Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 2/2015

01-04-2015 | Original Article

Outcome in porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement of infected abdominal wall defects: a prospective study

Authors: P. Zerbib, R. Caiazzo, G. Piessen, M. Rogosnitzky, C. Séquier, D. Koriche, S. Truant, E. Boleslawski, J. P. Chambon, F. R. Pruvot

Published in: Hernia | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Management of infected abdominal wall defects is a subject of debate, and the use of prosthetic mesh repair is not recommended due to the dramatic rate of mesh infection. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the recurrence rate and long-term outcomes of repairing infected abdominal wall defects using the Strattice porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement through a single-stage surgical approach.

Methods

From August 2010 to May 2012, consecutive patients treated for infected abdominal wall defects using Strattice, a biologic prosthesis, were enrolled. All data were collected prospectively and all patients were followed for physical examination and CT scan evaluation. The primary outcome measure was the recurrence rate.

Results

Eighteen patients were enrolled and 14 were evaluable. Of these, eight patients had mesh infections and six had enterocutaneous fistulas. Median follow-up was 13 months (range, 3–22) and median length of hospitalization was 13 days (range, 4–56). The Strattice was placed in the intraperitoneal underlay position in 12 patients, and in the retro-rectus position for two. Post-operative complications included skin dehiscence (n = 3), wound infection (n = 2), skin necrosis (n = 1), and seroma (n = 2). At the end of follow-up, six patients (43 %) experienced abdominal wall defect recurrence.

Conclusions

The utility of biologic prostheses to repair infected abdominal wall defects is controversial; however, currently, they remain the only alternative to a two-staged surgery. Prospective, randomized studies in larger populations of patients are necessary to fully determine the usefulness of biologic prostheses in this setting.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Butler CE (2006) The role of bioprosthetics in abdominal wall reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 33(2):199–211 (v–vi)CrossRefPubMed Butler CE (2006) The role of bioprosthetics in abdominal wall reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 33(2):199–211 (v–vi)CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Moore M, Bax T, MacFarlane M, McNevin MS (2008) Outcomes of the fascial component separation technique with synthetic mesh reinforcement for repair of complex ventral incisional hernias in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg 195(5):575–579 (discussion 579)CrossRefPubMed Moore M, Bax T, MacFarlane M, McNevin MS (2008) Outcomes of the fascial component separation technique with synthetic mesh reinforcement for repair of complex ventral incisional hernias in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg 195(5):575–579 (discussion 579)CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jin J, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J, McGee MF, Williams CP, Marks J, Ponsky J (2007) Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 205(5):654–660CrossRefPubMed Jin J, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J, McGee MF, Williams CP, Marks J, Ponsky J (2007) Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 205(5):654–660CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Itani KM, Rosen M, Vargo D, Awad SS, Denoto G 3rd, Butler CE (2012) Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH Study. Surgery 152(3):498–505CrossRefPubMed Itani KM, Rosen M, Vargo D, Awad SS, Denoto G 3rd, Butler CE (2012) Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH Study. Surgery 152(3):498–505CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Souza JM, Dumanian GA (2013) Routine use of bioprosthetic mesh is not necessary: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive cases of intra-abdominal midweight polypropylene mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surgery 153(3):393–399CrossRefPubMed Souza JM, Dumanian GA (2013) Routine use of bioprosthetic mesh is not necessary: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive cases of intra-abdominal midweight polypropylene mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surgery 153(3):393–399CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF, Rosen M, Silverman RP, Vargo D (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148(3):544–558CrossRefPubMed Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF, Rosen M, Silverman RP, Vargo D (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148(3):544–558CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, Rzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398CrossRefPubMed Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, Rzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Butler CE, Langstein HN, Kronowitz SJ (2005) Pelvic, abdominal, and chest wall reconstruction with AlloDerm in patients at increased risk for mesh-related complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(5):1263–1275 (discussion 1276–1277)CrossRefPubMed Butler CE, Langstein HN, Kronowitz SJ (2005) Pelvic, abdominal, and chest wall reconstruction with AlloDerm in patients at increased risk for mesh-related complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(5):1263–1275 (discussion 1276–1277)CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Franklin ME Jr, Trevino JM, Portillo G, Vela I, Glass JL, Gonzalez JJ (2008) The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 22(9):1941–1946CrossRefPubMed Franklin ME Jr, Trevino JM, Portillo G, Vela I, Glass JL, Gonzalez JJ (2008) The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 22(9):1941–1946CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Patton JH Jr, Berry S, Kralovich KA (2007) Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions. Am J Surg 193(3):360–363 (discussion 363)CrossRefPubMed Patton JH Jr, Berry S, Kralovich KA (2007) Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions. Am J Surg 193(3):360–363 (discussion 363)CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Gatti M, Bhanot P (2012) Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement. Ann Plast Surg 69(4):394–398CrossRefPubMed Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Gatti M, Bhanot P (2012) Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement. Ann Plast Surg 69(4):394–398CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583 (discussion 583–585)PubMedCentralPubMed Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583 (discussion 583–585)PubMedCentralPubMed
14.
go back to reference Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 237(1):129–135CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 237(1):129–135CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
Outcome in porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement of infected abdominal wall defects: a prospective study
Authors
P. Zerbib
R. Caiazzo
G. Piessen
M. Rogosnitzky
C. Séquier
D. Koriche
S. Truant
E. Boleslawski
J. P. Chambon
F. R. Pruvot
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1153-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Hernia 2/2015 Go to the issue