long-term complications from polypropylene slings including erosion, dyspareunia and chronic pain. With recent highly negative media coverage, many women are presenting with chronic pain attributed to the mesh to request complete removal. The available literature provides limited evidence on safety, symptom resolution and incontinence following MUS removal.

Methods

We identified all patients who underwent laparoscopic removal of MUS mesh at our hospital between 2011 and 2016. We extracted data from medical records to assess operative safety and contacted all patients by questionnaire that incorporated pain scales, symptom severity and satisfaction.

Results

A total of 56 women were assessed. Removal occurred at a median of 44 months following sling insertion (range 3–192). Mean operative time was 74 min (range 44–132). Two patients were returned to theatre (one at 24 hours and one at 14 days) to evacuate a retropubic haematoma, but no visceral injuries occurred. The median inpatient stay was 2 days (range 1–7). Of the 46% of patients who returned the questionnaire (n = 26), 88% said they would recommend the procedure. There was a median 6-point decrease in pain scores (10-point numerical scale, p < 0.0001); 44.6% reported worsening SUI, more common with removal of the suburethral mesh [odds ratio (OR) 10.72 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10–104].

Conclusions

Laparoscopic removal of MUS is feasible and effective but carries a risk of worsening SUI.

Wu JM, Gandhi MP, Shah AD, et al. Trends in inpatient urinary incontinence surgery in the USA, 1998-2007. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:1437–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1509-x.CrossRefPubMed

Jonsson Funk M, Edenfield AL, Pate V, et al. Trends in use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:79.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.008.CrossRef

Gibson W, Wagg A. Are older women more likely to receive surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence since the introduction of the mid-urethral sling? An examination of hospital episode statistics data. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123:1386–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13338.CrossRef

Kurkijärvi K, Aaltonen R, Gissler M, Mäkinen J. Surgery for stress urinary incontinence in Finland 1987-2009. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1021–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2926-z.CrossRefPubMed

Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, et al. Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:755.e1–755.e27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.017.CrossRef

Ulmsten U, Falconer C, Johnson P, et al. A multicenter study of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998;9:210–3.CrossRefPubMed

Bader G, Fauconnier A, Roger N, et al. Cystocele repair by vaginal approach with a tension-free transversal polypropylene mesh. Technique and results. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2004;32:280–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2004.02.004.CrossRefPubMed

Welk B, Al-Hothi H, Winick-Ng J. Removal or revision of vaginal mesh used for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:1167–75. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2590.CrossRefPubMed

Jonsson Funk M, Siddiqui NY, Pate V, et al. Sling revision/removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention: long-term risk and predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:73.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.006.CrossRef

10.

Keltie K, Elneil S, Monga A, et al. Complications following vaginal mesh procedures for stress urinary incontinence: an 8 year study of 92,246 women. Sci Rep. 2017;7:12015. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11821-w.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on Colposuspensions, Pubovaginal slings, and Midurethral Tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017;72:567–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.026.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Morling JR, McAllister DA, Agur W, et al. Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997-2016: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2017;389:629–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32572-7.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Zoorob D, Karram M, Stecher A, et al. Analysis of surgical outcomes and determinants of litigation among women with transvaginal mesh complications. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22:404–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000304.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Nolfi AL, Brown BN, Liang R, et al. Host response to synthetic mesh in women with mesh complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:206.e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.008.CrossRef

15.

Chughtai B, Sedrakyan A, Mao J, et al. Is vaginal mesh a stimulus of autoimmune disease? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:495.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.021.CrossRef

16.

Chughtai B, Sedrakyan A, Mao J, et al. Challenging the myth: transvaginal mesh is not associated with carcinogenesis. J Urol. 2017;198:884–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.099.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Moalli P, Brown B, Reitman MTF, Nager CW. Polypropylene mesh: evidence for lack of carcinogenicity. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:573–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2343-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Barber MD. Surgical techniques for removing problematic mesh. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;56:289–302. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182856371.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Rigaud J, Pothin P, Labat JJ, et al. Functional results after tape removal for chronic pelvic pain following tension-free vaginal tape or transobturator tape. J Urol. 2010;184:610–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.132.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Rouprêt M, Misraï V, Vaessen C, et al. Laparoscopic surgical complete sling resection for tension-free vaginal tape-related complications refractory to first-line conservative management: a single-Centre experience. Eur Urol. 2010;58:270–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.025.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Boulanger L, Boukerrou M, Rubod C, et al. Bacteriological analysis of meshes removed for complications after surgical management of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:827–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0537-z.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Li L, Wang X, Park JY, et al. Pathological findings in explanted vaginal mesh. Hum Pathol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2017.07.020.

23.

Baines G, Jackson SR, Price N. Obturator nerve injury: a rare complication of retropubic tension-free vaginal sling. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1597–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3011-y.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Pikaart DP, Miklos JR, Moore RD. Laparoscopic removal of pubovaginal polypropylene tension-free tape slings. JSLS. 2006;10:220–5.PubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Marcus-Braun N, Theobald v P. Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:423–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1050-3.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Outcomes after laparoscopic removal of retropubic midurethral slings for chronic pain
Authors: Elizabeth J. Goodall
Rufus Cartwright
Emily C. Stratta
Simon R. Jackson
Natalia Price
Publication date: 01-08-2019
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3756-6

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Outcomes after laparoscopic removal of retropubic midurethral slings for chronic pain

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

The underutilization of obliterative and constrictive surgery in the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Subjective and objective responses to PTNS and predictors for success: a retrospective cohort study of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder

Impact of animated instruction on tablets and hands-on training in applying bimanual perineal support on episiotomy rates: an intervention study

Impact of vertical versus horizontal vaginal cuff closure on vaginal length following hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Clinical implications of the anatomical position of the urethra meatus in women with recurrent post-coital cystitis: a case-control study

Comparison of measurement systems for posterior vaginal wall prolapse on magnetic resonance imaging