Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Osteoarthrosis | Protocol

The impact of wait time on patient outcomes in knee and hip replacement surgery: a scoping review protocol

Authors: E. Dawson, M. E. Neufeld, E. Schemitsch, A. John-Baptiste

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Total hip and total knee replacement surgery are in high demand, leading to long wait times for many patients. While on the waiting list, patients may experience worsening pain, reduced mobility, and deteriorating health. Given that long wait times are common for lower joint replacement surgery, it is important to understand how patient health changes during the wait period and whether this impacts patient outcomes after surgery. The aim of this scoping review will be to identify and describe the evidence regarding the impact of wait time on patient outcomes for patients who undergo total knee and total hip replacement surgery.

Methods

This scoping review was designed with guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis, and results will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane electronic databases will be searched for English language articles published after 1999. Studies of adult patients with osteoarthritis undergoing primary knee or hip replacement surgery, which measure patient outcomes over the wait period for surgery, will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts followed by full article review. Data will be extracted by two reviewers using a standardized form. Outcomes assessed during the wait period will be identified and described in tables. Factors associated with changes in health status during the wait period will be qualitatively described.

Discussion

This review will map the evidence regarding wait times for lower extremity joint replacement surgery. Better understanding of how the impact of wait times on patient health status is measured over the perioperative period will inform future research on wait times.

Scoping review registration

Registered with Open Science Framework, Feb 14, 2021 DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​17605/​OSF.​IO/​MV4FS
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferguson RJ, Palmer AJR, Taylor A, Porter ML, Malchau H, Glyn-Jones S. Hip replacement. Lancet. 2018;392:1662–71.CrossRef Ferguson RJ, Palmer AJR, Taylor A, Porter ML, Malchau H, Glyn-Jones S. Hip replacement. Lancet. 2018;392:1662–71.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Price AJ, Alvand A, Troelsen A, Katz JN, Hooper G, Gray A, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2018;392:1672–82.CrossRef Price AJ, Alvand A, Troelsen A, Katz JN, Hooper G, Gray A, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2018;392:1672–82.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Johnson T, Morris K, Zelmer J. Priority areas for wait time reduction: what we know and what we don’t know. Healthc Q. 2007;10(3):26–8.CrossRef Johnson T, Morris K, Zelmer J. Priority areas for wait time reduction: what we know and what we don’t know. Healthc Q. 2007;10(3):26–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Urbach DR, Martin D. Confronting the COVID-19 surgery crisis: time for transformational change. CMAJ. 2020;192(21):E585–6.CrossRef Urbach DR, Martin D. Confronting the COVID-19 surgery crisis: time for transformational change. CMAJ. 2020;192(21):E585–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Crawford RW, Murray DW. Total hip replacement: indications for surgery and risk factors for failure. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56(8):455–7.CrossRef Crawford RW, Murray DW. Total hip replacement: indications for surgery and risk factors for failure. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56(8):455–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Morris J, Twizeyemariya A, Grimmer K. The cost of waiting on an orthopaedic waiting list: a scoping review. Asia Pac J of Health Manag. 2017;12(2):42.CrossRef Morris J, Twizeyemariya A, Grimmer K. The cost of waiting on an orthopaedic waiting list: a scoping review. Asia Pac J of Health Manag. 2017;12(2):42.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sutherland JM, Crump RT, Chan A, Liu G, Yue E, Bair M. Health of patients on the waiting list: opportunity to improve health in Canada? Health Policy. 2016;120(7):749–57.CrossRef Sutherland JM, Crump RT, Chan A, Liu G, Yue E, Bair M. Health of patients on the waiting list: opportunity to improve health in Canada? Health Policy. 2016;120(7):749–57.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Blom AW, Artz N, Beswick AD, et al. Improving patients’ experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2016. Chapter 5, Measuring functional outcomes in patients having hip and knee replacement: a cohort study. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK379620/ Blom AW, Artz N, Beswick AD, et al. Improving patients’ experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2016. Chapter 5, Measuring functional outcomes in patients having hip and knee replacement: a cohort study. Available from: https://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​books/​NBK379620/​
11.
go back to reference Wilson I, Bohm E, Lubbeke A, Lyman S, Overgaard S, Rolfson O, et al. Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(6):357–67.CrossRef Wilson I, Bohm E, Lubbeke A, Lyman S, Overgaard S, Rolfson O, et al. Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(6):357–67.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Canadian Institute for Health Information, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD patient-reported indicator surveys (PaRIS) initiative: patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for hip and knee replacement surgery — international data collection guidelines. Ottawa: CIHI; 2019. Canadian Institute for Health Information, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD patient-reported indicator surveys (PaRIS) initiative: patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for hip and knee replacement surgery — international data collection guidelines. Ottawa: CIHI; 2019.
13.
go back to reference Learmonth ID, Cavendish VJ. Outcome assessment following total hip replacement. Orthopedics. 2005;28(8):S827–30.PubMed Learmonth ID, Cavendish VJ. Outcome assessment following total hip replacement. Orthopedics. 2005;28(8):S827–30.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hoogeboom TJ, van den Ende CH, van der Sluis G, Elings J, Dronkers JJ, Aiken AB, et al. The impact of waiting for total joint replacement on pain and functional status: a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17(11):1420–7.CrossRef Hoogeboom TJ, van den Ende CH, van der Sluis G, Elings J, Dronkers JJ, Aiken AB, et al. The impact of waiting for total joint replacement on pain and functional status: a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17(11):1420–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pincus D, Jenkinson R, Paterson M, Leroux T, Ravi B. Association between surgical approach and major surgical complications in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1070–6.CrossRef Pincus D, Jenkinson R, Paterson M, Leroux T, Ravi B. Association between surgical approach and major surgical complications in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1070–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of wait time on patient outcomes in knee and hip replacement surgery: a scoping review protocol
Authors
E. Dawson
M. E. Neufeld
E. Schemitsch
A. John-Baptiste
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01909-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Systematic Reviews 1/2022 Go to the issue