Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Osimertinib | Research

Comparison of partitioned survival modeling with state transition modeling approaches with or without consideration of brain metastasis: a case study of Osimertinib versus pemetrexed-platinum

Authors: Yoon-Bo Shim, Byeong-Chan Oh, Eui-Kyung Lee, Mi-Hai Park

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The partitioned survival model (PSM) and the state transition model (STM) are widely used in cost-effectiveness analyses of anticancer drugs. Using different modeling approaches with or without consideration of brain metastasis, we compared the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimates of Osimertinib and pemetrexed-platinum in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

Methods

We constructed three economic models using parametric curves fitted to patient-level data from the National Health Insurance Review and Assessment claims database from 2009 to 2020. PSM and 3-health state transition model (3-STM) consist of three health states: progression-free, post-progression, and death. The 5-health state transition model (5-STM) has two additional health states (brain metastasis with continuing initial therapy, and with subsequent therapy). Time-dependent transition probabilities were calculated in the state transition models. The incremental life-year (LY) and QALY between the Osimertinib and pemetrexed-platinum cohorts for each modeling approach were estimated over seven years.

Results

The PSM and 3-STM produced similar incremental LY (0.889 and 0.899, respectively) and QALY (0.827 and 0.840, respectively). However, 5-STM, which considered brain metastasis as separate health states, yielded a slightly higher incremental LY (0.910) but lower incremental QALY (0.695) than PSM and 3-STM.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that incorporating additional health states such as brain metastases into economic models can have a considerable impact on incremental QALY estimates. To ensure appropriate health technology assessment decisions, comparison and justification of different modeling approaches are recommended in the economic evaluation of anticancer drugs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bullement A, Cranmer HL, Shields GE. A review of recent decision-Analytic models used to evaluate the Economic Value of Cancer treatments. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019;17(6):771–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bullement A, Cranmer HL, Shields GE. A review of recent decision-Analytic models used to evaluate the Economic Value of Cancer treatments. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019;17(6):771–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Woods BS, Sideris E, Palmer S, Latimer N, Soares M. Partitioned survival and State Transition Models for Healthcare decision making in Oncology: where are we now? Value Health. 2020;23(12):1613–21.CrossRefPubMed Woods BS, Sideris E, Palmer S, Latimer N, Soares M. Partitioned survival and State Transition Models for Healthcare decision making in Oncology: where are we now? Value Health. 2020;23(12):1613–21.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, Bharat A, et al. Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(5):497–530.CrossRefPubMed Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, Bharat A, et al. Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(5):497–530.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mujoomdar A, Austin JH, Malhotra R, Powell CA, Pearson GD, Shiau MC, et al. Clinical predictors of metastatic disease to the brain from non-small cell lung carcinoma: primary tumor size, cell type, and lymph node metastases. Radiology. 2007;242(3):882–8.CrossRefPubMed Mujoomdar A, Austin JH, Malhotra R, Powell CA, Pearson GD, Shiau MC, et al. Clinical predictors of metastatic disease to the brain from non-small cell lung carcinoma: primary tumor size, cell type, and lymph node metastases. Radiology. 2007;242(3):882–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Li L, Luo S, Lin H, Yang H, Chen H, Liao Z, et al. Correlation between EGFR mutation status and the incidence of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(8):2510–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li L, Luo S, Lin H, Yang H, Chen H, Liao Z, et al. Correlation between EGFR mutation status and the incidence of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(8):2510–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Fernandes AW, Wu B, Turner RM. Brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients on epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: symptom and economic burden. J Med Econ. 2017;20(11):1136–47.CrossRefPubMed Fernandes AW, Wu B, Turner RM. Brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients on epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: symptom and economic burden. J Med Econ. 2017;20(11):1136–47.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nadler E, Espirito JL, Pavilack M, Baidoo B, Fernandes A. Real-world disease burden and outcomes of brain metastases in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2020;16(22):1575–84.CrossRefPubMed Nadler E, Espirito JL, Pavilack M, Baidoo B, Fernandes A. Real-world disease burden and outcomes of brain metastases in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2020;16(22):1575–84.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Roughley A, Damonte E, Taylor-Stokes G, Rider A, Munk VC. Impact of Brain metastases on Quality of Life and estimated life expectancy in patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Value Health. 2014;17(7):A650.CrossRefPubMed Roughley A, Damonte E, Taylor-Stokes G, Rider A, Munk VC. Impact of Brain metastases on Quality of Life and estimated life expectancy in patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Value Health. 2014;17(7):A650.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mok TS, Wu YL, Ahn MJ, Garassino MC, Kim HR, Ramalingam SS, et al. Osimertinib or Platinum-Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):629–40.CrossRefPubMed Mok TS, Wu YL, Ahn MJ, Garassino MC, Kim HR, Ramalingam SS, et al. Osimertinib or Platinum-Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):629–40.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Mok TS, Han JY, Ahn MJ, Delmonte A, Ramalingam SS, et al. Osimertinib versus platinum-pemetrexed for patients with EGFR T790M advanced NSCLC and progression on a prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor: AURA3 overall survival analysis. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(11):1536–44.CrossRefPubMed Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Mok TS, Han JY, Ahn MJ, Delmonte A, Ramalingam SS, et al. Osimertinib versus platinum-pemetrexed for patients with EGFR T790M advanced NSCLC and progression on a prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor: AURA3 overall survival analysis. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(11):1536–44.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Briggs A, Sculpher M, Claxton K. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRef Briggs A, Sculpher M, Claxton K. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Latimer NR, NICE Decision Support Unit Technical Support Documents. Survival analysis for economic evaluations alongside clinical trials - extrapolation with Patient-Level Data. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2013.CrossRef Latimer NR, NICE Decision Support Unit Technical Support Documents. Survival analysis for economic evaluations alongside clinical trials - extrapolation with Patient-Level Data. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2013.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jiang SX, Walton RN, Hueniken K, Baek J, McCartney A, Labbé C, et al. Real-world health utility scores and toxicities to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Med. 2019;8(18):7542–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jiang SX, Walton RN, Hueniken K, Baek J, McCartney A, Labbé C, et al. Real-world health utility scores and toxicities to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Med. 2019;8(18):7542–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Cranmer H, Shields GE, Bullement A. A comparison of partitioned survival analysis and state transition multi-state modelling approaches using a case study in oncology. J Med Econ. 2020;23(10):1176–85.CrossRefPubMed Cranmer H, Shields GE, Bullement A. A comparison of partitioned survival analysis and state transition multi-state modelling approaches using a case study in oncology. J Med Econ. 2020;23(10):1176–85.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Goeree R, Villeneuve J, Goeree J, Penrod JR, Orsini L, Tahami Monfared AA. Economic evaluation of nivolumab for the treatment of second-line advanced squamous NSCLC in Canada: a comparison of modeling approaches to estimate and extrapolate survival outcomes. J Med Econ. 2016;19(6):630–44.CrossRefPubMed Goeree R, Villeneuve J, Goeree J, Penrod JR, Orsini L, Tahami Monfared AA. Economic evaluation of nivolumab for the treatment of second-line advanced squamous NSCLC in Canada: a comparison of modeling approaches to estimate and extrapolate survival outcomes. J Med Econ. 2016;19(6):630–44.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Smare C, Lakhdari K, Doan J, Posnett J, Johal S. Evaluating partitioned survival and Markov decision-Analytic modeling approaches for use in cost-effectiveness analysis: estimating and comparing survival outcomes. PharmacoEconomics. 2020;38(1):97–108. Smare C, Lakhdari K, Doan J, Posnett J, Johal S. Evaluating partitioned survival and Markov decision-Analytic modeling approaches for use in cost-effectiveness analysis: estimating and comparing survival outcomes. PharmacoEconomics. 2020;38(1):97–108.
17.
go back to reference Gen S, Tanaka I, Morise M, Koyama J, Kodama Y, Matsui A, et al. Clinical efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with distant metastasis. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):654.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gen S, Tanaka I, Morise M, Koyama J, Kodama Y, Matsui A, et al. Clinical efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with distant metastasis. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):654.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Wang BX, Ou W, Mao XY, Liu Z, Wu HQ, Wang SY. Impacts of EGFR mutation and EGFR-TKIs on incidence of brain metastases in advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017;160:96–100.CrossRefPubMed Wang BX, Ou W, Mao XY, Liu Z, Wu HQ, Wang SY. Impacts of EGFR mutation and EGFR-TKIs on incidence of brain metastases in advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017;160:96–100.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wu YL, Ahn MJ, Garassino MC, Han JY, Katakami N, Kim HR, et al. CNS efficacy of Osimertinib in patients with T790M-Positive Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: Data from a Randomized Phase III Trial (AURA3). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(26):2702–9.CrossRefPubMed Wu YL, Ahn MJ, Garassino MC, Han JY, Katakami N, Kim HR, et al. CNS efficacy of Osimertinib in patients with T790M-Positive Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: Data from a Randomized Phase III Trial (AURA3). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(26):2702–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Siebert U, Alagoz O, Bayoumi AM, Jahn B, Owens DK, Cohen DJ, et al. State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling Good Research practices Task Force–3. Value Health. 2012;15(6):812–20.CrossRefPubMed Siebert U, Alagoz O, Bayoumi AM, Jahn B, Owens DK, Cohen DJ, et al. State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling Good Research practices Task Force–3. Value Health. 2012;15(6):812–20.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Roberts M, Russell LB, Paltiel AD, Chambers M, McEwan P, Krahn M. Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling Good Research practices Task Force–2. Value Health. 2012;15(6):804–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Roberts M, Russell LB, Paltiel AD, Chambers M, McEwan P, Krahn M. Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling Good Research practices Task Force–2. Value Health. 2012;15(6):804–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Branchoux S, Sofeu CL, Gaudin AF, Kurt M, Moshyk A, Italiano A, et al. Time to next treatment or death as a candidate surrogate endpoint for overall survival in advanced melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an insight from the phase III CheckMate 067 trial. ESMO Open. 2022;7(1):100340.CrossRefPubMed Branchoux S, Sofeu CL, Gaudin AF, Kurt M, Moshyk A, Italiano A, et al. Time to next treatment or death as a candidate surrogate endpoint for overall survival in advanced melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an insight from the phase III CheckMate 067 trial. ESMO Open. 2022;7(1):100340.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Li Q, Zhang H, Chen Z, Guo Y, George TJ Jr., Chen Y et al. Validation of Real-World Data-based Endpoint Measures of Cancer Treatment Outcomes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021;2021:716– 25. Li Q, Zhang H, Chen Z, Guo Y, George TJ Jr., Chen Y et al. Validation of Real-World Data-based Endpoint Measures of Cancer Treatment Outcomes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021;2021:716– 25.
24.
go back to reference Stewart M, Norden AD, Dreyer N, Henk HJ, Abernethy AP, Chrischilles E, et al. An exploratory analysis of real-world end points for assessing outcomes among immunotherapy-treated patients with Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inf. 2019;3:1–15. Stewart M, Norden AD, Dreyer N, Henk HJ, Abernethy AP, Chrischilles E, et al. An exploratory analysis of real-world end points for assessing outcomes among immunotherapy-treated patients with Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inf. 2019;3:1–15.
25.
go back to reference Walker B, Boyd M, Aguilar K, Davies K, Espirito J, Frytak J, et al. Comparisons of real-world time-to-event end points in Oncology Research. JCO Clin Cancer Inf. 2021;5:45–6.CrossRef Walker B, Boyd M, Aguilar K, Davies K, Espirito J, Frytak J, et al. Comparisons of real-world time-to-event end points in Oncology Research. JCO Clin Cancer Inf. 2021;5:45–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Jang SC, Kwon SH, Min S, Jo AR, Lee EK, Nam JH. Optimal Indicator of Death for using real-world Cancer patients’ data from the Healthcare System. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:906211.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jang SC, Kwon SH, Min S, Jo AR, Lee EK, Nam JH. Optimal Indicator of Death for using real-world Cancer patients’ data from the Healthcare System. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:906211.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Gaut D, Sim MS, Yue Y, Wolf BR, Abarca PA, Carroll JM, et al. Clinical implications of the T790M mutation in Disease characteristics and treatment response in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-Mutated non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Clin Lung Cancer. 2018;19(1):e19–e28.CrossRefPubMed Gaut D, Sim MS, Yue Y, Wolf BR, Abarca PA, Carroll JM, et al. Clinical implications of the T790M mutation in Disease characteristics and treatment response in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-Mutated non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Clin Lung Cancer. 2018;19(1):e19–e28.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sun JM, Ahn MJ, Choi YL, Ahn JS, Park K. Clinical implications of T790M mutation in patients with acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Lung Cancer. 2013;82(2):294–8.CrossRefPubMed Sun JM, Ahn MJ, Choi YL, Ahn JS, Park K. Clinical implications of T790M mutation in patients with acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Lung Cancer. 2013;82(2):294–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Gao X, Zhao Y, Bao Y, Yin W, Liu L, Liu R, et al. Poor prognosis with coexistence of EGFR T790M mutation and common EGFR-Activating mutation in non- small cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:9621–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gao X, Zhao Y, Bao Y, Yin W, Liu L, Liu R, et al. Poor prognosis with coexistence of EGFR T790M mutation and common EGFR-Activating mutation in non- small cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:9621–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Ma G, Zhang J, Yin L, Jiang H, Zhang W, Song Y, et al. The prognostic role of pretreatment epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncotarget. 2017;8(31):50941–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ma G, Zhang J, Yin L, Jiang H, Zhang W, Song Y, et al. The prognostic role of pretreatment epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncotarget. 2017;8(31):50941–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Comparison of partitioned survival modeling with state transition modeling approaches with or without consideration of brain metastasis: a case study of Osimertinib versus pemetrexed-platinum
Authors
Yoon-Bo Shim
Byeong-Chan Oh
Eui-Kyung Lee
Mi-Hai Park
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-11971-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Cancer 1/2024 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine